Sparks fly on CNN as Ana Navarro discounts pundit's opinion because he's a 'White man'
By Gabriel Hays
Published July 16, 2025
CNN senior political commentator Ana Navarro sparked a clash on the network Monday when pointing out a panelist's racial identity during a discussion about Trump administration immigration policies.
During "CNN NewsNight," Navarro dismissed conservative journalist Brad Polumbo's critique of her view of President Donald Trump's immigration policies by pointing out his race and gender.
"It might be hyperbolic for you as a White man… It's certainly not hyperbolic for me as a Latino," Navarro said to Polumbo, who took offense at the comment and accused Navarro of being racially discriminatory.
'VIEW' CO-HOST TELLS OTHERS TRUMP IS IN POWER 'BECAUSE YOU GUYS SCREWED THIS UP' IN CLASH OVER BIDEN COVER-UP
The clash happened after Polumbo called out the CNN commentator and "The View" co-host for referring to Trump's immigration agenda and detention of illegal immigrants as a "reign of terror."
"I think you're definitely being hyperbolic when you talk about a reign of terror. When the doomsday alarm from Democrats or media critics is always at a ten, it doesn't hit the same," he said.
Though the discussion had moved on to other topics, Navarro made sure to respond to Polumbo's "hyperbolic" point when it was her turn to speak again.
"Also, I want to respond to you saying that I was hyperbolic when I talked about a reign of terror," she said. Polumbo interjected, "Because that is hyperbolic."
Navarro made the "White man" comment, which prompted a strong reaction from the journalist.
BUFFALO NEWSPAPER GUILD CANCELS EVENT AFTER CARTOON DEPICTING TRUMP SUPPORTERS, TEXAS FLOODS SPARKED BACKLASH
"Oh OK, so we're being racist now?" he asked. Navarro denied that charge, saying, "No, I'm not being racist."
The conservative disagreed, saying, "To dismiss my opinion for being a White man, is racist."
Meanwhile, Navarro was trying to speak over him: "No, I'm not dismissing your opinion. I am telling you that what the Latino community, the Brown community in America–"
Polumbo interjected, "A lot of them disagree with you. You do not speak in one voice for them."
"OK, well let me speak in my voice," she replied, getting louder. "You said I was being hyperbolic–"
Polumbo cut her off again, "Until you insulted me racially, sure."
CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE
With her voice raised, she asked, "Being a White man is an insult?"
"When you invoke it to dismiss my opinion, yes," he responded.
Navarro followed up, asking, "Do you think Latinos are living under circumstances that other people may not be right now?" Before Polumbo could respond, host Abby Philip cut in to reassert control of the discussion. She defended Navarro.
"But I just want to make a point that, Brad, all she's saying is that her view of the situation is different from yours. I don't think that's an insult," she said.
Polumbo maintained that Navarro was saying he couldn't be correct because of his race.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Philip disagreed, saying, "No, no, no… She said I see it differently from you — which is not an insult. And it's also not a racial insult." Print Close
URL
https://www.foxnews.com/media/sparks-fly-cnn-ana-navarro-discounts-pundits-opinion-because-hes-white-man
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump administration will release more than $5 billion in frozen education funding
The Trump administration has decided to release the rest of the nearly $7 billion in funding for public schools that it had frozen, with little notice, earlier this month. A senior administration official told CNN they have finished a programmatic review, and the additional funds will be released to the states. The administration previously announced the release of $1.3 billion of the frozen funds. 'Guardrails are in place to ensure these funds will not be used in violation of Executive Orders or administration policy,' the official added. The nearly monthlong pause in critical funding set off a scramble in schools as they prepare for the fall and summer camps, which faced immediate impacts, with many worried about being able to keep their doors open for the duration of the summer. The funding for K-12 programs included money for teacher education and recruitment, English language programs, student enrichment and nonprofit learning centers that partner with schools, among other initiatives. Much of the money goes towards programs that serve some of the US' poorest children. A day before the funds were to be released, the Department of Education instead sent a letter to programs, saying that money was being held, pending a review. 'The Department will not be issuing Grant Award Notifications obligating funds for these programs on July 1 prior to completing that review,' the email to recipients said. 'The Department remains committed to ensuring taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the President's priorities and the Department's statutory responsibilities.' The administration alleged the money was being used to promote 'leftwing' ideologies and was conducting a review. It comes as the Trump administration is seeking to dismantle the Department of Education, with mass layoffs underway and severe funding cuts under consideration. Last week, after much outrage at summer camps and non-profits like the Boys and Girls Club that were facing immediate impacts of the frozen funds, the Office of Management and Budget decided to release the hold on $1.3 billion of the nearly $6 billion in funding that goes to 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21st CCLC) – affecting summer camp and after-school programs. But the rest of the funds were still frozen, until now. Earlier this month, some two dozen Democratic-led states sued the Department of Education in federal court to release the funds, which had already been approved by Congress.
New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
Sen. Rick Scott to fly banner urging New Yorkers who ‘hate socialism' to move to Florida
Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) is taking aim at socialist Big Apple mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani – with aerial ads urging fed-up New Yorkers to flee to Florida. 'Hate Socialism? Us too! Move 2 FL,' read the banners the Sunshine State senator will fly over New York beaches this weekend. In a Florida flex, the ad continues: 'WE HAVE BETTER BEACHES.' 3 The aerial ads will be flown over New York beaches this weekend. miami2you – In a statement, Scott described the ad campaign as a 'friendly reminder' to New Yorkers that 'in addition to our world class beaches, Florida is the state where you can escape socialism.' The senator also slammed the cost of living in the Big Apple, antisemitism on college campuses and the rise of Mamdani. 'New York City once represented the American Dream – a city where anything was possible. Today, it has now become the city where only billionaires can prosper, Jewish students are attacked on campus, capitalism is shunned and radical socialists like Zohran Mamdani are celebrated,' Scott said. 'New York City has benefitted from the best system in the world – Capitalism – yet it is now being villainized by the Democrats all across this country.' 'Democrats are working around the clock to discredit President Trump and tear down our country and rebuild it in their woke, radical image through socialist policies.' Scott decried socialism as 'an old, barbaric, discredited idea that's failed every time it's been tried' and noted that Florida has become a place of refuge for families that have fled 'brutal regimes' in Cuba and Venezuela. 3 The ads target New Yorkers disillusioned with the rise of Mamdani. Andrew Schwartz / 3 Scott noted that many families from Cuba and Venezuela have sought refuge from socialism in Florida. Getty Images 'As Governor and now US Senator, I have constantly worked to make sure every family can get a great job, their kids can get a world class education and they can live in safe communities,' he added. 'That is the American Dream and it is deeply unfortunate that it is completely slipping away in New York.' 'New York families deserve better.'
San Francisco Chronicle
24 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Democrats and advocates criticize Trump's executive order on homelessness
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Leading Democrats and advocates for homeless people are criticizing an executive order President Donald Trump signed this week aimed at removing people from the streets, possibly by committing them for mental health or drug treatment without their consent. Trump directed some of his Cabinet heads to prioritize funding to cities that crack down on open drug use and street camping, with the goal of making people feel safer. It's not compassionate to do nothing, the order states. 'Shifting these individuals into long-term institutional settings for humane treatment is the most proven way to restore public order,' the order reads. Homelessness has become a bigger problem in recent years as the cost of housing increased, especially in states such as California where there aren't enough homes to meet demand. At the same time, drug addiction and overdoses have soared with the availability of cheap and potent fentanyl. The president's order might be aimed at liberal cities such as San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York, which Trump views as too lax about conditions on their streets. But many of the concepts have already been proposed or tested in California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democratic mayors have worked for years to get people off the streets and into treatment. Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court made it easier for cities to clear encampments even if the people living in them have nowhere else to go. Still, advocates say Trump's new order is vague, punitive and won't effectively end homelessness. His office said Friday that Trump's order relies on harmful stereotypes and focuses more on "creating distracting headlines and settling old scores." "But, his imitation (even poorly executed) is the highest form of flattery,' spokesperson Tara Gallegos said in a statement, referring to the president calling for strategies already in use in California. San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie has also emphasized the importance of clean and orderly streets in banning homeless people from living in RVs and urging people to accept the city's offers of shelter. In Silicon Valley, San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan recently pushed a policy change that makes a person eligible for jail if they reject three offers of shelter. Trump's executive order tasks Attorney General Pam Bondi and the secretaries for health, housing and transportation to prioritize grants to states and local governments that enforce bans on open drug use and street camping. Devon Kurtz, the public safety policy director at the Cicero Institute, a conservative policy group that has advocated for several of the provisions of the executive order, said the organization is 'delighted' by the order. He acknowledged that California has already been moving to ban encampments since the Supreme Court's decision. But he said Trump's order adds teeth to that shift, Kurtz said. 'It's a clear message to these communities that were still sort of uncomfortable because it was such a big change in policy,' Kurtz said. But Steve Berg, chief policy officer at the National Alliance to End Homelessness, called parts of the order vague. He said the U.S. abandoned forced institutionalization decades ago because it was too expensive and raised moral and legal concerns. 'What is problematic about this executive order is not so much that law enforcement is involved — it's what it calls on law enforcement to do, which is to forcibly lock people up,' Berg said. 'That's not the right approach to dealing with homelessness.' The mayor of California's most populous city, Los Angeles, is at odds with the Newsom and Trump administrations on homelessness. Mayor Karen Bass, a Democrat, opposes punishing sweeps and says the city has reduced street homelessness by working with homeless people to get them into shelter or housing. ___
