logo
Indian Army to bear expenses of boy who supplied tea, milk to soldiers during Operation Sindoor

Indian Army to bear expenses of boy who supplied tea, milk to soldiers during Operation Sindoor

The Hindua day ago
The Indian Army on Sunday (July 20, 2025) said it will bear the study expenses of a ten-year-old boy, who supplied little meals to soldiers battling gunfight in a Punjab village during Operation Sindoor.
Shvan Singh had run errands for the soldiers posted in Tara Wali village.
The boy took water, ice, tea, milk, and lassi to soldiers as they exchanged fire with the Pakistan Army.
In recognition of his courage and enthusiasm, the Indian Army's Golden Arrow Division has committed to fully sponsor Shvan's education.
During a ceremony at Ferozepur Cantonment on Saturday, Lt Gen Manoj Kumar Katiyar, General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Western Command, also felicitated the boy.
The Army said Shvan's story serves as a reminder of the "quiet heroes" across the country who deserve recognition and support.
Shvan, whose village lies in Mamdot area of Ferozepur district, had earlier said he too wants to join the Army when he grows up.
"I want to become a 'fauji' when I grow up. I want to serve the country," the boy had said in May.
His father had then said, "We are proud of him. Even soldiers loved him." He said the class 4 student supplied the ration on his own without anyone asking him to do it.
Tara Wali village is around 2 km from the international border.
Under Operation Sindoor, the Indian armed forces carried out pre-dawn missile strikes on May 7 on nine terror targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir.
The targets included the Jaish-e-Mohammad stronghold of Bahawalpur and Lashkar-e-Taiba's base in Muridke.
The operation was launched in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives.
Following the Indian action, Pakistan launched an offensive against Indian military bases and resorted to shelling the border areas for the next three days.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mamata Banerjee accuses BJP of ‘linguistic terrorism' against Bengalis
Mamata Banerjee accuses BJP of ‘linguistic terrorism' against Bengalis

Scroll.in

time3 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Mamata Banerjee accuses BJP of ‘linguistic terrorism' against Bengalis

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Monday accused the Bharatiya Janata Party of unleashing ' linguistic terrorism ' against Bengalis, PTI reported. The Trinamool Congress chief said that the battle to protect the Bengali language and identity would continue until the BJP was ousted from both the state and the Centre. 'If linguistic profiling does not stop, the resistance movement will reach Delhi,' she said. Banerjee was speaking at a Martyrs' Day rally held by the Trinamool Congress in Kolkata, where she called for support to defeat the BJP in the 2026 Assembly elections in the state and also remove it from power in Delhi. Her remarks come amid Indian authorities pursuing a policy over the past month to 'push' individuals claimed to be undocumented migrants into Bangladesh. Many of those forced out of the country claim that they are Indian citizens. Reports of migrant workers from West Bengal living in BJP-ruled states, including Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh and Delhi, being detained and deported under allegations that they were Bangladeshi citizens have also emerged. At the rally on Monday, the chief minister claimed that Bengalis in BJP-ruled states were being harassed, detained and removed from voter rolls. She also announced the launch of a movement from July 27 against what she described as 'the BJP's terrorism' against the Bengali language. 'Every weekend after July 27 till the elections, hold rallies to protest against the attack on Bengalis,' the chief minister was quoted as saying by The Telegraph. 'This movement will continue till the Assembly election results are announced.' She added: 'Wherever Bengali-speaking people are detained, we will protest. If even one person is detained, we won't stop protesting. I challenge them. How many jails, detention centres can they build?' Banerjee further accused the BJP of targeting Bengalis through the National Register of Citizens process. She claimed that notices were being sent by the Assam government to residents in West Bengal. The Trinamool Congress chief claimed that Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma was interfering in the affairs of her state. 'He cannot handle his own state but is meddling in the affairs of West Bengal,' she was quoted as saying by PTI. Banerjee also accused the Election Commission of acting under the BJP's influence and 'conspiring against West Bengal'. She alleged that it wanted to replicate in West Bengal what was being done in Bihar through the special intensive revision of the state's electoral rolls. The revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar was announced by the Election Commission on June 24. As part of the exercise, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list will need to submit proof of eligibility to vote. India has forced more than 2,000 persons, alleged to be undocumented migrants, into Bangladesh since the country launched ' Operation Sindoor ', a military operation against terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The legality of the 'push back' policy has been debated in India and internationally. Experts have told Scroll that the policy violated India's obligations under international law and customary international law. In June, four men from West Bengal, who had been picked up by the Maharashtra Police and forced into Bangladesh, were brought back on June 15. The Murshidabad Police in West Bengal had presented proof of them being Indian citizens. On July 16, the Calcutta High Court asked the Centre if there was truth to the claims that Bengali-speaking persons were being deported to Bangladesh.

Russian woman in custody battle seems to have left India, says Centre; ‘absolutely not acceptable' remarks Supreme Court
Russian woman in custody battle seems to have left India, says Centre; ‘absolutely not acceptable' remarks Supreme Court

Indian Express

time3 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Russian woman in custody battle seems to have left India, says Centre; ‘absolutely not acceptable' remarks Supreme Court

The Centre on Monday informed the Supreme Court that the Russian woman caught in a dispute with her Indian husband over the custody of their minor child, and who was reported missing from her Delhi home since July 7, may have already reached her home country, travelling through Nepal and the UAE. Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati informed a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, 'We are saying only on the basis of her email IP address login. Airlines have not, so far, responded to us because it was Saturday and Sunday (the matter was last heard on July 18, Friday), but we will get a confirmation… But on the IP address, we have located her presence. July 7 is when she left her home, on July 8 she is in Bihar, then Nepal on July 11 and 12, and then Russia on July 16'. Justice Kant said he and Justice Bagchi were discussing that it is the safest route to flee from India. When the court asked if there were CCTV visuals, Bhati said, 'We are still investigating. This is what we have found so far. We will investigate and continue to give reports to the court.' Justice Kant referred to the status report submitted by the Delhi Police Commissioner and said that the woman had boarded an Air Arabia flight from Nepal. Bhati said, 'We have the boarding pass, but we need to have confirmation from the airlines. We can't place it before your Lordships till it is confirmed through proper channels.' The bench also wondered about their passports. 'How were the passports released? Does it not show active collusion and connivance of embassy officials?' asked Justice Kant. Bhati said, 'We are still investigating. The Delhi Police are using the office of the Ministry of External Affairs to do this. We will also be using the diplomatic channels for her to be brought back to face the law.' 'This is absolutely not acceptable to us at any cost. File an affidavit that you are satisfied with your information, that this is how she is involved. Then, we propose to pass an order. This is definitely a gross case of contempt. Then we will see (about) the red corner notice and you will have to activate your diplomatic channels.' ASG Bhati pointed out that as reflected in an order of the court, the child's passport was surrendered. Justice Kant said, 'It means duplicate passports were prepared and those were prepared by the officials of the Russian embassy… Let the Russian embassy also give in writing….' Calling for a fresh status report, the bench said it will hear the matter after a week. The woman had initially approached the court to resolve the custody dispute, and the SC passed orders in the matter from time to time. The parents had been living separately in Delhi on the court's direction, with both sharing responsibility for the child. In May, the court granted the father exclusive custody for four days a week, and the mother retained custody for the remaining three days. Earlier this month, the father returned to the Supreme Court, alleging that both the mother and the child had gone missing. He claimed that the mother had been seen entering the Russian Embassy in Delhi accompanied by a diplomat. Following this, the Supreme Court directed authorities to locate the missing minor, hand over the child to the father, and prevent the mother from leaving India.

Tariff uncertainty continues: US team to visit India in mid-Aug, well after Aug 1 ‘hard deadline'
Tariff uncertainty continues: US team to visit India in mid-Aug, well after Aug 1 ‘hard deadline'

Indian Express

time3 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Tariff uncertainty continues: US team to visit India in mid-Aug, well after Aug 1 ‘hard deadline'

After Indian negotiators wrapped up another round of negotiations in Washington last week, a US team led by US Trade Representative for South and Central Asia Brendan Lynch is expected to visit India in mid-August to continue negotiations for a trade agreement, The Indian Express has learned. While India and the US have agreed on a wide range of tariff lines, the negotiations — which currently only involve market access for goods — are stuck over sensitive sectors such as agriculture and automobiles, which are key job creators in India. The new round of talks beyond the August 1 deadline comes amid growing suspense over whether India will face 26 per cent reciprocal tariffs starting August 1, as US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Sunday said that August 1 is a 'hard deadline' for countries to begin paying tariffs. 'That's a hard deadline, so on August 1, the new tariff rates will come in… Nothing stops countries from talking to us after August 1, but they're going to start paying the tariffs on August 1,' Lutnick said in a television interview on Sunday. Notably, President Donald Trump's deadline for implementation of reciprocal tariffs has shifted from April 1 to July 9, and now to August 1. While Trump has reiterated that a deal with India is close, India could face tariffs of up to 26 per cent if both countries fail to reach an agreement. Government officials have maintained that India is aiming to sign a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) by the end of the year, which would provide market access in labour-intensive sectors and ensure a significant tariff differential compared to its Asian peers. Lutnick also said that smaller countries — including those in Latin America, the Caribbean, and many in Africa — would face a baseline tariff of 10 per cent. 'The bigger economies will either open themselves up or they'll pay a fair tariff to America,' he said. Trade experts have pointed out that, despite being presented as trade 'agreements', Trump's deals do not meet WTO standards for Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). Under WTO rules, FTAs require mutual tariff reductions on a substantial share of trade. 'Under the Trump model, only the partner country lowers its Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) tariffs, while the US makes no reciprocal cuts. Trump lacks Fast Track Trade Authority from Congress to reduce MFN tariffs. Instead, he's offering to roll back only the 'Liberation Day' tariffs imposed in April under emergency powers — tariffs that a US federal court has already ruled unlawful. The case is under appeal, but the legal basis remains fragile,' the think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said. For India, those April tariffs added a 26 per cent surcharge on top of normal US tariffs. Even if a deal is struck, Indian exports may still face a minimum 10 per cent additional levy, making it a pressured compromise, not a true partnership, GTRI said in a report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store