Gemini Live camera and screen sharing rolling out to all users- Here's how it works
Gmini Live was introduced last year as a conversational model with an audio-based interface. Now, Google has expanded its capabilities to share the camera or screen within Gemini Live conversation. With these features, users can simply point the camera at to object, place, or monument and ask questions. Gemini will be able to analyse the object for relevant responses. Google also says that, 'Gemini will provide real-time feedback based on the new skill you're learning or task you're completing.'
In April 2025, the feature was rolled out to several Android devices, now it's also available to iOS users. Additionally, Google has also expanded its access from subscription users to free-tier users. However, we are yet to know about the limitations
Step 1: Open the Gemini app on your Android or iOS device.
Step 2: Click on the Live waveform icon, placed in the right corner, to activate Gemini Live
Step 3: Once activated, you'll find the camera and screen share option at the bottom left side.
This way, users can interact with Gemini Live via the camera or by sharing their screen to resolve queries and ask related questions. As of now, the feature is not available on iOS devices. However, we expect it to be rolled out soon. Google is also expanding the Gemini Live feature to other apps such as Calendar, Keep, Maps, and Tasks. This integration is expected to roll out in the upcoming weeks.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Zuckerberg's AI dream team is all built by immigrants: Will visa walls break Silicon Valley's AI backbone?
The United States of America, sobriqueted as the "land of opportunities," now stands at the precipice reeking of irony. What if we told you that America's tech supremacy, the very capability it is globally championed for, rests not on homegrown talent, but on the passports of the immigrants? Historical facts have added their weight to it, and now present affirms it further. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Mark Zuckerberg's newly announced AI Superintelligence Lab tells the story emphatically: Eleven scientists, eleven immigrants, not a single US-born engineer in sight. What is striking is not that America depends on immigrants: It is how profoundly that dependency is knitted into the architecture of its future. Their names are not etched on billboards. Their accents may differ. But from Princeton to Peking University, from IIT Kanpur to Carnegie Mellon, these minds are carrying the bastion of artificial intelligence for the Silicon Valley. The global minds behind American machines Meta's all-immigrant dream team reads like a map of intellectual migration. Trapit Bansal, an alumnus from IIT Kanpur, honed his brilliance at UMass Amherst and OpenAI. Shuchao Bi, born in China, gave GPT-4o its voice. Huiwen Chang invented architectures that made machines 'see.' Ji Lin made AI cheaper and faster. The journeys trace their roots back to overcrowded classrooms in Beijing, Delhi, or Pretoria, survived the crucible of elite admissions, and culminated in a foreign land where visa renewals were as stressful as debugging code. They trained in the US, built foundational models, and are now constructing the scaffolding of AI's future. This isn't an exception. It is the rule. From Google's Bard to OpenAI's GPT-4, from Microsoft's Azure to Amazon's Alexa, the architects of American AI are more likely to have roots in Chennai than Chicago, in Wuhan than Washington. Silicon Valley's immigrant skeleton America's tech economy has always run on imported intellect. Over 70% of H-1B visas are granted to Indian nationals alone, according to data shared by USCIS. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Some years, the number has crossed 75%. And it's not just engineering cubicles. Sundar Pichai (Google), Satya Nadella (Microsoft), and Arvind Krishna (IBM), the corner office is increasingly accentuated. The journey started in the 1990s when coders flocked the Silicon Valley, which has now translated into an artery system of AI architects, cloud infrastructure pioneers, and cybersecurity leaders. They do not just solve technical problems; they set the global agenda for what AI is and what it has become. And yet, these very professionals are being subjected to a political climate that casts suspicion on foreign workers, tightening visa controls, and erecting bureaucratic minefields that threaten to break the very backbone of American tech. Visa battles and broken promises The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) received over 780,000 applications for just 85,000 H-1B slots in FY 2024, according to USCIS data. The odds are absurd, the process increasingly punitive. A proposed beneficiary-based lottery model aims to curb mass applications, but it also risks shutting out legitimate talent. Add to that the rising wage thresholds, compliance red tape, and anti-immigrant rhetoric that predictably peaks during election years, and you begin to see why America's AI future is hanging by a bureaucratic thread. The tightening immigration policies might cast a shadow on the tech progress that America is witnessing right now. The Indian engine of the AI age The effect of this reliance is more pronounced in India. Post-liberalisation, our country developed an obsession with engineering, catalysed by the IITs and fuelled by social aspiration, creating a goldmine of global tech workers. Over the years down the line, India has lost its talent to offshore and, in a way, contributed enormously to building the American tech empire. The irony deepens: Indian engineering graduates built apps for the world, but couldn't find jobs at home. Their futures, and sometimes their families' fortunes, hinged not on innovation but immigration. A tectonic shift or a temporary snag? Today, that engine is sputtering. Visa regimes are unstable. The H-1B system is outdated. International students, once America's intellectual capital in waiting, now live under a cloud of uncertainty. And as Meta's immigrant-only team shines bright, the tech juggernaut is exposed well enough. If tomorrow, the gates narrow further, or worse, if talent stops navigating to the country, the US will not only lose developers, but with them the crucial direction as well. Already, there are numerous murmurs among graduates about staying back. Startup India, AI missions, and semiconductor initiatives, the incentives are growing. With the right policy push, India could convert its brain drain into a brain return. Maybe, the global tech power can be rescripted, this time from Bengaluru and not Boston. Innovation is not a nationality The American edge in AI owes a lot to the passports that have flown from distant countries with a utopian vision of building a future. They showed up with foreign degrees, accents that were often mocked, and dreams that carried enough weight. However, dreams need visas. And revolutions, especially technological ones, need the freedom to cross borders. The question before America now is simple: Will it remain the world's most powerful magnet for minds? Or will it build walls so high that even superintelligence can't climb over? If it picks the latter, it may soon find that the AI of tomorrow and the accompanied power may find an abode somewhere else and might not be in America.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Android 16 Introduces Live Updates, Google's Answer To Apple's Live Activities
Google has officially begun rolling out Live Updates with the stable release of Android 16, offering a glimpse at its long-awaited answer to Apple's Live Activities. Live Updates are a new class of notifications designed to provide real-time updates for ongoing activities like food delivery, ride-hailing pickups, navigation, and timers. These notifications come with elevated permissions, enabling them to appear above standard alerts - including in the status bar and on the lock screen. However, the initial rollout of Android 16 only supports Live Updates in a limited capacity. Full system-level integration is expected later in 2025, ahead of support for Wear OS devices. In its current form, Android 16 allows apps to generate Live Updates using progress-style notifications, but the system doesn't treat them any differently from standard notifications. As a result, these alerts lack a fully expanded view that sets Live Updates apart. Notably, Google didn't provide a firm timeline for full Live Updates integration. The feature's absence in Android 16 QPR1 Beta 1 cast doubt on its rollout, but signs of progress emerged in QPR1 Beta 2 and 2.1. Android analyst Mishaal Rahman, writing for Android Authority, noted that Google is adjusting the underlying requirements for what qualifies as a Live Update - a move that may explain the staggered release. Full support is still in development, but Android users can expect the polished version of Live Updates to arrive in upcoming updates later this year.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Will the EU delay enforcing its AI Act?
With less than a month to go before parts of the European Union's AI Act come into force, companies are calling for a pause in the provisions and getting support from some politicians. Groups representing big U.S. tech companies such as Google owner Alphabet and Facebook owner Meta, and European companies such as Mistral and ASML have urged the European Commission to delay the AI Act by years. The rules for general purpose AI (GPAI) models take effect on August 2, a Commission spokesperson reiterated, adding that the powers for enforcing those rules start only on August 2, 2026. Under the landmark act that was passed a year earlier after intense debate between EU countries, its provisions would come into effect in a staggered manner over several years. Some important provisions, including rules for foundation models like those made by Google, Mistral and OpenAI, will be subject to transparency requirements such as drawing up technical documentation, complying with EU copyright law and providing detailed summaries about the content used for algorithm training. The companies will also need to test for bias, toxicity, and robustness before launching. AI models classed as posing a systemic risk and high-impact GPAI will have to conduct model evaluations, assess and mitigate risks, conduct adversarial testing, report to the European Commission on serious incidents and provide information on their energy efficiency. For AI companies, the enforcement of the act means additional costs for compliance. And for ones that make AI models, the requirements are tougher. But companies are also unsure how to comply with the rules as there are no guidelines yet. The AI Code of Practice, a guidance document to help AI developers to comply with the act, missed its publication date of May 2. "To address the uncertainty this situation is creating, we urge the Commission to propose a two-year 'clock-stop' on the AI Act before key obligations enter into force," said an open letter published on Thursday by a group of 45 European companies. It also called for simplification of the new rules. A Commission spokesperson said the European AI Board is discussing the timing to implement the Code of Practice, with the end of 2025 being considered. Another concern is that the act may stifle innovation, particularly in Europe where companies have smaller compliance teams than their U.S. counterparts. While the Commission is set for GPAI rules to come in force from next month, its plan to publish key guidance to help thousands of companies to comply with the AI rules by year end would mark a six-month delay from its May deadline. EU tech chief Henna Virkkunen had earlier promised to publish the AI Code of Practice before next month. Some political leaders, such as Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, have also called the AI rules "confusing" and asked the EU to pause the act. "A bold 'stop-the-clock' intervention is urgently needed to give AI developers and deployers legal certainty, as long as necessary standards remain unavailable or delayed," tech lobbying group CCIA Europe said.
