logo
Race against time: How Congress barely made July 4 deadline on 'big, beautiful bill'

Race against time: How Congress barely made July 4 deadline on 'big, beautiful bill'

Fox News4 days ago
Football and basketball coaches are experts in clock management.
So are lawmakers.
Coaches are adept at either burning or saving just enough time on the clock to execute a play – or prevent the other team from doing so.
Congressional clock management is very different.
Whatever lawmakers say they will do – it will always take them a profoundly longer period of time in which to do it.
That's why the temporal politics of passing President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" overwhelmed everyone who works on Capitol Hill over the past few weeks.
That ranges from the lawmakers themselves to the aides, journalists, Capitol custodians and U.S. Capitol Police officers.
To wit:
Congressional Republicans have churned through variations of frameworks and iterations of the big, beautiful bill since February. But things finally got serious when the House adopted its formal version of the package on May 22, beating the Memorial Day goal by four days.
There was chatter that the Senate would tackle the House's package the week of June 9. Then that fell to the week of June 15. The idea was that the Senate would process its version of the bill that week and then allow the House to sync up during the week of June 22.
Then those hopes were dashed.
That's to say nothing of the Senate at least voting to proceed to even start debate at the very end of the week of June 15.
Here's what really happened. And it underscores just how protracted the process can be on Capitol Hill, especially with a very complicated and controversial piece of legislation.
On Monday, June 23, Republican senators talked about taking a procedural vote to launch debate on the big, beautiful bill as early as Wednesday or Thursday, June 25 or 26. Such a vote would require just 51 yeas. But the bill wasn't ready. Republicans were still crafting and drafting the bill to comport with Senate budget rules. The GOP also aimed to write the legislation in a fashion to court 51 yeas to crack the procedural hurdle and formally start debate.
Midweek came and the Senate never took a procedural vote. Sens. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Thom Tillis, R-N.C., opposed starting debate on a bill that was not complete.
So midweek morphed into the weekend, and when the Senate convened on Saturday, June 28, Fox News was told the chamber would take a procedural vote to begin debate around 4 p.m. ET.
Well, you guessed it.
The Senate did not trigger that vote until 7:31 p.m. Saturday. And the 15-minute vote turned into a three-hour and 38-minute affair. The Senate closed the vote at 11:09 p.m.
Saturday – with Vice President JD Vance nearby in case his services were necessary to break a tie.
They were not.
At least not on the dais.
But Vance played a pivotal role in negotiating with Johnson, Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., and others to greenlight the Senate starting on the bill.
However, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., then compelled Senate clerks to read the entire 940-page bill out loud from the dais. That enterprise consumed just under 16 hours of floor time. The clerks – their voices cracking and hoarse – concluded a few minutes after 3 p.m. on Sunday. This marked the first time a senator required the clerks to verbally read a bill before the Senate since 2021.
So, once the clerks concluded their oratory, it was believed that the Senate might go all night with its marathon voting session – known as a "vote-a-rama" – and try to finish the bill sometime by dawn Monday.
But this is Congress time.
Senators didn't even begin the vote-a-rama until 9:40 am Monday. Twelve hours later, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., suggested it was time to "start figuring out" a final group of amendments that were necessary to conclude the bill.
Some groaned at that notion. One senator told Fox News that 12 hours later was a little late in the game to "start figuring out" something of that magnitude.
The Senate then toiled throughout the night Monday and into Tuesday. Thune and the GOP leadership finally cut a deal with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, on rural hospitals to marshal her vote. The Senate approved the bill late Tuesday morning after an all-night session. Vance was back to break the tie in what is called a "Van Halen" vote. The tally was 50-50 since three GOP senators defected. But Vance's vote in favor made the roll call "51-50."
For those who are uninitiated in the Van Halen discography, "5150" was Van Halen's first album with new lead singer Sammy Hagar, supplanting David Lee Roth. It went to No. 1 on the Billboard charts.
Then, it was on to the House.
The House Rules Committee serves as a gateway for legislation to head to the floor. It convened a meeting early Tuesday afternoon. The Senate would soon send its revamped version of the big, beautiful bill across the Capitol Dome for the House to align. The Rules Committee then proceeded to meet until around 1 a.m. Wednesday, prepping the bill for the floor.
That meant the House could vote by late Wednesday afternoon.
But there was a problem.
House GOP leaders discovered what they termed a "technical error" in the rule. The entire House must first approve the rule before debating legislation on the floor. So the House needed to vote on the fix first. That vote started early Wednesday afternoon – and continued for another seven hours and 31 minutes. That established a record for the longest roll call vote in House history, topping a vote of seven hours and 21 minutes in 2021.
Some Republicans weren't at the Capitol. But they held the vote open to buy time to work on skeptical GOP members who may be holdouts.
And around 9:30 p.m. Wednesday, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., decided to double-dog dare anyone who was against the bill to put their voting card where their mouth was. Republican leaders closed the "technical correction" vote and proceeded to a vote on the "rule." If the House adopted the rule, it could formally debate the bill. The House was stuck if its members failed to approve the rule.
The tally board behind the dais in the House chamber populated relatively quickly. All 216 Democrats said no There were also four GOP no votes – and several who refused to vote yes. Republicans could only lose three votes and still pass the rule. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., was a yes on the rule – even though he opposed the bill. He then switched to no as the vote dragged on. However, Massie ultimately supported the rule in the end.
Reps. Victoria Spartz, R-Ind., Keith Self, R-Texas, Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., and Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., were no votes throughout the vote. But around 1 a.m., there was movement. The holdouts and some of those who voted no met with Johnson and other GOP leaders. That seemed to pry loose the votes of the holdouts and opponents – except Fitzpatrick.
But there was a problem.
Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa. – who had not voted – drove home to Pennsylvania. So everyone at the Capitol patiently waited for Perry to return. He did around 3:30 a.m. Thursday. Everyone but Fitzpatrick voted as a bloc in favor of the rule. The House had the votes to begin debate on the rule.
It looked as though the House might vote around daybreak on the actual bill itself.
But the office of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., had told Fox News on Wednesday that Jeffries intended to speak for an hour or so at the end of debate. There's a custom in the House where top leaders of both parties are yielded "a minute" to speak on the floor. But this is a "magic minute." As a courtesy to those leaders, they speak as long as they want.
Jeffries began speaking just before 5 a.m. Thursday – and finally concluded eight hours and 45 minutes later just after 1:30 p.m. ET Thursday. Jeffries shattered the mark of eight hours and 32 minutes established by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., in 2021. McCarthy set the record as minority leader.
So those House members hoping to hop an early morning flight and get home for July 4 would have to wait.
Mike Johnson didn't speak nearly as long as Jeffries. But he did observe that the late President Ronald Reagan once said that no speech should run longer than 20 minutes.
Johnson spoke for 23 minutes.
And then the House voted, finally passing the bill 218-214 at 2:31 p.m. Thursday. Fitzpatrick and Massie were the only GOP noes.
It is said that we never have enough time in life. And if you work on Capitol Hill, you'll probably have even less thanks to congressional clock management.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iranian Cleric Offers Reward for Whoever 'Brings the Head of Trump'
Iranian Cleric Offers Reward for Whoever 'Brings the Head of Trump'

Newsweek

time20 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Iranian Cleric Offers Reward for Whoever 'Brings the Head of Trump'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. An Iranian cleric has offered a reward "to anyone who brings the head of Trump," according to an exiled Iranian outlet, adding to the calls from several Iranian figures and state-aligned media for the president's assassination. Mansour Emami, a state-appointed official from the West Azerbaijan province of northwestern Iran, offered a substantial reward for Trump's assassination, according to the U.K.-based Iranian International opposition outlet and the state-run Hawzah news agency. Newsweek has been unable to independently verify these reports. Newsweek has contacted Iran's foreign ministry for comment via email on Thursday. In recent weeks, at least one high-profile Iranian official has issued a fatwa, or ruling grounded in Islamic law, against the Republican and also against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The fatwa, publicized by one of the country's most senior clerics, Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi, was downplayed by Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian during a conversation with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson earlier this month, who said the order had "nothing to do with the Iranian government or the Supreme Leader," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The spike in violence between Israel and Iran, now referred to by many as the "12 day war," flared last month when Israel launched attacks on Iran's nuclear and military sites. Tehran then launched its own aerial assaults on Israel. U.S. President Donald Trump addresses the nation, alongside U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, from the White House in Washington, D.C. on June 21, 2025, following the announcement that the U.S. bombed nuclear sites in... U.S. President Donald Trump addresses the nation, alongside U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, from the White House in Washington, D.C. on June 21, 2025, following the announcement that the U.S. bombed nuclear sites in Iran. More CARLOS BARRIA/POOL/AFP via Getty Images Trump greenlit U.S. strikes on three of Iran's nuclear sites, which the president has since described as having "obliterated" Tehran's nuclear program. Different assessments say the sites sustained varying degrees to damage. The U.S., and many of America's allies, have said it is unacceptable for Iran to have nuclear weapons. While Tehran has insisted its program is peaceful, international investigators have found highly enriched uranium close to the level needed for a weapon, and Iranian officials have suspended their cooperation with the international nuclear watchdog. Iran said on Tuesday it had not requested talks with the U.S. on nuclear agreements after Trump indicated Tehran was seeking a new accord, and that negotiations were "scheduled." The Department of Homeland Security last month said Iran "has a long-standing commitment to target U.S. Government officials it views as responsible for the death of an Iranian military commander killed in January 2020." Iranian commander Major General Qasem Soleimani was assassinated at the start of 2020 during a drone strike ordered by Trump during his first term in office. Mohammad-Javad Larijani, an aide close to Khamenei, said earlier this week the U.S. President "can no longer sunbathe in Mar-a-Lago," referring to Trump's Florida resort. "While he's lying down, a micro-drone might target and strike him right in the navel," Larijani said during an appearance on state-controlled television. When asked about the remarks, Trump responded: "I'm not sure it's a threat, actually, but perhaps it is." "The Iranian regime's continued calls to assassinate President Trump are completely unacceptable," Republican Senator Jim Risch, the chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said on Wednesday. Ahead of his reelection late last year, Trump said in September there were "big threats on my life by Iran," adding: "Moves were already made by Iran that didn't work out, but they will try again." CNN reported in July 2024 that U.S. authorities had information indicating Iran had developed a plot to assassinate Trump, prompting security around the then-presidential candidate to tighten over the summer. There was no indication that Thomas Matthew Crooks, the 20-year-old who attempted to assassinate Trump that month, was connected to Iran, according to the report. An Iranian website claims to run a public campaign to fundraise for Trump's assassination. As of Thursday, the website claimed to have raised more than $40 million.

Kathy Griffin stands by belief that Trump didn't win 2024 election, despite 'tinfoil hat' label
Kathy Griffin stands by belief that Trump didn't win 2024 election, despite 'tinfoil hat' label

Fox News

time23 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Kathy Griffin stands by belief that Trump didn't win 2024 election, despite 'tinfoil hat' label

Comedian Kathy Griffin said she doesn't believe President Donald Trump won the 2024 presidential election, and doesn't care if people call her "Tinfoil hat" in response. "People think I'm tinfoil hat because I don't think he won in a free and fair election this time" Griffin said during a Substack Live with writer E. Jean Carroll, posted Tuesday on Griffin's YouTube channel, in response to a question from Carroll about who won the election. "No, I'm going to take a hit for that, and I understand, but that's just my humble opinion," Griffin added. In the clip flagged by The Daily Caller's Jason Cohen, she also said she is suspicious of Elon Musk, founder and CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, Inc., who headed up Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and was assigned to trim $2 trillion from the federal government's budget. Musk announced he was leaving DOGE in a post on X on May 28, and has been critical of various proposals from Trump, including the 47th president's "big, beautiful bill" which he signed into law on July 4. "I don't trust the Elon connection," Griffin said. "I have my suspicions and yet at the tender age of 64, I never thought I would say something. And I know that sounds crazy, but I just had to put that out there because I can't resist getting in trouble." Carroll, who accused Trump of sexually abusing her in the 1990s, told Griffin that "there's a wave of people who agree with you." "That's why I'm sort of saying it out loud now because look, I'm not a conspiracy theorist," Carroll said. "But something about him winning every swing state, all seven ... it doesn't sit right with me. But I also don't know if we'll really find out anything in my lifetime." During a recent conversation with Don Lemon, Griffin made similar remarks, saying that "I do not think Trump won in a free and fair election. I believe there was tampering."

5 most absurd Trump-like things Donald Trump recently said to 5 African leaders
5 most absurd Trump-like things Donald Trump recently said to 5 African leaders

Business Insider

time23 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

5 most absurd Trump-like things Donald Trump recently said to 5 African leaders

Donald Trump's anticipated meeting with five African leaders, including the presidents of Mauritania, Senegal, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, and Liberia, took place on July 9, 2025, as scheduled. The heads of state present at the meeting had a great deal of issues to address. Donald Trump met with five African leaders on July 9, 2025, to discuss trade, security, and investment. The meeting followed his successful peace agreement between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Trump's rhetorical style was evident during the discussions, making several notable statements. Following the historic peace deal Trump was able to broker between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, the U.S. president scheduled a meeting with 5 other African leaders to discuss trade, regional security, and investment. The meeting, which was held on Wednesday, went about as typically as anyone would have hoped for, relative to Trump's other meetings with world leaders, notably the contentious and hostile sessions with the presidents of Ukraine and South Africa. While Trump's meeting with the five African heads of state was as civil as it gets, it was not void of Trump's signature rhetorical style. Few political figures in recent history have captivated the public's attention like Donald Trump. His litigious style, which is typically direct, combative, and unique, has attracted and divided audiences in the United States and the world over. Whether making campaign speeches, tweeting, or participating in televised debates, Trump's style of discourse has constantly ignored established political norms. With that said, here are the 5 most Trump-like things the U.S. president said to the five African leaders during their meeting. 'There's a lot of anger on your continent; we've been able to solve a lot of it.' The U.S president said this in his welcome note, referring to the peace deal he initiated between Rwanda and the DRC. The anger on the continent in his context referenced the wars in Libya, Sudan, and every other conflict-ridden region. 'You guys are going to fight; we're not going to trade.' This was said by Donald Trump when he was addressing the measures the United States takes against warring states that it sanctions. His point here was that he is willing to trade with African countries as long as they are not fighting. 'We've encouraged the countries here today to make greater investments in defence, hopefully, of course, buying our equipment, because we do make the best defense equipment, I guess we proved that two weeks ago in Iran.' This quote by the American president is practically self-explanatory, as his goal with this statement was to encourage the buying of American-made weapons by African countries. 'I haven't thought of it, but maybe, I don't know, I like him, him, him, and him, no, I don't think so, not too much, these are friends of mine now.' Donald Trump responded to a reporter's question about imposing hefty tariffs on the countries represented by the leaders present. He pointed to four of the five African leaders there, stating that he liked them and would be hesitant to impose large tariffs on their countries. Perhaps the most controversial statement from Trump during the meeting, given how much it has been trending on social media, Trump asked Liberia's president where he learnt to speak English so well. This has come across as passive-aggressive to some people, as they claim that the president's statement implies that Africa is illiterate. Some say it's driven by ignorance, given that Liberia is an English-speaking country, something the U.S president should have been aware of. The rest of the African leaders present at the meeting spoke French.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store