
AI video becomes more convincing, rattling creative industry
To measure the progress of AI video, you need only look at Will Smith eating spaghetti.
Since 2023, this unlikely sequence – entirely fabricated – has become a technological benchmark for the industry.
Two years ago, the actor appeared blurry, his eyes too far apart, his forehead exaggeratedly protruding, his movements jerky, and the spaghetti didn't even reach his mouth.
The version published a few weeks ago by a user of Google's Veo 3 platform showed no apparent flaws whatsoever.
"Every week, sometimes every day, a different one comes out that's even more stunning than the next," said Elizabeth Strickler, a professor at Georgia State University.
Between Luma Labs' Dream Machine launched in June 2024, OpenAI's Sora in December, Runway AI's Gen-4 in March 2025, and Veo 3 in May, the sector has crossed several milestones in just a few months.
Runway has signed deals with Lionsgate studio and AMC Networks television group.
Lionsgate vice president Michael Burns told New York Magazine about the possibility of using artificial intelligence to generate animated, family-friendly versions from films like the John Wick or Hunger Games franchises, rather than creating entirely new projects.
"Some use it for storyboarding or previsualisation" – steps that come before filming – "others for visual effects or inserts," said Jamie Umpherson, Runway's creative director.
Burns gave the example of a script for which Lionsgate has to decide whether to shoot a scene or not.
To help make that decision, they can now create a 10-second clip "with 10,000 soldiers in a snowstorm."
That kind of pre-visualisation would have cost millions before.
In October, the first AI feature film was released – Where The Robots Grow – an animated film without anything resembling live action footage.
For Alejandro Matamala Ortiz, Runway's co-founder, an AI-generated feature film is not the end goal, but a way of demonstrating to a production team that "this is possible".
'Resistance everywhere'
Still, some see an opportunity.
In March, startup Staircase Studio made waves by announcing plans to produce seven to eight films per year using AI for less than US$500,000 (RM2.11mil) each, while ensuring it would rely on unionised professionals wherever possible.
"The market is there," said Andrew White, co-founder of small production house Indie Studios.
People "don't want to talk about how it's made", White pointed out. "That's inside baseball. People want to enjoy the movie because of the movie."
But White himself refuses to adopt the technology, considering that using AI would compromise his creative process.
Jamie Umpherson argues that AI allows creators to stick closer to their artistic vision than ever before, since it enables unlimited revisions, unlike the traditional system constrained by costs.
"I see resistance everywhere" to this movement, observed Georgia State's Strickler.
This is particularly true among her students, who are concerned about AI's massive energy and water consumption as well as the use of original works to train models, not to mention the social impact.
But refusing to accept the shift is "kind of like having a business without having the Internet", she said. "You can try for a little while."
In 2023, the American actors' union SAG-AFTRA secured concessions on the use of their image through AI.
Strickler sees AI diminishing Hollywood's role as the arbiter of creation and taste, instead allowing more artists and creators to reach a significant audience.
Runway's founders, who are as much trained artists as they are computer scientists, have gained an edge over their AI video rivals in film, television, and advertising.
But they're already looking further ahead, considering expansion into augmented reality and virtual reality – for example creating a metaverse where films could be shot.
"The most exciting applications aren't necessarily the ones that we have in mind," said Umpherson. "The ultimate goal is to see what artists do with technology." – AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Google says discord over search results is unresolved; risks EU antitrust fine
FILE PHOTO: A Google logo is seen at a company research facility in Mountain View, California, U.S., May 13, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo BRUSSELS (Reuters) -Alphabet's Google said it failed this week to resolve disagreements with hotels, airlines and specialised search services such as Skyscanner over how it presents search results, putting it at risk of a hefty European Union antitrust fine. The U.S. tech giant held a July 7-8 workshop with critics to address EU antitrust charges of unfairly favouring its own services such as Google Shopping, Google Hotels and Google Flights over competitors. The landmark Digital Markets Act seeks to rein in the power of Big Tech, with violations subject to fines as much as 10% of a company's global annual revenue. Google offered two options at the workshop, likely the last of several before the commission issues a decision on the company's compliance in the coming months. In both options, vertical search service (VSS) such as Skyscanner, Kelkoo and would get a box at the top of the search page while hotels, restaurants and airlines would be ranked below them. "Competing interests continue to pull us in different directions," Google's lawyer Oliver Bethell wrote in a blogpost on LinkedIn on Wednesday. "While we have invited feedback throughout this process, we now need to bring this debate to an end without the interests of a few being prioritised over the millions of people and businesses in Europe who benefit from Search." Skyscanner said Google's proposals need more work. "The latest options on the table introduce significant changes, some of which risk misleading consumers and cementing Google's position at the top of organic results," its CEO Bryan Batista told Reuters. Thomas Hoppner, a lawyer at Geradin Partners who advises some of Google's complainants, was equally critical. "Google is shifting the focus to alleged tensions between direct suppliers and intermediaries, diverting attention from the root issue: its own non-compliance, which created these tensions in the first place," he said. (Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; Editing by Richard Chang)


The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
Nvidia-backed Perplexity launches AI-powered browser to take on Google Chrome
FILE PHOTO: Perplexity AI logo is seen in this illustration taken January 4, 2024. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo (Reuters) -Nvidia-backed Perplexity AI said on Wednesday it has launched Comet, a new web browser with AI-powered search capabilities, as the startup looks to challenge the dominance of market leader Alphabet's Google Chrome. The launch marks Perplexity AI's entry into the competitive browser market, aiming to replace traditional navigation with agentic AI that can think, act, and decide on behalf of users. Google Chrome held a commanding 68% share of the global browser market in June, according to StatCounter, cementing its position as the world's most widely used browser—far ahead of Safari, Microsoft Edge, and Firefox. Comet enables users to ask questions, perform tasks, and conduct research in a single, unified interface. The browser integrates a built-in assistant that can compare products, summarize content, book meetings, and transform complex workflows into simple, conversational experiences. Comet is currently available to subscribers who pay $200 per month for Perplexity Max, with broader access rolling out via invite over the summer. Backed by high-profile investors like Jeff Bezos, SoftBank, and Nvidia, Perplexity is leveraging the launch of Comet to directly challenge incumbents such as Google's Chrome and Microsoft's Edge, while also exploring new revenue streams in advertising and e-commerce. Last year, OpenAI added a search engine to ChatGPT and recently made the service available to all of its users. Google also introduced an AI-powered search feature, called AI Overviews, last May. Comet stores data locally and avoids model training on personal information—a move likely to appeal to privacy-conscious users. However, the company has come under criticism from media organizations such as News Corp-owned outlets, Forbes and Wired, and Wall Street Journal parent Dow Jones for using their content without consent or compensation. Perplexity has responded by launching a publisher partnership program to collaborate with news outlets. (Reporting by Akash Sriram in Bengaluru; Editing by Tasim Zahid)


The Sun
9 hours ago
- The Sun
Musk's AI firm deletes Grok posts after antisemitism criticism
WASHINGTON: Billionaire Elon Musk's artificial intelligence startup on Wednesday removed posts made by its chatbot Grok on X after it came under fire for antisemitic content. 'We are aware of recent posts made by Grok and are actively working to remove the inappropriate posts,' said a post attributed to the AI system on Musk's social media platform X, where the bot can be accessed. 'Since being made aware of the content, xAI has taken action to ban hate speech before Grok posts on X.' The firm said xAI was training the bot for 'only truth-seeking' and thanked its users for helping the company identify the inappropriate posts. Screenshots posted on X showed several posts made by the bot in which it praised Adolf Hitler, and claimed Jews promoted 'anti-white hate.' The chatbot, developed by Musk's company xAI, was criticised by Jewish activist group Anti-Defamation League (ADL) for answering multiple user prompts with the questionable posts. 'What we are seeing from Grok LLM right now is irresponsible, dangerous and antisemitic, plain and simple,' the ADL said on X. 'This supercharging of extremist rhetoric will only amplify and encourage the antisemitism that is already surging on X and many other platforms.' Musk has not commented on the controversy, but posted Wednesday: 'Never a dull moment on this platform.' Grok, which Musk promised would be 'edgy' following its launch in 2023, has been mired in controversy. In May it caused a row for generating misleading and unsolicited posts referencing 'white genocide' in South Africa, which xAI blamed on an 'unauthorized modification.' – AFP