To settle whether ‘Janaki' should stay in Suresh Gopi film title or not, a special screening for Kerala High Court
After the CBFC demanded a change in the title as well as the name of the protagonist, on the ground that Janaki is also a name for goddess Sita, the producers had approached the HC over the delay in granting a certificate to the film, which should have hit screens on June 27.
On Wednesday, while hearing the arguments, the Bench of Justice N Nagaresh said the court will watch the movie on Saturday and consider the matter on Tuesday.
On Monday, while hearing the matter, the judge had directed the Deputy Solicitor General of India (DSGI), O M Shalina, who appeared for the CBFC, to submit an affidavit on July 2, detailing the reasons for not issuing the screening certificate to the film. On Wednesday, the CBFC sought more time to file the affidavit.
Earlier, the Union Government had told the court that the film's name refers to the goddess Sita, and the petitioners can use a neutral name instead. The CBFC also submitted that the title violates guidelines issued by the Union Government in conformity with Section 5B(2) of the Cinematograph Act, which deals with certifying films.
At this stage, the court had asked, 'Now you will dictate to directors and artists which names they should use and which stories they should tell. What is wrong with Janaki? How is it contemptuous of a religion? … That is the freedom of artists.''
When the petitioner said the film is about the fight of a rape survivor and Janaki is the name of the protagonist, the court noted, 'Janaki is not a rapist. If a rapist is named as Rama, Krishna, Janaki, then I can understand. The heroine is fighting for justice, what is the problem with that name?''
Rajya Sabha MP and advocate Haris Beeran, who appeared for the producers, said the film's teaser has been certified by the CBFC. The teaser was released three months ago, and so far, no complaints had emerged related to the title, he pointed out.
'Has anyone complained about the name Janaki? Whose sentiments are being hurt? Has anyone actually raised an objection?' the judge asked.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
Akshay Kumar Wanted To Star With 'Young' Kareena Kapoor So His Own Age Would Look Less: Pahlaj Nihalani
Akshay Kumar insisted on casting Kareena Kapoor in Talaash, says Pahlaj Nihalani, calling it a turning point in Bollywood's actor-driven casting culture. Former CBFC chief and filmmaker Pahlaj Nihalani recently opened up about the changing dynamics of Bollywood casting and rising entourage costs. Speaking on the YouTube channel Learn From The Legend, he recalled a moment during the making of the 2003 film Talaash: The Hunt Begins, when Akshay Kumar insisted that Kareena Kapoor be cast as the female lead. Nihalani explained how casting decisions used to be strictly the domain of producers and directors, with actors rarely getting involved. 'Earlier, producers and directors used to cast and heroes wouldn't interfere in casting. The first actor to interfere in casting with me was Akshay Kumar in Talash in 2002. He told me that 'we can start the movie tomorrow, and you can give me any amount that you want, but the heroine of this film will be Kareena Kapoor.' It was one of the most costly films of that time, it was made in Rs 22 crore. This was the first time in my career that an actor had demanded a certain cast." Pahlaj added that Akshay's motivation was partly about image. 'Sometimes, as the actors grow old they want to star against younger actresses so that their own age looks less. That was the first time I heard that, but these days actors decide everything and producers work as a courier service." The veteran filmmaker also slammed the ballooning costs caused by actors' entourages. 'Where one person was working now 10 people are employed. Earlier, there used to be one vanity van, but now actors demand six vanity vans — one for exercising, one for the kitchen, one for meetings. Sharam ani chahiye un actors ko ko che vanity vans mangate hai (Actors feel ashamed for asking for 6 vanity vans). Earlier, only makeup man used to go with actors, now they demand a separate hairdresser and a person just to hold their mirror. They give Rs 1.5 lakh bills for nothing. Earlier they used to bring home-cooked food, but now they want diet food. They want drugs at night and diet food in the morning." First Published:
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Akshay Kumar 'demanded' a particular actress to star opposite him in a movie, says famous Bollywood producer and shares why
Pankajl Nihalani about celebrities' drug use You Might Also Like: 'Want diet food in morning and drugs at night': Famous Bollywood producer spills dark secrets about actors Veteran filmmaker and former CBFC chief Pahlaj Nihalani has offered a blunt look at how Bollywood 's power dynamics have drastically changed over the years. In a recent interview on the Learn From The Legend podcast, Nihalani reflected on how the control once held by producers and directors in casting decisions has now completely shifted to actors. Drawing from his own experience, he recalled that the first time he ever encountered an actor insisting on a particular co-star was during the making of Talaash in the early 2000s, when Akshay Kumar demanded Kareena Kapoor be cast as the lead to Nihalani, the 2003 action thriller was one of the most expensive films of its time, with a lavish budget of ₹22 crore. It featured extravagant sets, including 22 built from scratch, scenes shot in South Africa, and even a moving train sequence. The producer recalled that Akshay was ready to start the shoot very next day as the script was ready, but he demanded that the heroine has to be Kareena Kapoor. He speculated that Akshay had already worked with Karisma Kapoor and wanted to be paired with a younger heroine, possibly to appear younger himself on stood out, however, was the shift in decision-making: from directors and producers to actors calling the shots on co-stars to technicians. Nihalani remarked that today's industry functions like a "racket," where the actor decides everything while the producer is reduced to someone who simply arranges finances and delivers the producer also weighed in on Akshay Kumar's recent slump at the box office, with 10–12 films reportedly flopping back-to-back. He noted that while the actor began his career with discipline, punctuality, and sincerity—qualities that ensured continued work despite his early films not performing well—those strengths may no longer align with current audience preferences. Nihalani pointed out that even when Akshay takes up philanthropic efforts now, the timing seems to be working against a recent podcast, filmmaker Pahlaj Nihalani criticised the growing entitlement of actors, highlighting how stars today demand massive entourages, including multiple vanity vans for workouts, meetings, and meals. He noted that what once required one person now needs ten, including separate staff just to hold mirrors. He also alleged rising costs for makeup and fitness, and even claimed that drug use remains prevalent in the industry, saying it's sometimes visible in the very eyes of certain actors.
India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
Kerala High Court to watch Janaki vs State of Kerala amid censorship controversy
The Kerala High Court is scheduled to watch the Malayalam film 'Janaki Vs State of Kerala' on July 7 at Lal Media in Palarivattom in Kerala's Kochi. This decision comes amid a controversy involving the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) and their demand for a title change. The film's production company, Cosmos Entertainments, has petitioned for the court's CBFC's revising committee has requested changes, citing concerns over the character Janaki's portrayal as a victim of sexual assault and its reference to Goddess Sita. The board argued this depiction necessitates a title change, suggesting it poses "a challenge to the freedom of creative expression." The film's counsel contends that Janaki is "a fighter for justice," challenging the board's N Nagaresh, who will watch the film alongside representatives from both the petitioner and the CBFC. In a report by The Hindu, he said, "Considering the allegations in the petitions, I believe it is appropriate to watch the movie before arriving at a decision." The petitioner's counsel highlighted a perceived inconsistency, noting that "the same board had also issued a censor certificate to a film titled 'Janaki Jaane.'"The court observed that "the character is a victim who is fighting for justice, and is not an accused." The case is set for a hearing on July 8 after its screening. This legal battle highlights ongoing tensions between artistic freedom and regulatory oversight in Indian the hearing date approaches, the court's decision is anticipated to set a precedent for future cases involving creative works and censorship.- EndsMust Watch
