I have to tear down £50k Grand Designs-style mansion as council say it ‘doesn't fit'… but it's only trains who see it
Tonnes of soil was excavated from Shokat Khan's garden to build a three-storey bunker-like addition to his home in Bradford.
3
3
3
The father-of-one, who is originally from America, wanted to "bring a slice of California" to his West Yorkshire home that is fit with a home office, games room, gym and rooftop terrace.
It is cleverly hidden from view by a railway embankment below, and therefore only visible to trains passing by.
However, council officials have rules the structure was built without permission, and declared the entire £50,000 project illegal.
Following years of investment by Mr Khan into the ambitious build, the council have ordered for it to be demolished.
Mr Khan, thinking his property would not be intrusive or overbearing for neighbours, said: ""Because it's in a valley that nobody can see, I thought it was perfect.
"I won't build it up, I'll build it down, so you can't see anything."
He added: "The building inspector came out in 2008 and gave me the go-ahead, and I never heard anything from the council for years.
"There was no suggestion at all that I had done anything wrong."
If built commercially, the white-rendered grand annex would have cost around £250,000.
But because Mr Khan did it all himself, from removing the vegetation, laying concrete foundations, and building up from the foot of the embankment to garden level, he thought the project fell within permitted development rights.
Bradford Council, however, took enforcement action last August by demanding he demolish the structure within three months.
They described the building as "incongruous" and "prominent" with its modern design, white render finishing and 'scale, massing and position upon an otherwise undeveloped embankment."
During a planning committee meeting, planners also claimed the rooftop terrace provided 'unrestricted views into the most private areas' of a neighbour's home.
Mr Khan argues the council's enforcement action comes too late, as the project was started more than decade ago.
He also insists the annex was built to a very high standard, with structural engineer backing: "I've gone at least five times over what is stipulated by building regulations.
"When I build something, I build something where it's going to last."
"I've done everything by the book, gone above and beyond," Mr Khan continued.
"I've worked on it after work, digging and building myself."
"You just want to create something beautiful that'll be there after you're gone - and still, you're treated like you've done something wrong.'
The 55-year-old still has greater plans for the property, including installing a kitchenette, toilet, Jacuzzi and full-size pool table.
But he may have to demolish the building entirely, if his current appeal to the Planning Inspectorate is unsuccessful.
Mr Khan is determined to fight if it comes to it: "I've got lawyers. I'll go all the way. Anyone with sense can see the value in what I've built.
"It's not intrusive at all. You have to think of people other than yourself.
"I could have built a granny annex at ground level which would have been imposing - instead they're looking at something much nicer."
He expects the home could be finished within five months, but it's been two years since he has done anything to its interior due to fears its demolition could come at any moment.
"I've felt like jumping off the rooftop because of all this constant harassment from the council."
Bradford Council, however, have defended their decisions and stated: "The difficulty with this proposal is that the size of the outbuilding with the amount of floor space over multiple levels is substantial in the context of a private dwelling.
"The building is large and the floorspace is utilised over multiple floors, and the local planning authority has not been provided with any details or any explanations as to why such an amount of space for an outbuilding use would be required for that amount of ancillary space."
But he thought the build would be something all the neighbours could enjoy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Firms call for interest rate cuts as taxes bite
Business leaders last night urged the Bank of England to press ahead with interest rate cuts this week. The heads of the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) and Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) told the Daily Mail that now was the time to lower borrowing costs to ease pressure on companies and households struggling despite four rate cuts since last August. They also warned firms have been clobbered by Rachel Reeves' £25billion National Insurance tax raid on employers. Fears are mounting of more tax hikes this autumn to plug a gaping hole in the Chancellor's Budget plans. A report by the Institute of Directors last week showed business confidence has collapsed to a record low under Labour, with morale lower than during Covid lockdowns. Interest rates are expected to be cut from 4.25 per cent to 4 per cent on Thursday – though with inflation well above the 2 per cent target and the highest in the G7 at 3.6 per cent, the CBI warned the Bank is 'walking a tightrope'. Alpesh Paleja, deputy chief economist at the CBI, said: 'We expect a rate cut and then two more after that, so that rates settle at 3.5 per cent early next year. 'However, interest rates rank fairly low in the spectrum of costs. Firms continue to grapple with the rise in employer NICs, high energy costs and more general uncertainty. 'The cumulative burden is something the Government needs to be mindful of, as we head closer to the next Budget.' David Bharier, head of research at the BCC, said small firms in particular 'are increasingly impatient for more cuts'. He added: 'Interest rate cuts are only part of the solution right now. For many SMEs, the cost of doing business is too high with new tax and administrative burdens. To restore business confidence and stimulate investment, a comprehensive growth plan is essential.' Martin McTague, chairman of the FSB, said: 'Small firms will be hoping for a cut to ease some of the financial pressure they are under and enable more of those who need finance to grow to access it. 'If no cut is forthcoming, the Bank should set out a clear path for the rest of the year, building in a gradual easing of the base rate to encourage investment and unlock growth.'
The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
Labour must come up with a deterrent that makes migrants worry their money won't get them what or where they want
Boats sailed WHEN will the Government finally get the message on illegal immigration? Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's announcement of 300 extra National Crime Agency officers to tackle people-smuggling gangs is welcome, of course. 1 Anything that disrupts this evil trade is a good thing, in the same way that a crackdown is needed on profiteers who employ the migrants on the cheap — no questions asked — when they get here. But if this £100million investment is the Government's grand plan to 'break the business model' of the crooks then it is doomed to failure. When the risk-versus-reward equation is so much in their favour, the smugglers and the illegal migrants will always find a way. The incentives are too great: millions of pounds for the smugglers, for little effort; hand-outs, accommodation and black market jobs for the migrants, with virtually no chance of being deported. The only way to break the business model is to come up with a deterrent which makes the migrants worry that their money — and the dangers they will face — won't get them what they want. Or where they want. A deterrent like the Rwanda scheme, which was already beginning to work but which Labour couldn't wait to ditch. The soaring number of Channel small boats is the inevitable consequence. Jobs shame THE number of young people facing unemployment is one of the most heart-breaking results of the Chancellor's job-wrecking tax hikes. A million Neets — youngsters Not in Education, Employment or Training — is a disaster for the economy as well as a tragedy for them. Migrant boats are carrying 'bad people' REJECTED by other NATIONS says Trump At a time in their lives when they are desperately trying to find their place in the world, a job — or the skills to get one — gives them purpose and a sense of who they are, just as surely as being dumped on benefits crushes that. The Skills Tax Relief proposed by more than 100 business chiefs would be a vital boost to apprenticeships and vocational training, offering young Brits a route into the workplace. If Rachel Reeves isn't swayed by the thought of saving so many from the scrapheap, then she should be swayed by the £10billion of welfare savings it could bring over the next five years. It's not the water temperature that puts them off but the sewage dumped in it. What a blow for our coastal communities and seaside resorts.
Times
30 minutes ago
- Times
Gen Z's perfect time to dine? Bookings for 6pm are booming
This summer, one London restaurant is introducing a £50 early evening set menu aimed at the growing crowd of purposeful post-work diners. 'It's a more accessible experience that still reflects our standards,' said Joe Laker, the co-founder and head chef at Counter 71 in Shoreditch, London. 'It's a more relaxed way to unwind.' And Laker isn't alone. Across the country, restaurants are adapting to meet demand from customers who want to eat earlier. Fashionably late is out — in 2025, it's the early diners who are first to the fork. Data from OpenTable, the online restaurant reservation service, reveals a sharp rise in 6pm reservations, up 11 per cent in London and 6 per cent across the UK compared with the same period last year. Zonal, the hospitality tech service, pegs the new national average dining time at 6.12pm, with nearly half of all bookings falling between midday and 6pm. Laker's new £50 menu at Counter 71 includes snack highlights from its long-form dinner, a main course focused on whole chicken and 'playful' desserts. But it's more than a menu shift — it's a response to a cultural change. 'Many of our guests now live further out than before,' Laker says. 'They want to eat early so they're not sprinting for the last train.' What began as a post-pandemic adjustment is now reshaping the way we eat out, pushing restaurants to overhaul their service models and menus, while diners swap late-night indulgence for early evening sobriety. Commuters and wellness-focused professionals are driving the shift in attitudes, along with the sober-curious and cost-conscious — and the restaurant industry is taking note. According to Lucia Reisch, a professor of behavioural economics from the University of Cambridge, Covid was a pivotal moment. 'People who work from home tend to start and finish earlier, which naturally leads to earlier dining. Add the lack of a commute, and people have far more flexibility,' she said. 'There's also now broader public awareness that late-night eating isn't great for health.' It's not just about health, although wellness is a major factor. 'Younger diners especially are making choices that reflect physical and mental wellbeing, but also financial health,' said Dr Richard Piper, the chief executive of Alcohol Change UK. 'Earlier dining helps avoid expensive late-night drinking — people want to socialise without the hangover.' That sentiment is echoed by Laura Willoughby, the co-founder of the low and no-alcohol specialist Club Soda. 'This isn't about being virtuous. It's about making the most of the week — whether that's getting to the gym early or having a quiet dinner midweek and saving bigger nights out for the weekend.' For Aamena Hanif, a London-based professional who frequently dines out, the draw is less logistical and more personal. 'I've started booking dinner around 6pm because the vibe just suits me better,' she said. 'I don't drink, so I'm not looking for a buzzy atmosphere. Early evenings are calmer. You can actually hear your friends talk.' Restaurants are already responding. At Sael, a private dining room in St James's Market, London, the chef and restaurateur Jason Atherton says the early prix fixe menu has proved popular. 'People are commuting farther and want to get home earlier — and health is a big factor,' Atherton said. 'Before the pandemic, we'd be plating main courses at midnight. Now, most of our venues close well before that.' Outside London, earlier dining is also gaining traction. At Fifty Two at the Rudding Park Hotel in Harrogate, North Yorkshire, Sunday dinner now starts at 6pm sharp — a response to guest preferences. 'Eating out is becoming a way to socialise without compromising other goals,' said Linda Haden of the hospitality analysts Lumina Intelligence. 'We're seeing more smoothies and fewer cocktails on dinner tables.' Peter Backman, a restaurant analyst, believes 6pm bookings now reflect something deeper. 'Dining at 6pm signals the end of the workday. It's not just about food — it's about reclaiming time,' he said. Andrew Oswald, an economics and behavioural science professor at the University of Warwick, agreed. 'Londoners had the longest commutes in the UK. The pandemic broke the psychological mould. People had time to realise they didn't want to arrive home at 9pm any more. I doubt they'll go back.'
