
I booked £400 flights for the wrong date - but the agent won't give me my money back
I booked using an online travel agent that compares flights from different airlines.
I didn't realise when I navigated back a page, my dates were switched to the site's default dates.
The flight I accidentally booked was a few weeks away, while the one I intended to book had been in three months' time. I'm not able to travel on the former dates.
Within minutes, I realised my error and filled in an online cancellation form with the travel agent. This was a Sunday so I couldn't speak to them on the phone.
I thought I could get my money back as I read that purchases made online come with a two-week 'cooling off' period.
But my request was declined and I'm still out of pocket. Why? T.R
Helen Crane, This is Money's consumer champion, replies: The cost of going away has rocketed in the last few years, meaning we are all desperate to get a good deal.
When flipping back and forth between internet tabs comparing different airlines, dates and prices, I can see how a mistake like this could be made.
You are right to say that, when buying things online, customers usually benefit from a 14-day cooling off period. This is a legal protection.
But unfortunately for you, it doesn't apply to plane tickets - or tickets for any other form of transport, for that matter.
This is because the companies who sell them argue that, as the tickets are tied to a specific time and date, they would be hard to resell in many circumstances.
Essentially, they say having to pay back any customer who asks within two weeks would leave them at an unfair disadvantage.
Having a 14-day 'get out' clause would also encourage holidaymakers to game the system, as they'd be able to cancel and re-book if they saw prices had dropped.
When denied a refund they feel they deserve, a savvy consumer might turn to their credit card provider - if they paid using one - hoping to be protected by Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act.
However, that is unfortunately also not possible in your case, as consumer expert Scott Dixon explains below.
So what options are open to you, if any, to recoup your £400? I asked Dixon, who runs the website The Complaints Resolver, to explain the rules and what you can do.
Scott Dixon replies: Unlike most online purchases, flight bookings are exempt from the standard 14-day cooling-off period under the Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013.
This means that once you have confirmed and paid for your flights, you are generally locked in, even if you have made a mistake.
The reason for this is because flight tickets are time-sensitive and perishable.
Airlines argue flights are time-specific services that cannot be easily resold if cancelled, and are subject to dynamic pricing, meaning that fares can fluctuate rapidly.
Airlines operate on tight margins and aim for maximum seat capacity, so changes can disrupt their logistics and financial position.
This exemption is set out in Regulation 28 of the Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013, which lists the circumstances where cancellation rights do not apply.
This includes accommodation, transport, vehicle hire, catering and leisure services, if the contract is tied to a specific date or period of performance.
In plain English, if you book transport like flights, trains or buses for a specific date or time, the 14-day cancellation right does not apply.
That's why consumers cannot legally cancel a flight just because they changed their mind or made a mistake, even within 24 hours of booking.
If you have made a booking error (like selecting the wrong date), you are relying on the airline's goodwill.
Some airlines such as British Airways, Virgin Atlantic and American Airlines may allow a 24-hour grace period to amend or cancel without penalty, but this is a voluntary policy and not a legal right.
Section 75 protection under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 only applies if there has been a breach of contract or misrepresentation, and only when you book direct and spend over £100.
It doesn't apply to mistakes made by consumers. Travel insurance typically won't cover this, unless a specific cancellation clause applies in the terms and conditions.
Always double-check your dates and details before you proceed. If things do go wrong, be polite but persistent and contact the airline directly as soon as possible.
You are relying on staff goodwill, so be nice if you need to ask for their help.
Politeness and good manners costs nothing, yet it can make the difference between you getting the outcome you want or the outcome you deserve.
Helen Crane replies: Unfortunately, it seems this is likely to be a costly lesson.
You are out of the 24-hour grace period that Scott mentions, and even then, this is completely voluntary and you don't know if the agent you used would have been willing to offer it.
That said, all of this is ultimately down to the company's discretion, so perhaps one attempt at a charm offensive as he describes wouldn't hurt.
It is interesting that the three firms he names which may look kindly on customers who make mistakes are all airlines, rather than agents.
Personally, I now try to book flights direct with the airline wherever possible, rather than using a third-party travel agent.
In my experience this makes life easier when things go wrong, whether that is a cancellation, lost luggage, or a booking error like yours - as you only have one company to deal with rather than two.
However, it does often mean missing out on the absolute cheapest deals.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
an hour ago
- Times
A $10bn oil empire in tatters: how Prax collapsed
Sanjeev Kumar Soosaipillai was as charming and upbeat as ever in September 2023 as he addressed investors at Prax Group's annual conference at the five-star Dorchester hotel on Park Lane, London. 'He gave a presentation about how everyone should be very proud,' one source at the event said. But even the most optimistic in the audience could not avoid arching an eyebrow as Soosaipillai presented profit numbers that seemed off the chart. Some attendees were incredulous and left the celebrated Mayfair hotel with one thing on their mind: how could Soosaipillai possibly back up the figures? The following day, Prax's executive committee convened for an off-site day at another luxury hotel – this time at the £2,000-a-night Fairmont hotel golf retreat on the outskirts of Windsor. To say that the gloss had come off Soosaipillai's sunny disposition was something of an understatement, as senior leaders grilled him on the previous day's profit number, which had even come as a surprise to some of them, according to one of those involved. The company was facing 'challenging markets… which affected our financial performance', Soosaipillai would later disclose. What followed was 'Project King', an initiative where Soosaipillai temporarily handed over control of his empire to consultants from Deloitte, such was the parlous state of its finances. One senior figure familiar with the situation said this led to the brutal axing of one in five staff to balance the books. Soosaipillai was typically sanguine. He referred to the exercise as 'a journey of value creation and cost efficiencies to extract the benefits from our consolidated diversified business which has grown substantially over the past years'. 'But that was a little bit futile,' said the source. 'Because the biggest problem was the refining.' Soosaipillai and his co-owner, wife Arani, have proven an enigma to outsiders after opening their first petrol station in St Albans with the help of an HSBC overdraft more than a quarter of a century ago. The reclusive couple's empire unravelled in spectacular fashion last week when it declared bankruptcy after being pursued by HMRC for £250 million in unpaid taxes. Rumours abound that they have fled the country. 'Sanjeev Kumar Soosaipillai no longer works for the Prax Group' and 'Arani Kumar Soosaipillai no longer works for the Prax Group' were the automated emailed responses in response to efforts by The Sunday Times to contact them for comment. Administrators are now in charge of Prax's parent; and the government's official receiver has seized control of the Lindsey oil refinery in Humberside — one of only five remaining in the UK that keep the country running. And it can this weekend be revealed that Britain was just a whisker away from handing over another major strategic asset to the couple. Prax had exchanged contracts with French oil major Total to acquire its interests in the West of Shetland gas fields. This included the Shetland Gas Plant, which is responsible for producing about 8 per cent of the UK's gas needs, enough for two million homes, according to Total. The deal had been due to complete in the final week of June, just days before administrators and receivers intervened. With their multi billion-pound empire in tatters, ministers have called for them to 'put their hand in their pocket' to pay for the huge bill that will now otherwise fall on taxpayers. The Insolvency Service has ordered an investigation. The couple's refusal to put their side across is, in their defence, consistent with how they have behaved over the years. Although regulars at private industry events, the husband and wife team – both 52, and who met while studying accountancy at the University of Kent – have shunned the media spotlight. Their preference has been to lock themselves inside a lavish 15,500 square foot mansion in a private gated community at St George's Hill, Surrey, or behind the tall brick walls that surround their head offices in nearby Weybridge. Sanjeev and Arani's first foray into oil came in 1999 when they opened a forecourt in Hertfordshire. Extra sites were added, in part funded by remortgaging their home. By 2005 they had added an oil storage site in Dagenham, east London, and thereafter carved out a niche in blending diesel, before diversifying into gas oil, kerosene and petrol. Armed with cheap bank loans, the Prax group of companies snaffled unwanted assets from oil majors such as BP, Total and Shell. A landmark deal came in 2015 when Prax landed the debt-fuelled takeover of Harvest Energy from commodities trader Trafigura and the Irish magnate Denis O'Brien for a cut-price $23 million. Harvest supplied a tenth of Britain's road fuel and owned forecourts of its own, but low oil prices had hit the group's bottom line, allowing the Soosaipillais to pounce. The pair's ambitions went well beyond the UK. In 2016, Prax swooped on AIM-listed oil explorer Tethys Petroleum, thrusting it into a legal row over the rights to thousands of barrels of oil that culminated with armed guards preventing oil tankers from leaving a Tethys base in Kazakhstan. By 2024, Prax could justifiably boast of an empire upon which the sun would never set, with interests as far east as Malaysia and southeast China, across the Middle East and Africa and over to Texas. The company made a virtue of being 'vertically integrated' — that is, owning a toehold in every bit of oil supply, from wells to refineries to petrol stations. It was, in effect, a mini oil major. Throughout this time, and flanked by his wife, Sanjeev retained an iron grip on his company. 'He is energetic, charismatic, and very charming,' said one person that worked with him. The problem was that he was either unable or unwilling to delegate, they said. 'I was surprised how he surrounded himself with less capable people,' the person added. 'He wants to do everything. The answer would always be: 'I'll fix it.'' This management style yielded results in the early years, but caused complications as the Prax group grew and grew. Located in North Killingholme, the pastel-painted tanks of the Lindsey oil refinery provide a much-needed dash of colour to the otherwise drab Lincolnshire flatlands on the south bank of the Humber Estuary. Lindsey processes about 113,000 barrels of crude oil per day, equivalent to approximately 7 per cent of the UK's demand for petrol, diesel and aviation fuel. Prax's acquisition of this site from French giant Total in 2021 would define the Soosaipillais as a major player in the UK energy market. The acquisition would also prove to be the couple's undoing. The Soosaipillais knew Total well by this point, having struck a deal to operate petrol stations under the French company's brand in 2019. They paid $167 million for Lindsey, including the Fina pipeline, which runs through the east of England, and an oil storage terminal. The Lindsey deal completed in March 2021. Within a year, Prax was toasting not only smashing through the $10 billion revenue barrier, but fat profit margins as oil prices soared in the wake of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. It allowed the couple to book a $500 million paper profit from their investment in the refinery. But as oil prices normalised, profit margins narrowed and may have even been negative, according to some industry experts. Whether it was poor due diligence, or inexperience in refining, the poor state of the refinery meant that it was not long before Lindsey turned from goldmine to millstone. The Soosaipillais put the refinery into a 'turnaround' – a standard practice that takes place every few years to overhaul and refurbish a plant. It is a major undertaking and requires careful planning to minimise the period of outage. Prax issued a press release last month hailing Lindsey's turnaround, which it said had taken place earlier in 2025. Bosses said the successful overhaul was a 'testament to the dedication, meticulous planning and safety mindsets of everyone involved'. Multiple sources dispute this version of events, however. They said that the turnaround actually commenced in March 2024 and dragged on until September. In the northern hemisphere, turnaround programmes typically occur in the spring or autumn. This is so they miss inclement weather during the winter, and avoid the summer, when oil prices are typically higher in response to 'driving season' in the US, when there is an increase in motorists using their cars. Industry sources said that a turnaround would typically take 45 days, meaning the March 2024 start date would have been perfectly timed, with reopening commencing in mid-April. Sources close to the company dispute the 45-day average, and pointed out that Lindsey refinery was in a poor state of repair, meaning that it was always likely to take longer. Nevertheless, some say that the effective four-month shutdown of Lindsey was a hammer blow to the wider Prax group. During this time, cashflows dried up. Given the size of the refinery, this had implications for the wider group. Not even a two-year offtake deal with FTSE 100 commodities giant Glencore, agreed in July 2024 on more favourable terms than the previous contract with Trafigura, could stop the difficulties mounting. Dealmaking became difficult at the same time. Prax agreed to acquire Shell's 37.5 per cent stake in a major refinery outside Berlin that was majority-owned with Kremlin-controlled Rosneft, only for the deal to collapse after the UK firm's financing fell through late in 2024, according to a source familiar with the deal. By May this year, the government had finally cottoned on to the travails of a group that owned a major piece of Britain's energy infrastructure. Energy secretary Ed Miliband summoned Soosaipillai into Whitehall for an explanation. Yes, it had been far from smooth-sailing, but Prax was not in peril, he was told. In fact, Soosaipillais is reported to have told Miliband the group was planning future investment. Whether or not Soosaipillai discussed his company's towering tax bill with Miliband is unclear. But it was ultimately his and his wife's undoing. Officials from UK Government Investments stepped up their preparations to take control of the Lindsey refinery in the week commencing 23 June. Special managers from FTI Consulting, acting on behalf of the government's Official Receiver, began taking control of the business on Friday, 28 June. Meanwhile, insolvency practitioners from Teneo were appointed as administrators to Prax's parent entity, State Oil Limited. So what next for Prax? On Friday, it emerged that FTI had struck a deal with Glencore for taxpayers to foot an unpaid bill for crude oil. That means that its consultants, working on behalf of the government's Official Receiver, are now free to consider sales options for the Lindsey refinery and associated companies. Previously, Glencore had security over the site as part of its offtake agreement with Prax. Some sources questioned whether Lindsey would find a buyer, given its relatively small size. It is the smallest of the UK's five oil refineries, after all. That said, next-door neighbour Phillips 66, which operates a refinery double its size, could be tempted. Teneo has a far larger job. It is now preparing the rest of Soosaipillai's sprawling network of companies for sale. It is understood that Teneo was first contacted by the company just four days before it collapsed into bankruptcy. Originally, the consultancy was asked to assist with raising new financing. Within hours, Teneo's team realised they were dealing with a group that was not financially viable. Sanjeev initially worked with Teneo before being suspended from his post by Prax's non-executives ahead of the group's insolvency. Teneo is understood to have opened a forensic investigation into Soosaipillai's actions as a company director. The likes of Lancaster offshore oil field west of the Shetland basin, bought as part of the takeover of AIM-quoted Hurricane Energy for £250 million in early 2023, is likely to attract suitors. Control of Total's Shetland assets, so close to becoming part of the group, have reverted back to the French oil giant. Likewise, the company's portfolio of petrol stations. Among the potentially interested parties are EG On The Move, EG Group and MFG. Sources said the preference was to sell the sites as one job lot. 'Twenty-five years on from the birth of Prax, we have the opportunity to set our business up for the next wave of growth and success,' Soosaipillai wrote in the company's 2024 annual report. 'Across Prax, we are embracing this opportunity with out classic 'can do' spirit.' When it comes to Prax, such sentiment only gets you so far, it would seem.


Times
an hour ago
- Times
P&O Ferries scraps Teesside to Zeebrugge service after 30 years
P&O Ferries is to scrap a ferry service between northeast England and Zeebrugge that has been running for more than 30 years. The operator is understood to have exercised a break clause in its contract to run ferries between Teesside and the Belgian port. The decision was taken at the end of June and the last sailing on the route is due to take place in mid-August. P&O Ferries is understood to have been operating services between Teesport and Zeebrugge since the 1990s. The move follows P&O's sailings between Teesport and Rotterdam being axed in 2023. The change will mean that P&O, once one of the biggest ferry operators in the UK, will soon run just three routes from the UK: Dover-Calais, Hull-Rotterdam, and Cairnryan in Scotland to Larne in Northern Ireland. • P&O bosses shared £15m after sacking 800 crew P&O sparked a national outcry in 2022 by sacking nearly 800 seafarers and replacing them with low-paid agency staff. Owned by Dubai logistics firm DP World, bosses controversially pressed ahead with the cost-cutting move to balance the books and compete with rivals that had similarly opted to staff ships with agency seafarers. Peter Hebblethwaite, the chief executive, later admitted to a parliamentary committee that P&O had broken the law by opting for mass redundancies without consultation. 'I completely throw our hands up, my hands up, that we did choose not to consult,' he said. A spokesman for P&O said: 'The closure of the Zeebrugge-Teesport route facilitates our North Sea strategy to focus on and invest in a strategic, flexible and differentiated network. This will not affect any P&O Ferries employees. The deployment of the Norbay [ferry] is currently under review. • P&O claims it has saved 3,000 jobs and rescued the company 'We are excited about the arrival of the Lismore [another ferry] into our fleet later in the year, bringing greater capacity and efficiency for our customers. ' P&O's exit may come as a blow to the Teesport owner PD Ports, which is owned by the Canadian infrastructure giant Brookfield. PD Ports declined to comment. PD Ports was put back on the market last year after an aborted sale in 2021. Brookfield is said to have slapped a £2 billion price tag on the business as it seeks to sell a 50 per cent stake. Sources insisted that underlying demand for ferry services had not diminished and PD Ports was confident that another operator would step in to fill the void at Teesport. Rival Peel Ports, which had previously registered an interest in bidding for PD Ports, has reportedly bowed out of the process.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Poundland confirms another branch is shutting its doors in weeks – see full list of shops closing
POUNDLAND has confirmed another branch is closing its doors for good in just weeks. The bargain retailer is pulling down the shutters after more than 15 years on a Kent high street. 1 Poundland bosses say their branch on St George's Street in Canterbury city centre will close on July 23. The store replaced Woolworths following the retailers closure in December 2008. But Poundland says it has been unable to "secure a long-term lease" at the site which would enable it to continue trading. A spokesperson for the brand confirmed the store was closing this month. They said: 'We recently made it clear that over time, Poundland expects to have a store network of around 650-700 stores in the UK & Ireland compared to about 800 today. 'While that that remains a very sizeable number of stores, we know how disappointing it is for customers when a location like Canterbury closes. 'It goes without saying that we will formally consult with colleagues at the store and that work is underway.' Canterbury has a second Poundland store at Marshwood Close Retail Park but there are rumours this branch will also close in the coming months. Local residents expressed their disappointment on the Canterbury Residents Group on Facebook, under the impression that both branches will be shutting for good. One disappointed customer said: "Really sad to hear both our Poundland stores are closing, it's been my go to place for pet bits since we lost Wilko's. "Absolutely wonderful staff in the High Street one, hope they all find alternative work soon." "That's so rubbish, Poundland is such a gem, we don't really have any other shops like it in town," said another. When asked to about the potential closure at Marshwood Close Retail Park, a spokesperson for Poundland said no announcement has been made. It comes as the company is set to close its store in Merry Hill Shopping Centre, Dudley, on July 18. Poundland to be sold for JUST £1 as frontrunner for shock takeover is revealed after wave of store closures In addition, two more closures are expected in the coming weeks with the site in Cowes, Isle of Wight closing on July 30 and another in Newquay on August 1. Poundland has already closed 16 stores across the UK since March last year, including in Macclesfield, Maidenhead and Flint. What's happening to Poundland? Poundland has confirmed plans to shut 68 stores, with a further 150 at risk of closure, separate to the 19 shops mentioned above. It comes after the struggling chain was sold for just £1 to investment fund Gordon Brothers last month. Poundland will continue to be headed up by chief executive officer Barry Williams under the new ownership. Gordon Brothers has also proposed to negotiate rent reductions at a number of other locations. Meanwhile, it has also proposed: Getting rid of frozen food products at all stores where they're currently sold Reducing the number of chilled food items sold Closing its frozen and digital distribution centre in Darton, South Yorkshire, later this year Closing its national distribution centre in Bilston, West Midlands, in early 2026 No longer selling products on its website Providing more womenswear and seasonal ranges Gordon Brothers, the ex-owner of Laura Ashley, has agreed to provide up to £80million in financing to Poundland as part of the deal it struck last month. The retail chain had previously been owned by Polish company Pepco Group since 2016. But the group put Poundland up for auction in March as it looked to offload the brand. The move followed weak financial results, with revenues dropping by 6.5% to £830million for the six months to March compared with a year earlier. Pepco had blamed "highly challenging trading conditions" for the fall in sales. What Poundland stores have closed? Find a list of the Poundland stores that have closed below: Connswater Shopping Centre, Belfast – closed March 2024 Macclesfield – closed August, 2024 Maidenhead – closed October, 2024 Sutton Coldfield – closed October, 2024 Clapham Junction Station, London – closed May 2 Belle Vale Shopping Centre, Liverpool – closed May 6 St George's Centre, Gravesend – closed May 8 Southwark Park Road – closed May 14 Copdock Mill Interchange, Ipswich – closed May 20 Brackla, Wales – closed May 24 Chiswick High Road – closed May 28 Filton Abbeywood – closed May 31 Surrey Quays – closed June 11 Barrow Dalton Road - closed June 12 Union Gate, Bristol - closed June 20 Flint - closed June 21 Canterbury - closing on July 23 Newquay - closing on July 30 Cowes, Isle of Wight – closing July 30 Newquay - August 1