KIIT's unlawful acts led to suicides: UGC panel
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
"
Along with these findings, the committee has issued a set of strong recommendations, based on which the commission is contemplating a freeze on the university's expansion and departmental action against erring officials, among others. The UGC committee, chaired by Professor Nageshwar Rao, submitted its report on May 20, 2025, after campus visits, stakeholder interactions, and detailed analysis.
The report cited the university's failure to act lawfully on sexual harassment complaints, inadequate hostel facilities, excessive student intake, and use of brute force on students as key failings contributing to the incidents.
The committee's observations and findings include serious lapses in infrastructure and governance. It found that hostel facilities were "substandard" with "three students put in a small room" and female international students accommodated without cultural considerations. It also noted that complaints of sexual harassment were ignored or illegally compromised, that the administration forcibly removed Nepalese students without support, and that security personnel used physical aggression against students.
The university, it said, prioritised its "reputation of university over regulations, law of land and international relations of the country."
Observing that members of the internal complaints committee (ICC) and senior administrative personnel of the university "are liable for criminal punishment as per law", the report stated, "... university's internal complaints committee (ICC) failed to take lawful action in reported sexual harassment cases.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
There was no transparency that protocols for investigation were followed. The girl had made complaints to the administration twice much before this tragic incident.
In both the complaints, they decided to go for illegal compromise... The university has the power to punish the boy even when the first complaint was lodged. Instead of punishment, they favoured the boy by pushing forced illegal compromise with the girl.
Later on, this has led to suicide. This suicide case could have been averted."
On Feb 16, Prakriti Lamsal, a third-year BTech student from Nepal, was found dead in her hostel room. The report also called for departmental action against ICC members who acted in violation of rules. "Had KIIT University taken action to decide the reported harassment case as per law in the first case, the tragedy could have been avoided," the report stated.
On May 2, another Nepalese undergraduate student was found dead in her hostel room at KIIT.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Univs sensitise students, faculty, staff on POSH Act
1 2 Bhubaneswar: In the wake of a college student's self-immolation in Balasore over alleged sexual harassment by her head of department, state govt has urged universities and colleges to intensify awareness about the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, or POSH Act and measures to lodge complaints. Universities have started holding meetings, workshops and seminars to sensitise students, staff and other stakeholders to create safe campuses for women. While some of them have already conducted sensitisation programmes, others plan to carry out such activities. Utkal University on Friday conducted a seminar-cum-workshop on the POSH Act to raise awareness about workplace rights while promoting a safer, gender-sensitive environment within the academic space. Jointly hosted by the internal complaints committee (ICC) and the Post Graduate Council, experts explained the institutional framework and responsibilities of the ICC in handling harassment cases. They emphasised the importance of timely redressal and institutional support for complainants. Sambalpur University conducted a workshop on the Act this week, where experts highlighted different forms of harassment, including visual, verbal and non-verbal, and spoke on inappropriate behaviour such as unwanted messages and comments on appearance. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Passive Income Ideas Sitting at Home Mone Undo "We are planning to organise another workshop in Aug. Besides, we have strengthened the CCTV surveillance system, ensured proper lighting on the campus and a robust grievance redressal mechanism," said vice-chancellor Bidhu Bhusan Mishra. On July 22, a gender sensitisation workshop was organised by the ICC of Fakir Mohan University, Balasore, to raise awareness and understanding about gender discrimination and create a more sensitive and inclusive environment. "There is a dire need to eradicate all forms of gender bias and foster a culture of mutual respect on the campus," said VC Santosh Kumar Tripathy. Berhampur University also conducted an awareness meeting on the POSH Act on July 19. The university has decided to hold a sensitisation meeting on the Act every quarter, involving students and teachers. It has installed complaint boxes in different departments, hostels and other places and urged students to lodge their grievances.
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Woman arrested for jewellery shop theft
1 2 Hyderabad: Suryapet police arrested a woman on Sunday who was part of a seven-person gang in connection with the burglary of Santoshi Jewellers in Suryapet a week ago. The arrested accused was M Yashoda from Khammam. Officials recovered 14 tolas of stolen gold from her. Police said that three Nepalese nationals — Prakash Anil Kumar, Kadak Singh and an unknown person — and three other individuals from Jharkhand — B Amar and two others — remain at large. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad According to police, following the jewellery store burglary, the accused travelled to Khammam, where they met Yashoda and gave her 14 tolas of gold for her expenses. Prakash, the prime accused, came to Khammam several months ago and met his friend Kadak Singh. It was through Kadak Singh that Prakash was introduced to Yashoda, and they got into a relationship. She had previously assisted the two accused in committing thefts at banks and jewellery shops. Police said they were also previously charged in two other cases. The police said that the accused had conspired to commit an offence in Suryapet because no one recognised them there. Under the pretext of setting up an eatery, they rented a house close to a jewellery store. They conducted recce of the store for several days and committed the offence on July 21. They gained entry by making a hole in the washroom attached to the jewellery store. They then used a gas cutter to enter the storeroom where the ornaments were kept and stole about 2.5kg gold.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Delhi High Court upholds action against assistant professor at DU in sexual harassment case
The Delhi High Court has upheld the compulsory retirement of an assistant professor of political science in Delhi University's Bharati College over multiple allegations of sexual harassment by students. The Court described the accused's conduct as 'so profane' that it refrained from reproducing in its judgment the objectionable messages he sent to the complainants. In the July 17 judgment, Justice Subramonium Prasad observed that, 'Teachers shape the career of young aspiring students for a better future... The act of sexual harassment done by these very teachers, who are considered our guides and mentors, against young female students who have just attained majority, has a deleterious effect on the psyche of such students.' The accused had challenged the orders of compulsory retirement issued by the college's governing body in December 2020. Four complaints were filed against him — three by current students of Bharati College and one by a former student — alleging sexual innuendoes/advances through Facebook chats and WhatsApp messages. The complaints surfaced in February 2018, shortly after a video of students confronting the professor about his conduct became public. The video sparked student protests and demands for an inquiry. The matter was referred to the college's Internal Complaints Committee (ICC), in line with the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act), and UGC regulations. The Court noted that the ICC's inquiry report of August 28, 2018, found all charges against the professor to be substantiated through both documentary and oral evidence. 'The testimony of each of the complainants remained unimpeached and resultantly, this Court finds no reason to question the veracity of the ICC's analysis of the evidence and statements,' the Court held. The Court rejected the professor's arguments of procedural impropriety, noting that it found no violation of rules in how the ICC was constituted or how the inquiry was conducted.
