Highly controversial, encourages 'dadagiri': Ramdas Athawale criticises Raj Thackeray's statement
Athawale said that forcing people to speak Marathi is wrong and he also questioned Uddhav Thackeray's silence on attacks against Hindus and said strict action should be taken against MNS workers involved in violence.
Ramdas Athawale questioned Raj Thackeray's stance, asking if he would provide jobs to all if industries close due to such incidents.
Athawale also targeted Uddhav Thackeray, asking what he's doing to protect Hindus despite his father Balasaheb Thackeray's efforts for the community. Athawale emphasized the need for strict action against MNS party workers involved in such incidents.
Speaking to ANI, Ramdas Athawale said, 'Raj Thackeray made a highly controversial statement, which encourages those who engage in 'dadgiri'. He is a politician, and hence he should avoid such things. To beat someone because of language is not good, and this language of slapping someone should end. Mumbai, the economic capital, has non-Marathi people who also own industries. Will Raj Thackeray give jobs to all if the industries close? I have a question from Uddhav Thackeray, as Hindus are being attacked and Balasaheb Thackeray did a lot for Hindus, but what is he doing now?... I think strict action must be taken against the party workers of MNS.'
Athawale also urged authorities to arrest those who attack others over language issues.
'Those who are born in Mumbai and even if they belong to any other state, they know Marathi well. They speak Marathi but saying something in a tone of 'dadagiri' that they all must speak Marathi is not good. We condemn this. I appeal to people to arrest those who beat others,' Athawale said.
The controversy began when Raj Thackeray advised his party workers to beat those who don't speak Marathi, but not to record videos of such incidents. This statement came after MNS workers allegedly attacked a businessman's office in Mumbai for not speaking Marathi.
Athawale's remarks come after Raj Thackeray's statement at the Mumbai reunion rally, where he said, 'Be it a Gujarati or anyone else here, must know Marathi, but there is no need to beat people for that if they don't speak Marathi. Yet, if someone does some drama, you must hit them below their eardrums.'
Shiv Sena (UBT) Chief Uddhav Thackeray shared the stage with Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) Chief Raj Thackeray, marking a reunion after years of political separation.
The issue has sparked debates about linguistic pride and intolerance in Maharashtra. MNS workers have been accused of targeting individuals who don't speak Marathi, leading to violent incidents.
The police have taken action, detaining some MNS supporters involved in the attacks. Maharashtra's Deputy Chief Minister, Devendra Fadnavis, has stated that the state government won't tolerate 'hooliganism in the name of language.'
A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court in April seeking action against Raj Thackeray for alleged hate speech against Hindi-speaking individuals. The petition also seeks derecognition of the MNS. (ANI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
37 minutes ago
- India Today
Shinde Sena MP faces heat for calling Mumbai Gujarat's capital
Days after Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde came under opposition attack for his 'Jai Gujarat' slogan at an event, his Shiv Sena party MP Pratap Jadhav is facing flak for calling Mumbai as former capital of the neighbouring to reporters in Dharashiv district on Sunday, Jadhav, Union Minister of State for Health, told reporters, 'There is no need to indulge in politics over such issues. Gujarat is our neighbouring state. It is not in Pakistan.'advertisementDuring the Samyukta Maharashtra (movement), Mumbai was also the capital of Gujarat, Jadhav said. Shiv Sena (UBT) Rajya Sabha member Priyanka Chaturvedi objected to Jadhav's remarks.'This man is MoS in the centre. This man is also someone who betrayed his own party leadership for panaas khoke (50 boxes). This man is also part of the Jai Gujarat party from Maharashtra. No wonder this man has started hallucinating and making up history to please his masters,' she posted on X on Sena (UBT) MLA Aaditya Thackeray said Jadhav's remarks show hatred for speaking at an event in Pune last week, lauded Union Home Minister Amit Shah and ended his speech with this sequence of slogans: 'Jai Hind, Jai Maharashtra, Jai Gujarat.'While he came in for flak from the opposition members who accused him of being 'greedy for power' as Amit Shah and PM Narendra Modi belong to Gujarat, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis defended Shinde, saying "Just because Shinde said 'Jai Gujarat', it doesn't mean that Shinde loves Gujarat more than Maharashtra.'- Ends IN THIS STORY#Maharashtra#Gujarat
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
43 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Modi govt plans to invest ₹5,000 cr to develop Northeast waterways: Sonowal
Union Minister of Ports, Shipping and Waterways, Sarbananda Sonowal on Monday announced multiple initiatives by the government to boost the waterways and maritime sector in the region. "With an investment of Rs 5,000 crore earmarked, the Union Government has drawn up major initiatives in this regard," Sarbananda Sonowal said. He said that, over the past 11 years, the Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways (MoPSW) has transformed India's maritime sector with record growth in cargo handling, capacity and coastal shipping. Major ports have nearly doubled their capacity, cruise tourism is rising with ambitious new terminals, and 50,000 youth from the Northeast will be trained for maritime jobs. "Key legislative and digital reforms, green shipping initiatives, and projects like the Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Transport Project are strengthening regional connectivity and trade. India's ports are now globally competitive, with nine ranking in the World Bank's top 100, and Visakhapatnam Port reaching the top 20," Sonowal said. Addressing a press conference in Guwahati Sarbananda Sonowal said, "Under the visionary leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, we have revitalised India's maritime sector as never before. From historic growth in port capacity and cargo handling to pioneering green shipping, cruise tourism and skill development for our youth -- these achievements reflect the Modi government's unwavering commitment to make India a global maritime powerhouse and drive inclusive development across every coastal and riverine region." At the press conference, the Union Minister Sarbananda Sonowal said the government aims to train 50,000 youth from the region in maritime skills over the next decade, offering them assured employment opportunities in the growing sector. "The Maritime Skill Development Centre (MSDC) in Guwahati as well as the upcoming Centre of Excellence (CoE) in Dibrugarh aims to power this transformation. The CoE will be developed with an investment of Rs 200 crore. Both the centres are likely to produce 500 jobs annually," he said. Sonowal said, "PM Modi has always envisioned how Yuva Shakti can bring about real transformation in the country. Our vision is to train, enable and empower 50,000 youth from the Northeast with world-class maritime skills over the next decade, ensuring meaningful employment & growth. Our centres in Guwahati and Dibrugarh will be the backbone of this transformation." He said that the Ministry has undertaken projects worth Rs 1,000 crore in the Northeast's inland waterways sector over the past two years, with Rs 300 crore works completed and Rs 700 crore slated for completion by 2025. "Major initiatives include permanent cargo terminals at Pandu, Jogighopa, Dhubri, Bogibeel, Karimganj and Badarpur; year-round fairway dredging; a new approach road to Pandu Port; heritage restoration in Dibrugarh; tourist jetties worth Rs 299 crore; skill development centres at Guwahati and Dibrugarh; and plans for lighthouses at Bogibeel, Biswanath Ghat, Silghat and Pandu. Feasibility studies has been completed and found feasible for operation in Guwahati, Tezpur and Dibrugarh, and cruise vessels are being procured under central schemes. For Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura, the efforts are on to expand IWT infrastructure and promote water-based tourism. The operationalisation of Indo-Bangladesh Protocol Route (IBPR) offers new trade routes bypassing the Siliguri Corridor, strengthening regional connectivity and aligning with the broader vision of Atmanirbhar Bharat," Sonowal said. Responding to a query on the status of Kaladan Multimodal Transit Transport Project (KMTTP), Sarbananda Sonowal said that Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Transport Project is the result of India Myanmar Friendship Treaty. "This is a strategic initiative to enhance connectivity between India's Northeast and Myanmar -- is set to be fully operational by 2027. Under the visionary leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Northeast stands at the heart of the Bharat's development agenda. Empowered by Modi ji's transformative 'Act East' policy, this once landlocked region is now poised for direct and shorter access to international sea routes. The swift execution of the Sittwe Port in Myanmar is a testament to this commitment. Once fully operational, the region will unlock new trade opportunities not just for Northeast India, but also for Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, and Myanmar by connecting them with Southeast Asia. This milestone truly embodies Modi ji's guiding philosophy of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas' -- collective effort for inclusive growth," he said. He said that from Paletwa in Myanmar to Zorinpui in Mizoram, the Sittwe port connects to Paletwa in Myanmar through an inland waterway and from Paletwa to Zorinpui in Mizoram through a road component. "From Sittwe, Myanmar to Sarboom, Tripura, goods from Kolkata to Sittwe Port can be shipped to Teknaf Port, Bangladesh which is just 60 nautical miles of Sittwe. From Teknaf Port goods can be transported by road to Sabroom which is 300 km away. Sabroom has an Integrated customs border between Bangladesh and Tripura. Sittwe port and the Kaladan Project will immensely benefit Tripura by way of significant reduction in transportation time and logistics cost. Major cargo for export for Sittwe Port; i.e. exports from Myanmar include Rice, Timber, Fish and seafood, Petroleum products and Garments and textiles. The major cargo for import for Sittwe Port; i.e. imports by Myanmar, include construction materials such as cement, steel and bricks among others," Sonowal said. He further said that, other key initiatives include the deployment of 100 barges operated by a global major on NW2 & 16 by 2025, intended to significantly enhance cargo movement across Assam and neighbouring states. "To ensure round-the-year navigability, the ministry plans to deploy 10 amphibian and cutter section dredgers, backed by an investment of Rs 610 crore," he said. Sonowal also announced plans to develop 85 community jetties across the Northeast to improve local connectivity. Speaking on this, Sonowal said, "To unlock the true economic potential of the Brahmaputra and Barak rivers, we are investing Rs 610 crore to deploy 10 state-of-the-art dredgers, ensuring all-weather navigability. This will transform cargo movement, create new trade routes, and strengthen economic linkages across Assam and the entire Northeast. By combining this with 100 modern barges by global logistics major from Germany, Rhenus, and 85 community jetties, we aim to build an integrated and sustainable waterways network that empowers local communities and drives growth." Highlighting efforts to support tourism and regional trade, Sarbananda Sonowal shared that Rs 300 crore will be invested to build new tourism and cargo jetties at Silghat, Neamati, Biswanath Ghat and Guijan. In a major move toward modern urban transport, Water Metro projects are planned in Guwahati, Tezpur and Dibrugarh, with feasibility studies already completed. "The government will also set up lighthouses at Pandu, Tezpur, Biswanath & Bogibeel, each equipped with IMD centres, with support from the Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, Govt of India, to provide accurate local weather forecasts. These projects reflect our commitment to transform the Northeast into a major hub of waterways-based trade, tourism and employment, aligned with PM Narendra Modi's vision of inclusive development," Sarbananda Sonowal said.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
What MNS-Shiv Sena protests don't see: The Hindi in Hindutva
After weeks of twists and turns, the Maharashtra government has suspended its proposed policy of introducing Hindi as a compulsory language from the first standard in state schools. This may appear to be merely a state-level issue. Opposition to it may seem like a seasonal bout of opportunistic politics. It is neither. The pro-Hindi policy of the state government has been in line with the BJP's longstanding ambition to have Hindi (shuddh Hindi, not Hindustani) as the national language — a policy that dovetails with its penchant for enforcing uniformity in every respect and implementing a one nation, one language policy. The recent troubles over education policy in Maharashtra, therefore, need to be understood in a larger context, beyond pedagogic wisdom, state-level party politics and Marathi pride. These troubles amplify the debate over what we mean by the Indian nation, and in turn, the deeper, routine practices of majoritarianism. When the Maharashtra government kept insisting on introducing Hindi in the first standard, only two responses against it seem to have mobilised public opinion in the state. One somewhat apolitical response has been about the wisdom of introducing three languages when a child begins her education. This argument is confined to the child's capacity to grasp multiple languages at an early age and the question of burden. The other response, predictably, was triggered by the pro-Marathi sentiment. This helped the estranged Thackeray cousins to share the same ideological ground after a long time. Sections of the media, and intellectuals who have always romanticised the idea that a strong pro-Marathi lobby would help the language, have naturally been excited over this second development concerning Marathi pride, so quick on the heels of Marathi being declared a classical language by the Narendra Modi government. But there is not much awareness of the larger ideological implications of the pro-Hindi policy. This is not restricted to Maharashtra alone. Many administrators and policymakers have always remained somewhat narrow in their approach to the language question — looking at it only in terms of convenience, and therefore, reducing it to the question of official language or link language. For many of us, diversity is always a clumsy inconvenience. The question of language, however, has always spilled over beyond administrative convenience to the realm of unity and nationhood. Thus, even within Congress, there always was a strong Hindi lobby that believed a common language was necessary for a nation and that Hindi could naturally claim that status. There were even some from the south in this lobby, and though they were not necessarily inclined to surrender their own linguistic traditions, they supported the idea of a national language — rashtrabhasha. That is why we had rashtrabhasha samitis pushing for Hindi education through voluntary efforts. This idea that Hindi would gradually evolve to become a national language often overlapped with the imagination that a nation requires one common language. Among north India's Hindi lobby, this overlap was more pronounced. But that overlap was not exclusive to Hindi-speaking pro-Hindi activists. Where does this craving for a national language come from? During much of the time when India's national struggle was shaping up in the early 20th century, the more prominent model of nationalism in Europe often privileged uniformity over anything else. This had a deep influence on many Indian social and political activists and thinkers. But the Hindutva nationalism of V D Savarkar and the RSS most enthusiastically adopted the idea of uniformity. Many in Congress were attracted to it, but believed that such uniformity was either culturally inherent in India's practices or that it would evolve over time through persuasion and practice. Thus, two different models of uniformity operated in actual politics as India became independent. The more predominant one was uniformity through mutual exchange, give-and-take, and historical sharing, while the Hindutva vision believed in the primacy and urgency of uniformity over anything else. This applied to the language question, too. Debates over Hindutva have often remained confined to the question of religion. But Hindutva as an ideology and politics should be understood not merely in terms of the Hindu-Muslim question. True, the practical politics of Hindutva obsessively revolves around, and is based on, deep Islamophobia, coupled with anti-minority sentiments and Hindu supremacy. But at the root of it is a more general imagination that democracy means a free play for the majority community. In the case of the language question, too, it would be a mistake to ignore this foundational belief that has shaped Hindutva. It is often argued that a certain percentage of people in India speak Hindi. It is another matter that this 'number' is derived historically through amalgamating speakers of many other languages and claiming those languages as variants of Hindi — that is exactly how 'majorities' are constructed, whether based on religion, language or culture. In the majoritarian project, some traits of one section of society are posited as common to most. It is then argued that all those who manifest those traits constitute one community, enjoying large numbers. More recently, the systematic push in favour of making Hindi the official language unofficially has been evident. While sometimes, the majoritarians hope for assimilation (samrasata), they don't have the political patience to wait for that to happen. Majoritarian projects, when out of power, speak of assimilation in order to save themselves from state action, but when in power, exercise the same state power to enforce uniformity. Since the BJP knows that its coalition partners have nowhere to go, it nudges them to support the idea of uniformity on the question of language. A large electoral majority in Maharashtra has encouraged the BJP-led government to adopt the policy of enforcing Hindi while its domesticated allies in Andhra Pradesh talk of willingly adopting Hindi. In withdrawing its controversial decision in Maharashtra, the BJP may have accepted a tactical retreat temporarily, but it knows that the Shiv Sena (UBT) and the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena neither comprehend nor want to counter the majoritarian project. With a soon-to-be-formed 'expert committee', the state government will subsequently find ways of continuing with a majoritarian politics of enforced uniformity. Just like in Maharashtra, the BJP's pro-Hindi policy will receive only limited opposition elsewhere, be it in West Bengal or Tamil Nadu. That response will be in terms of regional identity, language protectionism and an anti-Hindi stance. Recent history shows that Hindutva has the capacity to absorb such regionalist tendencies at state level. Thus, Maharashtra's protests against Hindi imposition will only produce a Marathi pride that is oblivious of the larger majoritarian project. That project will mostly go unchallenged as anti-Hindi politics will neither protect our linguistic diversity nor sensitise the public about the dangers of imposing uniformity. The day when votaries of regional languages appreciate the link between making one language 'national' and making one culture national, we shall have a better handle to understand the politics of nationalism masquerading as the politics of a national language. The writer, based in Pune, taught Political Science
