PR babus to call on Governor to clear air on BC quota hike
As the Telangana High Court deadline for conducting local body elections draws closer, uncertainty prevails over the fate of the 'Panchayat Raj Act (Amendment) Ordinance – 2018', which is yet to receive the Governor's assent. The ordinance seeks to amend Section 285-A of the Act to enable the implementation of 42 per cent reservations for BCs in local bodies. Sources indicate that Panchayat Raj department officials have sought an appointment with the Governor and are preparing to make a detailed presentation justifying the need for enhanced BC quotas. Higher officials intend to brief the Governor personally, highlighting the legal perspectives, the historical backwardness of BC communities, and the recommendations made by the BC Dedicated Commission. The objective is to address the Governor's concerns and convince him about the state's due diligence, including caste-wise enumeration and related safeguards undertaken to ensure constitutional validity.
It is also understood that the Governor recently sought legal advice on the draft ordinance and has reviewed how similar reservations were implemented in other states. However, no official decision has been communicated so far, leading to growing suspense and political speculation.
The state cabinet had earlier approved the ordinance to amend Section 285-A, which currently restricts reservations in local bodies to 50 per cent. To facilitate the proposed 42 per cent quota for BCs without breaching the overall reservation cap, the section required amendment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Anti-doping bill 2025 passed: Independent panels, no athlete fines, Wada demands met
Representational image New Delhi: An independent Appeals panel, the non-imposition of financial sanctions on athletes caught doping and ensuring the operational independence of the nation's anti-doping watchdog are some of the key highlights of the 'National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill 2025', which was introduced in Parliament by sports minister Mansukh Mandaviya on Wednesday. The bill was tabled in the Lok Sabha after the govt addressed objections raised by the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada), which included reducing the extensive powers granted to the proposed 'National Board for Anti-Doping in Sports' under the legislation. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! The original bill, introduced by then sports minister Anurag Thakur and passed by both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha in 2022, faced significant scrutiny from Wada for sustained govt interference and undermining the independence of the National Anti-Doping Agency (Nada). The govt's continued control over Nada and the Appeals panel through the formation of the anti-doping Board led Wada to threaten a ban on India by disaffiliating the nation as its member and derecognising the National Dope Testing Laboratory (NDTL) in Delhi. Following intense discussions between the sports ministry under Mandaviya and Wada officials, an amended version of the bill was introduced without substantial govt interference. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World Undo Prior to the bill's introduction, supervision and control over Nada were exercised by a governing body chaired by the sports minister. The Lausanne-based Wada, while revising its anti-doping Code, ensured that National Anti-Doping Organisations (NADOs) remain free from any govt overreach, citing conflicts of interest when NADOs are controlled by their respective union govt. Poll Do you support the removal of financial sanctions on athletes caught doping? Yes, it's a fair decision. No, there should be consequences. Once the legislation becomes an Act, the anti-doping Board will no longer oversee the Appeals panel as was the case in the original bill passed in Aug 2022. Additionally, a clause in the previous bill that allowed the imposition of financial sanctions, including proportionate recovery of costs from athletes, was removed after Wada objected to it. 'The amended bill seeks to enhance institutional and operational independence of the Appeals panel and Nada to ensure autonomy in their decisions pertaining to operations, investigations and enforcement activities,' stated the bill's objectives. The amended version includes: 'The Board may call for such information from the Disciplinary panel and the Appeals Panel on its operations and issue such directions, as may be necessary, for the effective and timely discharge of their functions with respect to Anti-Doping Rule Violations under this Act. Provided that such directions shall be limited to procedural efficiency of the Disciplinary Panel and the Appeals Panel and shall not, in any case, interfere with their decision making process. ' The amended bill comes as India topped Wada's 2023 testing figures last month, analysing 5,000 or more samples. Salient Features of the bill * To promote and strengthen the anti-doping measures in sports and to provide a statutory framework for the operation of the Nada, NDTL and for creation of the National Board for Anti-Doping in Sports. * Enhance institutional and operational independence of the Appeals Panel and Nada to ensure autonomy in their decisions pertaining to operations, investigations and enforcement activities. * Further align the provisions of the National Anti-Doping Act, 2022 with international best practices and the Wada Code. * Provide that such of the provisions of the Wada Code as are set out in the Schedule shall have the force of law in India Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Three accused get seven-year RI after pleading guilty
BENGALURU: Marking the first conviction in the 2020 KG Halli-DJ Halli riots case, a special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court on Wednesday sentenced three accused, who had pleaded guilty during the framing of charges, to seven years rigorous imprisonment with penalty. Accused no. 14 Syed Ikramuddin alias Syed Naveed (44), A-16 Syed Asif (46) and A-18 Mohammed Atif (26) were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Karnataka Prevention of Destruction and Loss of Property Act (KPDLP) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). On August 11, 2020, a mob attacked the KG Halli and DJ Halli police stations as well as the residence of Congress MLA Akhanda Srinivas Murthy. The violence was triggered by a provocative social media post allegedly made by the MLA's nephew, Naveen. The riots involved incidents of stone throwing, petrol bomb attacks and assaults on police personnel. Four people died when the police opened fire to bring the situation under control. Of the 199 accused in the case, 187 have been arrested and chargesheets filed against 138. The NIA took over the investigation on September 21, 2020, and filed its chargesheet on February 2, 2021. The NIA also established that the accused had links to the banned Popular Front of India (PFI). 'The police are charged with the duty of maintaining law and order as well as public order. When such custodians of law and order are attacked, public confidence in the efficiency of the police is likely to be shaken, thereby disturbing public order. We, the people, feel secure when we have a robust police force. The act of the accused in torching the KG Halli police station has shaken the confidence of the public and their sense of security,' said special public prosecutor for NIA, Bengaluru, P Prasanna Kumar. He added, 'This judgment has not only restored public confidence in the police force, but has also vindicated the action of the Central government in declaring the Popular Front of India (PFI) as an unlawful association.'
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
BRS brands caste survey a ‘betrayal' of Backward Classes
Hyderabad: Backward Classes (BC) leaders from the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) today alleged that the Telangana caste survey is not a genuine model but a 'mirage built on secrecy and political manipulation,' further accusing the Congress government of undermining the self-respect of BC communities. Leader of the Opposition in the Council, S Madhusudhana Chari, claimed that the 'hypocritical drama' of both Congress and BJP on the BC issue has been exposed. He asserted that BC reservations have been plagued by conspiracies. Condemning recent comments by Minister Ponnam Prabhakar and Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee (PCC) President Mahesh Kumar Goud, Madhusudhana Chari stated that the Congress was committing a 'desperate betrayal' of BCs on the 42 per cent BC reservation promise, akin to past actions. He accused Congress of placing state power in the hands of upper castes and subjugating the country to the rights of dominant castes. 'The Congress has committed the inhumanity of making BCs live in a miserable condition as second-class citizens for 75 years,' Madhusudhana Chari said. He added that the Congress, which he described as the 'cause of all the misfortunes of BCs,' is now exploiting the BC cause for political gains, citing the unfulfilled promises of the Kamareddy BC Declaration. This declaration, he alleged, contained many unfulfilled promises for BC castes such as Mudiraj, Gangaputra, Vishwakarma, Nai Brahmin, Gowda, Gollakurumalu, Padmasali, Rajaka, Munnurukapu, and others. Party MLC D Sravan Kumar echoed these sentiments, urging the Congress to cease its deception of the nation. He reiterated that the Telangana caste survey was not a model but a 'mirage built on secrecy and political manipulation,' demanding transparency from Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy. In an open letter to the Chief Minister, Sravan accused the Revanth-led regime of resorting to 'systematic deception, calculated concealment, and constitutional betrayal,' all under the false pretence of championing social justice. 'This is not a 'model' for India, it's a political mirage crafted to hoodwink the public. A spectacle of social justice on the outside, but hollow and dishonest within,' Sravan declared, labelling it a 'deliberate mockery of democracy and BC empowerment.'
