Amit Shah Breaks LK Advani's Record To Become Longest-Serving Home Minister
Amit Shah has become the longest-serving Union Minister of Home Affairs of India on Tuesday. With 2,258 days in office since assuming the role on May 30, 2019, Mr Shah has now surpassed the previous record held by senior BJP leader Lal Krishna Advani.
Mr Shah's tenure has also overtaken that of Congress stalwart Govind Ballabh Pant, cementing his position as a key pillar in the current National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government.
Coincidentally, Mr Shah achieved this milestone on August 5, the date he announced the abrogation of Article 370 in Parliament in 2019, ending the special status of Jammu and Kashmir.
Before Amit Shah, the leaders who served the longest tenures as Home Minister include Congress leader Govind Ballabh Pant and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Lal Krishna Advani.
Previously, BJP stalwart Lal Krishna Advani had held the position for 2,256 days (from March 19, 1998, to May 22, 2004). In comparison, Amit Shah has been serving as Home Minister since May 30, 2019, and by August 4, 2025, he will have completed 2,258 days in office.
Govind Ballabh Pant served from January 10, 1955, to March 7, 1961, a total of 6 years and 56 days.
Mr Shah became the country's Home Minister on May 30 2019, and remained in the post till June 9 2024. He again became Home Minister on June 10 2024, and is serving. Apart from the Home Ministry, he is also the country's first Cooperation Minister.
Apart from this, Amit Shah had also served as Gujarat Home Minister and held the position of BJP National President.
The tenure of Amit Shah as Union Home Minister, under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has been marked by several transformative developments in India's internal security landscape. The historic abrogation of Article 370 and the withdrawal of Jammu and Kashmir's special status stand out as landmark decisions. The region has since witnessed a dramatic improvement in law and order, with stone pelting incidents virtually eliminated. Across the country, there has been a sharp decline in areas affected by Left-Wing Extremism, Naxalism, and Maoist activities.
The peaceful progress in the construction of the Ram Janmabhoomi temple, the introduction of new criminal justice laws, and the successful enactment and rollout of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) further highlight this period. Multiple peace agreements in the North East have brought resolution to several long-standing insurgencies, making this a period of significant consolidation in the country's internal security framework.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Bombay High Court denies bail to ex-BJP MLA for shooting inside police station
Calling the act 'shocking' and 'unacceptable in a civilised society', the Bombay High Court on Tuesday (August 5, 2025) rejected the bail plea of former BJP MLA Ganpat Gaikwad, accused of opening fire on Shiv Sena leader Mahesh Gaikwad inside a police station last year. Justice Amit Borkar, while refusing bail, underscored the gravity of the incident and observed, 'The allegations against the applicant are of extremely grave and disturbing nature. It is the specific case of the prosecution that the applicant, who is a former elected representative (MLA), brazenly entered the cabin of the Senior Police Inspector at Hill Line Police Station, armed with a loaded revolver. It is alleged that he opened fire and discharged two rounds of bullets upon the injured Mahesh Gaikwad, with the clear intention of causing his death. It is further alleged that he also aimed and fired at another person present, Rahul Patil, thereby attempting to cause him fatal injuries as well.' Ganpat Gaikwad, a former MLA from the Kalyan (East) constituency, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), in connection with a case registered at Hill Line Police Station, Ulhasnagar. He is accused of offences under Sections 307 (attempt to murder), 120(B) (criminal conspiracy), 143, 147, 148, 149 (unlawful assembly and rioting), 109 (abetment), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 504 (intentional insult to provoke breach of peace) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, along with Section 30 of the Arms Act. According to the prosecution, on February 2, 2024, the two gathered at Hill Line Police Station, each demanding criminal action against the other. Around 9:30 p.m., Shiv Sena leader Mahesh Gaikwad, along with Rahul Patil and complainant Chainu Jadhav, was inside the Senior Police Inspector's cabin when Ganpat Gaikwad and his associate Vicky Ganatra entered. A heated argument broke out between the two factions. As tensions escalated, Senior PI Anil Jagtap stepped out to control the situation outside the cabin. The prosecution has alleged that after emptying all bullets from the revolver, the applicant noticed that the injured Mahesh was still alive. At this point, the Ganpat is stated to have sat on the Mahesh's chest and inflicted multiple forceful blows on his head using the butt of the revolver, a part not meant for attack, further aggravating the assault. 'Such an act, if taken to be true, demonstrates not only an intention to kill but also reveals the applicant's determination to ensure fatal consequences, irrespective of the location and presence of police officers,' Justice Borkar said, adding that these allegations, viewed in the context of the place where the incident occurred, inside the cabin of a senior police officer within the four corners of a police station, add a serious dimension to the entire episode. 'A police station is presumed to be a secure place for redressal of disputes and protection of life and liberty. If a violent crime of this scale is allowed to take place within such a protected zone, it shakes the confidence of the public in the ability of law enforcement machinery to maintain peace and order. A person, more so a public representative, engaging in such conduct reflects not only disregard for the rule of law but also sends a message of fear and intimidation to the citizens at large,' the court observed. While passing the order, the Judge said that the court is conscious of the fact that an accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty. However, at the stage of considering bail, the court cannot remain oblivious to the gravity of the offence and the manner in which it was committed. 'The nature of the allegations, the place of occurrence, and the conduct of the applicant, as narrated in the FIR and corroborated prima facie by CCTV footage and medical evidence, all suggest that the applicant's act was not one of mere provocation or sudden anger, but a deliberate and violent assault carried out with aggression. Such circumstances militate against the grant of bail at this stage,' the order read. The prosecution has placed significant reliance on CCTV footage from within the police station and the footage has been made part of the case record and, on initial examination, prima facie supports the account given by the first informant and injured eyewitnesses. The court noted that such electronic evidence plays a critical role at the bail stage. The ballistic report submitted by the Forensic Science Laboratory has confirmed that the bullets recovered from the injured victim's body were fired from the revolver seized from the applicant. This scientific evidence forms a critical link in the prosecution's chain of events, establishing a strong prima facie connection between the weapon and the injuries sustained. Ganpat Gaikwad claimed the incident was the result of a sudden fit of rage, lacking any premeditated intent. However, the footage clearly showed him entering the police station armed with a loaded revolver, which itself suggests conscious preparation, not an impulsive emotional outburst, the court said. The prosecution also relied on an audio recording of an interview the applicant allegedly gave to a private news channel, in which he is heard admitting to his intent to kill Mahesh Gaikwad and showing no remorse. This admission was made voluntarily and in the public domain, not under duress. The court noted that it reveals a mindset of justification rather than repentance, reinforcing the prosecution's position that the act was deliberate, intentional, and committed with impunity. The court found that the applicant's explanation lacks credibility, and the material on record clearly discloses a premeditated and violent act. At this stage, such conduct cannot be condoned, and the bail plea deserves to be rejected. 'The offence alleged against the applicant, if ultimately proved, is not only heinous but also indicative of a complete disregard for the rule of law and public safety. The manner in which the offence is alleged to have been committed, the location where it occurred, and the applicant's own post-incident conduct raise serious concerns regarding the possibility of obstruction of justice if he is released on bail/. In such circumstances, the Court finds that no case is made out for grant of bail at this stage,' the order said.
Mint
3 minutes ago
- Mint
Kashmir issue main source of tension between India, Pakistan: PM Shehbaz Sharif
Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif Tuesday said that the Kashmir issue is the main source of tension with India, as he criticised New Delhi's action to revoke the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. The Indian government abrogated Article 370 on August 5, 2019, bifurcating the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories — Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Pakistan has been observing the day as Youm-i-Istehsal to register its protest against India's action. Shehbaz said the Kashmir issue was the main source of tension between the two countries. 'The will and aspirations of the Kashmiri people, in accordance with UN Security Council resolutions, are the only path forward,' he added. He said that the just resolution of the Kashmir issue was a key pillar of Pakistan's foreign policy and urged the international community to play a role to help reverse India's "unilateral" actions of August 5, 2019. Separately, Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar said Islamabad desires friendly relations with all neighbouring countries and prefers dialogue and diplomacy over confrontation. Addressing a rally in Islamabad, Dar said Pakistan's armed forces and its people are "fully capable of delivering a resolute response to any act of aggression." Special walks and events were held across all four provinces and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Pakistani missions abroad also organised special events to mark the occasion.
Hindustan Times
3 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Soon, SOPs to curb non-consensual content
BENGALURU The Union government has set up an expert committee to create a standard operating procedure for combating the spread of non-consensual intimate images (NCII), following directions from the Madras high court in a case involving a woman lawyer whose private images were leaked and repeatedly resurfaced online. Centre told the court that the committee, composed of six experts and representatives from the Union government, will come up with a framework to deal with all cases involving NCII content. (Getty Images/iStockphoto) Senior counsel Abudu Kumar Rajarathinam, who appeared for the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), told the court that the committee, composed of six experts and representatives from the Union government, will come up with a framework to deal with all cases involving NCII content. The government made the submission before a bench of justice Anand Venkatesh of the Madras high court that was hearing the woman advocate's petition against the continued circulation of her private photos and videos, which her former partner had recorded without her consent and shared online. Despite multiple takedowns, the images kept reappearing, prompting Venkatesh to intervene and demand urgent systemic solutions. The government informed the court that MeitY had constituted a committee with representatives from the ministries of home affairs, women and child development, communications (department of telecommunications), and MeitY itself. The joint secretary of MeitY will head the panel, which also includes cyber law experts and nodal officers from the participating ministries, it said. The committee will draft an SOP (standard operating procedure) that combines 'legal and technical strategies to immediately and effectively' tackle NCII content. It will also propose long-term solutions and outline clear steps that victims themselves can take when their private content is leaked online. The Centre told the court that sensitising government agencies to the issue will form another key part of the committee's mandate. The high court recorded the submissions and said the committee should treat the present case as a 'test case' to find a robust mechanism to block such content and prevent it from resurfacing. 'This is like Ravana's head. Each time you cut it, it grows back. Even when we block the video, it reappears. The real problem is relapse,' justice Venkatesh said, referring to the woman lawyer's videos and photos resurfacing online despite the government and police authorities repeatedly blocking them. The court then suggested that MeitY can take the same steps it took to block over 1,400 URLs, including international links, spreading anti-India propaganda during 'Operation Sindoor'. Justice Venkatesh said the same intensity and technological tools must apply when a 'citizen's dignity' is at stake. 'The nation is nothing but a conglomerate of its citizens. If we can take swift action to protect the country's image, we must do the same when one individual's fundamental right under Article 21, right to dignity, is under attack,' the judge said. The court noted that NCII content remains a pervasive and recurring issue, especially affecting women who face stigma, threats, and long-lasting trauma. 'This isn't just one woman's fight. It reveals systemic gaps that harm thousands of women across the country,' the judge said. The petitioner's counsel pointed out that while MeitY had previously blocked six URLs, the video had now resurfaced across 13 new links. Senior counsel Rajarathinam confirmed that the URLs were inaccessible in Delhi and Mumbai but still active in Tamil Nadu. He said this was probably because of coordination issues with local service providers and said the authorities will fix it. The court reiterated that the committee must take the present case as a blueprint and evolve a method that works, so it can be replicated in future cases. 'This court will not allow this to become just another committee with a report that gathers dust,' justice Venkatesh said. During a previous hearing last month, the court had directed MeitY to detect and remove all private content of the petitioner within 48 hours. The woman had filed a police complaint after discovering that her ex-partner had secretly filmed their private moments and shared the content online. Despite repeated takedown efforts, the videos continued to resurface on pornographic websites, messaging apps, and social media platforms.
