logo
He thought his father abandoned him. Then he took a DNA test.

He thought his father abandoned him. Then he took a DNA test.

Washington Post2 days ago
For most of his life, Akihiko Yamamoto believed his American father had abandoned him in Japan.
Raised by his Japanese mother, his classmates and neighbors called him 'gaijin' – meaning foreigner – and told him to 'go back to your country.'
'My childhood was terrible,' said Yamamoto, 73. 'Everybody was so mean to me.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anger as 'brief' stop outside Sutton Coldfield opticians lands dad with £100 parking charge
Anger as 'brief' stop outside Sutton Coldfield opticians lands dad with £100 parking charge

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Anger as 'brief' stop outside Sutton Coldfield opticians lands dad with £100 parking charge

A dad was left fuming after a two-minute parking stop in a busy Birmingham shopping area cost him a £100 fine. Richard Jeffries said he stopped outside Malcolm Gray opticians in Lichfield Road in Mere Green, Sutton Coldfield, at 12.58pm on Friday, May 9. His fiancée got out of their blue Toyota and he took a pushchair from the boot for their six-month-old daughter Maisie before he drove off at 1pm. READ MORE: Popular city baker who gave up business is back with new venture He said the road was 'busy and dangerous' and it appeared a safe spot to drop them. He claimed signs bearing the terms and conditions of parking were 'set right back near the opticians' and could not be read from his location. He also said they were in 'small print'. Five days later, Mr Jeffries received a penalty charge notice from I Park Services Limited demanding he paid £100, reduced to £60 if he paid within 14 days. The dad, who is also a choirmaster in the area, appealed the decision and said he did not actually park but pulled up to allow his family out. He said there was no clear sign by the road detailing the parking restrictions. He said I Park was a member of the International Parking Community which has a code of practice that allows a five-minute grace period – which he was well within. But he said I Park dismissed his appeal 'within an hour'. A second appeal was with an 'independent appeals service'. Mr Jeffries told BirminghamLive: 'I drove off within two minutes, there was no-one in the car park and there no signs by the road. 'I think its unscrupulous. It's a way of getting money off people. 'I understand they don't want people in those spaces but I didn't actually park,' READ MORE: Driver seriously injured in two-car crash in city suburb He continued: 'Looking at the photos and screenshots not only can you tell I wasn't in a parking bay, I wasn't there longer than two minutes. 'Malcolm Gray was really unhelpful on the phone. They said 'it's nothing to do with us'. I said 'do you think it's fair?'. The lady said she didn't think it was fair, but there are signs. 'But as soon as you open the door of the car, that's when they charge you.' Get breaking news on BirminghamLive WhatsApp, click the link to join Mr Jeffries added: 'After a while I thought, 'why should I pay £100 if I didn't actually park?' 'Malcolm Gray could look at its system or contact the company and say 'this person didn't park' and cancel it. 'We have parked at the Butlers Arms further up Lichfield Road and a couple of times I didn't put my reg in and they just cancelled it. 'I am minded to fight it. If I pay they are just going to get away with it. 'I think it's really unfair.' READ MORE: Asda thief sat on man and kissed him in car park before stealing gold chain Kathryn Hartland, owner of Malcolm Gray, said the parking company was brought in after the neighbouring Post Office's owner did so - prompting more people to park in its spaces and affecting customers. She told BirminghamLive: 'I have been an owner of the practice for many years. We have been there over 40 years. 'We have three spaces and we have always rubbed along with other businesses. 'There used to be banks there. People would park on our spaces and run in and out. 'Then two or three years ago the owner of the Post Office introduced parking restrictions using a parking company for her spaces. 'That meant more people parked in our spaces to avoid getting a charge. 'It made our parking worse. It became an issue. 'It was the last thing we wanted to do but we met with them (I Park) and they said: 'Let us take the stress out of your parking. ''Anyone coming in to your practice, they put their registration into an iPad. Anyone else we will deal with'. 'People think they are just posting a letter or buying stamps but they are using our spaces and our customers then have to park elsewhere. 'We continue to allow I Park Services to manage our parking spaces. But it is nothing to do with us how they do it. That's down to them.' Get the latest Sutton Coldfield news delivered direct to your inbox I Park said: 'The car park is for customers throughout the opening hours of the optometrists. 'Parking outside the hours of the optometrists is not permitted unless payment is made in accordance with the terms and conditions. 'Drivers must register their vehicle details inside Malcolm Gray, which can only be carried out if they enter the premises. 'If the driver of the vehicle fails to meet the terms and conditions to park the vehicle and leaves the vehicle parked in the car park, the price for parking is £100, which is reduced to £60 if payment is made within 14 days of the notice to keeper. 'The signage around the car park is displayed and can be seen by the driver on entering the car park. It shows the terms and conditions of the car park the driver, by parking their vehicle, agrees to. 'The vehicle entered the car park at 12:58 and left at 13:00. "No entry was made into the terminal inside Malcolm Gray Optometrists. 'A consideration period, for the driver to read the signage and decide if the terms and conditions are acceptable or to leave the site, which may be up to five minutes, will only apply if the vehicle has complied with the terms and conditions. 'Parking and allowing passengers to exit the vehicle negates a consideration period as the driver has parked but in breach of the terms and conditions. 'Grace periods are a period of time after a period of paid parking has expired. In this situation no grace period is applicable. 'The evidence we hold shows the vehicle stopped over a number of bays to allow a passenger to exit the vehicle who then walked off the site before the vehicle left the car park. 'There is no entry into the Malcolm Gray optometrists terminal, therefore the vehicle was parked without a valid permit or authority from the landlord. 'The parking charge is currently at the Independent Appeals Service whereby the evidence supplied will be adjudicated by either a barrister or solicitor. 'If the adjudicator rules in favour of the driver, the parking charge will be cancelled.'

Wall Street Fined in Asia's $3B Money-Laundering Bombshell
Wall Street Fined in Asia's $3B Money-Laundering Bombshell

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Wall Street Fined in Asia's $3B Money-Laundering Bombshell

Singapore just sent a clear message to the global banking world: money laundering lapses won't go unpunished. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) handed out S$27.5 million (US$21.5 million) in fines to nine financial institutionsincluding some of the world's most powerful banksafter a two-year probe into the country's largest-ever money laundering case. Credit Suisse's Singapore branch took the biggest hit at S$5.8 million, followed by penalties against UBS (NYSE:UBS), Citigroup (NYSE:C), United Overseas Bank, and others. The case, which surfaced in August 2023, saw authorities seize over S$3 billion worth of assets, from luxury condos and supercars to crypto. Ten suspects of Chinese origin were convicted, and two ex-bankers were charged earlier this year. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Sign with UBS. At the heart of the issue: weak anti-money laundering controls. MAS pointed to poor or inconsistent implementation across the firms involved. Four individuals at Blue Ocean Invest were banned from regulated roles for up to six years, while several others received official reprimands. UBS, which absorbed Credit Suisse in 2023, said it fully cooperated with the review. Citi disclosed it has tightened onboarding and monitoring processes, while UOB and its brokerage arm UOB-Kay Hian also moved to close gaps. The regulator said it would monitor progress closely, signaling there's still more work to be done behind the scenes. This could be the biggest compliance reckoning since MAS shut down BSI Bank's local unit in 2016 during the fallout from the 1MDB scandal. While Singapore remains a rising star in global wealth managementassets under management climbed 10% to S$5.41 trillion last yearthe case highlights a tension between growth and governance. Similar crackdowns abroad have cost banks billions, including TD Bank's US$3.1 billion AML settlement last year and Danske Bank's US$2 billion fine in 2022. For investors, the key takeaway is this: as capital flows into Singapore, regulators are under pressure to show they can keep the pipes clean. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store