logo
What could be behind Europe's power outage

What could be behind Europe's power outage

Telegraph28-04-2025
The cause of the collapse in Spain and Portugal's national grids remains uncertain.
But experts are already suggesting reasons for the widespread power outages, including equipment fault, a cyber attack, the role of renewables and the weather.
Here are some of the key theories as to what may have gone wrong.
Cable fault
The cyber security wing of the European Union (EU) has suggested a technical or cable fault could be responsible for the mass power outage across Spain and parts of France and Portugal.
Preliminary findings from the the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) have veered away from a cyber security attack. A spokesman said: 'For the moment the investigation seems to point to a technical/cable issue.'
The ENISA said it is 'closely monitoring' the situation and remains 'in contact with the relevant authorities at national and EU level'.
Cyber attack
Early speculation centred on whether power could have been knocked offline by a cyber attack.
Spain's INCIBE cybersecurity agency initially said it was investigating the possibility of the blackout being triggered by a cyber attack.
Juan Manuel Moreno, the president of the regional government of the Spanish region of Andalucia, said: 'Everything points to a blackout of this magnitude only being due to a cyberattack.'
Spanish officials initially said they had not ruled out a cyber attack as the cause of the dramatic outage, with one government source telling Politico: 'A cyberattack has not been ruled out and investigations are ongoing.'
However, the Portuguese National Cybersecurity Centre said there was no sign that the outage was caused by a cyberattack.
Past cyber attacks on grid infrastructure have been used to cause mass blackouts for hundreds of thousands of people.
In December 2015, Russian hackers knocked out the systems of three energy companies in Ukraine, causing blackouts for 230,000 people.
The attacks were believed to have been ordered by Russia's intelligence agency and carried out by the Sandworm hacking group.
Spy chiefs have long warned that hostile states are targeting Britain's electricity grid and other critical national infrastructure.
In April, Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary, told The Telegraph that briefings from the country's intelligence agencies had left him with a 'deep concern about our ability to keep our country and critical services ... safe'.
'I was really quite shocked at some of the vulnerabilities that we knew existed and yet nothing had been done,' Mr Kyle said.
In November, Pat McFadden, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, warned that Russian cyber attacks had the capability to 'turn off the lights for millions of people'.
Spain is the third-most targeted country by Russian cyber criminals known as 'hacktivists', according to a council report.
ZIUR, a cybersecurity centre in the Basque province of Gipuzkoa, said that Spain's government, maritime and financial infrastructures had been regularly compromised by pro-Russian groups.
Problems with green energy
A lack of wind and Spain's reliance on turbines for power could also be a factor in the blackouts.
Spain has one of Europe's highest proportions of renewable energy, providing about 56pc of the nation's electricity.
More than half of its renewables comes from wind with the rest from solar and other sources. That means Spain's electricity supplies are increasingly reliant on the weather delivering enough wind to balance its grid.
For much of the last 24 hours, that wind has been largely missing. The website Windy.com, for example, shows wind speeds of 2-3mph, leaving the country reliant on solar energy and old gas-fired power stations.
The weather system that has left Spain bereft of wind is also having similar effects across the rest of Western Europe with the UK, Germany, the Netherlands and others all seeking extra sources of electricity as their wind turbines fall still.
France, for example, has been calling on Spain for extra electricity. The UK, which is also increasingly reliant on wind, was on Monday morning struggling to get any turbine power.
Instead, it was relying on imports from Europe – with the London and South East receiving 58pc of its power from imports, according to the National Energy System Operator (Neso).
The sheer scale of the demands being transmitted between countries and across interconnector cables – especially at a time when wind and other renewable output plummets – may be enough to disrupt grids and power transmission.
The large amount of solar power on the Spanish and Portuguese grids may have also left the Iberian power grid more vulnerable to faults or cyber attacks, according to one expert.
Generators that have spinning parts, such as those running on gas, coal or hydropower, create what is known as 'inertia', which helps to balance the frequency of power on the grid to prevent faults.
Solar panels do not generate inertia on the system, however, and there are known issues with low inertia on the Iberian grid.
At about 10am on Monday, roughly two hours before the power cuts, almost 60pc of Spain's power was being generated by solar farms, according to transparency data.
Ms Porter said: 'If you have a grid fault, it can cause a frequency imbalance and in a low-inertia environment the frequency can change much faster.
'If you have had a significant grid fault in one area, or a cyber attack, or whatever it may be, the grid operators therefore have less time to react. That can lead to cascading failures if you cannot get it under control quickly enough.
'The growing reliance on solar has pushed inertia on the grid to the point where it does become more difficult to respond to disruptions such as significant transmission faults.'
However, she added, if the blackouts were caused by cyber attacks on multiple parts of the grid, more inertia would not have helped.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Huge seaside resort built for 20k tourists bans foreigners weeks after opening
Huge seaside resort built for 20k tourists bans foreigners weeks after opening

Daily Mirror

time7 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Huge seaside resort built for 20k tourists bans foreigners weeks after opening

Despite years of delays and a grand opening ceremony, the world's most controversial Benidorm-inspired seaside resort has 'temporarily' prohibited foreign travellers from visiting A Benidorm-inspired seaside resort with 2.5 miles of golden sandy beach has sensationally banned foreigners from visiting, just 17 days after its grand opening. The Wonsan Kalma Coastal Tourist Zone might look like any other coastal destination at first glance. Complete with 43 hotels and camping sites that hold capacity for a whopping 20,000 visitors, the resort boasts a huge water park with thrilling slides, a cinema, theatre, 'recreation centre', and pristine beach. ‌ However, this seaside haven isn't located on the sunny Costa Blanca (although it is rumoured to be based on the Spanish hotspot). Instead, it's situated in the cruel dictatorship of North Korea, which has been accused of a series of gross human rights violations. ‌ ‌ These include detaining residents in prison camps for trying to flee, severely restricting the rights to freedom of expression, and rejecting international aid while people starved due to food shortages. But in 2017, North Korea sent a delegation on a trip to Benidorm so officials could take note of how the hotspot had designed many of its hotels and attractions. Following years of delay, the tourist park - believed to be a crucial part of Kim Jong Un's ambitions to boost tourism in the country - opened on July 1 this year. ‌ According to reports, the first droves of Russian tourists arrived at the resort earlier this month, with Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov branding the project a 'good tourist attraction' that he hoped would become popular amongst Russians. However, on July 18, North Korea updated its tourism website, declaring that foreigners are 'temporarily' not allowed to visit. This follows North Korea's decision to abruptly halt tourism from the West - including travellers from France, Germany and the UK, back in February. At the time of writing, the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) advises against all but essential travel to North Korea. ‌ "The level of tension on the Korean Peninsula remains high. While daily life in the capital city, Pyongyang, may appear calm, the security situation in North Korea can change quickly with no advance warning about possible actions by the authorities," the body warns. "This poses significant risks to British visitors and residents." ‌ Even before the site had actually opened, it garnered heavy criticism from human rights groups - including the UN which warned of 'shock brigades'. This is where workers are subject to harsh conditions and long working hours without adequate compensation. Cho Chung Hui, a North Korean who effectively defected from the country, witnessed some of these brutal conditions, although he wasn't directly involved in building the resort. "The principle behind these [brigades] was that no matter what, you had to complete the task, even if it cost you your life," he told the BBC. "I saw many women who were under so much physical strain and eating so poorly that their periods stopped altogether."

Protests in Kyiv as Ukraine clamps down on anti-corruption bodies
Protests in Kyiv as Ukraine clamps down on anti-corruption bodies

Times

time37 minutes ago

  • Times

Protests in Kyiv as Ukraine clamps down on anti-corruption bodies

Ukraine is no longer a genuine democracy, a prominent critic of President Zelensky has alleged, as protesters rallied in Kyiv against a government crackdown on two major anti-corruption organisations that could derail the country's bid to join the European Union. On Tuesday, the Ukrainian parliament approved a bill that brought the national anti-corruption bureau, known as Nabu, and the specialised anti-corruption prosecutor's office, Sapo, under the direct control of the country's prosecutor general, who answers to the president. Zelensky signed the legislation into force just hours later. He said it was necessary to purge the organisations of 'Russian influence,' but gave no other details. Both organisations were founded with western assistance following the 2014 Maidan revolution in Kyiv that toppled Viktor Yanukovych, the country's notoriously corrupt pro-Moscow leader. They were tasked with acting as independent groups that would root out and prosecute corruption without political interference. Last month, Nabu named Oleksii Chernyshov, who was at the time a Ukrainian deputy prime minister, as a suspect in a 'large-scale' corruption scheme led by a property developer from Kyiv. Chernyshov, who is said to be a close friend of Zelensky's, was the highest-placed Ukrainian official in history to be charged with corruption. He denied the charges, but lost his post in government this month when Zelensky appointed a new cabinet. At a rally near the presidential office in Kyiv on Tuesday evening, several thousand protesters, who included soldiers, condemned the move against the anti-corruption groups as a sign of growing authoritarianism and a betrayal of the ideas that powered the Maidan revolution. 'Ukraine is not Russia!' some chanted, while others held up signs saying 'Corruption = Death.' Zelensky's government has also recently proposed legislation that would block investigating corruption in the defence sector. The demonstration was the first significant show of public dissent against Zelensky since Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022. Vitali Klitschko, the mayor of Kyiv who has frequently clashed with Zelensky, was among the protesters. 'Sapo and Nabu must remain independent institutions,' he said. Dmytro Kuleba, Ukraine's former foreign minister, called the measures 'a bad day' for Ukraine. Marta Kos, the EU's top official for enlargement, warned that the move to clamp down on the agencies was 'a serious step back' for Kyiv's membership bid. She also said that their ability to operate without interference from the government was 'essential for Ukraine's EU path.' The offices of the two agencies were raided by Ukraine's security services on Monday over the claims that they had been infiltrated by Moscow. Opposition figures said the searches were an act of intimidation. Zelensky's move came after Vitaliy Shabunin, a well-known anti-corruption activist, was charged with fraud and evading military service in a case that was widely condemned as politically motivated. He faces up to ten years in prison, if found guilty. He is currently serving with the Ukrainian military. His house in Kyiv was raided by masked Ukrainian investigators while his wife and two small children were at home and he was stationed at a military base. 'After these events, I feel like Ukraine is no longer a full-fledged democracy. It feels more like a hybrid regime, still democratic, but with elements of authoritarianism and kleptocracy,' Shabunin, 40, told The Times in an interview from a location around 20 miles from the frontline. The co-founder of Ukraine's Anti-Corruption Action Center, an independent group, Shabunin said the charges against him were absurd because he had volunteered for service on the first day of the war and was then later seconded to work on anti-corruption efforts, an order he could not legally refuse. 'This is pure political persecution,' he said. Ukraine's State Bureau of Investigation has denied that the case is linked to Shabunin's anti-corruption activities. The raid on his home came almost five years to the day since his house was set on fire in apparent retaliation for his work. No one has been arrested over the attack. Shabunin also warned that Zelensky had crossed a 'red line' by moving against anti-corruption organisations. 'Ukrainians have always had a very, very strong demand for justice. And Ukrainians, like no one else, sense when the president does not give a damn about justice, and when he personally attacks it.' He suggested that Zelensky had become confident that he now had a free hand in Ukraine because Kyiv's western allies were now less focused on strengthening the country's democracy. 'Zelensky is showing his true face because the West, to put it mildly, is turning a blind eye. This is the real Zelensky, not the person we saw when the United States and the European Union demanded reforms and a fight against corruption,' he said. He also warned that Zelensky's determination to rein in independent anti-corruption groups could lead to violent protests. 'We will not be dancing on Maidan this time,' he said. 'Half of the country has combat experience. This is a scenario that [President] Putin is likely dreaming about. God forbid it should come to this. This is why it is in the interests of the West to stop Zelensky now, before such a confrontation.' He said, however, that western countries should continue to arm Kyiv. 'I don't think Zelensky will forgive me for speaking out so loudly. [But] whatever happens to me or whatever happens in the country, we want the West to continue to give weapons to Ukrainians and Ukraine. We need to survive. We know how to deal with our corrupt authoritarian elites. But without weapons we will die.' Zelensky's first term was due to end in May 2024, but Ukraine has banned elections during wartime, a policy that has wide support across the country. Although his popularity has slipped since the early days of the 2022 invasion by Russia, the Ukrainian president is still the country's second most trusted figure after Valery Zaluzhny, the former commander of the Ukrainian armed forces who is now Kyiv's ambassador in London, according to polls. It is unclear, however, how the unfolding row will impact Zelensky's ratings. One European diplomat speaking on the condition of anonymity described the measures against the anti-corruption groups as 'unfortunate,' but insisted there was still hope for Ukrainian democracy. 'Is it a setback? Yes. Is this a point of no-return? No,' the official said, according to the AFP news agency. However, the confrontation has opened up an unprecedented rift between the Ukrainian leader and civil society. The Kyiv Independent, Ukraine's main English-language website, accused Zelensky of betraying the country's democracy. 'Zelensky is making a choice to undermine Ukrainian democratic institutions in pursuit of expanding his personal power,' it wrote in an editorial. 'The same man who represents Ukraine's fight against Russia can't represent the destruction of Ukraine's democracy.' Back in Kyiv, protesters said that they were determined to keep battling to ensure Ukraine did not slide back into its authoritarian past. 'They are legalising corruption, and I have to fight against this' said Artyom, an 18-year-old protester. 'Our democratic institutions and democracy itself is collapsing,' said Kateryna, another protester.

Ukraine-Russia war: Who's winning now and what could happen next
Ukraine-Russia war: Who's winning now and what could happen next

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Ukraine-Russia war: Who's winning now and what could happen next

In the past month, Russian military units concentrated in Ukraine's Sumy region, which borders Russia in the northeast, the eastern cities of Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka, and Zaporizhzhia in the south, have gained about 200 square miles, according to data from the war study institute. That's an area a little larger than the size of Atlanta. Does that mean Russia is prevailing? Not really. It's not that simple. Here's the latest on Russia's war in Ukraine. Why is Russia gaining ground in Ukraine? Ukraine has liberated about 7% of the territory Russia occupied before and after Moscow's full-scale invasion in February 2022, according to Ukrainian estimates and DeepState. That leaves about 19% still in Russian hands. Moscow still controls Crimea, which it annexed in 2014, and about two-thirds of Ukraine's Donetsk region, a vast and heavily industrialized region which remains the center of the ground war. Russia has long had the upper hand in the war in terms of military manpower, but analysts say Moscow has suffered more casualties, and its loss of equipment - vehicles, artillery, tanks - also has been at a higher rate than Ukraine's. Though Russia has been advancing in recent months, those gains have been relatively slow and small, amounting to less than 0.1% of Ukraine's territory in July, according to a manual calculation. Still, one reason Russia may have been able to make progress, according to the war study institute, is that Russia has substantially increased its use of drone attacks, and missiles and shells, on Ukraine. These grew at an average monthly rate of 31% in June and July. Russia has been using drones to pin down Ukrainian troops. No, then yes, to more American weapons for Ukraine. Why? President Donald Trump began his second term promising to end the war in Ukraine in his first 24 hours in office. He quickly halted the flow of military aid to Kyiv and temporarily stopped sharing some intelligence. He also cast blame on Ukraine for the war, giving President Volodymyr Zelenskyy a public dressing down in the Oval Office when he tried to push back on that assertion and counter Trump by saying Putin was not a reliable negotiator. Since then, the leaders have revised their stances and welcomed more nuance in their discussions. The war is still raging. Trump has appeared to change his tune on Ukraine and Putin as the Russian leader has pushed forward with drone and missile attacks on Ukrainian cities and repeatedly rebuffed Trump's attempts to broker a ceasefire. In early July, Trump said he would resume shipping arms to Ukraine. He also announced a new arrangement with NATO that will see the military alliance transfer advanced U.S.-made air defense systems to Kyiv. He also altered his attitude about the Russian leader. "He's very nice to us all the time," Trump said July 9. "But it turns out to be meaningless." What about the diplomacy? Two rounds of Trump-brokered ceasefire talks between Ukraine and Russia have come to nothing. As the relationship between Putin and Trump has soured, a broad coalition of U.S. lawmakers has lined up ready to place new aggressive sanctions on Russia. Trump also has threatened "severe" economic penalties on Moscow if it does not commit to a ceasefire by early September. The Kremlin has dismissed this as "bluster." The Russian government has suggested that Trump and Putin could meet in Beijing in September when Russia's leader is there for the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. Moscow said it had not heard whether Trump plans to attend. The White House has not commented. But there's little doubt Moscow, for now, is on the back foot geopolitically, and perhaps even militarily. Zelenskyy and French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot announced in Kyiv a series of manufacturing deals with French companies on July 21 that will launch drone production in Ukraine. Overnight, Russia launched its latest barrage of drones and missiles at Kyiv. But Ukraine is also fighting back in ways increasingly difficult for Moscow to ignore. Videos published by Russian media showed people sleeping on the floor of Sheremetyevo, Russia's busiest airport, amid long lines and canceled flights after Ukraine bombarded it with drones.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store