logo
Lawyer representing CRPF constable's Pakistani wife in deportation case is an ‘unfazed' BJP functionary

Lawyer representing CRPF constable's Pakistani wife in deportation case is an ‘unfazed' BJP functionary

The Print02-05-2025
'I defended the law declared 25 April by the MHA (Ministry of Home Affairs) that people on a Long Term Visa (LTV) won't be deported to Pakistan. Menal Khan, the wife of CRPF constable (Munir Khan), had already given an interview for the LTV and the 51-day period after which LTV is deemed to be approved had passed on 4 April,' Sharma told ThePrint.
Known as an advocate who raises issues concerning the Hindus in Jammu, Sharma asserts that opposition to Muslim appeasement is not selective application of the law, based on the religion of the beneficiary. Instead, he says, that Muslim appeasement can only be opposed by supporting equal application of the law of the land.
New Delhi: Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) functionary and advocate Ankur Sharma is unperturbed by 'amateurish' criticism he faces for legally aiding the Pakistani wife of a CRPF constable, insisting that he always supports the rule of law above everything and will continue to do so.
On Thursday, the Jammy and Kashmir High Court granted interim relief to Menal, who was at the Wagah border for deportation. She had entered India on 28 February on a visitor's visa which expired on 22 March. Menal and Munir had married in May last year through WhatsApp video call, according to the findings of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), which has initiated department action against its personnel.
Sharma is Menal's lawyer in the J&K High Court where her husband moved a writ petition challenging deportation notice issued by the local tehsildar.
The people associated with the BJP or any critique on social media for representing Menal are criticising the law of the land decided by the MHA, he says.
'These criticisms are amateurish. I don't want to comment much on it. They are not criticising me for representing her in court. By criticising me, they are criticising the MHA,' Sharma tells ThePrint.
'This is not the only case I have fought in court. I have also fought for Jitendra Narayan Tyagi in the Jammu & Kashmir High Court and secured stay on the case filed for his alleged remarks against Islam. I have always supported the rule of law above everything and will continue to do so. I have opposed Muslim appeasement, and, hence, I was on the hit list of terrorist organisation Hizbul Mujahideen, but I will also not support selective application of law based on religion of the beneficiary,' he adds.
Tyagi aka Wasim Rizvi, the former chairman of Uttar Pradesh Shia Central Waqf Board, had faced charges for allegedly making disrespectful remarks about Islam and Prophet Muhammad.
Also Read: ED director concedes PMLA cases piling up for yrs, weeks after CBI chief made similar admission
Poster boy of Jammu's far-Right
Hailing from Jammu's Kathua district, Sharma went on to pursue LLB from Faculty of Law, Delhi University before he started his law practice at the J&K HC, according to information available on the website of Ekam Sanatan Bharat.
He first came into prominence in 2014, challenging the constitutional validity of Jammu and Kashmir State Land (Vesting of Ownership to the Occupants) Act, 2001, popularly known as 'Roshni Act'. Sharma had alleged that the policy introduced by the Congress government led by Ghulam Nabi Azad caused a loss of Rs 25,000 crore to the exchequer.
Similarly, Sharma made news when he moved the J&K HC to transfer the Kathua rape and muder case to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and later went on to represent on the accused persons alleging conspiracy of 'jihadis to defame Hindus'.
He later founded an outfit named IkkJutt Jammu, which formally took political shape in November, 2020 and went on to capture limelight by demanding a separate Jammu state and division of Kashmir into two Union Territories, including one exclusively for Kashmiri Pandits.
Sh. @JPNadda welcomes Sh. Ankur Sharma to BJP
Jammu, Sept 22: The BJP on Sunday got a boost after the Ekam Snatan Bharat Dal, National President, Sh. Ankur Sharma, Joined the party and was welcomed into the party fold by BJP National President, Sh. JP Nadda.
BJP Working… pic.twitter.com/qoCi1i85wg
— BJP Jammu & Kashmir (@BJP4JnK) September 22, 2024
The Ikkjutt Jammu came to be later known as Ekam Sanatan Bharat Dal. Last year, Sharma merged Ekam Sanatan Bharat with the BJP ahead of the assembly elections in Jammu and Kashmir.
At the time of Sharma's joining the party, BJP national president J.P.Nadda had hailed him as a 'nationalist' who has always stood for the cause of Jammu and Kashmir. 'Joining of Sh. Ankur Sharma in BJP is in the interest of J&K and will also strengthen BJP which is committed to the welfare, development and peace of J&K,' the party's UT unit had quoted Nadda as saying.
(Edited by Tony Rai)
Also Read: After Pahalgam widow's message against hate, an online army turns on its poster child for justice
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Assam: Last rites of slain CRPF jawan performed
Assam: Last rites of slain CRPF jawan performed

News18

time16 minutes ago

  • News18

Assam: Last rites of slain CRPF jawan performed

Agency: PTI Kokrajhar (Assam), Jul 17 (PTI) The last rites of a CRPF jawan, who was killed in an encounter with Maoists in Jharkhand, were performed at his native village in Assam's Kokrajhar district on Thursday. The body of Parneswar Koch was flown to Lokpriya Gopinath Bordoloi Airport at Guwahati in the morning and from there, it was taken to his residence in Magurmari village of Kokrajhar. Senior CRPF officials paid their last respects to the slain jawan at the airport, laying floral wreaths in his memory. The body was taken in a convoy to the village where locals gathered in large numbers to pay their tributes to Koch. The last rites were performed with full military honours as his family and friends mourned Koch's death. Two Maoists and a CRPF jawan were killed in a gunfight between the security forces and the red rebels in Birhordera forest in Gomia police station area of Jharkhand's Bokaro district on Wednesday. PTI SSG SSG ACD Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

'Replace Stones With Books': Samik Bhattacharya's Debut Speech Signals BJP's Tactical Shift In Bengal
'Replace Stones With Books': Samik Bhattacharya's Debut Speech Signals BJP's Tactical Shift In Bengal

News18

time18 minutes ago

  • News18

'Replace Stones With Books': Samik Bhattacharya's Debut Speech Signals BJP's Tactical Shift In Bengal

Last Updated: A closer reading of his speech reveals that Bhattacharya invoked Bengal's complex history, which includes several major riots both before and after independence. In a clear departure from the hardline, polarised politics that have characterised West Bengal in recent years, newly elected BJP state Chief Samik Bhattacharya, in his debut speech before party workers on Thursday, stated that Muslims in the state need to understand that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has never been against them. 'The BJP wants to replace stones with books and swords with pens in the hands of Muslim youth," Bhattacharya said, emphasising that Muslim youth have been used merely as a vote bank by Mamata Banerjee over the past one and a half decades. This statement is being seen as a major political shift for the BJP in West Bengal, especially with the crucial 2026 Assembly elections approaching. Political circles in the state, long accustomed to intensely polarised politics spearheaded by Leader of the Opposition Suvendu Adhikari, have taken note. Adhikari has, on multiple occasions, publicly stated, 'We don't want a single Muslim vote to win West Bengal." This raises the question: is Samik Bhattacharya moving away from the BJP's core ideology? The answer appears to be no. A closer reading of his speech reveals that Bhattacharya invoked Bengal's complex history, which includes several major riots both before and after independence. He referred to the Great Calcutta Killings of 1946 and the trauma endured by people in Murshidabad, Nadia, and Malda when, during the drawing of the Radcliffe Line, these districts were initially assigned to present-day Bangladesh. It was only after strong persuasion led by Bengal leaders, including Syama Prasad Mookerjee, that they became part of independent India. Bhattacharya also referenced recent incidents in Bangladesh, where Hindu minorities were attacked, women were raped, and properties burned — subtly reinforcing the idea of protecting minorities in a manner that aligns with the BJP's core ideological framework. However, political analysts observe that Bhattacharya seems to recognise the limitations of extreme polarisation. His tone suggests a tactical shift: instead of consolidating Muslim voters against the BJP, the party could reach out to those among them who are interested in development and socio-economic upliftment — a strategy that could benefit the BJP in 2026. This is why Bhattacharya emphasised Bengal's secular and pluralistic legacy, appealing to the Bengali educated middle class, who have historically believed in pluralism. He even said he envisions a Bengal where Durga Puja immersion rallies and Muharram processions are co-organised without conflict or communal tension, as has been the case for many years in the state. Interestingly, Bhattacharya did not use the slogan 'Jai Shri Ram." Instead, he invoked deities with whom Bengalis as a whole culturally identify — Maa Durga, Maa Kali, and Prabhu Jagannath. At the same time, Bhattacharya shifted the blame for the rise in polarised politics onto Mamata Banerjee, accusing her of dividing Bengalis for political gain. Analysts say he has effectively set the early narrative for the 2026 Assembly elections. What Is The Narrative? For the first time, a senior BJP leader in Bengal is speaking about 'Bengal's asmita" — Bengali pride. Bhattacharya began his address by referencing Bengal's glorious economic contribution before British rule, when undivided Bengal accounted for 40 per cent of India's GDP, a figure that has now dwindled to 8 per cent. Thus, the narrative he is attempting to build for 2026 focuses on industrialisation vs corruption, democracy vs autocracy, and peace vs violence. Political watchers note that until now, the BJP's narrative in Bengal largely focused on exposing the corruption of the Trinamool Congress, with little clarity on what the party offered as an alternative. Bhattacharya sought to address that gap today, stating that in 2026, the BJP aims to offer a governance model built on the principles of 'good governance," as demonstrated under Prime Minister Narendra Modi in BJP-ruled states. Understanding that the BJP lacks a strong face to counter Mamata Banerjee, Bhattacharya also tackled this issue directly. He argued that Banerjee's once-iconic image as a symbol of honesty has collapsed under the weight of multiple corruption allegations, claiming the TMC can no longer portray her as an icon of integrity. In a strategic move, Bhattacharya reached out to other opposition parties — particularly the Left and the Congress — urging them not to indirectly support the TMC in the name of 'No Vote to BJP" campaigns. Instead, he called on them to fight independently to remove Mamata Banerjee from power in 2026, assuring them that once the TMC is defeated, there will be space for a healthy opposition — a departure from the governance styles of both the Left and TMC, which were often accused of stifling opposition voices. With this speech, Bhattacharya appears to be reaching across religious lines, aiming to appeal to the Bhadralok Bengali, who has historically viewed the BJP as 'untouchable" or culturally alien to Bengal. It is often said in Bengal politics that without the support of the Bengali Bhadralok, no political change is possible. This was true in 1977 during the Left's rise, and again in 2011 when Mamata Banerjee came to power. Bhattacharya, clearly aware of this history, is now trying to reach out to the educated middle class by shifting the narrative from Hindu vs. Muslim to governance vs. non-governance. That is why he made repeated references to Bengali literature, culture, and stalwarts like Syed Wajid Ali — symbols still deeply revered by Bengal's educated middle class. view comments First Published: News politics 'Replace Stones With Books': Samik Bhattacharya's Debut Speech Signals BJP's Tactical Shift In Bengal Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

After The Hug, Comes The Hesitation: Why Raj Thackeray Isn't Sold On A Reunion Yet
After The Hug, Comes The Hesitation: Why Raj Thackeray Isn't Sold On A Reunion Yet

News18

time18 minutes ago

  • News18

After The Hug, Comes The Hesitation: Why Raj Thackeray Isn't Sold On A Reunion Yet

Last Updated: Raj Thackeray's calculated vagueness is telling. He has, so far, offered no endorsement of Uddhav's leadership, no clarity on the MNS's role in future polls When Uddhav Thackeray and Raj Thackeray stood shoulder-to-shoulder on stage at the July 5 'Marathi Vijay Rally', it wasn't just another photo-op. Or so it seemed at the time. The cousins hugged, invoked Balasaheb's legacy, and for a moment, made thousands of old-school Shiv Sainiks and MNS loyalists believe that Maharashtra's original saffron family was making a comeback. But a week later, the afterglow has faded, and so has the talk of a political alliance. At an internal MNS meeting in Taigatpuri, Raj Thackeray made it clear, 'I went to the Vijay Rally with Uddhav Thackeray only on the Marathi issue." No mention of elections. No commitment to joint strategy. No sign of a formal handshake beyond the optics. In fact, he told party workers that any decision on alliance or seat-sharing would only come during the BMC and municipal elections, in November or December. So the real question now is: Did Raj Thackeray just distance himself from Uddhav? And was that emotional rally nothing more than nostalgia in saffron hues? Uddhav Thackeray, who now leads the Shiv Sena (UBT) after losing the party's name and symbol to Eknath Shinde, has been searching for a revival strategy. With Sharad Pawar's NCP now split, and the Congress struggling to energise its base in urban Maharashtra, Uddhav has every reason to bring Raj into the fold. A joint Thackeray front could plug the leak in the Marathi vote bank, especially in Mumbai, Thane, Pune, and Nashik, where divided loyalties have helped the BJP and Shinde's faction gain ground. But the problem is that Raj Thackeray hasn't committed to seat-sharing. He hasn't agreed to contest elections with the Maha Vikas Aghadi, which includes the Congress and NCP(SP). And sources say he's still running the numbers, calculating whether the MNS has more to lose or gain by siding with Uddhav. The emotional power of that Vijay Rally was undeniable. Long-time Shiv Sainiks wept. MNS workers chanted Balasaheb's name. Leaders like Anil Parab and Kishori Pednekar called it a 'dream moment" that the Sena supremo would've loved to see. But behind the scenes, the arithmetic isn't adding up. The MNS still holds sway in pockets of Mumbai and Nashik, but hasn't translated charisma into seats in years. Uddhav's Sena, while wounded, remains organisationally stronger. If they join forces, who gives up which turf? Whose cadres dominate local 'shakhas'? Who controls ticket distribution? That's not just a negotiation, it's a minefield. And that's before factoring in the Congress and NCP, whose ideological pitch is far more inclusive than the MNS's past rhetoric on migrants and reservations. Aligning with Raj could alienate Muslim voters in urban seats, something the Congress will not accept lightly. Raj Thackeray's calculated vagueness is telling. He has, so far, offered no endorsement of Uddhav's leadership, no clarity on the MNS's role in future polls, and no indication that a realignment is imminent. He's keeping his options open, and that includes walking away. What this suggests is that the July 5 rally may have been a strategic pause, not a turning point. Raj got the optics, Uddhav got a morale boost, and both reconnected with their base. But neither offered anything concrete. And in a state where the BJP-Shinde machine is already gearing up for the next round of municipal polls, that vagueness could cost them. So did Raj snub Uddhav? Maybe not outright. But he certainly hasn't said yes. And in politics, silence often speaks louder than words. Raj has promised to 'decide later", after weighing the pros and cons. But time is not on their side. The BMC polls are looming. The BJP and Shinde are mobilising. And unless the cousins can sort out their differences and present a united front with real policy, shared seats, and a common agenda, the Marathis will continue to watch the Thackeray drama from the sidelines, not the voting booth. view comments First Published: July 15, 2025, 11:43 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store