Syringe Prick Reports Spark HIV Concerns in France
The cluster of reported cases has raised public concern and led to calls to the Sida Info Service (SIS), France's national HIV/AIDS helpline. In response, the organisation issued a public statement to address misconceptions and provide accurate information to both the public and clinicians.
Arame Mbodje, MD, medical director of the SIS Association in Montreuil, France, noted that while many individuals contacted the organisation with concerns about potential infection following these syringe-related incidents, the route of exposure did not pose a risk for HIV transmission. She emphasised that post-exposure prophylaxis is not warranted in such cases.
HIV is typically transmitted through sexual contact, exposure to contaminated blood (eg, shared needles), or from mother to child during pregnancy or delivery.
Although the risk for hepatitis B virus transmission is low, it may be present in individuals who are not vaccinated. In such cases, vaccination is recommended, according to Mbodje.
Stay Together, Stay Safe
According to Mbodje, large-scale events, such as music festivals and public gatherings, create environments in which pricking incidents can occur unnoticed due to crowd density. These settings make it easier for individuals to be targeted without witnesses.
She advised healthcare professionals to prioritise reassurance for those affected. There is no risk for HIV transmission associated with these incidents, and hepatitis B vaccination status should be checked, with immunisation offered if needed. Although concerns about drug-facilitated assault are common, toxicology tests have not detected any substances, and no cases of physical or sexual assault have been reported. Nevertheless, individuals should be encouraged to report incidents to the police.
As for prevention, she noted that advising people to avoid festivals or to remain constantly alert is neither practical nor helpful. Instead, healthcare professionals should encourage individuals to attend events with trusted friends, stay together in crowded spaces, and avoid isolation. The focus should be on promoting sensible precautions without creating unnecessary fear.
This story was translated from Medscape's French edition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Black America Web
2 hours ago
- Black America Web
Tamar Braxton & Gilead Partner For PrEP Promo To Black Women
Getty Images for ESSENCE Tamar Braxton has always been one to use her voice for good — good music, that is! — and now she's getting even louder with a new partnership alongside Gilead Sciences that will aim to promote HIV prevention like PrEP specifically to Black women. The big news was revealed this past weekend during Essence Festival 2025, where Tamar sat on the 'Safe & Sexy' panel for those who were able to visit the Global Black Economic Forum stage. RELATED: FDA Approves First And Only Twice-Yearly PrEP Option 'I'm all about dating with confidence,' she shared with guests on her reasoning behind the Gilead union, going on further add, 'Black women have stopped talking about HIV, and it needs to be part of our conversation again.' This comes not too long after Tamar went viral earlier this year for revealing that she herself takes PrEP, at the time sharing the news in a video posted to social media (seen below) where she blamed the current dating pool and its lack of options for, in her words, 'not being for the outside.' For Gilead, the partnership comes with perfect timing following The World Health Organization officially recommending its twice-yearly PrEP injection, lenacapavir, in the global fight against HIV infection. More details below, via Reuters : 'The recommendation, issued at the International AIDS Conference in Kigali, Rwanda, comes nearly a month after the U.S. health regulator approved the drug, giving patients new hope of interrupting virus transmission. The twice-yearly injectable offers a long-acting alternative to daily oral pills and other shorter-acting options, reshaping the response to the disease especially among those who face challenges with daily adherence, stigma, or access to health care. 'While an HIV vaccine remains elusive, lenacapavir is the next best thing,' said Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. The WHO's recommendations come at a critical moment as HIV prevention efforts stagnate with 1.3 million new HIV infections occurring in 2024 as funding challenges, stigma around the disease persist.' As we all should know by now, HIV has affected the Black community at a disproportionate rate compared to other race groups since the epidemic first began decades ago. As a result, we should be doing everything in our power to change those statistics and hopefully rid them altogether. Shoutout to Tamar for using her platform to spread some news that can save a life. You can visit HealthySexuals to get educated on PrEP medications and other honest conversations. SEE ALSO
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Chris Selley: Let your kids outside, for God's sake, even if it's a bit smoky
Environment Canada offers some reasonable-sounding advice for living with poor air quality caused by smoke from wildfires, which is currently afflicting several parts of Canada — and causing hysteria in one part of Canada, or at least in its media, or at least in one particular newspaper. Environment Canada identifies the people at particular risk as seniors, infants, folks who work up a sweat outdoors, and those with lung or heart conditions. It advises such people to assess their own sensitivities to poor air quality, in consultation with their physicians if they feel it necessary, and act accordingly. That wasn't nearly dramatic enough for the Toronto Star, which has a remarkably sensationalist tabloid sensibility when it comes to public-health matters. At one point on Monday, the top of the Star's homepage featured four separate stories about the terrible danger the air quality posed to your heart, lungs and offspring. One of the articles posed a familiar question to experts: Should children be wearing N95 masks? 'The answer is 'not really,' according to Dr. Jeffrey Brook, an associate professor at the University of Toronto's Dalla Lana School of Public Health,' the Star reported. 'The level that we're seeing here (is) what children are dealing with day in and day out in other countries in the world,' the Star quoted Brook. He added: 'It makes sense to be prudent, but not to panic.' (One might also recall how recently kids grew up in houses yellowed by second-hand smoke, not to mention eating in restaurants and flying in planes and driving in cars full of it. They didn't all die before 40.) Experts disagree on the mask question, as they do on most things, which is why 'experts say' is such a lousy way to frame a news article. 'On smoky days,' the University of Alberta reported on its website, its professor of medicine Dr. Anne Hicks 'recommends … using respiratory protection like masks when there is no option to avoid the smoke.' Quoting Jamie Happy with Alberta Lung, Global News reported that 'as soon as the AQHI (Air Quality Health Index) hits five or higher (out of 10), people should consider limiting their time outdoors or wearing a N95 mask.' (The AQHI hit eight in Toronto on Monday.) The Star, meanwhile, quoted Toronto family physician Dr. Jennifer Green to the effect that kids shouldn't wear N95 masks, because 'in children, N95 masks often don't fit properly, often aren't worn properly and really are not a solution.' Doesn't that just take you back five-and-a-half years or so? To when recent Order of Canada recipient Dr. Theresa Tam told us masks were worse than useless against viruses because we hadn't gone on the two-day ministry-approved donning-and-doffing course, as if we were purebred morons? It sure took me back. This sort of messaging only undermines the larger cause of public health. And speaking of which: 'I think for a child with underlying asthma, who must be outside, I would recommend wearing an N95 mask,' Green told the Star, somewhat paradoxically. 'But really, as much as possible, we should be keeping all children inside.' We should be keeping all children inside as much as possible. In July. Even if they're not especially vulnerable to smoke. After screwing up their lives for three years during COVID-19. No. No, we should not be doing that. Obviously. Whether you think school closures were justified or not during the pandemic, at all or to the truly extraordinary extent Ontario took it, at this point we should be exploring every avenue to remedy the damage. And that does not mean trapping kids inside because the air quality's a bit crap. That pandemic-era damage is huge. Of course it is. One of the most bizarre rhetorical phenomena of the pandemic was people arguing it wouldn't really do kids all that much harm not to go to school for a year or two. If that were true, why on earth do we spend so much money on K-12 education in the first place? The anecdotes from teachers and child-care workers about socially maladjusted and academically delayed kids keep piling up. So does the academic research: 'The pandemic has left its mark on their behaviour, mental health, social skills and their education,' BBC reported last month. 'Childhood experiences … tend to have an outsized effect on life trajectories because they can alter brain development, behaviour and overall wellbeing.' Standardized test scores have crashed in Britain, where schools were closed for considerably shorter periods of time than in Ontario and Quebec. And we did basically bugger-all to compensate for it except graduate struggling kids anyway and send them out into the world and hope for the best. Meanwhile, perhaps not coincidentally, the verb 'swarming' has gained new prominence with respect to gangs of feral youths attacking innocent people — homeless people, pizza franchisees. We will never know if they reoffend, because we can't know their names. The most Toronto Star part of the whole affair: Alongside the article advising children to stay indoors if at all possible, the paper ran another article quoting an expert explaining that people aren't even safe from wildfire smoke inside. You should close all your windows, a University of Waterloo professor advised (because, obviously, everyone has air conditioning). You should even consider taping the windows shut, the Waterloo prof advised, because homes have 'leaks and cracks' through which wildfire-smoke particulates might invade your home. That's absolutely bananas. How far should parents go? Pull their kids out of day camps or sleepover camps? Cancel all their kids' summer recreational activities, hopefully including some unstructured capering around in their neighbourhoods? I don't think parents are that dumb or hysterical. The media they consume shouldn't be either. National Post cselley@ Chris Selley: Toronto dares the Carney government to punish it for ignoring housing demands Chris Selley: We'll thank Travis Dhanraj for 'pulling back the curtain' on CBC News
Politico
4 hours ago
- Politico
HIV prevention gets an AI upgrade
WORLD VIEW Artificial intelligence chatbots could help with the introduction of a twice-yearly shot that can help prevent HIV, experts said at the International AIDS Society conference on HIV science in Rwanda on Monday. How so: Chatbots that answer people's questions on sex, health and other issues; help them self-test and interpret results and then connect them with health providers for prevention and treatment options are being tested in countries like South Africa to increase HIV prevention and treatment. 'We see these tools as demand-generation engines,' said Sarah Morris, chief product officer at Audere, a Seattle-based digital health company that's been involved in creating and testing such chatbots. Why it matters: 'They can help people in a private safe space with counseling, help them understand why testing or [pre-exposure prophylaxis] might be right for them, and we're hoping that this lays a really nice glide path for [lenacapavir] introduction,' she said referring to Gilead's HIV prevention shot just approved by the FDA. HIV experts believe the drug will be transformative in decreasing the number of new HIV infections if made available at scale globally. AI companions aren't judgmental and don't gossip, but they can provide access to confidential advice and support, said Shawn Malone, HIV/AIDS project director at the global health nonprofit PSI, who's worked on another chatbot in South Africa. Malone stressed that the AI tool 'is in no way meant to replace face-to-face care,' but 'we are hoping that we can take some pressure off providers so that they can use the very limited time they have in a way that's most meaningful, that's most impactful.' WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. Ancient Greek philosopher Plato would see AI as 'intriguing and persuasive – but misleading, and far from the truth,' said former Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou, Euronews reports. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Danny Nguyen at dnguyen@ Carmen Paun at cpaun@ Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: Dannyn516.70, CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. WORKFORCE President Donald Trump's Federal Trade Commission is considering whether to defend a Biden-era rule that would ban employers from requiring workers to sign agreements that would bar or restrict them from quitting and joining rivals. President Joe Biden's FTC approved the rule in 2024, but before it could go into effect, courts blocked it on the grounds that the agency had overstepped its authority. On Thursday, the deadline to decide whether to back the rule, the FTC requested a 60-day extension. Earlier that week, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) urged the Trump administration to stand behind the rule. 'I would love for the Trump administration to defend the rule,' Murphy said during a livestream on social platform X last week. 'It's a pro-worker rule, it's a pro-startup, pro-entrepreneurship rule, and just because it has Biden's fingerprints on it shouldn't mean it's not worth pursuing.' Washington watch: With Sens. Todd Young (R-Ind.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.) and Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.),Murphy has introduced bipartisan legislation to limit the use of noncompete agreements except in certain circumstances. 'We'll continue to pursue our bipartisan legislation,' Murphy said. 'If we want to do something about wages in this country, we've got to stop this gimmick.' Why it matters for doctors and hospitals: Hospital administrators have said they rely on such contracts to protect their businesses from cutthroat competition for talent. Both the American Hospital Association and the Federation of American Hospitals are among the hospital groups that have lobbied for an exemption. Doctors would benefit from a noncompete ban: A large share of them — 45 percent in group practices and likely many more in other areas of medicine — are bound by the contract provisions. In the states: While a handful of states have laws that limit noncompete agreements, Florida is taking a different approach by expanding them. This spring, state legislators passed the CHOICE Act, which permits agreements of up to four years instead of two. Kevin Paule, an attorney who handles noncompete agreements and business divorce cases at the Florida-based law firm Hill Ward Henderson, described the law as unusual, but noted it's not an across-the-board extension since it applies only to workers with an income above a certain threshold. It also includes a carveout for licensed health care providers. 'In some respects, there's a limiting component of this, but it definitely draws out the period that somebody would have to sit on the sidelines,' Paule told Erin. 'This gives employers a lot more teeth to put in their employment agreements if they want to.' What's next: Since Florida doesn't have a pocket veto, the CHOICE Act became law on July 1 without GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis signing the bill. Nationally, the FTC's new deadline to decide whether to back the noncompetes rule is Sept. 8.
