Map Shows Worst States for SNAP Fraud
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefit theft has become a pervasive issue in several states, with some of the most vulnerable families being left without vital food benefits.
Why It Matters
Some 40 million Americans receive SNAP benefits, which are loaded onto electronic benefit transfer (EBT) cards that can be used at approved retailers and select online stores. But they are vulnerable to fraud tactics as cards can be skimmed or cloned, something several states are trying to combat.
However, the problem is getting worse: Fraudulent SNAP transactions increased by 55 percent between the final quarter of fiscal year 2024 and the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, according to data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Food and Nutrition Service.
What To Know
New York is by far the state with the most reported SNAP benefit thefts, with 151,000 claims made between 2023 and March 2025, totaling more than $80 million lost by SNAP users.
Second to the Empire State is California, with almost 86,000 claims and $38 million down the drain. In third place is Maryland, with 63,800 fraud instances and $24 million lost to criminal schemes.
On the other end of the spectrum, Wyoming has the least number of claims made to the USDA in the same time period, with only nine instances of reported stolen benefits. South Dakota and North Dakota have similarly low numbers—23 and 27, respectively. Meanwhile, Idaho, Vermont and Montana all have fewer than 100 reported thefts.
In New York, law enforcement recently uncovered a $66 million criminal scheme involving a USDA employee. In Ohio, three Columbus residents were recently charged in connection with a $600,000 SNAP theft.
Tackling the Issue
Lawmakers in several states are taking steps to combat SNAP fraud. In New York, the state Senate has passed a bill requiring EBT cards to be equipped with EMV chips—technology commonly used in credit and debit cards to make them harder to clone or steal.
The USDA has also vowed to crack down on SNAP benefit theft, announcing in April that it had taken part in "targeted benefit fraud" operations in California.
In 2024, the USDA ended its policy of reimbursing stolen SNAP benefits. Congress did not approve funding to continue the reimbursements in the budget resolution passed in December. As a result, the USDA announced that states may choose to replace stolen benefits using their own funds in the absence of federal funds.
Some lawmakers are working to fill this gap. In April, Democratic Representative Al Green of Texas introduced the SNAP Secure Act of 2025, which proposes restoring federal funding to reimburse SNAP benefit recipients who are victims of fraud or theft. A similar bill has been introduced by Republican Representative Zach Nunn of Iowa.
What People Are Saying
A Department of Agriculture spokesperson previously told Newsweek: "SNAP is a vital nutrition safety net for low-income Americans. When benefits are stolen, SNAP participants' ability to feed their families is threatened. USDA will continue to leverage every resource and authority that remains at its disposal to combat all forms of SNAP fraud and abuse."
Representative Al Green, a Democrat from Texas, said in a statement in April: "I intend to turn this legislation into a modified amendment to the next appropriations bill. If accepted, this legislation would ensure that those who have had their SNAP benefits stolen will be able to feed themselves and their families."
What Happens Next
To protect your SNAP benefits, the USDA recommends these tips:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Family of Autistic Teen Shot 9 Times by Police Launch Lawsuit
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The family of 17-year-old Victor Perez, an autistic teenager who was shot nine times by police officers in Idaho earlier this year, is suing the Pocatello Police Department (PPD) over claims that officers violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Perez, who was non-verbal and also had cerebral palsy, died from his injuries after being shot multiple times by officers from the PPD following a violent outburst at his family's home on April 5. Officers were called by a neighbor who saw Perez holding a knife and arrived at the scene to subdue him but used deadly force instead of non-violent means of intervention. Perez's family has said they believe they could have solved the outburst without police intervention. Civil rights attorney John Burris, who is representing the Perez family, says the officers violated the ADA as they knew about Perez's disability. The ADA states that officers who know they are dealing with a disabled person must use non-lethal tactics. Newsweek has contacted the PPD for comment via their voicemail. Law firm Burris Nisenbaum Curry and Lacy has also been contacted via their website for comment. In this image taken from video, police are seen shortly before opening fire Victor Perez on the other side of a fence on April 5 in Pocatello, Idaho. In this image taken from video, police are seen shortly before opening fire Victor Perez on the other side of a fence on April 5 in Pocatello, Idaho. AP Photo/Brad Andres via AP Why It Matters This lawsuit could impact how police handle situations involving people who find it more difficult to advocate for themselves. What To Know On April 5, Pocatello police were called to Perez's family home as he was having a violent outburst. This was not the first time they had been called to his home due to his behavioral struggles, and according to the lawsuit, they had paperwork noting Perez's intellectual and physical disabilities. Footage released by police of the incident shows officers arriving to his home, guns drawn. Footage then shows police yelling at Perez several times to "drop the knife." In the video, Perez is on the ground but then stands up to take a step towards police, who were on the other side of a chain fence. This is when police opened fire on Perez, who according to local news station KTVB not only had several disabilities but also did not understand English, shooting him multiple times. The video released by police also includes the 911 call from the neighbor who said: "He is trying to stab everyone, it looks like." The caller then says, "This guy, he seems pretty drunk." The caller may not have known about Perez's disabilities. The footage does not show police attempting to use de-escalation tactics or any other form of non-lethal violence prevention. Police told KTVB at the time that they were not made aware that Perez was having a mental health crisis. However, the family's lawyers are now saying the police had records of his mental and physical state. Perez was rushed to hospital after being shot nine times and had operations including an amputation to remove the bullets. However, doctors could not save his life, and Perez was taken off life support. The footage was released by Pocatello Mayor Brian Blad in order to answer public questions about how the shooting occurred. PPD Chief Roger Schei said at the time: "The risk [to the police officers] was immediate," as justification for the shooting. However, Burris is saying the potential risk posed by Perez still disregards the ADA given the police department's prior knowledge of Perez's disabilities. Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN), a nonprofit advocacy organization, has spoken out against the use of "autism training" for police officers, saying "an hour of learning about autism cannot overcome months of training that teaches police that in uncertain situations, the first thing they should do is escalate force to exert control." "There have been cases where police who have been through autism-specific training still went on to shoot and kill autistic people they were called to help." Zoe Gross, director of ASAN, told Newsweek: "There are several steps we as a society can take to stop police violence against disabled people. We can reduce the likelihood that disabled people will have contact with police by promoting alternatives to policing. This may look like funding crisis intervention teams staffed with EMTs, social workers and mental health professionals. "These teams can respond to calls involving people in crisis or distress instead of sending police to intervene in these situations. Other alternatives to policing include peer respite and counseling, safe consumption sites, and housing and food assistance. All these alternatives must receive adequate funding, and one step towards that is to reduce the share of municipal funds that police departments currently receive." What People Are Saying Zoe Gross, director of Advocacy at the Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN), told Newsweek: "We must increase community oversight of police forces and make it easier to hold police accountable for violence by ending the policy of qualified immunity, which makes it very difficult to sue when police harm someone. People who want to see less police violence can advocate for policy changes like these." Gross added: "Police often profile or target autistic people, especially Black autistics and other autistic people of color. They may claim that someone with auditory processing issues is 'refusing to follow commands' that they do not understand; that someone who cannot speak is refusing to cooperate; or that someone making repetitive movements is making threatening gestures or is drunk or high. When autistic people do not understand or cannot follow a police officer's instructions, or moves in a way that police perceive as erratic or threatening, police may immediately escalate to using force, including sometimes killing the autistic person." Attorney John Burris told the press: "[Officers] arrived on the scene just like gangbusters and within moments, not minutes, not hours, no effort to give the young man any opportunity to locate where he was or to self-identify with these officers; They shot and killed him." Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador told the media at the time of the shooting: "As with all such matters, the Office of the Attorney General will conduct a thorough and impartial review once the Eastern Idaho Critical Incident Task Force completes its investigation." What Happens Next? The police in this lawsuit may receive additional legal aid due to the Trump administration, as President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing the Justice Department to explore a program that could involve law firms providing pro bono assistance to police officers accused of wrongdoing.
Axios
6 hours ago
- Axios
Axios Explains: Inside ICE's superpowers
The images of masked, heavily armed immigration agents snatching people off the streets and taking them away in unmarked cars have shocked many Americans — and led to a simple question: Is all of this legal? It is — at least for now. Why it matters: Since Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was created after the 9/11 attacks, its agents have operated with vastly more enforcement power, less transparency and fewer guardrails than local police. ICE's rules were designed largely to give the agency broad leeway in helping the FBI identify and arrest domestic terror suspects. Now the Trump administration is using that power to go after unauthorized immigrants — potentially millions of them — with a frequency and aggressiveness that has sent ripples through communities nationwide. Zoom in: Under Trump, critics say, ICE has become the closest thing the U.S. has to a secret police force. ICE agents aren't required to wear body cameras, can cover their faces, don't have to provide badge numbers or identify themselves, can arrive in unmarked cars and don't need a warrant from a judge to detain someone. Like those with other federal enforcement agencies, they can ignore rules that govern local police departments, particularly those local agencies with histories of abuse or that operate under court-imposed restrictions on racial profiling. In some cases, ICE agents can even arrest U.S. citizens — but they aren't supposed toplace them in immigration detention units. Even so, a few U.S. citizens have been detained in recent ICE raids because of agents' mistakes or negligence. Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin has defended ICE agents' tactics and the covering of their faces, saying in a statement that they're "facing a 500% increase in assaults against them while carrying out enforcement operations." She blamed Democrats for "violent rhetoric" against ICE agents. Critics say there's no evidence of a 500% increase in assaults on ICE agents, and that agents still should follow the law. "The tactics are causing fear in our communities," Vanessa Cárdenas of the advocacy group America's Voice told Axios. Zoom out: ICE was formed in 2003. It was placed under the control of the new Department of Homeland Security and replaced the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), which had been under the Justice Department. To protect national security after the terror attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, lawmakers gave ICE a unique combination of civil and criminal authorities. ICE initially didn't have the reputation of INS (known as " La Migra" to Latinos), but that changed under President Obama, when ICE expanded its operations to help carry out one of the largest deportations of unauthorized immigrants in decades. Immigrant rights groups began an "Abolish ICE" movement in 2018 — during President Trump's first term — as activists tried to bring attention to the agency's secretive tactics, which went unnoticed by most Americans. What can ICE do ICE is tasked with enforcing the nation's immigration laws anywhere within the nation's interior (the Border Patrol's jurisdiction is 100 miles into the interior, from any land or maritime border). ICE agents can arrest anyone they suspect of being in the U.S. illegally. They can arrest U.S. citizens only if they see them "breaking laws." To conduct raids or operations targeting suspects, ICE agents only need an "administrative warrant" — a warrant signed by a supervisor, not a judge, Rebekah Wolf, director of the American Immigration Council's Immigration Justice Campaign, tells Axios. ICE agents can conceal their identities and refuse any request to disclose their personal information. This has led to conflicts between people ICE agents have encountered, as well as allegations by Trump's administration that protesters have tried to dox agents involved in raids. Wolf said officers in other agencies are required to identify themselves and provide badge numbers to prevent impersonators. ICE has no such requirement, and there have been reports of ICE impersonators harassing people, creating more chaos and uncertainty in some communities. ICE doesn't have to collect evidence for cases and has few parameters around its use of force. Because it's such a young agency, it hasn't faced many lawsuits and court challenges to its use-of-force policies, unlike other federal agencies such as the FBI, the Forest Service or the Bureau of Indian Affairs. That's resulted in few directives aimed at limiting ICE agents' tactics. ICE units can conduct pre-dawn raids, unannounced entries (with judicial or administrative warrants), and surveillance without many of the public accountability rules that serve as checks on local authorities. What ICE can't do ICE agents can't enter a private home unless they have a judicial warrant. They still must adhere to the Constitution regarding the search and seizure limits protecting U.S. citizens. Although ICE isn't supposed to place U.S. citizens in immigration detention, Cárdenas says its agents have been detaining U.S.-born Latinos and dismissing their proof of citizenship as fake before eventually letting them go. This has led to allegations of racial profiling. ICE did not immediately respond for comment on these episodes. ICE also can't force a local law enforcement agency to join an operation, but police are obligated to keep order if protesters surround and ICE operation. The accountability question Allegations of abuse by ICE agents rarely are investigated because they typically involve immigrants who are removed from the U.S., Wolf said. Any internal investigations are conducted by the DHS's Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, or the department's inspector general. Joseph V. Cuffari, DHS's inspector general, was appointed by Trump during the president's first term and was not among the IGs Trump fired after taking office this year. Public accountability is limited for ICE agents — there are no regular civilian review boards and typically no body camera footage to use as evidence. What we're watching: Some immigration advocates and Democrats in Congress want to reduce ICE's powers. U.S. Rep. Lou Correa (D-Calif.) has introduced legislation to prohibit ICE agents from wearing masks.
New York Post
6 hours ago
- New York Post
Americans at risk ‘anywhere' after 6 illegal immigrants are charged in mother's murder: congressman
A South Carolina congressman is warning of threats that face Americans 'anywhere' after four years of an open border following the random murder of a Lancaster mom of two last month. The comments come after Lancaster authorities charged six illegal immigrants, between the ages of 13 and 21, in connection with Larisha Thompson's May 2 murder. Advertisement She was shot to death while driving to meet friends in Rock Hill. 'Two children will not have a mother to come home to,' Republican South Carolina Rep. Ralph Norman told Fox News Digital in a phone interview. 'It can happen anywhere, at any time. That's the sad part. We've seen it all over the country.' He added that while Laken Riley, the Augusta University student killed by illegal Venezuelan migrant Jose Ibarra in February 2024, has become 'the face' of crimes committed by those living illegally in the United States, there are similar victims in states across the country, including Thompson and others, such as Lizbeth Medina, Jocelyn Nungaray, Rachel Morin and Kayla Hamilton. 'The positive thing is: the border's secure now, but you've got to realize: four years of leaving the doors open to over 160 countries to put criminals and anybody else that wanted to come into the country,' Norman said. 'You wouldn't open your house up like that. Yet the Democrats are still not condemning what Joe Biden intentionally did. But it's a new day, and hopefully, [it is] going to be straightened out in time.' Advertisement 7 Larisha Thompson was shot to death while driving to meet friends in Rock Hill on May 2, 2025. Family handout Lancaster County Sheriff's Office deputies located Thompson, 40, deceased with a gunshot wound behind the wheel of her vehicle on Riverside Road in Lancaster, which is located about an hour south of Charlotte, North Carolina. On May 12, authorities announced the arrests of three adults – Asael Aminadas Torres-Chirinos, 21, Jarby Ardon Ramos-Odari, 18, and Jeyson Sobied Pineda-Salgado, 17 – and three juveniles, ages 13, 14 and 15, in connection with Thompson's death and a separate burglary that occurred on April 30. 'The unknown is what we fear,' Norman said when asked about people with criminal intentions who may have crossed illegally into the United States during the Biden administration. 'When you hear [FBI Director] Kash Patel talk about threats… the fact is that they're doing their best, but… we don't know who's here. And we're getting a lot of them out, but there's still the unknown of who's left here. And that's the problem. How many more deaths do we have to have that are just so senseless?' Advertisement 7 Jarby Ardon Ramos-Odari. Lancaster Co. Sheriff's Office 7 Rep. Ralph Norman arrives for a meeting at the Capitol Building on May 20, 2025. Getty Images Norman said he hopes prosecutors pursue the death penalty against the adult suspects accused of murdering Thompson. 'South Carolina is a great state,' Norman said, but added that people have 'got to be aware' and 'diligent.' Advertisement Lancaster Sheriff Barry Faile said Thompson's 'shooting defies any sense of decency in a civilized society,' during a May press conference. 'Ms. Thompson was going about her business on a Friday night, not bothering anyone. All of a sudden, these six men and boys – out to get something for nothing from someone they did not know and had no business bothering – pulled alongside her car, and Torres-Chirinos opened fire, killing Ms. Thompson,' Faile said at the time. 'There's no place in our society for acts like this or the people who commit them, and my hope is these six are never again among us.' The Department of Homeland Security has placed detainers on all six individuals charged, Faile said during a press conference, adding that the community is a 'much safer place today because these six individuals are off the streets.' Faile alleged that the suspects pulled up alongside Thompson and fatally shot her in what authorities described as a 'random robbery attempt.' Authorities believe the other five suspects were in the vehicle with Torres-Chirinos, who was driving and allegedly fired the fatal shot at Thompson. They are accused of attempting to enter her vehicle and then fleeing the scene upon realizing that it was locked. On April 30, deputies were dispatched to the Van Wyck Mart at 644 Rock Hill Highway before 8 a.m. to investigate a burglary. The store owner told deputies that surveillance video footage showed several young men trying to get into the store around 10:30 p.m. on April 29. When they could not get inside, they allegedly broke open a door on the northwest corner of the building, which opened up to a bathroom that had access to the inside of the store. The suspects are also accused of firing a handgun at a security camera and the bathroom door. Detectives collected ballistics evidence at the scene. 7 Jeyson Sobied Pineda-Salgado. Lancaster Co. Sheriff's Office Advertisement 7 Asael Aminadas Torres-Chirinos. Lancaster Co. Sheriff's Office The store the suspects allegedly broke into and the location of Thompson's murder are a seven-minute drive apart. Detectives determined that ballistic evidence recovered from the scene of the murder came from the same 9 mm handgun used at the burglary days before. Through digital surveillance, investigators also identified Torres-Chirinos at the scene of both crimes. They questioned him at the sheriff's office on May 8, and by the end of that day, they had identified, located and detained the five additional suspects. Advertisement 7 Mom Larisha Sharell Thompson was found dead in her car on May 2, 2025. 7 Lancaster officials announce the charges against the six illegal immigrants in the murder of Thompson. Fox News The three adult suspects are charged with murder, attempted armed robbery and second-degree burglary. Authorities believe Torres-Chirinos fired the handgun in both incidents, and he is charged with two counts of firearms possession during the commission of a crime and one count of firearms possession by an unlawful alien. A judge denied bond for all three men. Advertisement The three juvenile suspects are also charged with murder, attempted armed robbery and second-degree burglary. All six suspects are subject to removal from the United States under federal immigration law based on their immigration status, the sheriff's office said. Thompson's family is 'grieving and trying to get their heads around how something like this could happen,' Faile added.
