
6 Indian badminton players out of World University Games over administrative lapse
advertisement
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Divya Deshmukh springs another surprise to be in semis
Slowly but surely emerging as one of India's key players, International Master Divya Deshmukh stunned higher-ranked compatriot Harika Dronavalli 2-0 in the tiebreaks to enter the semifinals of the FIDE World Women's Chess Cup here. After two uneventful draws in the classical games, the pressure was on Harika in the rapid tiebreaks. Divya capitalised with a determined performance to win the first game, before sealing the match in the second as Harika, in a must-win situation, overpressed in search of a miracle that never came. While Harika has been a semifinalist on three different occasions in a similar format which was then called the world women's championship, Humpy and now Divya have become the two Indians who made it to the semis of the women's world cup as this is a part of the new world championship cycle. This also means that one Indian entry is assured in the Women's Candidates Tournament slated sometime next year, which will decide who will contest the world championship match against incumbent Ju Wenjun of China. Highest-ranked Indian for over a decade, Koneru Humpy is already in the last four for the first time in her career, and this is one title that has eluded her all these years. With Divya Deshmukh joining her as the other semi-finalist, it shows a paradigm shift in Indian women's chess too, where the boys have largely been making hay. Divya employed the Italian Opening in the first game and gave nothing away. Harika was outdone in the middlegame while trying to find some serious counterplay but ended up miscalculating, which cost her the queen for two white pieces. The rest was easy for Divya, who has now established herself as a force to reckon with in women's chess. In the return game, Harika had to win, but again Divya was up to the task in defence. It is well known that Harika adores her chances in faster versions, but against Divya she did not get many. It was a picturesque finish in the end that closed the doors for Harika. In the semifinals, Humpy will meet top seed Lei Tingjie of China, while Divya will face former women's world champion Tan Zhongyi, also of China.


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
FIR filed against Aurad BJP MLA's son in rape case
Bidar: A case was registered at the women's police station in Bidar city on Sunday against Prateek Chavvan, the son of BJP MLA Prabhu Chavvan from Aurad, for allegedly deceiving and raping a woman under the pretence of marriage. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now According to the complaint filed by a 25-year-old woman from Udgir, Maharashtra, she connected with Prateek on Instagram two years ago. Subsequently, he invited her to Bengaluru with marriage promises, where he allegedly raped her repeatedly at a hotel under duress. Prateek's family visited her residence and agreed to the marriage, the complainant said. An engagement ceremony took place in December 2023, with the wedding planned for May 2024. However, Prateek delayed the wedding, citing Lok Sabha elections and the monsoon. Prateek took her to Latur and Shirdi in Maharashtra, where he continued to threaten and sexually assault her, the complaint alleged. When her family approached Prateek's household to discuss the marriage, MLA Prabhu refused the alliance, she said. The case was registered under IPC sections 376(2)(N), 366, 324 and 506. At a media interaction on Monday, the woman appeared with her face covered and refuted Prabhu's allegations about her involvement with another boy. She said neither she nor her family had any political backing, and no one was orchestrating their actions. Conspiracy to defame my family: Prabhu Meanwhile, Prabhu claimed this was a conspiracy to defame his family, specifically accusing former Bidar BJP MP Bhagwanth Khuba's team. Regarding the woman's complaint to the women's commission, Prabhu alleged she maintained inappropriate communication with another person through messages and video calls. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Prabhu stated he advised the woman since the engagement and discussed the matter with her brother-in-law. He said the marriage was cancelled following consultations with Banjara community leaders. Prabhu said he has a 30-year unblemished political career and arranged numerous marriages. A counter FIR was lodged by one of his brothers against eight members of the girl's family at Hokarn police station in Aurad taluk on Sunday. The accused individuals allegedly assaulted Prabhu and vandalised the doors of his residence in Aurad taluk. Bidar SP Pradeep Gunti said the investigation is ongoing.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
In Mumbai train blasts case, many questions: LeT or IM, household utensils or pressure cookers?
MUMBAI: The 2006 train blasts case remains controversial due to the claims of the Maharashtra ATS that the blasts were carried out by SIMI with the support of LeT while a subsequent claim two years later by the Mumbai crime branch said it was the handiwork of an Indian Mujaheeddin module which it had busted. In court, the ATS chargesheet only mentioned household utensils were used in the blasts, and the use of pressure cookers surfaced only during the trial. The ATS theory that pressure cookers were used also raised some questions since the shopkeeper from where eight of these were purchased was not called for a test identification parade and no sketches of the suspect were prepared and circulated based on his description. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai Besides recovery of some pressure cookers and related accessories at the instance of the accused, there is no mention of these in his statement, according to the Bombay high court judgment acquitting the accused. Another accused mentioned the use of RDX and timers for the blasts, but there was no mention of pressure cooker. In 2008, the crime branch, headed by Rakesh Maria, arrested Sadiq Shaikh, an alleged member of the IM, for the Delhi and Ahmedabad blasts, along with others. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 most beautiful women in the world Shaikh allegedly told officials of the crime branch that the IM was responsible for all the blasts, including the train blasts. The trial court while convicting the accused rejected the defence claim of IM module involvement. An investigation by the Delhi police's special cell, alongside the interrogation of Yasin Bhatkal of th IM, too had found that the train bombings were carried out by IM operatives. The IM had claimed responsibility for the Mumbai blasts along with three other strikes in an email sent to media houses in Nov 2007, said sources. The Delhi police even came on record to state this after the arrest of IM's shadowy co-founder, Abdul Subhan Qureshi, also known as Tauqeer, on Jan 20, 2018. Tauqeer was the one who used to sign off as 'al-Arabi' on the emails sent by the IM after every blast. The Delhi police said both Yasin Bhatkal and Shaikh disclosed the role of Atif Amin, who went to Mumbai specifically for this task along with other members who were later found at Batla House in Delhi in 2008. The module, comprising Shaikh, Amin, and Bhatkal, met once again in Mumbai at a McDonald's restaurant in Andheri before the Ahmedabad blasts, an officer said. "The use of pressure cooker bombs was another IM signature style at the time," he said. In Mumbai, though, some senior police officers said the LeT claim by the ATS and the differing, IM claim by the crime branch may have been a case of one-upmanship. After the train blast, the then Mumbai police commissioner A N Roy stated at a press conference that bombs were planted in pressure cookers and were the handiwork of LeT. At the time — Vilasrao Deshmukh was the Maharashtra chief minister and R R Patil the deputy chief minister, who also held the home portfolio — the Mumbai crime branch was not connected to the case, but after the 2008 blast in Ahmedabad, a suspicious vehicle stolen from the Mumbai region became part of the case when it was found parked outside a civil hospital in Ahmedabad. Through CCTV footage, the vehicle thief, Afzal Usmani was traced and it was found that he had stolen four vehicles from Navi Mumbai which were used in the blast in Ahmedabad. It led to the arrest of Shaikh and his other IM group members. Shaikh had claimed that he, along with Riyaz Bhatkal, Arif Badruddin Shaikh, Amin, Shahnawaz, with the help of other members, carried out the blasts on the instruction of Amir Raza at Mominpura in Delhi, Sankatmochan Mandir in Varanasi, on the Shramjeevi Express, and on Mumbai train from Feb 2005 to Sept 2008. He had claimed in his initial statement that Raza sent explosives and materials for this purpose with help from Riyaz Bhatkal or his men, while Arif Badar prepared the clock timer circuit. He, Badar, Bhatkal and Amin knew how to prepare bombs and circuits. The trial court found the statements "vague".