Welch's makes major change to favorite product after ‘natural source' ingredients push
And the fix comes just ahead of this year's back-to-school season.
Welch's Fruit Snacks, headquartered in Park Ridge, New Jersey, announced this week it will remove artificial dyes.
The ingredients will be replaced with colors that come from 'natural sources,' according to a Welch's Fruit Snacks news release.
The rollout involves three flavor packs: Mixed Fruit, Berries 'n Cherries and Fruit Punch.
Fox News Digital reached out to the maker of the snacks, PIM Brands, for comment.
'This marks an important milestone in Welch's Fruit Snacks' commitment to exclusively use colors from natural sources in all products across the portfolio by early 2026,' according to the release.
Jason Levine, PIM Brands chief marketing officer, said consumers and their families are always the top priority.
Welch's will remove artificial dyes from its Fruit Snacks.
Aaron – stock.adobe.com
'The move to colors from natural sources began over a decade ago and is already reflected in products launched since 2018,' Levine said in the release.
'Just in time for back-to-school, we're proud to begin rolling out our best-selling flavors made without artificial dyes and without compromising on the things we know people love about Welch's Fruit Snacks: real fruit and great taste.'
Welch's Mixed Fruit Snacks currently contain natural and artificial flavors: annatto (color), turmeric (color), Red 40 and Blue 1.
Jason Levine, PIM Brands chief marketing officer, said consumers and their families are always the top priority.
Wikipedia / sweetfixNYC
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced in April that it will be working with industry leaders to eliminate synthetic dyes from the food supply by the end of next year.
Among the dyes HHS is looking to get rid of are Red 40 and Blue 1.
Red 40 has been associated with increasing hyperactivity, possibly irritability, and more susceptibility to children, according to WebMD.
Children diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) also tend to be more sensitive to such additives, per WebMD.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
16 hours ago
- Epoch Times
HHS, FDA, and USDA Address Chronic Disease Epidemic Brought About by Ultra-Processed Foods
Multiple federal agencies are uniting in an effort to tackle the health risks posed by ultra-processed foods to Americans, according to a July 23 joint statement. The joint effort is a collaboration between the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Food and Drug Administration, and the Department of Agriculture (USDA). The initiative is aimed at addressing the 'growing concerns around ultra-processed foods and the current epidemic of diet-related chronic disease that is plaguing America.'
The Hill
19 hours ago
- The Hill
RFK Jr. sued over a task force by the anti-vaccine group he founded
The anti-vaccine organization founded by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is now funding a lawsuit against him, arguing Kennedy has failed to establish a task force on the safety of childhood vaccines. 'Our first priority will ALWAYS be children's health. Sec. Kennedy has FAILED 'to establish a task force dedicated to making childhood vaccines safer, as mandated by federal law,' so we WILL be holding him accountable,' Children's Health Defense (CHD) posted on social platform X. The lawsuit claims Kennedy is violating the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which requires the HHS secretary to stand up a task force consisting of the director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The law also requires the health secretary to provide Congress with progress reports every two years. CHD contends that the steps taken to make vaccines safer has never been reported to lawmakers. Kennedy and his allies have been interested in the panel for years, arguing that its absence shows the government has not taken appropriate steps to ensure vaccines are safe for children. While he was part of Children's Health Defense in 2018, Kennedy — along with fellow vaccine critic and adviser Del Bigtree — filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for copies of the reports from HHS. When no reports were found, Kennedy and Bigtree sued HHS to produce them, part of an effort to bolster their misleading narrative about vaccine safety A task force was created in the wake of the law's passage and produced reports. It was short-lived and made its final report to Congress in 1998. During a 2019 Senate hearing about vaccines and rising rates of preventable disease, then-Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) noted the Health, Education Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee received two reports from HHS about vaccine safety in 1988 and 1989. Alexander said the law only required HHS to submit a report to Congress 'within two years.' The former lawmaker during the hearing blasted 'internet fraudsters' for 'preying on the unfounded fears and daily struggles of parents' by convincing them vaccines aren't safe. Dorit Reiss, a law professor at UC Law San Francisco and expert on vaccine litigation, said she thinks the CHD lawsuit is 'performative,' and doesn't mean Kennedy's former group has turned on him. Reiss noted that the lawsuit could be a way to give Kennedy cover to set up the vaccine safety panel he's been floating for years. Ray Flores, the CHD attorney who filed the complaint, indicated that is exactly what the group wants to do. 'It may appear as though we are being unfriendly to Mr. Kennedy. On the contrary, we're helping him to have an excuse to do his job,' Flores said in an interview with CHD TV.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Medical groups and US states work to circumvent Kennedy's vaccine decisions
By Julie Steenhuysen CHICAGO (Reuters) -U.S. health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s changes to federal vaccine policy are prompting medical organizations and several states to formulate their own vaccine recommendations for the fall respiratory illness season, concerned many healthy children and pregnant women could lose access to preventive shots. This push for an alternative standard to the one set by the federal government runs the risk of increasing confusion among providers and patients, according to health experts. It also runs up against hundreds of laws at the state level that rely on a federal vaccine advisory panel, the experts said. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, advises the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on which people should receive vaccines and at what intervals after they are approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Kennedy has spent decades sowing doubts about vaccines even when contradicted by scientific evidence. Since being appointed by Republican President Donald Trump to head the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, Kennedy has upended the federal government's process for recommending vaccines for the American public. Kennedy last month fired all 17 ACIP members, replacing them with hand-picked advisers including anti-vaccine activists. Prior to that, Kennedy in May withdrew a federal recommendation for COVID shots for pregnant women and healthy children without ACIP's input, saying there was not enough evidence to support offering these boosters to healthy children. 'WILL NOT STAY SILENT' Leading U.S. medical organizations including the American Academy of Pediatrics, known as AAP, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, called IDSA, have sued Kennedy over the COVID decision. AAP said it will promote its own evidence-based vaccine guidelines starting with the fall respiratory season for COVID, influenza and respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV. "We simply cannot and will not stay silent as the system we rely on is being intentionally dismantled," Dr. Sue Kressly, the academy's president, told Reuters. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, called ACOG, is also developing guidelines for the upcoming respiratory illness season, to be issued in August or September. An ACOG spokesperson said the organization continues to recommend COVID vaccines for pregnant women, a group at increased risk for severe COVID and pregnancy complications. The spokesperson also said the organization rejects a recommendation by Kennedy's vaccine panel against flu shots containing thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative that vaccine skeptics long have sought to link to autism despite evidence that these vaccines are safe. Both organizations and several others including the IDSA are collaborating with the Vaccine Integrity Project, a group of public health and infectious disease experts formed amid concerns about changes to vaccine policy, to review the latest scientific evidence on licensed vaccines for use in their guidelines. "What we're trying to do is add a piece of non-biased, authoritative review of the data for use by the (medical) societies," said Dr. Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, who served as an adviser to Democratic former President Joe Biden on COVID. An HHS spokesperson defended Kennedy's actions, saying the newly configured panel brings "fresh, independent scientific judgment" and that ACIP "will continue to be the statutory authority guiding immunization policy in this country." 'IT IS MIND-NUMBING' Jen Kates, a senior analyst at the nonprofit health policy organization KFF, said U.S. states have always maintained a patchwork of health policies. But having multiple entities issuing vaccine recommendations at the state and federal levels could make it hard for parents to know who to trust, according to Kates. "This patchwork could become even more pronounced with significant implications for health. State laws and requirements may vary, but pathogens don't abide by borders," Kates said. Recommendations issued by ACIP since its founding in 1964 have become embedded in laws across the United States governing health insurance coverage, access to vaccines for children in low-income families, school immunizations, the ability of pharmacists to administer vaccines, and, in some states, vaccine purchasing. "It is mind-numbing when you compare how many things are impacted by ACIP," said Rebecca Coyle, who serves as executive director of the American Immunization Registry Association, an organization that develops and updates vaccination information systems used by physicians, and as an adviser to ACIP. An analysis by the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials found that nearly 600 statutes and regulations across 49 of the 50 U.S. states, three U.S. territories and Washington, D.C., reference ACIP recommendations. Several states have already taken action. Wisconsin said it continues to recommend the current COVID vaccine during pregnancy and for everyone age 6 months and older, and noted that the state's Medicaid health program for low-income people will continue to cover the shot for eligible people. The Democratic governors of California, Washington state and Oregon condemned Kennedy's dismissal of the ACIP panel members, citing their "grave concerns" about the integrity and transparency of upcoming federal vaccine recommendations. These states said they will continue to recommend COVID vaccines for children 6 months and older and pregnant women in accord with leading U.S. medical associations. Some states have started rewriting statutes to no longer defer exclusively to ACIP. Colorado, for instance, has amended laws to include vaccine recommendations from major medical societies in addition to ACIP when setting the state's policies for immunizing schoolchildren. Massachusetts lawmakers are considering legislation proposed by Democratic Governor Maura Healey to empower the state's public health commissioner to determine routine childhood immunizations in lieu of ACIP's recommendations. Legislators in Maine have removed references to ACIP from a state vaccine access law. Osterholm said health insurers have told the Vaccine Integrity Project that they would be more likely to cover uniform vaccine recommendations, increasing pressure for alignment among various groups. "We need to come together the best we can," Osterholm said, but "we can't leave the ACIP or HHS recommendations as the only other source out there." Solve the daily Crossword
