ADP: Private payrolls grew by 37,000 in May; lowest rate since 2023
June 4 (UPI) -- Private payroll processor ADP reported Wednesday that May private sector job growth was at its lowest level in two years.
U.S. private employers added 37,000 jobs in May, the lowest pace of hiring since March 2023, ADP's monthly report said.
"After a strong start to the year, hiring is losing momentum," ADP Chief Economist Nela Richardson said in a statement. "Pay growth, however, was little changed in May, holding at robust levels for both job-stayers and job-changers."
The Dow Jones consensus expectation was 110,000.
ADP May data showed 38,000 jobs created in leisure and hospitality, 20,000 created in financial services and 8,000 in information.
But professional and business services lost 17,000, education and health services lost 13,000, and natural resources and mining saw a 5,000 decline in jobs.
Goods-producing industries lost a net 2,000 jobs with manufacturing down by 3,000.
President Donald Trump referenced the ADP report as he again called on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to lower interest rates.
"ADP NUMBER OUT!!! 'Too Late' Powell must now LOWER THE RATE. He is unbelievable!!! Europe has lowered NINE TIMES!" Trump wrote on Truth Social.
While the labor market weakened in May, pay gains held steady.
ADP found that year-over-year pay increased in May by 4.5% for workers who stayed in their jobs. Pay rose 7% for job-changers.
Financial services jobs had the greatest impact on pay gain of 5.2% for job-stayers.
By region, the West gained 37,000 jobs and the Midwest gained 20,000.
The Northeast lost 19,000 jobs and the South lost 5,000.
Medium-sized employers with 50 to 499 employees added a net 49,000 jobs.
But small and large employers lost 13,000 and 3,000 jobs respectively.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fed Governor Kugler to Resign Effective Aug. 8
Federal Reserve Governor Adriana Kugler will step down from her position on the central bank's board, the Fed announced. Mike McKee reports on "Bloomberg The Close." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why did stocks tumble this week?
Why did stocks tumble this week? originally appeared on TheStreet. The stock market had a tough week, with the S&P 500 and tech-stock-heavy Nasdaq retreating sharply on Thursday and Friday following a batch of concerning news on inflation, jobs, and tariffs. The S&P 500 fell 2.7% from an early-week high while the Nasdaq lost 3.9% of its value from its peak on Thursday. Here's why stocks retreated, and what could happen next. Fed interest rate policy risks being too late The stock market sell-off began in earnest following the Federal Reserve's controversial decision to keep interest rates at 4.25% to 4.5%. President Trump has advocated for Fed Chairman Jerome Powell to cut rates aggressively, recommending a 3% interest rates support stock prices because they increase household and business spending, fueling revenue and profit growth. Powell's reluctance to lower rates remains a headwind for stocks this year. Powell cited risks of tariffs driving inflation higher later this year and a "solid" economy for the decision to leave rates unchanged. Many viewed his hawkish tone during his press conference as an indication that rates may not get cut at the next meeting in September either. The decision drew the ire of President Donald Trump, who has previously called Chairman Powell "Mr. Too Late" and a "numbskull" for not already reducing interest rates. The President renewed his calls for Powell to resign following the Fed meeting. Despite White House pressure, the Fed's dual mandate targets low unemployment and inflation, which dictates its decisions on monetary policy. The Fed's mandate purposefully excludes political jawboning. Unfortunately, the Fed's dual goals are contradictory. While Fed rate cuts boost economic activity and lower unemployment, they increase inflation. The opposite is true when it raises rates. This dynamic often means that the Fed hesitates for fear of causing more economic problems than it solves. Unfortunately, that often means that the Fed falls behind the curve when setting interest rates at appropriate levels, forcing it to act more aggressively than it might otherwise because the economy has gotten too hot or cold. That chasing can lead to greater uncertainty, causing stock market volatility. Rising inflation amid higher tariffs is bad for stocks The stock market's sell-off earlier in 2025 was primarily due to higher-than-expected import tariffs and the risk that they would boost inflation, zapping economic activity. Those worries fell when President Trump paused many tariffs on April 9, kickstarting a massive stock market rally that sent the S&P 500 and Nasdaq up over 28% and 38%, respectively. More Layoffs: Intel's recent layoffs take an unexpected turn Walmart makes more cuts customers won't like Looking for a job? Job ads probably won't help you find one However, now that President Trump's tariff pause expired on August 1, he's announced new tariffs ranging from 10% to 41%, including a 35% tariff on Canada, up from 25%. Canada was our third-largest trading partner in 2024. The higher tariffs are problematic, given that they occur even as the impact of tariffs left in place earlier this year seems to be increasing inflation. The Personal Consumption Expenditures index showed inflation increased to 2.6% in June, up from 2.4% in May and 2.2% in April. The higher and faster inflation rises, the more likely business and household spending will shrink, dinging corporate revenue and earnings growth at publicly traded companies. Jobs data show cracks in the US economy forming The stock market was also hit by disappointing jobs data. Stocks perform best when the economy creates more jobs and wages grow, creating extra discretionary Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said the US economy only added 73,000 jobs in July, far fewer than the 100,000 expected and 147,000 in June. As a result, the unemployment rate increased to 4.24%, its highest level this cycle. Meanwhile, the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) showed the number of open jobs fell to 7.4 million in June from 7.7 million in May. In case that wasn't concerning enough, Challenger, Gray & Christmas reported that US employers announced 62,075 layoffs in July, up 29% from June and 140% year over year. What's next for the stock market Stocks have had a remarkable rally, and it's not shocking that they might take a break. August is a notoriously weak month for stock market returns, and recent gains have lifted the S&P 500's forward price-to-earnings ratio, a key valuation measure, to lofty levels. According to FactSet, the S&P 500's forward P/E ratio was 22.4 on Friday, near the highs set in February before tariff announcements caused a sell-off, and up from about 19 in April, when stocks were near the lows. With valuation arguably rich and inflation and jobs uncertainty growing, stocks could experience more volatility than usual this month. Long-term investors are likely best off simply recognizing that pullbacks are common. According to Capital Group, a money manager with $2.2 trillion under management, the S&P 500 retreats 5% to 10% about once per year. Short-term investors may want to take a different approach, locking in recent gains and looking for lower entry points in the coming did stocks tumble this week? first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 2, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 2, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Federal Reserve's power: Congress giveth and Congress can taketh away
Congress created America's central banking system with the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 and can amend the law to modify the Fed's authority or mission. That's as the Fed faces questions about its independence and role in the economy amid pressure from the White House to lower interest rates. The White House's relentless pressure on the Federal Reserve has kindled a debate on the central bank's independence and role in the economy. While President Donald Trump has backed off earlier suggestions that he would fire Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, he continues to demand lower interest rates. The surprise announcement Friday that Governor Adriana Kugler will step down next week, well ahead of her expected departure in January when her term on the board of governors expires, gives Trump an early start on picking Powell's replacement. The president has already said he would nominate a new chair who would lower rates. That's despite the continued resistance from Powell and most other policymakers to keep rates steady as Trump's tariffs make their way through the economy and put upward pressure on inflation. Amid the standoff between the White House and the Fed, Congress has the power to modify the central bank's authority and mission. Wharton finance professor Jeremy Siegel highlighted this potential last month, when he told CNBC that Powell may need to resign in order to preserve the Fed's long-term independence. His reasoning: if the economy stumbles, then Trump can point to Powell as the 'perfect scapegoat' and ask Congress to give him more power over the Fed. 'That is a threat. Don't forget, our Federal Reserve is not at all a part of our Constitution. It's a creature of the U.S. Congress, created by the Federal Reserve Act 1913. All its powers devolve from Congress,' Siegel explained. 'Congress has amended the Federal Reserve Act many times. It could do it again. It could give powers. It could take away powers.' In fact, Siegel's fears may be realized. The economy has flashed sudden warning signs, most notably Friday's shocking jobs report that showed payroll gains were much weaker than previously thought. Economists at JPMorgan even cautioned that the report flashes a recession alert as it suggests a sharp decline in labor demand from businesses. Amending the Fed's dual mandate Congress' leverage over the Fed is not lost on lawmakers. At an Axios event this past week, Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, was asked if the Federal Reserve Act needs to be changed or updated. 'There's a lot of things that we should talk about,' he replied. 'For example, should the Federal Reserve be paying interest rates to banks for their overnight deposits? I think that's a legitimate question that we need to examine a little bit more.' In addition to paying U.S. banks interest on their reserves, he pointed out that the Fed pays foreign banks to hold money in America, adding 'I don't know that that's a good plan. Maybe it needs to be lowered.' Moreno also flagged the Fed's dual mandate of full employment and price stability, which was established in 1977 when Congress amended the Federal Reserve Act. He said Congress should take another look at the Fed's mission, suggesting the mandate should be modified to target maximum employment 'at the highest possible wage.' As for the other piece of the dual mandate, Moreno also said 'we need to make certain that we understand what they're looking at when it comes to inflation.' As an example, he noted Powell's failure to hike rates sooner during the pandemic, when there was a supply shock and a spike in demand from all the stimulus. He also pointed to the Powell's current reluctance to lower rates despite no indications yet that tariffs have caused a big spike in inflation and while taxes are coming down. 'So it's, 'how do you analyze this?'' Moreno explained. 'And I think he's looking at from a very political lens. He should be looking at from a very apolitical lens.' For his part, he also told Axios earlier in the conversation that he 'absolutely' believes in central bank independence but added that Powell could be legitimately fired for being 'extraordinarily incompetent.' Fed independence Of course, the Fed isn't completely devoid of any political influence. The president nominates and the Senate confirms members the board of governors, including the chair and vice chair. The Fed chair also must testify before Congress regularly and gets grilled by lawmakers. At the same time, the Fed was structured to be somewhat insulated from political pressures. Governors have 14-year terms that expire on a staggered scheduled, preventing a single president from completely revamping the board all at once. Governors also can't be removed for policy disagreements and can only be ousted 'for cause,' which has been interpreted to mean gross neglect of duty or malfeasance. Regional Fed presidents are also not politically appointed, and the Fed funds its own operations without appropriations from lawmakers. That's why Fed independence is a tricky concept, Michael Pugliese, senior economist at Wells Fargo, told Fortune, as it largely derives from a mix of laws, norms, informal agreements and traditions. 'It's not like there's an independence clause,' he said. 'It's more that the structure itself is built a little bit independent of the political system.' Pugliese thinks it's highly unlikely Congress will amend the Federal Reserve Act to allow for more explicit influence from the White House. That's because Democrats wouldn't go along with it, and Republicans probably wouldn't get rid of the filibuster rule in the Senate to immediately erode the Fed's independence, he said. 'Getting rid of the filibuster would probably open the door to tons and tons and tons of other policy discussions on a lot of different issues, not just the Federal Reserve Act.' Pugliese explained. 'The filibuster has stuck around as long as it has because both parties have had reasons and cause to not change it. And maybe that changes one day, but I would be very surprised if the thing that changed it was the Fed.' This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
