
Indecisive? 3 Science-Backed Steps To Make Good Choices FAST
On average the adult human mind makes 33,000 to 35,000 total decisions each day, according to various sources. Many of these decisions are when the mind is on autopilot based on information it has stored about what works and what doesn't. But there's a point at which your mind on autopilot no longer works because the fried brain—unable to make more than 35,000 individual decisions—short circuits, decision-making goes offline and you are indecisive.
When you make decisions after working days on end, your fatigued brain makes choices different from the ones you'd make after your brain has a rest period. Why? Scientists have discovered a phenomenon known as decision fatigue—which is what happens when your brain is worn out and depleted of mental energy.
Decision fatigue impairs mental clarity and is why many wage earners have little mental energy left over for activities outside of work. After hours of nonstop working, your brain can suffer from cognitive overload, compassion fatigue and burnout. The longer you work and the more choices you make in those extended work hours, the more difficult it is for your strained mind to make sound decisions.
And the harder it is to make choices like what to wear, where to eat, how much to spend or how to prioritize work projects. Mind fatigue can lead to shortcuts such as not thoroughly proofing an important email or opting out of decision-making with your team. And it can cause you to be short with colleagues, eat junk food instead of healthy meals and forego exercise. And in some cases even life-or-death issues such as permitting your newly-licensed teenager to drive the car on an icy road at night.
Some of us have to make so many decisions in the workday that after a while we suffer from decision fatigue, but some experts assert that indecisiveness can be traced to childhood. "Being indecisive when it comes to major life and career choices can lead to avoidance, and that's when you get into trouble," says clinical psychologist Dr. Helen McKibben, author of Drop: Making Great Decisions.
According to McKibben, the stage is set for our decisive--or indecisive--nature in the first five years of brain development. "When a child expresses a feeling, reads a situation a certain way or shares an idea of something they would like to do, how their parent or caretaker responds to them over time creates a neuron track in the brain that follows them into adulthood. When a child's feelings and ideas are supported and reinforced, the neuron track leads to trusting their instincts, feelings and choices throughout life.
McKibben cautions that if they're dismissed, minimized or controlled, the child walks away second-guessing themselves. 'That neuron track creates a habit of looking to others for validation and doing what they say instead of trusting themselves,' she explains. "An example of some things not to say in response to a child would be "'Oh, you don't feel that way,' or 'If you do it my way, it will be better.''
If someone else was making choices for you, like 'helicoptor parents' do, always saying you're wrong or helps you do everything as a child, she points out that you may be in the habit of reading others for their reactions or thoughts. 'That neuron track leads you straight to indecisiveness. The good news is that you can rewire that track to erase self-doubt and trust your instincts.'
That's where the "Drop" technique comes in to create a new neuron configuration on the old neuron track, McKibben says, adding that the key is to listen to the brain the way it was designed to work, which uses memory recall when making decisions. When faced with a situation or person, the brain's job is to configure how you feel in the moment and automatically retrieves memories of every time you felt that way. This memory recall then prompts you with words and ideas to help you make a choice in your best interest.
'You become decisive once you trust what your brain puts together for you,' McKibben insists. 'If people don't listen to those instincts, they are up in their heads trying to decide themselves. That's when they are reading other people for guidance. They are indecisive and don't present confidently.'
She asks if you've ever walked away from a situation thinking, 'Why didn't I listen to myself? I KNEW this was going to happen?' When presented with a choice, she says your brain automatically compiled words and ideas for you to use in making that choice, but you didn't trust yourself enough.
I was curious about how long it takes to become more confident in our decisions. McKibben explained by email that using the "Drop" technique over time will help us replace the old neuron track of self-doubt with the new neuron track of confidence.
'It takes just weeks of practice to reinforce the new configuration on an old neuron track,' she assures us. 'It's like a golfer who gets a new coach that changes their swing. They don't just forget the old swing, they practice and practice until the new swing becomes natural and the old swing is gone.'
McKibben shares her proven three-step method to make better decisions by engaging your brain the way it's naturally designed to work: Stop, Drop and Listen.
McKibben suggests that the antidote to being indecisive is not to second-guess what you hear. This takes practice, especially if you grew up in an environment where someone was making choices for you, always said you were wrong or helped you do everything. Your brain adapts to your words or ideas which will replace the tendency to look to others for guidance and second guessing yourself," McKibben concludes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
a minute ago
- Fox News
'Bachelor' couple says it's 'hard to watch the Ozempic craze'
Catherine and Sean Lowe emphasized there is a "healthier route" than Ozempic while speaking to Fox News Digital about their wellness habits.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Multiple medical groups say they are barred from CDC's panel of vaccine advisers
Multiple medical groups say they have been barred from working on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's panel of vaccine advisers. It comes weeks after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired the original panel of independent experts and replaced them with his own handpicked members -- many of whom have expressed skeptical views on vaccines. Liaisons representing major medical groups were historically invited to meetings of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) as non-voting members to provide their independent expertise in respective fields. In a joint statement, the groups said they have now been excluded "from the process of reviewing scientific evidence end informing vaccine recommendations." MORE: Members of CDC vaccine panel ousted by RFK Jr. say committee has 'lost credibility' A total of eight groups signed on to the statement, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, teh American College of Physicians, the American Medical Association and the National Medical Association among others. In a statement provided to ABC News, an HHS spokesperson said: "Under the old ACIP, outside pressure to align with vaccine orthodoxy limited asking the hard questions. The old ACIP members were plagued by conflicts of interest, influence, and bias. We are fulfilling our promise to the American people to never again allow those conflicts to taint vaccine recommendations." The statement went on to say: "Experts will continue to be included based on relevant experience and expertise, not because of what organization they are with." MORE: CDC vaccine advisers who were removed from committee by RFK Jr. speak out In their statement, the medical organizations said they learned the groups will be excluded from the panel's work in an email late Thursday and noted they were "deeply disappointed and alarmed" by the move. "To remove our deep medical expertise from this vital and once transparent process is irresponsible, dangerous to our nation's health, and will further undermine public and clinician trust in vaccines," the statement read. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Doctors Explain What They Really Think of Biohacking
There are plenty of health trends that pop up and fizzle out fast, but biohacking seems to have staying power. The practice of trying to 'hack' your health for longevity is showing up on podcasts, Netflix documentaries, and all over your For You feed, making it hard to miss. But for all the chatter about biohacking, it's easy to gloss over the actual definition of this practice. What is biohacking, and is it something you should be doing? It's important to state this upfront: Biohacking is a little controversial in the medical field. 'It's using your body as an experiment,' points out Mikhail Kogan, M.D., medical director of the George Washington University Center for Integrative Medicine. While some doctors have a broad view of biohacking that includes things like eating a healthy, varied diet, others view biohacking as more focused on less-proven strategies, like loading up on certain supplements that don't have robust data to back them up. (More on that in a bit.) Meet the experts: Mikhail Kogan, M.D., medical director of the George Washington University Center for Integrative Medicine; Bert Mandelbaum, M.D., sports medicine specialist and co-director of the Regenerative Orthobiologic Center at Cedars-Sinai Orthopaedics in Los Angeles; Kanwar Kelley, M.D., physician and co-founder of Side Health in Orinda, CA; Salim Hayek, M.D., chair of internal medicine at the University of Texas Medical Branch. Whatever your take on biohacking, it's important to at least know what's out there and what it all means. With that in mind, here's what doctors want you to know about biohacking, as well as how to decide if it's right for you. What is biohacking? Biohacking is a broad term used to describe the process of making tweaks to try to improve your health. It can involve sleep, workout routines, supplements, dietary changes, and more. 'Biohacking is essentially DIY biology—making intentional changes to your lifestyle, diet, or environment to optimize health and performance,' explains Salim Hayek, M.D., chair of internal medicine at the University of Texas Medical Branch. 'It ranges from simple tweaks like tracking your sleep or trying intermittent fasting, to more extreme practices like implanting microchips.' Biohacking in the traditional sense means that it's experimental, says Dr. Kogan. 'It wouldn't be called 'biohacking' if it's scientifically proven—that would be standard of care,' he says. But some doctors look at biohacking as people simply trying to improve their health beyond what they may discuss in a routine exam with their physician. 'It's a marketing term that describes things that enhance health, healthspan, and playspan,' says Bert Mandelbaum, M.D., sports medicine specialist and co-director of the Regenerative Orthobiologic Center at Cedars-Sinai Orthopaedics in Los Angeles. 'The essential aspect is that you are what you eat, think, drink, and do. Those are all very important.' The right ways to try biohacking—according to experts Dr. Mandelbaum prefers to look at biohacking as enhancing what you've got with the help of scientifically-proven methods. Kanwar Kelley, M.D., physician and co-founder of Side Health in Orinda, CA, also suggests this approach. 'Biohacking does not need to be overly complicated or require specialized equipment,' he says. 'Adjusting your approach to diet, supplementation, and sleep can help enhance performance and overall health, leading to increased productivity and longevity.' Even meditation and incorporating foods with beneficial properties can fall into this category, he says, among other things. On the supplement front, it's important to talk to your doctor before trying anything new—and your doctor may recommend a blood test to identify if you have any deficiencies. Dr. Hayek also recommends leaning into biohacking in the sense of adding new scientifically-proven healthy behaviors to your life vs. trying whatever crosses your social media feed. 'The real benefits come from evidence-based practices,' Dr. Hayek says, such as prioritizing sleep, exercising, and managing stress. 'The key is that most genuine benefits come from consistent, healthy lifestyle changes—not magic pills or high-tech gadgets,' he says. Some tech can be useful, though, especially in how it helps promote self-awareness: 'Use technology wisely—fitness trackers can keep you accountable, but don't become obsessed with the numbers,' Dr. Hayek says. His other tip? 'Try one change at a time so you can actually tell what's working.' Biohacking practices to avoid—according to experts There are several biohacking practices that doctors recommend taking a pass on, but Dr. Mandelbaum points out that the practice of taking several supplements without talking to a doctor first has been somewhat normalized, even though it's potentially risky. 'Those are the kinds of things you want to avoid: Things that are marketed with no scientific evidence.' Dr. Kelley also suggests being wary of techniques that are marketed as 'complete solutions' to health issues. 'While biohacking can help improve performance, no single method will solve all problems,' he says. 'Techniques should be plausible scientifically and have peer-reviewed scientific backing.' Dr. Hayek recommends avoiding biohacking treatments like "young blood" transfusions, DIY genetic engineering, and amateur implant surgeries. And of course, don't take prescription drugs that weren't prescribed to you, he says. 'Be wary of extreme diets promising miraculous results, or mega-dosing supplements,' he adds. 'If a practice could realistically land you in the hospital, think twice.' Risks of biohacking Because biohacking is such a broad category, there are plenty of potential risks involved in it, Dr. Kogan says. 'Almost anything you can think of is a risk,' he says. If used incorrectly, certain 'anti-aging' drugs may cause heart issues and even death, he points out. 'Many DIY biohacking experiments also lack regulation and safety oversight,' Dr. Hayek says. 'Misinformation is rampant online, and people might delay proven medical treatments for unproven hacks. Plus, it can become expensive and psychologically obsessive.' Does biohacking actually help you live longer and increase healthspan? 'We have no proven way to dramatically extend human lifespan through biohacking yet,' Dr. Hayek says, although who knows what the future may hold. For now: 'The best-documented longevity strategies are quite simple: Don't smoke, eat well, exercise, sleep enough, and manage stress,' he continues. 'Some biohacks that promote these behaviors can contribute to healthspan, living more years in good health. But the extreme anti-aging interventions making headlines? Most lack definitive proof and some are potentially dangerous.' Ultimately, if you want to try to enhance your healthspan and lifespan, doctors recommend sticking with the scientifically-proven basics. You Might Also Like Can Apple Cider Vinegar Lead to Weight Loss? Bobbi Brown Shares Her Top Face-Transforming Makeup Tips for Women Over 50