Sparks fly on CNN as Ana Navarro discounts pundit's opinion because he's a 'White man'
By Gabriel Hays
Published July 16, 2025
CNN senior political commentator Ana Navarro sparked a clash on the network Monday when pointing out a panelist's racial identity during a discussion about Trump administration immigration policies.
During "CNN NewsNight," Navarro dismissed conservative journalist Brad Polumbo's critique of her view of President Donald Trump's immigration policies by pointing out his race and gender.
"It might be hyperbolic for you as a White man… It's certainly not hyperbolic for me as a Latino," Navarro said to Polumbo, who took offense at the comment and accused Navarro of being racially discriminatory.
'VIEW' CO-HOST TELLS OTHERS TRUMP IS IN POWER 'BECAUSE YOU GUYS SCREWED THIS UP' IN CLASH OVER BIDEN COVER-UP
The clash happened after Polumbo called out the CNN commentator and "The View" co-host for referring to Trump's immigration agenda and detention of illegal immigrants as a "reign of terror."
"I think you're definitely being hyperbolic when you talk about a reign of terror. When the doomsday alarm from Democrats or media critics is always at a ten, it doesn't hit the same," he said.
Though the discussion had moved on to other topics, Navarro made sure to respond to Polumbo's "hyperbolic" point when it was her turn to speak again.
"Also, I want to respond to you saying that I was hyperbolic when I talked about a reign of terror," she said. Polumbo interjected, "Because that is hyperbolic."
Navarro made the "White man" comment, which prompted a strong reaction from the journalist.
BUFFALO NEWSPAPER GUILD CANCELS EVENT AFTER CARTOON DEPICTING TRUMP SUPPORTERS, TEXAS FLOODS SPARKED BACKLASH
"Oh OK, so we're being racist now?" he asked. Navarro denied that charge, saying, "No, I'm not being racist."
The conservative disagreed, saying, "To dismiss my opinion for being a White man, is racist."
Meanwhile, Navarro was trying to speak over him: "No, I'm not dismissing your opinion. I am telling you that what the Latino community, the Brown community in America–"
Polumbo interjected, "A lot of them disagree with you. You do not speak in one voice for them."
"OK, well let me speak in my voice," she replied, getting louder. "You said I was being hyperbolic–"
Polumbo cut her off again, "Until you insulted me racially, sure."
CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE
With her voice raised, she asked, "Being a White man is an insult?"
"When you invoke it to dismiss my opinion, yes," he responded.
Navarro followed up, asking, "Do you think Latinos are living under circumstances that other people may not be right now?" Before Polumbo could respond, host Abby Philip cut in to reassert control of the discussion. She defended Navarro.
"But I just want to make a point that, Brad, all she's saying is that her view of the situation is different from yours. I don't think that's an insult," she said.
Polumbo maintained that Navarro was saying he couldn't be correct because of his race.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Philip disagreed, saying, "No, no, no… She said I see it differently from you — which is not an insult. And it's also not a racial insult." Print Close
URL
https://www.foxnews.com/media/sparks-fly-cnn-ana-navarro-discounts-pundits-opinion-because-hes-white-man
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
23 minutes ago
- USA Today
Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell set to meet today with DOJ
WASHINGTON − Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche plans to meet with convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell on July 24 to find out what more she can say about her dealings with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, according to news reports. CNN, ABC and NBC News reported the expected meeting with the former British socialite, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for trafficking a minor to Epstein for sexual abuse. News of the meeting date comes as President Donald Trump continues to try and contain the growing backlash over the Epstein saga and his administration's recent decision not to release Epstein investigative files in the custody of the Justice Department. DOJ officials did not immediately respond to a USA TODAY request for comment. Who is Ghislaine Maxwell? DOJ turns to Jeffrey Epstein's ex-partner The meeting comes as many Trump supporters, Democratic lawmakers and even some Republicans demand the release of more information about the accused sex trafficker, who died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. Maxwell is also reportedly set to meet on Aug 11. with congressional lawmakers after the House Oversight Committee subpoenaed her on July 23. In a social media post Tuesday, Blanche – who is Trump's former personal defense lawyer – said that if 'Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.' This is a developing story and will be updated.
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Meghan McCain urges White House to pull credential of CNN's Kaitlan Collins
Conservative pundit Meghan McCain attacked CNN anchor and reporter Kaitlan Collins, suggesting she be barred from covering the White House after she aggressively questioned press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Wednesday about President Trump's view on Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. 'Kaitlan Collins is an absolute imbecile and a pure partisan hack,' McCain wrote Wednesday on the social media platform X. 'Have some respect for the two women standing in front of you who are exposing lies, deep corruption and keeping the country safe. The White House should pull her credentials.' McCain was responding to Collins' questioning of Gabbard, who during a briefing earlier in the day alleged that former President Obama and his allies worked to undermine President Trump ahead of the 2016 election. 'What would you say to people who believe that you're only releasing these documents now to improve your standing with the president after he said that your intelligence assessments were wrong,' Collins asked, in reference to conflicting intelligence within the administration relating to Iran's nuclear program. Collins has made a name for herself in the media with direct questioning of top Republican lawmakers on her nightly prime time show and repeated follow ups directed at Trump during gaggles with members of the press. There is precedent for Trump's White House pulling credentials of reporters they feel are overly combative. During his first term, the president yanked the credential of former CNN reporter Jim Acosta before eventually reinstating his hard pass. This year, The White House took control of the press pool covering the president daily and sought to elevate right-wing and 'new media' voices in media briefings and interactions with reporters. Trump has sued a number of leading news outlets in recent months and on Monday, Leavitt announced the Wall Street Journal would be banned from covering Trump's upcoming trip to Scotland over its reporting on his alleged ties to Jeffery Epstein.
Time Magazine
24 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
How Trump's Supporters Are Reacting to the News of His Name in the Epstein Files
The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday and other news outlets confirmed what many had already suspected given Donald Trump's apparent uneasiness about the unrelenting focus on his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein since his Administration tried to close the case on the alleged sex trafficker and unsuccessfully urge people to move on earlier this month. The Justice Department in May 'informed the President at a meeting in the White House that his name was in the Epstein files,' the Journal reported, citing senior officials. Sources also told the same thing to the New York Times and CNN, among other media. After years of allies, including officials that would join Trump's second-term Administration, promoting conspiracy theories that past governments had suppressed incriminating Epstein-related evidence, including a supposed 'client list,' Trump's Justice Department announced in early July that it 'did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties' and that 'no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.' The announcement rocked MAGA world, infuriating many of Trump's own supporters and frustrating Trump, who has called the matter a 'hoax' and 'witch hunt' and tried to distract attention from it, including by baselessly accusing former President Barack Obama of treason. Even before Wednesday's news, Democrats had openly questioned 'whether the White House has moved to prevent the declassification and public release of the full Epstein files because they implicate President Trump, and whether these massive redaction efforts and the withholding of the files were intended to shield your boss from embarrassing revelations within those files.' And Trump's former ally turned critic Elon Musk had raised eyebrows when he said shortly after leaving the Administration in late May that Trump 'is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public,' in a since-deleted post on X. 'This is nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media,' White House communications director Steven Cheung said in a statement after the Journal's latest report. Trump is currently suing the Journal over a report last week that Epstein received a lewd birthday drawing from Trump in 2003, which Trump denies. That Trump's name appears in Epstein files the government has not yet publicized has stirred a variety of reactions among his supporters. Being in the files isn't necessarily bad 'Being in the Epstein Files does not mean you're a pedophile,' pro-Trump influencer Joey Mannarino posted on X. 'Epstein was a member of Mar-A-Lago for years until Trump threw him out. Of course there will be incidental mentions of Trump.' It's an argument that even some more objective observers, like longtime Epstein reporter Julie K. Brown, have espoused. 'Trumps name (along with many other names) was on Epstein's plane logs, his name is in his 'black book' phone directory -- and his name was on phone message pads seized by police from Epstein's Palm Beach home in 2005,' Brown posted. 'All these have long been part of the federal investigation into Epstein. So the idea that Trump's name would be in the files isn't new -- and having your name in the files in of itself doesn't implicate him in any wrongdoing.' But some have pointed out the hypocrisy from Trump supporters, including Mannarino, who previously anticipated that the release of Epstein-related files would reveal high-profile Democrats linked to Epstein. Earlier this year, ahead of what turned out to be a widely disappointing document disclosure, Mannarino had posted: 'The Epstein Files come tomorrow. Any living people on that list should immediately be jailed.' And, of course, others have noted, being named in the Epstein files may not be incriminating, but it's certainly not exculpatory either. 'We've seen this before' Right-wing media personality and commentator Mike Cernovich, who was among a group of MAGA personalities who received a binder of supposed Epstein files from the White House in February, posted on X: 'Epstein kept a book of phone numbers, as many of his era did, which included Trump family members and other randoms. That's what this is in reference too. We reported this back in February.' YouTuber Matt Christiansen similarly downplayed the revelation of Trump's existence in the Epstein files as a 'necessary conclusion' from knowledge of their already public relationship, especially after the Journal released its report on Trump's birthday letter. 'If you buy that story as true, then the Wall Street Journal said that letter is in the book that is in possession of the DOJ and the Wall Street Journal has reviewed it… then yes, Trump is in the Epstein files and his boob drawing is in there.' Democratic deflection Some conspiracy theorists suggested that the news of Trump's name in the Epstein files is part of a Democratic-led conspiracy to distract from the Trump Administration's efforts to prosecute Obama and his former officials. Trump himself previously said as much in a post on Truth Social earlier this month, when he decried that people are 'giving publicity to Files written by Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the Losers and Criminals of the Biden Administration.' Trump said 'they created the Epstein Files, just like they created the FAKE Hillary Clinton/Christopher Steele Dossier that they used on me.' Infowars founder Alex Jones claimed in a video on X on Wednesday that 'the Democrats control' the FBI's files related to Epstein and 'of course there's going to be mentions of Donald Trump.' He said: 'I've been predicting this, so it's true, the Democrats have been in control of those files.' Jones said he was 'pissed at Trump for the Streisand effect thing,' referring to the phenomenon whereby trying to suppress something only draws more attention to it, but he said 'it's going to be more nothingburgers.' 'What we know,' Jones said, seemingly unrelated to yet part of his 'analysis' of the Journal report about Trump being named in the Epstein files, 'well that Obama ordered the entire Russiagate thing and tried to take down Trump. That is treason.' Jacob Creech, a QAnon figure who uses the X handle @WarClandestine, replied to the Journal's thread of its report, saying: 'Your panic is delicious. You all will do anything to deflect from the fact that your messiah Obama is guilty of treason.' 'Why wasn't it released before?' Others expressed disbelief in the seriousness of Trump's name by claiming that if the implications were more damning, then it would have come out before Trump returned to office. Actress Angela Belcamino, who posted earlier this month that 'if Republicans are on the Epstein list, lock them up and throw away the key,' said after the report came out: 'If Trump is in the Epstein files… why didn't the Biden administration do the right thing and release them during his administration?' It's been a refrain among Trump supporters for some time. Last month, conservative commentator Benny Johnson posted: 'First off, ask yourself this: If there was incriminating evidence against Trump in the Epstein files, would the Deep State have just kept it a secret and just watched Trump take office -- TWICE?!' He described the reasoning as 'proof that Trump is *Not* in the Epstein Files.' Daily Wire podcaster Matt Walsh posted on X last month: 'It is totally inconceivable that there would be something incriminating about Trump in the Epstein files and yet the Democrats kept that information to themselves for all these years. Sure, you can say that they are also incriminated in the files. But so what? They would have just released the part that incriminated Trump.' And right-wing activist Jack Posobiec repeated earlier this month on X: 'If Trump was in the Epstein files, why wouldn't Biden and [former U.S. Attorney General Merrick] Garland just have released it?' Maybe Trump isn't so good after all Still, to some former MAGA diehards disappointed by the recent Epstein saga, the Journal's report was the nail in the coffin to make them turn their backs on Trump. Livestreamer Nick Fuentes, who has been described as a white nationalist and Holocaust denier and once dined with Trump at Mar-a-Lago in 2022 though he did not endorse Trump in 2024, posted on X: 'The Wall Street Journal just confirmed that Trump has been engaged in a deliberate coverup of the Epstein Files ever since he learned he was named in them in May. Then he spent the last week gaslighting & guilting-tripping his supporters for not believing his lies. DESPICABLE.' Trump's handling of the Epstein files and responses thus far to the controversy has been a bitter pill for many of his supporters to swallow, especially as it becomes harder and harder to deny that he may have something to hide about his closeness to Epstein. Recently a video of the late convicted sex offender has gone viral on social media. Asked during a 2010 deposition whether he had socialized with Trump, who was not yet even talked about as a future White House contender, 'in the presence of females under the age of 18,' Epstein responded: 'Though l'd like to answer that question, at least today l'm going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth, and 14th Amendment rights, sir.' Critics have cited Trump's own words from the campaign trail in 2016 against him now about invoking the constitutional right to not self-incriminate: 'If you're innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?'
