Turkey Rejects Alleged Maintenance Role in Air India Crash
Turkish authorities have clearly denied that Turkish Technic conducted any maintenance on the Boeing 787‑8 Dreamliner of Air India Flight 171, which crashed on 12 June 2025 near Ahmedabad, resulting in 279 fatalities. The Directorate of Communications' Centre for Countering Disinformation labelled the claims 'false' and 'disinformation', emphasising that existing agreements with Air India in 2024–25 strictly covered Boeing 777 aircraft—not the 787‑8 model involved in the disaster.
Flight AI 171 had lifted off from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport bound for London Gatwick, crashed approximately 30 seconds later into a hostel block of B. J. Medical College in Ahmedabad's Meghaninagar area. Of the 242 onboard, only one passenger survived; the crash also claimed around 38 lives on the ground.
ADVERTISEMENT
Turkish officials reiterated that the maintenance contract signed with Air India was limited to B777 aircraft serviced at Turkish Technic's Istanbul facilities, and never extended to Dreamliner models. They acknowledged awareness of the company that last serviced the crashed aircraft, but refrained from naming it to avoid speculation amid the ongoing investigation.
The denial followed sensational allegations by yoga guru Baba Ramdev, who suggested a Turkish maintenance firm's involvement, describing a possible 'foreign conspiracy.' Turkish agencies sharply rejected his claims as baseless and manipulative.
The crash—the first fatal hull-loss involving a Boeing 787 since its entry into service—has sparked a major international investigation. India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau is leading the probe under Annex 13 protocols, with support from Boeing, GE Aerospace, and UK and US aviation authorities. Investigators are examining multiple lines of inquiry, including engine thrust anomalies, flap alignment, landing gear deployment, possible bird strike, and maintenance protocols.
India's civil aviation regulator has ordered additional inspections across Air India's Boeing 787 fleet, comprising 33 jets, and directed IndiGo to review its single 787. This unprecedented disaster, marking the deadliest global aviation accident involving a 787 in over a decade, has sharpened scrutiny on Air India's maintenance regimes and Boeing's safety standing.
Eyewitness and CCTV footage captured a distressing mayday call: 'Thrust not achieved. Falling,' suggesting a rapid loss of lift. Preliminary observations indicate that the aircraft may have experienced dual-engine thrust failure or malfunctioning flaps or landing gear, heightening the risk of aerodynamic stall.
An aviation expert, retired captain Alok Singh, stressed that while the Boeing 787 platform is broadly reliable, such incidents often arise from a confluence of mechanical issues, procedural errors, or environmental factors such as bird ingestion. Meanwhile, industry analyst Steven Chen has advanced the theory that inadvertent flap retraction by the co‑pilot during take‑off may have disrupted lift, though this remains speculative pending flight data.
The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau has recovered the flight data recorder. Retrieval of the cockpit voice recorder is still in progress. Both are expected to yield critical insight into procedural actions and system failures. India's government has established a high-level panel with a three-month deadline to issue findings.
In response to the tragedy and international concern, Boeing and GE Aerospace withdrew from the Paris Air Show to concentrate on search and investigative support. Boeing's CEO Kelly Ortberg expressed condolences and pledged full cooperation, even as the company navigates ongoing operational and reputational pressures following prior safety incidents.
Air India, now under Tata Group ownership since 2022, has announced financial compensation packages for victims' families and is working with authorities on victim identification through DNA and dental records. Public anxiety has surged, with many calling for systemic reforms in aircraft maintenance oversight, cross-border service dependencies, and regulatory enforcement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
4 days ago
- Gulf Today
Families received wrong remains of Air India crash victims: Lawyer
Relatives of a British victim killed in last month's Air India crash received a casket that contained mixed remains, a lawyer representing several families and UK media said on Wednesday. The family of a separate victim received the remains of another person, according to James Healy-Pratt, who is representing 20 British families who lost loved ones in the disaster. A total of 241 people on board the London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner died when the plane crashed shortly after take-off from Ahmedabad in western India on June 12. Some 169 Indian passengers and 52 British nationals were killed, making it one of the deadliest plane crashes in terms of the number of British fatalities. Several people on the ground also died while only one passenger, British citizen Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, survived the crash. Firefighters carry a victim's body after the Air India flight 171 crashed in a residential area. File / AFP Healy-Pratt told the Press Association news agency that the return of victims' remains had been marred by serious errors, which had been identified following a probe by a British coroner. "In the first two caskets that were repatriated, in one of the caskets, there was co-mingling of DNA which did not relate to the deceased in that casket or the casket that accompanied it," he said. The lawyer added the coroner was then "able to determine that one particular loved one was not at all who the family thought they were." Miten Patel, whose mother Shobhana Patel died along with her husband in the disaster, told the BBC that "other remains" were found in her casket after her body was returned to Britain. Health workers shift the body of a victim, who died in the plane crash, to a cold storage at a hospital, in the aftermath of an Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crash during take-off from an airport, in Ahmedabad, India, June 13, 2025. REUTERS/Adnan Abidi "People were tired and there was a lot of pressure. But there has to be a level of responsibility that you're sending the right bodies to the UK," he told the broadcaster. The Daily Mail newspaper first reported two cases in which the wrong remains were apparently returned to families in Britain. India's foreign ministry said all remains "were handled with utmost professionalism and with due regard for the dignity of the deceased." "We are continuing to work with the UK authorities on addressing any concerns related to this issue," the statement added. Agence France-Presse
Khaleej Times
5 days ago
- Khaleej Times
Air India says no issues found in Boeing 737 fuel control switches
Air India has completed precautionary inspections on the locking mechanism of the Fuel Control Switch (FCS) on all its Boeing 737 aircraft, with no issues found, the airline said on Tuesday. The probe into the Air India flight that crashed and killed 241 of the 242 people on board and 19 on the ground, is centred around the fuel control switches on the Boeing 787 jetliner. A preliminary report into the tragedy depicted confusion in the cockpit shortly before the jetliner crashed, after the plane's engine fuel cutoff switches almost simultaneously flipped, starving the engines of fuel. Days earlier, Air India announced the completion of similar precautionary checks across its fleet of Boeing 787 aircraft and revealed that no issues were detected. Air India operates a fleet of Boeing 787 twin-aisle jets on its long-haul operations, while low-cost unit Air India Express operates the Boeing 737 single-aisle jets. A final report into the incident is expected within a year of the accident. Air India reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining the highest standards of operational safety and ensuring full regulatory compliance across its network. What are the FCSs? The FCSs regulate fuel flow into a plane's engines. They are used by pilots to start or shut down engines on the ground or to manually shut down or restart engines if an engine failure occurs during a flight. Aviation experts say a pilot would not be able to accidentally move the fuel switches that feed the engines. But if moved, the effect would be immediate, cutting off engine power. There are independent power systems and wiring for the fuel cutoff switches and the fuel valves controlled by those switches, according to US aviation safety expert John Cox. The switches are spring-loaded to remain in position. To change one from run to cutoff, a pilot has to first pull the switch up and then move it from run to cutoff or vice versa. There are two modes: 'CUTOFF' and 'RUN'.
Khaleej Times
6 days ago
- Khaleej Times
2 deadly plane crashes shock South Asia in just 2 months
Two catastrophic aviation disasters within just two months have sent shockwaves across South Asia. The tragedies, one in India and another in Bangladesh, have not only claimed hundreds of lives but also left lasting scars on communities and sparked widespread public anxiety. On Monday (July 21) a Bangladeshi Air Force fighter jet crashed into the Milestone School and College in Dhaka's Diabari area, killing at least 20 people and injuring more than 170. Many of the victims were students who had just been released from classes. The Chinese-made F-7 BGI aircraft reportedly suffered a mechanical failure during a training mission. 'The exact cause remains under investigation,' the military said in a statement. This marks Bangladesh's deadliest aviation disaster since 1984, when a commercial flight from Chattogram to Dhaka went down, killing all 49 people on board. Just over a month earlier, on June 12, tragedy struck India when an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed into a medical college complex shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad. Bound for London with 242 passengers, the flight lost thrust shortly after takeoff. The crash killed all but one of those on board, and 19 others on the ground — bringing the death toll to 279. The lone survivor, British national Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, was seated in seat 11A near the emergency exit and managed to escape the wreckage with severe burn injuries. His survival has turned seat 11A into a symbol of hope — with some UAE-based travel agents noting a sudden spike in requests for that specific seat number. Following the Air India crash, passengers flying out of the UAE expressed heightened flight anxiety. Despite the tragedy, many continued with their travel plans, though with a renewed focus on safety.
