Catch up on the latest state budget decisions in the Maine Legislature
A budget plan is taking shape and the clock is ticking.
Maine Morning Star will have regular updates as the committee tasked with setting that plan, the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee, takes straw votes on what to include ahead of a final vote on the budget proposal to be sent to the Maine Senate and House of Representatives for consideration.
Legislative leaders have said the intention is to complete all work by June 18, what had been the statutory adjournment date for the first regular session. Though, the Legislature is now in a special session, without a formal deadline.
In March, the Democratic majority pushed through a roughly $11.3 billion, two-year budget plan without Republican support and formally adjourned in order to start the clock for those funds to become available in 90 days.
Senate Republicans refused to back an alternative short-term plan that would have immediately filled the current deficit for MaineCare, the state's Medicaid program, because it did not include structural reform to the program.
The budget that did pass continued funding for state services at the same level while also providing one-time funding for MaineCare and other urgent needs. But it didn't include any of the policy changes Gov. Janet Mills proposed, such as tax increases and program cuts, to address the deficit and flattening revenues.
These proposals and others from lawmakers are now being weighed by the appropriations committee as it crafts the next iteration of the budget.
Follow along below:
8 mins ago
10 mins ago
8 mins ago
Monday morning at the State House began with more talk about taxes as the Appropriations Committee continued its line-by-lines votes on what to include in the budget.
The majority of the committee voted to remove Mills' proposed tax on ambulance services, which is one of several tax increases the governor proposed as a means to address the deficit and flattening revenues.
The tax on non-municipal ambulance service providers would have been equal to 6% of their net operating revenue, which the Mills administration said it would have used to leverage additional federal dollars and eventually increase MaineCare reimbursements.
While Republicans on the committee said they supported removing the tax — as the minority party has made clear it will not support tax increases of any kind — they questioned how the state will deal with those shortfalls and pay for additional spending the committee has approved.
One example from Monday was reallocating the cost of an emergency coordinator position that is partially funded through federal expenditures to being completely supported by the general fund.
'We're moving positions and costs into the general fund, and my only question is, where is that money coming from?' Sen. Sue Bernard (R-Aroostook) asked. 'Is it coming from more tax increases? Is it coming from cutting other programs that we haven't gotten to yet, or what?'
Sen. Peggy Rotundo (D-Androscoggin), who co-chairs the committee, responded, 'As we build this budget, we will take care of that in one way or another so that the budget will balance at the end.'
It is not yet clear whether the committee will support some of Mills' other proposed taxes or the cuts she proposed to health and child care programs. So far, the committee also voted out a proposed pharmacy tax.
Implications from federal funding cuts were also top of mind.
The coordinator position was one of several that the committee readjusted to be more reliant on state funding, though Mills made those recommendations before President Donald Trump's administration began rescinding congressionally appropriated funds.
'We have talked about the fact that if federal funds disappear, positions disappear,' Rotundo said.
But some concerns about federal funding predated Trump's second term. During the public hearing for the budget bill, the Maine Emergency Management Agency said budget deficits related to federal funding had already resulted in the agency leaving two positions vacant.
The committee voted to fund two positions fully with the general fund, after they'd previously been supported solely by federal dollars.
'It was important to make sure that these positions were preserved and that it was worth the investment in additional general fund dollars,' said Rep. Drew Gattie (D-Westbrook), the other co-chair of the committee.
10 mins ago
During the committee's last meeting on Thursday, the majority of its members rejected a tax on Maine pharmacies the governor had proposed, while voting in favor of additional funding and rate reform for nursing homes.
The pharmacy tax would have imposed a 70-cent tax on every outpatient prescription filled by Maine pharmacies, the revenue from which the Mills administration said it would use to leverage additional federal dollars and eventually increase MaineCare reimbursements.
'I haven't voted for any items,' said Republican budget lead Jack Ducharme of Madison on Thursday. 'Yet, this will be my first, because I believe that we already collect too much taxes.'
With a 10-2 vote, other Republicans backed removing the tax too, though the holdouts noted that their opposition was because of a lack of clarity about the overall budget plan.
'I applaud the work of the majority in terms of removing this,' Rep. Ken Fredette (R-Newport) said. 'However, I will be consistent in reviewing the overall global budget in determining whether or not I will support it.'
That sentiment was also shared ahead of the committee voting 9-3 in favor of $20 million in additional funding for nursing homes over the biennium. This includes a $6.5 million investment for rate reform to support the direct care workforce and incentivize permanent staff, which would in turn unlock $12.2 million in funding from the federal government.
'Nursing home rate reform is very important to us, however at this particular time we have not had a discussion about where additional general funds come from that we're going to need,' Ducharme said. 'In order for me to support this, even though I would historically support something like this, I want to know where the money's coming from.'
Other Republicans had a different take. While Rep. Amy Bradstreet Arata of New Gloucester would also like to know where the funds are coming from, 'I feel right about supporting this,' she said. 'I might not support the entire package, but I feel better knowing that this is in there, ultimately.'
Read more here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
41 minutes ago
A court called off a key 9/11 suspect's plea deal. Here's where the case stands
NEW YORK -- The United States' long legal case against accused Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed remains in limbo after an appeals court this week scrapped a plea deal that the government had negotiated but had later withdrawn. Essentially, the ruling leaves the case on track for trial before a military commission. It is unclear when that might happen. Here's what to know about the case and how it got here: Mohammed is accused of developing and directing al-Qaida's plot to crash hijacked airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001. Another of the hijacked planes flew into a field in Pennsylvania. In all, nearly 3,000 people were killed in one of the deadliest attacks ever on the United States. Mohammed was arrested in 2003 in Pakistan and eventually taken to the U.S. military base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. At the time, it was where the U.S. held hundreds of men captured in President George W. Bush's 'war on terror.' Military prosecutors filed charges in 2008 against Mohammed and some co-defendants. After an Obama-era plan to try them in a civilian court in New York collapsed, the case remained with the military commission. The case dragged on through years of legal and logistical challenges. A major point of contention has been how much the evidence and case have been tainted by the men's torture while in CIA custody during the first years after their capture. Mohammed was waterboarded 183 times. Military prosecutors and defense lawyers began plea talks several years ago. Last year, Mohammed and two others agreed to plead guilty, under an agreement that would have led to life in prison instead of a potential death penalty. The deal also would have required the men to answer questions posed by Sept. 11 victims' relatives. Military prosecutors called the arrangement 'the best path to finality and justice.' Some 9/11 families also saw the deal as the best hope for bringing the painful case to a conclusion and getting some answers from the defendants. But other victims' relatives said a trial was the right way to get justice and information, and some saw the plea deal as capitulation. Republican lawmakers also criticized the agreement, negotiated during Democratic President Joe Biden's administration. Then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin soon rescinded the deal, saying that victims' relatives, U.S. troops and the American public ' deserve the opportunity ' to see military commission trials play out. Defense attorneys and the government wrangled in various courts over whether Austin was legally able to scrap the deal. It was on-again, off-again for months. A panel of appeals judges put it on hold in January and then, on Friday, issued 2-1 ruling saying that Austin had the authority to rescind the agreement. The order bars the military judge from taking any guilty pleas under the now-undone deal. It is not clear whether defense lawyers plan to appeal. A message seeking comment was sent Saturday to Mohammed's attorneys. Without a plea deal, the case would once again be back in the pretrial stage within the military commission system, with the legal and logistical complications that it has faced. Questions about whether the men's torture would prevent the use of evidence, including statements they made, are yet to be resolved.
Buzz Feed
41 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Nick Offerman Says Ron Swanson Is Not A Trump Supporter
Nick Offerman is shutting down "dumb people" who think his most beloved TV character would be a Trump supporter. In an interview with IndieWire to promote his new film Sovereignty, Nick made it clear that Ron Swanson from Parks and Recreation would not be an unwavering supporter of the 47th president. Nick played Ron in Parks and Rec for seven seasons and 126 episodes between 2009 and 2015. Since then, the character Ron has lived on as a prime choice for clips, memes, and GIFs shared across the interwebs. The actor boiled it down to the fact that MAGA supporters might believe, "Well, he had a shotgun, so he must be one of us," he said. "Dumb people insist that Ron Swanson would've voted for Trump. And I don't deign to answer myself," Nick continued. "I take it to Mike Schur, the main creator of Ron, and he said, 'Swanson would've despised Trump, because Ron loved capitalism. And Trump made the stupidest move you could make as a capitalist, which is to go into public service.'" Nick believes that Ron wouldn't be MAGA at all, and he would despise its leader. "He would think he's an absolute idiot. He would also despise him because he's disrespectful to women and many others. And that's just an example of all the people and value sets that Ron would despise, because Ron is a good person." As a fan of Parks & Recreation who relates so hard with the series (I'm a Donna Meagle with a Tom Haverford rising at my job), it's obvious that Ron wouldn't be a Trump supporter. For one, he's not even a Republican. "Ron Swanson, a wonderful creation from much more brilliant minds than my own, people hold up for the wrong reasons, and take their own reading of this true Libertarian who was cool with everybody," Nick said in the interview. Ron fired back with a reference to the series finale, "One Last Ride," which included the wedding of Ron's hairdresser, Typhoon. "Ron was best man at a gay wedding you dumb fuck," Nick wrote. "Happy Pride." So that's that! Ron is a Libertarian LGBTQ+ ally. Period.
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Lawmakers visited Alligator Alcatraz. Here's what they say they saw and learned
For the first time since detainees began arriving at Florida's makeshift immigrant detention center in the Everglades this month, the DeSantis administration on Saturday gave the outside world a brief glimpse inside Alligator Alcatraz, offering limited, guided tours to members of Congress and the Florida Legislature. Just before noon, Democratic and Republican lawmakers entered the facility — without their phones — to tour the tents and trailers erected at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport off of U.S. Highway 41. Afterward, they told press gathered outside the perimeter that, over a period of about two hours, they saw the food given to detainees, met with administrators and were given a tour of a new, empty dorm. At one point, they said their guide briefly opened the door to an occupied living quarters, where detainees began to shout 'Libertad!' Guards stood between the lawmakers and detainees. The visit is one of the state's first steps toward transparency at a hastily erected site housing hundreds of migrant detainees slated for deportation by the federal government. Several lawmakers said they were told by the director of the Division of Emergency Management, which oversees the site, that the plan is to deport all detainees within two weeks of their arrival. The DeSantis administration has so far refused to release a list of the men housed at the facility, or say how many people are kept in its cells, built inside heavy duty tents. Several lawmakers said the few staffers who would speak to them told them roughly 900 migrants are being detained on site. Attorneys and families say they have had trouble locating detainees, who during the first days of operations have shared stories of toilets that don't flush, extreme temperatures and low-quality food. The day after the first detainees arrived, Democrats were turned away at the gates. The state has ignored the Miami Herald's requests to visit the facility. But after touring the site, Republican state Sen. Blaise Ingoglia said the facility looked nothing like the poor descriptions laid out over the last week in press reports. He said he took the opportunity to lay down in one of the beds for detainees, describing it as 'better than my bed at home.' 'The first thing I will tell you is that the rhetoric does not match the reality of what you guys have been hearing from Democrats, especially congressional Democrats. It's actually a well-run facility,' Ingoglia told reporters. 'The idea that the detainees are in there and they're in squalid conditions is just not accurate.' Before entering, Democrats, who have wanted to conduct unannounced tours of the facility, expressed skepticism about whether their limited view would reflect the day-to-day reality for detainees. 'We expect they will show us little to nothing,' said U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz. U.S. Rep. Maxwell Frost brought along a binder filled with photos of people he said his constituents had asked him to look for while inside. Frost and others said they were denied access to speak with any of the detainees, without explanation. Afterward, they didn't directly dispute Ingoglia's comments about the cleanliness of the detention center, but said they had been kept from getting a good look at the bathroom and living facilities that are currently being used by detainees. Wasserman Schultz said she brought a thermometer that showed the temperature at roughly 83 degrees at the threshold to a dorm where detainees were being held. She also noted that food portions appeared to be smaller at the Everglades facility than in the Krome Detention Center. Democrats also focused on what they said they learned at the facility: They said officials clarified repeatedly that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is 'calling the shots' at the detention center — an open question after the agency's acting deputy associate director of enforcement and removal operations downplayed federal involvement. In a declaration filed in response to a lawsuit by environmental groups challenging the facility's operations, Thomas P. Giles wrote that ICE's role concerning the development of the site 'has been limited to touring the facility to ensure compliance with ICE detention standards, and meeting with officials from the State of Florida to discuss operational matters.' 'The ultimate decision of who to detain' at Alligator Alcatraz, he wrote, 'belongs to Florida.' ICE has repeatedly deferred press questions about the facility to the state of Florida. Democrats said there are 32 detainees per 'cage,' that detainees are given color-coded wristbands to identify those with criminal convictions, and that private contractors appeared to be largely staffing the interior of the facility. They also said they plan to return. 'I can tell you many of us will be back for unannounced visits to see how things are,' Frost said. A Division of Emergency Management spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the details relayed by lawmakers.
