Bubba Wallace Fired Major Accusation At Rival NASCAR Driver
Bubba Wallace Fired Major Accusation At Rival NASCAR Driver originally appeared on The Spun.
Bubba Wallace was not happy with a rival NASCAR Cup Series driver on Saturday night.
The Quaker State 400 Presented by Walmart took place on Saturday evening. The race, held at the Atlanta Motor Speedway, featured a massive crash. Chase Elliott ended up taking home the win, while Brad Keselowski and Alex Bowman rounded out the top three. Tyler Reddick and Erik Jones finished in fourth and fifth place, respectively.
Advertisement
Wallace, meanwhile, finished in 22nd place. He was not happy with a rival NASCAR Cup Series driver during the race, accusing him of being a "(expletive)."
LONG POND, PENNSYLVANIA - JUNE 21: Bubba Wallace, driver of the #23 McDonald's Toyota, walks the grid during qualifying for the NASCAR Cup Series The Great American Getaway 400 at Pocono Raceway on June 21, 2025 in Long Pond, Pennsylvania. (Photo by)Wallace was involved in the Lap 58 crash in Turn 4. The crash impacted Wallace, Christopher Bell, Ryan Blaney, and Austin Dillon. It took place three laps from Stage 1's end.
The 23XI Racing driver ended up running into Bell's door, causing serious damage.
Wallace, who has had an up-and-down season, lashed out on his team radio. He accused Bell of being an "(expletive)" for his decisions during the race.
"Christopher Bell is a f------ dumb---,' Wallace roared. 'That's what he gets.'
Wallace was able to hang around in the race, despite suffering some damage to his No. 23 Toyota car.
Advertisement
Blaney wasn't happy with Bell, either.
'As usual for this year, got caught up in someone else's mess," Blaney said after emerging from the wreck.
NASCAR's 2025 Cup Series is scheduled to move forward with the Grant Park 165 on the Chicago Street Course next weekend.
That race will take place at 6 p.m. E.T. on Sunday, July 6.
Bubba Wallace Fired Major Accusation At Rival NASCAR Driver first appeared on The Spun on Jun 29, 2025
This story was originally reported by The Spun on Jun 29, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
26 minutes ago
- New York Times
Brad Keselowski, as playoff hopes fade, grapples with another difficult loss
HAMPTON, Ga. — Brad Keselowski has raced long enough to become well-versed in how to process tough losses. He knows how to quickly move past the hurt and turn his focus to what's next. It's a part of why he is so successful — a NASCAR Cup Series champion, a 36-time race winner, and likely an eventual first-ballot NASCAR Hall of Famer. Advertisement But considering the stakes Saturday night at Atlanta Motor Speedway, it's hard not to think the 41-year-old Keselowski's latest tough loss is going to take a little longer to process. And yet, there he stood on pit road after falling victim to a numbers game, not able to overcome the teamwork executed by the Hendrick Motorsports duo of Chase Elliott and Alex Bowman and trying not to dwell on what could've been. 'Every loss stings,' Keselowski said. It's been a trying season for Keselowski, one filled with missed opportunities, bad luck and miscues that have contributed to him being buried in the standings. Coming into Atlanta, he ranked 30th in points, so deep that his only pathway to the playoffs was by winning one of the remaining nine regular-season races. Atlanta represented a chance for reprieve, for Keselowski to push past what is statistically his worst season since 2010, his de facto rookie year. And in a race he needed to win to salvage his faint playoff hopes, he delivered a stirring performance that called back to a time when he ruled on drafting tracks like Atlanta, which shares similar characteristics to Daytona and Talladega — two tracks at which he owns a combined seven wins — since being reconfigured three years ago. Much of Saturday's final stage was vintage Keselowski. There he was, making sweeping passes going into the corners, pulling off impressive blocks when someone behind him got a big run, executing aggressive moves when called for, completing a smooth-looking crossover pass on Elliott off Turn 4 as they dueled in the closing laps, and deftly working with RFK Racing teammate Chris Buescher, who acted as his wingman. 'That's the Brad that is so good at these super speedways and this style of racing,' Buescher said. 'We had race cars that enabled us to make moves, and most specifically, Brad, to make some of those power moves that he's so good at. It's a big step for us just having better race cars and him showing what he's capable of when we get to that point.' Advertisement But as great as Keselowski was, he couldn't stave off Elliott on the final lap. The Hendrick driver got a run down the frontstretch, allowing him to complete the pass going through Turns 1 and 2. Any chance Keselowski had to counterattack went away when a charging Bowman opted not to work with Keselowski, instead protecting his teammate and ensuring a Hendrick win. THE SI-REEN SOUNDS AGAIN! @chaseelliott wins with a last-lap pass of @keselowski! — NASCAR (@NASCAR) June 29, 2025 '(Bowman) was a great teammate in that moment, for sure,' Elliott said. 'If (Bowman) takes me two-wide, we are all but saying, 'Here, Brad, you can win.' … It's our job as a company to try to get Hendrick Motorsports a win at that point in time, whether it was he or I or however that transpired, right? Naturally, it did just that.' It was a selfless decision by Bowman — who also needs a win as he too is fighting for a playoff spot — but one that proved costly to Keselowski. Without a push by Bowman, and without Bowman going after Elliott and slowing the Hendrick teammates, Keselowski was virtually helpless with Buescher having fallen back. Elliott snapped a 44-race winless streak; Keselowski's winless streak extended to 41 races. '(Elliott and Bowman) were able to work together really well and kind of doubled up on me at the end, and there was nothing I could do,' Keselowski said. Had Keselowski been able to close out, Saturday night's triumph would've been one for the highlight reel. It wasn't as memorable as when he won at Pocono in 2011, days after breaking his ankle in a crash while testing, or at Talladega in 2014, when he came through in a must-win situation in a playoff elimination race, but Atlanta would've certainly been another moment in a career defined by them. Maybe knowing there was nothing he could've done differently is why Keselowski was so pragmatic afterward. He's experienced this enough times to understand that the circumstances are sometimes just beyond your control. Still, the reality is that Keselowski's point situation is so dire that he must win a race in the next eight weeks or he'll fail to qualify for the playoffs. And with three of the eight remaining races held on road/street courses — he's never won on either track type — his path to the postseason feels even narrower. 'I don't think about that,' Keselowski said. 'I just want to win.' (Top photo of Brad Keselowski, left, leading the pack alongside Alex Bowman during Saturday's race: Sean Gardner / Getty Images)
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
How Rational Is EV Fast Charging When Most Cars Are Parked All Day?
All the press is about fast charging stations, some of which are literally sited with gas stations ... More and run by oil companies There are many different views on how EV charging infrastructure should be built, and financed. Today, almost all discussion revolves around 'fast charging' at 50kW or more, which will usually refill a car in under an hour. This is due to the legacy of 'gasoline thinking.' For a century, we drove cars with gasoline around until the tank said 'E' and then looked for a place to fill-up, which took under 5 minutes. That's a good experience, and it's understandable why there's so much effort to duplicate it. The more important question is should we? Almost all news and investment activity in EV charging is around this gasoline fill-up problem. Faster chargers and more of them. 800v cars and chargers that can peak over 350kW. New battery designs that can get a usable charge in under 10 minutes. BYD's demo of a partial charge in just 5 minutes in China. Charging stations which look very much like gas stations in their placement and style. Everybody would like fast charging, all other things being equal. But they very much aren't equal. Fast charging is very expensive, and the faster it is the more expensive it is. Wiring in hundreds of kilowatts isn't likely to ever get cheap. 10 minute charges require a megawatt, and that's definitely not easy or cheap. Imagine having 10 chargers at a station. If you consider the inherent energy in gasoline, a gas pump delivers 20 megawatts. Per pump. (In reality, because gasoline cars are around 30% efficient, that's more like 6 megawatts worth, but it's still huge.) You're unlikely to ever duplicate that, or to want to pay the price to do it. Fast charging stations today use a lot of expensive electrical gear. Tesla is smart, and it costs them about $30,000/stall to put in their stations, while non-Tesla stalls only get put in thanks to very fat government subsidies, and routinely cost over $200,000 each. That means getting a charge at these fast stations is pricey. The cost is typically around 40 to 60 cents/kWh, while the average cost at home in the USA (which recently increased a lot) is 16.26 cents, though often under 10 cents at night, and even less for people who put in solar power. It's such a huge difference that while those who charge at home save large sums over what they used to spend on gasoline, fast charging stations can make your energy cost per mile be more than gasoline in a hybrid car. In addition, being expensive, it's precious. It has to go in far fewer locations, and generally one must leave the stall as soon as charging is done to make space for somebody else. So all other things are not equal. That's without counting the time spent waiting at these stations or detouring to them, compared to the home or office or hotel where you sleep or work while your car sits where it was already going to sit anyway. Office parking lots with solar panels nearby and slow charging for the cars that park there all day ... More are the biggest win The typical car is parked over 22 hours per day. And the average driver who drives 10,000 miles/year only needs to charge for under 2 hours/day, not at a fast charger, but at a slow 'level 2' one. In fact, it only needs to charge for 7 hours/day, on average, at on ordinary dedicated 120v household plug, called 'level 1.' Slow chargers are cheap. In fact, there's almost nothing in them, just a $5 computer, a switch, thick wires and a plug. The most expensive part is the wiring (if you want the Level 2.) Enough electricity is already present in almost every building in the world. Other than land cost, one can probably put in 50 to 100 slow chargers for the cost of a single CCS fast charging stall. In the ideal future of the EV transition, there's low cost, not particularly fast charging at just a subset of those parking locations cars spend just 2 to 8 of their 22 parked hours. Today, most EV drivers have that--over 80% of EV drivers can charge at home or work and never use fast charging in their home town, with very rare exceptions. If we can 'charge where we park, rather than park where there's charging' the EV experience becomes much better than the gasoline one in every way. When people ask me how long it takes to charge my EV, I tell them it takes less time than I spent getting gasoline in my last car. That's true at home, and it's almost true on road trips. It's hard to see wanting any other world. Yet many companies are building large EV gas stations hoping they can get in on being the 'gas station of the 21st century.' And today, they have customers, because there is a small cohort of EV drivers who can't charge at home or work, because they don't have a driveway, or don't own their home. But this is what we need to fix. All the subsidies and EV promotion laws should be aimed at trying to fix that, not at building EV versions of the gas station. Let's make it easy for apartments and condos to put in charging, and for tenants to demand it. Let's get curbside charging for streets where people don't have driveways and park on the street at night. Let's leave the gas-style EV stations for the few who can't get that. There's more good news. Under 20th century rules, many buildings could not add EV charging because they didn't have sufficient electrical service. New, smarter technologies (Disclaimer: I have investment in a company that provides this) allow any building to handle all its EVs without upgrading the electrical service. The Exceptions There are some cars that aren't parked 95% of the time. Professional drivers/cabs, and people on long intercity road trips. There are many types of road trips. In most, cars are still parked 10 hours at a hotel or other sleeping stop, and 1-2 hours for meals and breaks. For more leisurely road trips, they are parked many more hours at 'attractions' along the way. These cars also need much more charging during their day of long driving. Fast charging is needed, but it also should be located at the places people already stop, such as restaurants, some shops, and attractions. At restaurants, 100kW is more than enough for most--in fact, if it's too fast, you have to interrupt your meal to go move your car, because fast stations also don't let you sit idle after you are done. They're too expensive. The only cars that need really fast charging are those in a terrible hurry, who want to stop for a bathroom break every 2-3 hours and want to pick up 30-40kWh in the fastest time. (Most cars only charge fast when going from 0% to 50%.) If we build the world where there's EV charging in the places we already stop or park, the other needs are few. How many will pay large surcharges for 10 minute charges? Will they be enough market to justify building these cars and stations? Perhaps only if it gets cheaper. Most Uber drivers actually do under 300 miles/day, often under 200. If so, they'll need only a small amount of fast charging if they can get a cheap, slow 'sleep charge.' A short break, for lunch or otherwise, will keep them in place, as long as there is charging where they stop. Some Fleet vehicles (particularly heavier ones with shorter range) may want to run multiple shifts, or may need a larger recharge mid-shift. These do want their charging to be fast. If a fleet sees full utilization, and charging time is downtime, this is an instance where you want it to be as fast as possible. If utilization is not full, though, you just rotate vehicles so some are charging and others are working, and you don't need the charging to be as fast. The Future Tesla keeps promising their cars will fully drive themselves 'this year,' and has predicted that each year for almost a decade. But one thing that's actually coming is cars that can make short drives at off-peak times on quiet roads and in office complexes at low speeds. That's a car that can take itself to charging. as long as an attendant or robot (or the car itself, which is a robot) can plug it in. When that arrives, you no longer need charging where you park, you just need charging lots within a moderate distance of where you park. Cars needing a charge can slip off when their owner is asleep or working or staying for a while. Remember that the average car needs less than 2 hours of slow charging per day. Forget 'gasoline' thinking--this is a car that just is always charged as if by magic, with no electrical wiring, and very limited use of fast charging. Robotaxis, on the other hand, though able to drive to where they charge, actually do want faster charging to get back to work. Though in this case 25kW does the job--that is what Tesla has chosen for the CyberCab.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
I-20 at US-377 in Benbrook shut down due to crash
Westbound lanes of I-20 at US-377 in Benbrook are shut down due to a crash. The crash happened around 2:25 a.m. on Monday, according to the Texas Department of Transportation. Traffic cameras showed cars being diverted off I-20 at Winscott Road. It is unclear how long the road will be closed. This story is developing. Check back for updates.
