
Can PM turn diplomatic work with Macron into concrete action on migration?
That story - the conflict and a historic Anglo-French agreement that ended centuries of feuding, the Entente Cordiale - adorn the walls of this great hall.
Looming over the hundreds of MPs and peers who had gathered in the heat to hear the French president speak, hang two monumental paintings depicting British victories in the Napoleonic wars, while the glass stand in the room commemorates the 408 Lords who lost their lives fighting for Europe in two world wars.
The French president came to parliament as the first European leader to be honoured with a state visit since Brexit.
It was the first address of a French president to parliament since 2008, and Mr Macron used it to mark what he called a new era in Anglo-Franco relations.
7:22
Peers and MPs cheered with delight when he confirmed France would loan the Bayeux Tapestry to the UK in the run-up to the anniversary of William the Conqueror's birthday.
"I have to say, it took properly more years to deliver that project than all the Brexit texts," he joked as former prime minister Theresa May watched on from the front row
From Brexit to migration, European security, to a two-state solution and the recognition of Palestine, Mr Macron did not shy away from thorny issues, as he turned the page on Brexit tensions woven through Anglo-French relations in recent years, in what one peer described to me as a "very political speech rather than just the usual warm words".
He also used this address to praise Sir Keir Starmer, sitting in the audience, for his leadership on security and Ukraine, and his commitment to the international order and alliances forged from the ashes of the Second World War. For that, he received a loud ovation from the gathered parliamentarians.
3:28
The test now for Sir Keir is whether he can turn his deft diplomatic work in recent months with Mr Macron into concrete action to give him a much-needed win on the domestic front, particularly after his torrid week on welfare.
The government hopes that France's aim for "cooperation and tangible results" at the upcoming political summit as part of this state visit, will give Starmer a much-needed boost.
The PM is attempting to drive-down crossings by negotiating a one-in one-out return treaty with France.
Under this plan, those crossing the Channel illegally will be sent back to France in exchange for Britain taking in an asylum seeker with a family connection in the UK.
But as I understand it, the deal is still in the balance, with some EU countries unhappy about France and the UK agreeing on a bilateral deal.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rayner backs down in Islamophobia free speech row
Angela Rayner has backed down on 'secretive' plans for a new definition of Islamophobia after free speech campaigners threatened legal action. The Deputy Prime Minister has expanded and extended a public consultation over the proposals, which critics fear will rubber-stamp a controversial definition. The consultation will now run for an extra week and a link for responses to the plans has been made public. The move followed complaints by the Free Speech Union (FSU), which said the new definition was being drawn up behind closed doors. The FSU wrote to Ms Rayner expressing concern that the process would enshrine a definition which treats Islamophobia as a type of racism. The definition has been criticised for being so expansive that it could threaten free speech, act as a de facto blasphemy law and stifle legitimate criticism of Islam as a religion. In his letter, Lord Young, the general secretary of the FSU, said the consultation questions appeared to be 'heavily weighted' in favour of a 'predetermined outcome', endorsing a definition 'closely aligned' with that put forward by the all party parliamentary group (APPG) on British Muslims. The APPG definition was adopted by Labour and stated that 'Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness'. Lord Young said key groups that might challenge the definition over its impact on free speech and provide alternative views had not been invited to submit evidence. He listed Christian Concern, the Christian Institute, the Adam Smith Institute, and the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Ms Rayner's department has extended the deadline to July 20 and widened the consultees. Lord Young said it needed to give sufficient time to take on board all the responses to the plan. Lord Young said: 'I'm glad the working group has abandoned its plans to confine its consultation to a small group of hand-picked activists in response to my letter. 'But given that the group will now be carrying out a proper consultation and extending the deadline, I trust it will delay coming up with a definition of Islamophobia until it has had a proper chance to consider all the responses. 'Hoping to complete its work within a couple of months is now completely unrealistic.' A spokesman for Ms Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: 'The independent working group is listening to a broad range of views and perspectives. 'The call for evidence will enable them to build on the extensive consultation already undertaken, ensuring the advice provided to Government reflects diverse experiences and opinions, while also safeguarding our vital and unwavering right to freedom of speech.'


Sky News
38 minutes ago
- Sky News
Ex-Tory chairman Sir Jake Berry defects to Reform
Former Tory chairman Sir Jake Berry has defected to Reform, in the latest blow to the Conservatives. The former MP for Rossendale and Darwen, who served as Northern Powerhouse minister under Boris Johnson, said he had defected to Nigel Farage's party because the Tories had "lost their way".


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Boys are falling behind at school — could mentors be the answer?
Boys need mentors including workmen and Scout leaders to boost their attainment, a new think tank has suggested. In a parliamentary debate on boys' education on Thursday, it will call for a minister for boys as well as a new strategy to tackle the problem. Boys do worse than girls at almost every subject and level at school and this is too readily accepted, according to the Centre for Policy Research on Men and Boys. • Classroom crisis: number of male secondary teachers at record low A briefing sent to MPs before the debate, which will be led by Sam Rushworth, Labour MP for Bishop Auckland, says that boys' underperformance at school is ignored and there should be a campaign to boost results. Girls achieve on average higher grades than boys in primary school tests, GCSEs, A-levels and first-class degrees, although slightly more boys attain A*s, the top grade at A-level. The think tank's trustees include Professor Sir Michael Marmot, professor of epidemiology at University College London; Professor Roger Kirby, former president of the Royal Society of Medicine; and Dr Anna Machin, an anthropologist who has written books on fatherhood. The organisation wants a full research programme on the reasons for boys' and young men's relative underperformance, a strategy and plan to address this and for the government and local authorities to work with civic organisations such as the Scouts and cadets to increase boys' membership. It said: 'There should be a nationwide campaign and strategic project to encourage and increase the number of male mentors available to young men and boys whether through schools, including more male teachers … or [with] relatable leaders such as tradespeople or community leaders.' Previously the government ran the campaign This Girl Can to get more girls into sport, and the think tank called for a similar initiative for boys, which could give them careers advice, including routes into under-represented careers for men such as health and social care and education. The briefing says: 'Policymakers including governments at all levels should talk up young men and boys to give them confidence. There should be a ministerial role with explicit responsibility for improving boys' educational attainment. 'The level of under-attainment and disengagement is impacting on the economy and wider society and will impact on the government's plans for a national employment rate of 80 per cent.' Mark Brooks, director of policy at the think tank, said that it was important to raise the profile of the 'politically under-recognised issue'. He added: 'Boys are behind girls at every stage of education and it seems to have been accepted as normal with little in the way of research and solutions. We would like to see a full strategy to find out the causes with a plan to boost boys' results. This can be included in the government's schools white paper, due in the autumn.' Brooks also called for a campaign to give boys confidence and skills in finding jobs and careers, plus a national scheme for increasing male mentors, particularly those without male role models in the home. Teachers and head teachers have urged the government to fund September's pay rise fully. In May, the government accepted the recommendations of the School Teachers' Review Body to raise the salaries of teachers and school leaders in England by 4 per cent from September. Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, said schools would have to find about 1 per cent of the pay awards themselves 'through improved productivity and smarter spending'. In a joint response to Phillipson, four education unions have set out their 'united view' on the need for the government to provide additional investment to fully fund the pay increase for the next academic year. The National Education Union, the National Association of Head Teachers, the Association of School and College Leaders and Community said: 'Investing in the improvements needed to teacher and school leader pay and conditions is vital to tackling the recruitment and retention crisis.' They warned against creating a 'false trade-off' between teacher pay and reductions in support for pupils.