Missouri lawmakers move to repeal abortion protections enacted by voters
The move comes just six months after Missouri voters approved an amendment enshrining the right to reproductive freedom, including abortion care, in the state constitution, effectively overturning a near-total abortion ban that was in effect. A circuit court affirmed the right to reproductive freedom in December.
The bill now heads to the governor's desk, but does not need his signature to appear on a ballot.
MORE: Fighting for their lives: Women and the impact of abortion restrictions in post-Roe America
The initiative will appear on the November 2026 ballot unless Gov. Mike Kehoe calls a special election sooner than that.
If it passes, HJR 73 would prohibit abortions, except in cases of medical emergencies, fetal anomalies, rape or incest. If the abortion is due to rape or incest, it must occur no later than 12 weeks' gestation, according to the bill.
"Senate Republicans are overturning the will of the voters and pushing to bring an Abortion Ban back to Missouri," Missouri Senate Democrats wrote in a post on X Wednesday evening. "This new ballot item will ban abortion and take away a right that voters secured just six months ago."
If approved, the amendment would also permit state lawmakers to enact legislation to regulate abortions and access to care.
"These laws shall include, but not be limited to, laws requiring physicians providing abortion care to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital; laws requiring facilities where abortions are performed or induced to be licensed and inspected for clean and safe conditions and adequate instruments to treat any emergencies arising from an abortion procedure; laws requiring physicians to perform a sufficient examination of the woman to determine the unborn child's gestational age and any preexisting medical conditions that may influence the procedure; and laws requiring ultrasounds to be performed only by physicians or licensed medical technicians," the bill states.
MORE: A state-by-state breakdown of where abortion stands after ballot initiatives pass
State Sen. Adam Schnelting, who sponsored the bill, did not immediately return ABC News' request for comment.
Anti-abortion right groups praised the bill, claiming it will "save lives."
"We applaud the Missouri legislature for passing this pro-life amendment to save lives, protect parents' rights, and safeguard women and girls," Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the anti-abortion rights group Susan B. Anthony (SBA) Pro-Life America, said in a statement. "We call on Missouri GOP leaders in Washington and across the state to offer their strong, vocal support of this measure."
Since Roe v. Wade was overruled by the Supreme Court in June 2022, 12 states have ceased nearly all abortion services while four states have a six-week ban on books, according to an ABC News tally.
Following the Supreme Court decision, Missouri enacted a trigger law banning most abortions in the state.
However, Amendment 3, which enshrined abortion rights in the state constitution, passed in November 2024 with 52% of voters in favor of the amendment.
Anti-abortion advocates, such as SBA, have argued that Amendment 3 is extreme and goes beyond what Missourians have supported.
Abortion Action Missouri, the group that supported Amendment 3, released a statement on Wednesday criticizing lawmakers for attempting to reinstate an abortion ban.
"Missourians support access to abortion. This past November more than 1.5 million Missourians made their voices heard at the ballot box -- voting to enshrine abortion rights into the Missouri constitution," Mallory Schwarz, executive director of Abortion Action Missouri, said. "And right now, thanks to Missourians, abortion is legal and available for the first time in years. Despite this, today anti-abortion politicians passed HJR 73, showing us they think Missourians are disposable. We know the truth -- Missourians are used to fighting back and are prepared to keep showing up. In the past 4 months, thousands of Missourians have shown up over and over again to defend the will of the people. Do not underestimate their determination."
Missouri lawmakers move to repeal abortion protections enacted by voters originally appeared on abcnews.go.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
8 minutes ago
- USA Today
President Trump, I supported you. Release the Epstein list – or resign.
Trump has said we should stop talking about Epstein. What do you think? USA TODAY readers sound off in our Opinion Forum. President Donald Trump wants Americans to stop talking about Jeffrey Epstein. But judging from recent polling and responses from USA TODAY readers, many people aren't ready to do that. Trump and other top administration officials had played up the case of the disgraced financier who died in jail on charges of sex trafficking girls. They pumped up the idea that once Trump was elected he would let loose explosive revelations. Instead, the Justice Department and FBI closed the case. Now the president is facing blowback from many quarters, including once-loyal MAGA supporters who are expressing a sense of betrayal – and Democrats pointing to Trump's backtracking as a lack of transparency. As part of our Opinion Forum, we turned to USA TODAY readers, asking if they thought an Epstein "client list" existed – and if they thought the Trump administration had access to it, as well as what they thought of Trump's calls to move on from the Epstein affair. Read the responses below. I believe Trump administration has access to an Epstein client list I do believe a Jeffrey Epstein client list exists. And I believe the Trump administration had access to it. They can't release it because the billionaires, corporations and deep state that rule the country wouldn't allow it. I think Trump believed he couldn't be told what to do. The only thing I cared about was criminal "pedos" being brought to justice, but we know that will never happen. Epstein wasn't the only one out there doing what he was doing. Another view: I believe Trump has access to an Epstein client list. But it no longer helps him. | Opinion Forum While Trump has said repeatedly he wants people to stop talking about Epstein, he's one who used this for his campaign platform. If that's what he wants, he should've never brought it up. As for whether MAGA will split with Trump over this Epstein fallout – maybe some of MAGA will break with him but most will stay loyal. — Christine Luongo, Rockaway, New Jersey Mr. President, I supported you. Please release the list. Yes, I believe a Jeffrey Epstein client list exists. Court records indicate that massive amounts of information exists, documenting Epstein's (apparently shared) need and enjoyment in having predatory sex with perhaps hundreds of underage and emotionally vulnerable girls. I believe that he and others used the girls to feed their addiction to selfish, self-gratifying sex. And that he and others are on the "list." And that many, many highly visible people are on the list; it appears that the president is protecting them (and possibly himself). Because of this I think we will start to see a greater divide among his supporters. Musk proposes America Party: Do you think the US needs a third party? Tell us. | Opinion Forum I would say to the president: Despite your (more than several) less-than-likeable personality traits, we supported you because we love America and you also love America. However, we also stand for truth, justice and the American way. Please put our minds at ease and release the list. I supported you, attended many of your rallies and even greeted Kamala Harris at three of her rallies with a 6-foot Trump banner. Follow American ideals, Mr. President. Please release the list ... or resign. — Phil Parlock Sr., Huntington, West Virginia MAGA cult has been brainwashed I'm not sure if an Epstein client list exists. It's obvious they spent so much time talking about it because it fueled the conspiracy theorist-type thinking that Trump has been able to manipulate people's reality with so easily. That, and it supported a narrative that the Biden administration was withholding information that he, Trump, would release. When asked about releasing presumably hidden files such as those on President John F. Kennedy's assassination or the 9/11 attack, Trump always affirmed without hesitation that he would make them public. When asked about the Epstein files however, he seemed to always qualify their release with the condition that unnamed innocent people who he seemed to be aware were on the list could be protected. This caution can only be explained either by his knowledge that the files did in fact exist or by his awareness from personal experience that their existence was plausible. I do care about the Epstein case, and in a perfect world it should get more attention than it currently is. However, the MAGA cult has been brainwashed to automatically see the media reporting on Trump's bad behavior as evidence of Trump's righteousness. I fear more attention by the media would trigger their persecution complex and override the cognitive dissonance they feel by having their 'open book' president 'deep state' them. The Trump administration should focus on resigning and making way for competent people to lead the country. The most likely explanation for Trump saying we should stop talking about Epstein is that he did something illegal with Epstein that he knows all but his most loyal followers would condemn him for. The likelihood of this explanation is supported by Trump's resistance to releasing any such list and his attempts to explain away the files, saying things like, there are innocent people who would get hurt, they don't exist, the Clintons fabricated them, etc. In terms of whether MAGA will split with Trump over the Epstein issue, I think maybe some in the movement will break away, but most will stay loyal. — Samuel Barnes, Saint George, Utah I don't care if there's an Epstein list I don't believe any client list existed. But I also don't care. Epstein struck me as too wily to leave any kind of written record of his business, clients or victims. But MAGA folks love a conspiracy and this one has everything: salacious details, mysterious death, famous names and money. Lots of money. Epstein is dead. His empire crumbled. And Americans have far too much going on in the U.S. and in the world that requires our attention. I don't agree with Trump on much, but I certainly do when it comes to his recent repeated calls for us to stop talking about Epstein. He really needs to focus on urgent matters now – flooding in Texas and elsewhere, uncontrolled wildfires in Arizona, education and immigration battles. Then there are the international problems, many of which seem to have no easy answers. But I do think we will start to see a greater divide among his supporters. — Kathleen Bryson, Globe, Arizona
Axios
8 minutes ago
- Axios
How Trump's game-planning for the 2026 midterms
President Trump is already fixated behind the scenes on next year's midterm elections for the House and Senate — unleashing his billion-dollar political operation and personally burrowing into the minutiae of races. Why it matters: Now that his "big beautiful bill" has passed Congress, Trump's ability to accomplish more big things there — and avoid impeachment — hinges on keeping the GOP's razor-thin majorities in both chambers of Congress in his last two years in office. Zoom in: Even with all that's swirling around Trump — foreign conflicts, deportations, tariffs, the Jeffrey Epstein fallout — he's micro-level focused on 2026 races. One example: Trump's been particularly locked in on the already messy GOP Senate primary in Texas, where polls indicate Sen. John Cornyn is trailing scandal-plagued state Attorney General Ken Paxton, a longtime Trump loyalist. After Paxton's wife announced she was filing for divorce, White House insiders say, Trump — who hasn't endorsed in the race — was aware of it within an hour. He's been asking others about its political impact. Here's how Trump's team is laying the groundwork for 2026: 1. Money muscle Trump's biggest asset could be his enormously well-heeled political operation, for which he continues to aggressively raise money. Trump has told congressional Republicans he plans to spend heavily on their races. He's also planning to headline a big Republican National Committee fundraiser in D.C. this fall. Trump political lieutenants James Blair and Tony Fabrizio are slated to appear at an upcoming donor retreat to be held by House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). Trump's operation will soon set up fundraising vehicles for candidates in several high-profile races to allow the Trump team to quickly raise money for them. 2. Recruit aggressively The White House is seeking candidates to run in several key races. Trump himself is expected to get involved if an on-the-fence prospect needs a push. Trump aides currently are trying to land a recruit in the race for New Hampshire's vacant Senate seat, for example. White House political director Matt Brasseaux has been attending House candidate recruitment meetings being organized by Georgia Rep. Brian Jack, a former Trump aide. 3. Early redistricting Trump is pushing for Texas Republicans to redraw the state's House districts five years early to create more GOP-friendly seats. That could net as many as five new GOP-held seats and dilute Democrats' voting power — but it carries risks. It almost certainly would face court challenges, and some Republicans worry that some of the party's incumbents could be endangered by shifting GOP voters to districts now represented by Democrats. It also could lead blue states to try the same thing to favor Democrats. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened as much in that state. Democrats already outnumber Republicans in California's House delegation, 43-9. Trump urged members of Texas' congressional delegation to get on board with his plan during a call this week, and his team is eyeing other states for possible redistricting. 4. Keep selling Trump's big bill The White House is drawing up plans to spend the next year-plus selling Trump's domestic policy mega-bill to voters. That won't be easy: Polls indicate the measure — which includes tax cuts and a range of cuts to social programs — isn't popular. Trump and his cabinet members plan to travel to battleground areas to promote provisions of the bill Trump's team sees as politically palatable. Last week, Vice President Vance touted the bill in eastern Pennsylvania. Fabrizio spoke to a small group of House Republicans a few days ago to offer guidance on messaging, and Blair recently addressed a Senate GOP lunch with Trump pollster David Lee. The White House is planning an August retreat for congressional staffers to discuss how to promote the bill. 5. Stave off retirements Trump is trying to use his political sway to persuade battleground Republicans from vacating their seats. Trump this month helped get Iowa Rep. Zach Nunn to seek reelection to his competitive district, rather than run for governor. The White House also is trying to keep Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst from retiring. Ernst drew fire — and a Democratic opponent — recently when she told a group of constituents, "We all are going to die," in response to concerns about Medicaid cuts in Trump's megabill. But top Republicans worry her retirement would complicate their prospects of keeping the Republican-friendly seat. 6. Endorse — and attack — in primaries Trump plans to use his dominance over the GOP to shape primaries — either to ensure the party nominates who he sees as the most electable candidates for the general election, or to punish Republicans who've crossed him. He's endorsed more than a dozen House Republicans from swing seats to try to protect them from costly primary challenges, and is expected to endorse more. He recently met with Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp to discuss the state's Senate primary for the seat now held by Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff. The White House is eager to avoid a bloody primary and is determining how to engage, similar to its wait-and-see posture in the Texas Senate primary. Trump's political operation has run a pair of ads targeting Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, who was one of two House Republicans to vote against the megabill. What they're saying: " The president understands that good politics makes even better policy and has embarked on ... a multidimensional effort aimed at expanding the House and Senate majorities," said Chris LaCivita, a senior Trump political adviser.
Axios
8 minutes ago
- Axios
Wary Democratic establishment keeping New York's Mamdani at arm's length
Zohran Mamdani, New York City's surprise Democratic nominee for mayor, is scrambling to woo lawmakers, donors, and the city's elite who are wary of the democratic socialist. So far, they're mostly playing hard to get. Why it matters: In their party's ongoing identity crisis, many Democrats have attacked or refused to endorse Mamdani to lead the nation's largest city, while others on the left have rallied around the 33-year-old political phenom. The schism over Mamdani is a version of the turbulence Democrats are wrestling with nationwide, as progressives and some party operatives are increasingly frustrated by snubs from the establishment. Driving the news: That divide was clear last week, when Mamdani visited D.C. Most Democrats on Capitol Hill kept their distance, but dozens of progressive members of Congress greeted him enthusiastically at a breakfast arranged by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a fellow New Yorker. Democratic leaders Rep. Hakeem Jeffries and Sen. Chuck Schumer, both also from New York, have declined to endorse Mamdani. They've criticized his past refusal to condemn those who say "globalize the intifada" — a slogan that backs Palestinian uprisings against Israel and that some Jewish people see as antisemitic. Mamdani also has accused Israel of conducting a "genocide" against Palestine, another reason some Democratic leaders have kept their distance from him. Jeffries did meet with Mamdani in New York on Friday but declined to endorse him afterward. Some progressives and democratic socialists have responded by threatening to back primary challenges against Jeffries and other Democrats. Jeffries' team responded by calling such left-wing activists "Team Gentrification," and that the House Democratic leader's response to any such challenge would "be forceful and unrelenting," as Jeffries senior adviser André Richardson told CNN. Zoom in: Mamdani's plans to freeze rents for stabilized apartments, increase taxes, build city-owned grocery stores and provide free child care for all children — along with his criticisms of corporations and the police — have freaked out many Democrats close to the party's political center. To try to rally the party behind him, Mamdani is changing his rhetoric, bringing on experienced operatives, talking with the business leaders he wants to tax, and repeatedly talking about "partnership." His recent message boils down to: I come in peace. Mamdani said this week he'd "discourage" pro-Palestine protesters from using the term "globalize the intifada," after repeatedly saying he wasn't interested in policing people's speech, as The New York Times reported. Mamdani also tried, with mixed success, to charm the city's business elite on Tuesday in a closed-door meeting with the Partnership for New York City — a group that includes representatives from big law firms and businesses. Mamdani, who in the past has called to "defund the police" and is now proposing a "Department of Public Safety" separate from the police department, is now signaling he's open to keeping the current police commissioner, who's widely viewed as tough on crime. He's also been adding operatives such as Jeffrey Lerner, the former political director of the Democratic National Committee, and political veterans in communications and other areas to add some experience to his young but passionate team. Flashback: Mamdani's reception by the party contrasts sharply with how Democratic leaders celebrated Mayor Eric Adams four years ago, after he won the Democratic primary. Then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi hosted Adams and invited him to speak before the Democratic caucus. Then-President Biden had him over to the White House. Between the lines: Some Democrats are worried about how Mamdani's rise in New York City has already set off Republican fear-mongering aimed at the entire Democratic Party. Some conservative critics are focusing on Mamdani being a Muslim who was born in Uganda, while others, such as Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, are calling him a "communist." What they're saying: Spokespeople for Mamdani and Jeffries did not respond to requests for comment. State of play: New York's Democratic establishment is paralyzed in part because there now are two Democrats running as independents in the Nov. 4 general election: Adams and former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who lost to Mamdani in the Democratic primary. This week, Mamdani and Adams repeatedly took shots at Cuomo and his record as governor. Both see Cuomo as the biggest threat to their winning in November. Adams, who polls now find to be deeply unpopular, wants to try to drive Cuomo out of the race to get a one-on-one match-up with Mamdani. Bottom line: Mamdani is the front-runner in the heavily Democratic city, but some Democratic leaders are unsure he'll win — and for now, they don't want to risk aligning with him.
