North Korea Warns US Over Strategic Bombers Near Airspace
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
North Korea has accused the United States of threatening regional peace by deploying strategic bombers for a trilateral exercise over the Korean Peninsula last week.
The drill—which involved aircraft from the U.S., Japan and South Korea—showed collective ability to respond immediately to regional security challenges, according to the U.S. military.
Why It Matters
North Korea is one of nine nuclear-armed nations, with an estimated 50 warheads and long-range missiles capable of delivering nuclear strikes against the U.S. mainland. Kim Jong Un, the country's leader, has vowed to pursue the "unlimited expansion" of his nuclear arsenal.
Facing North Korea's growing threats, Japan and South Korea are under the protection of U.S. extended deterrence—also known as the nuclear umbrella—which refers to the pledge to deter and respond to nuclear threats, including through the use of U.S. nuclear weapons.
What To Know
A pair of American B-52H bombers was escorted by two Japanese F-2 fighter aircraft and two South Korean KF-16 fighter jets during a trilateral flight on Friday, according to the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command. It was the third such flight between the allies this year.
Fighter aircraft from Japan and South Korea escort two U.S. B-52H bombers over the East China Sea on July 11, 2025.
Fighter aircraft from Japan and South Korea escort two U.S. B-52H bombers over the East China Sea on July 11, 2025.
South Korean Air Force
The B-52H bomber is capable of carrying up to 70,000 pounds of ordnance, such as bombs and missiles, the U.S. Air Force says. According to the Federation of American Scientists, 46 of the 76 B-52H bombers are nuclear-capable, while the rest are conventionally armed only.
It was not immediately clear whether the U.S. bombers that participated in the allied drill were nuclear-capable. Each nuclear-armed B-52H aircraft can carry up to 20 AGM-86B air-launched cruise missiles for nuclear strikes, the Federation of American Scientists added.
According to the Japanese and South Korean defense ministries, the flight was conducted over the East China Sea, west of Japan's Kyushu Island and off the coast of South Korea's Jeju Island. Officially released photos show six allied military aircraft flying in formation.
In a statement released on Sunday, the chief of the Policy Office of North Korea's Defense Ministry claimed that joint military activities between the U.S. and its two allies are the "main danger factors" heightening the level of military tension on the Korean Peninsula.
"It is our just sovereign right to take countermeasures against provocative military actions such as the moves to strengthen the multilateral military alliance threatening the security of the region and the joint military drills with clear aggressive character," the statement warned.
North Korea's Defense Ministry also said that the country's armed forces remain in "constant military preparedness" to counter what it called "collective provocations" by the U.S. and its allies, deter their aggression, and respond to "acts of war."
Japanese and South Korean fighters are seen with American B-52H bombers over the East China Sea on July 11, 2025.
Japanese and South Korean fighters are seen with American B-52H bombers over the East China Sea on July 11, 2025.
South Korean Air Force
What People Are Saying
The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command said in a press release on Friday: "Our steadfast commitment fosters trust, strengthens cooperation, and reinforces the collective will and ability to maintain security and stability in the Indo-Pacific."
Japan's Joint Staff Office said in a press release on Saturday: "This exercise strongly promotes trilateral cooperation to respond to regional security challenges amid an increasingly severe security environment surrounding Japan, and demonstrates the strong commitment of the three countries to secure a free and open international order based on the rule of law."
South Korea's Defense Ministry said in a press release on Friday: "Based on close coordination, the three countries will cooperate to jointly deter and respond to North Korea's threats while continuing with three-way training."
The chief of the Policy Office of North Korea's Defense Ministry said in a statement in English on Sunday: "We express serious concern over [U.S., Japanese and South Korean] hostile acts of persistently conducting provocative and threatening military actions while deliberately ignoring the security concern of [North Korea] and strongly warn of the grave consequences to be entailed by them on the regional situation."
What Happens Next
It remains to be seen whether North Korea will take further action, such as firing ballistic missiles toward waters near Japan and South Korea, thereby showcasing its military capabilities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
15 minutes ago
- UPI
Trump threatens 100% secondary tariffs on Russia if no peace deal reached
July 14 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump warned Russia Monday that it may face "severe tariffs" if a peace deal with Ukraine isn't negotiated. Trump said the United States would impose 100% secondary tariffs on nations that engage in trade with Moscow. "We're very, very unhappy with them," Trump said. "And we're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days." Trump shared this during a meeting and press conference in the Oval Office Monday with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte in which he also explained how American weapons will now head to Ukraine. "We've made a deal today where we are going to be sending them weapons and they're going to be paying for them," Trump said, reiterating what he had said Sunday to the press at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on the same subject. "The United States will not be having any payment made," Trump added. "We're not buying it but we will manufacture it and they're going to be paying for it." Trump also explained some weaponry, including Patriot missile systems, will be in Ukraine "very soon, within days," and that the arms would first arrive in NATO countries before being transferred to Ukraine. Rutte added that the process will run through NATO's system, and that Ukraine will receive what it requires. "It will mean that Ukraine can get its hands on really massive numbers of military equipment," he explained. "For air defense, missiles, ammunition, etc." "So if I were Vladimir Putin today," Rutte continued, "I would reconsider if I should take negotiations with Ukraine more seriously."
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Billionaire Trump ally Marc Andreessen warns elite universities will ‘pay the price' for DEI
Billionaire Trump ally Marc Andreessen warned that elite universities like MIT and Stanford will have to 'pay the price' for DEI as he called for a 'counterattack' on educational institutions in a group chat with tech leaders and White House officials. 'I view Stanford and MIT as mainly political lobbying operations fighting American innovation at this point,' the co-founder of the Andreessen-Horowitz venture capital firm wrote, according to screenshots of messages sent May 3 and obtained by the Washington Post. 'The universities are at Ground Zero of the counterattack.' 5 Marc Andreessen warned that elite universities will have to 'pay the price' for DEI. REUTERS Andreessen, whose firm has $42 billion in assets under management, has donated millions of dollars to Stanford over the years. He blasted Stanford and other top universities for favoring DEI initiatives that bring in foreign students over US citizens — a sentiment shared by President Trump and Tesla founder Elon Musk. 'The combination of DEI and immigration is politically lethal. When these two forms of discrimination combine, as they have for the last 60 years and on hyperdrive for the last decade, they systematically cut most of the children of the Trump voter base out of any realistic prospect of access to higher education and corporate America,' Andreesseen wrote, according to the report. 'They declared war on 70% of the country and now they're going to pay the price.' The rapid-fire blast of texts were sent to a WhatsApp group used by Trump officials to discuss AI policy with tech leaders and academics, according to the Washington Post. A White House official told the Washington Post that members of the Trump administration participated in the chat in a personal capacity, that no official policy was discussed and that Andreessen was not an official adviser to the president. The White House did not immediately respond to The New York Post's request for comment. 5 The venture capitalist took aim at Stanford University, where he had long been a donor. JOHN G MABANGLO/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Andreessen deleted many of the messages after sending them, according to screenshots and two members of the text chat who spoke to the newspaper. In the group chat, Andreessen allegedly called for the National Science Foundation, an independent government agency that funds research, to receive 'the bureaucratic death penalty.' 'Raze it to the ground and start over,' He reportedly wrote. Andreessen claimed the agency had backed projects that censored American citizens online – taking a staunch free speech stance similar to Musk, who has loosened content restrictions on X and inspired similar moves from other tech leaders like Meta's Mark Zuckerberg. He also alleged Stanford had ousted his wife, Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen, from her role as chair of the university's philanthropy center. 5 President Trump has targeted universities, DEI, affirmative action and student visas. REUTERS '[T]hey forced my wife out of Stanford without a second thought, a decision that will cost them something like $5 billion in future donations,' Andreessen wrote, according to the screenshots. Representatives for Andreessen Horowitz, Arrillaga-Andreessen and Stanford did not immediately respond to The Post's requests for comment. 'MIT is merit-based and affordable, driven by innovation and entrepreneurship, and committed to excellence,' a university spokesperson told The Post, adding that MIT admits applicants prior to learning their financial circumstances. Some members of the chat found Andreessen's comments out of character for the group – which was often used to argue that a crackdown on immigration and attacks on universities could make it more difficult to attract and train top tech talent, the sources said. Andreessen argued that his 'cohort of citizens' had once been willing to accept diversity policies as the cost of past bigotry in the US, 'even though the discrimination was now aimed at us,' according to the text screenshots. 'The insanity of the last 8 years and in particular the summer of 2020, totally shredded that complacency…And so now my people are furious and not going to take it anymore.' 5 Marc Andreessen and his wife Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen at the 10th Breakthrough Prize Ceremony in April 2024. Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP Andreessen stopped using the group chat soon after his messages in May, according to the report. The group chat is moderated by Sriram Krishnan, a White House senior policy adviser on AI. He created the group before Trump's second term, while he was working as a partner at Andreessen's firm, according to the report. Some of the experts in the chat include Yann LeCun, Meta's chief AI scientist and NYU professor who supported Kamala Harris' presidential campaign; and Fei-Fei Li, a Stanford professor and robotics entrepreneur who worked with the Biden administration on government funding for AI projects. The group has recently debated the Trump administration's budget cuts to the NSF and whether export curbs should be placed on Chinese AI firm DeepSeek, two members of the chat told the news outlet. The tech industry has typically lobbied for research funding and high-skilled immigration policies, like permitting student visas. Andreessen has seemingly sided with Trump's approach – targeting universities, criticizing DEI and affirmative action, slashing research funds and moving to cancel student visas. 5 Students walk in front of a building on Massachusetts Institute of Technology's campus. Getty Images Andreessen has supported Democratic presidential candidates, including Hillary Clinton in 2016, as well as Republicans, like Mitt Romney in 2012. His firm endorsed Trump last July after the assassination attempt during a Butler, Pa. rally, arguing the Republican could help reverse harsh Biden-era policies that stifled tech advancements. Andreessen's firm also financially backed Musk's takeover of Twitter in 2022, saying it would encourage free speech.
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Trump reluctantly comes around to backing Ukraine. Will he stick with it?
(News Analysis) Nearly six months after his inauguration, when President Donald Trump pledged he would measure his success by 'the wars we end' and 'the wars we never get into,' he is adopting an approach toward Russia that on the surface looks much like his predecessor's: arming the Ukrainians to fight off an invasion. Trump came to this point in a circular fashion, and if these past few months are any indication, there is reason to doubt he will stick with it. A first test may come Monday and Tuesday, when Trump meets at the White House with the secretary-general of NATO, Mark Rutte, and is expected to formally announce new plans to route U.S. arms to Ukraine through European allies. He also appears to be moving to embrace new sanctions European leaders are pushing to put more pressure on President Vladimir Putin of Russia. The president is a late and very reluctant convert to the approach of trying to confront and isolate Putin. During last year's presidential campaign, Trump vowed a quick resolution of the war because he said he alone had the stature to deal with the Russian leader. Once he took office, he blamed the Ukrainians themselves for Russia's invasion of their own country. Then he clashed with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in an extraordinary Oval Office display, telling him, 'You don't have the cards.' He gave Russia a pass on tariffs and praised Putin for his strength, and provided assurance that Ukraine would never join NATO. Much of that is seemingly reversed, at least for now. The president said last week he was 'very strongly' considering backing a bipartisan Senate bill that would impose a new sanctions bill that would allow -- but not require -- Trump to impose 500% tariffs on any country purchasing Russian oil or gas. Trump also lifted a brief U.S. pause on delivering weapons to Ukraine. A plan hatched at the NATO summit in June to arm the Ukrainians by selling American weapons to the Europeans, who in turn would pass them on to Ukraine's beleaguered forces, is beginning to take shape. Speaking to reporters Sunday, the president said he planned to provide more Patriot missiles to Ukraine, stressing that the weaponry would be paid for, and that the nation was in 'desperate need' of it. 'Because Putin really surprised a lot of people,' Trump said. 'He talks nice and then he bombs everybody in the evening, but there's a little bit of a problem there. I don't like it.' The president, who has also complained privately to several associates that he believes Putin has strung him along, declared the other day that 'we get a lot of (obscenity) thrown at us by Putin.' That was a point that the foreign policy advisers around former President Joe Biden say they made, repeatedly, to Trump's incoming team. 'It's a welcome change in rhetoric,' Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in an interview Saturday. 'He seems, at least in his recent comments, to recognize that he's finally getting this -- Vladimir Putin is playing him.' 'Whether that lasts very long,' she added, 'is not clear.' Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson, declined to respond to the idea that Trump's position now more closely mirrors Biden's, or address Trump's frustrations with an inability to sway Putin so far. In a statement, she blamed Biden for not being able to halt Russia's invasion. 'Unlike Biden, President Trump is focused on stopping the killing, and thanks to his leadership, Russia and Ukraine are having direct talks for the first time in years,' she said. Biden's approach to Ukraine came from a conviction that the invasion was both illegal and morally offensive, and that in the 21st century, nations do not violate others' borders. He declared, repeatedly, that stopping Russia from taking Ukraine was crucial if the West wanted to deter a Russian march deeper into Europe. To Biden, halting the aggression that has led to Europe's largest war since the defeat of Nazi Germany was essential to preserving the post-World War II order. Trump has never had much use for those alliances, or the order they created for the past 80 years. Nor has he ever in the past decade condemned Putin with the same ferocity that Biden did. When television host Bill O'Reilly bluntly called Putin a 'killer' on Fox News while interviewing Trump in 2017, the newly elected president replied with moral relativism: 'There are a lot of killers,' he said. 'You think our country's so innocent?' Trump never called the 2022 invasion illegal -- when it first began, he praised Putin for a 'smart,' if violent, land grab. He has approached the few, sporadic negotiations over a ceasefire and possible peace accord as a real estate transaction. The one he has envisioned would acknowledge that Putin will hold whatever lands he now controls in the south and east, and perhaps more. At the Justice and State departments, Trump has largely dismantled the offices gathering evidence for possible war crimes prosecutions against Russian officials. But now, the president seems to be acting out of a sense of personal pique, and perhaps the discovery that his relationship with the Russian leader isn't what he once might have imagined. Trump has admired Putin's toughness, part of a pattern of praise by the U.S. president for authoritarian leaders. But he appeared to believe the sentiment was mutual. In the past, Trump expressed skepticism about continuing to support Ukraine with military aid, a reversal of American strategy and a position that resonated not just with the president's fiercest supporters but some in the broader electorate who had come to see defending Ukraine as yet another lengthy foreign entanglement. And Trump has talked with Putin a half-dozen times since taking office, though by his account with diminishing results. He sent his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, to visit Putin at the Kremlin, but he emerged with little to show for the discussions, which usually took place with no other U.S. officials, save for a translator. Although Trump has said there would be no progress on Ukraine without a direct meeting between him and Putin, none has been scheduled. (Biden had only one face-to-face meeting with the Russian leader, in Geneva in June 2021, largely prompted by a major Russian ransomware attack on an American oil and gas pipeline provider.) A phone conversation between Trump and Putin earlier this month was followed, within hours, by a massive Russian missile and drone attack on Kyiv and other major Ukrainian cities, a volley in one of the most extensive assaults on Ukraine since the war began. That has left Trump in the position he most hates: being embarrassed and, worse, appearing like a paper tiger. When he claimed to have discovered after the fact that the Pentagon has paused the transfer of some defensive weapons to Ukraine, he told reporters he was ordering the shipments resumed. That sent Washington abuzz with speculation that the president may have finally gotten in sync with the strategy from which his NATO allies never wavered: to isolate Russia and arm Ukraine. Still, little has substantively changed when it comes to U.S. support for Ukraine. 'The problem is that lifting the pause, while an important first step, only releases aid that was authorized during the Biden administration,' said David Shimer, who served as the director of Eastern Europe and Ukraine policy on Biden's National Security Council. 'But it will only restore the status quo of a week ago,' he said, 'which was of dwindling security assistance flows, authorized under the prior administration.' He added that 'now is the time for this administration to go further and adopt a sustained strategy to increase military aid for Ukraine, increase economic pressure on Russia, and push Putin to engage in meaningful negotiations to end this war.' The approach Trump is taking seems designed to keep him at least one arm's length away from the conflict. By having the Europeans pay for and funnel the arms, Trump may hope that he is not regarded as a direct participant in the war. Of course, the United States is directly participating: It even hosts the intelligence center in Germany where British, U.S. and Ukrainian military officials sort through targets each day. But Trump has not backed a new security assistance package from Congress, which he knows would inflame his base and run contrary to its demands -- often voiced by Vice President JD Vance -- to end the cycle of direct American support. He has not pressed Europe to seize the $300 billion in Russian assets that Moscow had in Western financial institutions when it mounted the invasion in 2022. And while he appears to be vaguely supporting the bill now in the Senate -- backed by 85 senators by latest count -- that would call for sanctions against countries that are buying Russian energy products, including China and India, he has not said whether he would actually impose those sanctions. Marshall Billingslea, who served in Trump's first term as arms control negotiator and in other diplomatic roles, noted recently in a social media post that Trump 'already has all the legal authority needed to do everything in that bill.' But Trump appears to want the cover of having Congress act first. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
