Letters: Why has the Government delayed and supplanted the widely popular Occupied Territories Bill?
Last week, the Cabinet passed its proposed alternative to the Occupied Territories Bill (OTB). Unfortunately, it appears weak and flawed.
Even if forced through by a political whip system, it can have little impact on the suffering. Most Irish people already support the OTB, introduced by senator Frances Black in 2018.
Its innovative, peaceful approach can attract worldwide support, as the Irish shop workers above did.
For supportive countries, implementation of the OTB is practical and feasible. Its focus is on the illegal occupation, rather than blanket boycotts on blameless Israelis.
However, its significant penalties include exports of both services and goods. The Government's bill has far less scope and potential impact.
The outstanding question is, why has the Irish Government proposed this flawed bill to supplant the acclaimed 2018 OTB? The latter's democratic credentials are unquestionable, having gained large majority support in the Dáil and Seanad and twice with the electorate.
Instead of enactment, there has been 11 months of dilution, deferral and avoidable delay, during a particularly horrific period for Gaza. If this sad saga has resulted from threats or serious external pressure on our Government, they should be shared with a sympathetic public.
Confidence in our precious democracy might be renewed in Dáil votes on the OTB and its proposed replacement. Suspension of the party whip system would allow votes of conscience on this profound humanitarian issue.
Philip Powell, Dún Laoghaire, Dublin
Housing shortage a worry, but new school delivery is also a growing concern
I was one of many who recently took 'one last stroll' through CBS Secondary School, Kilkenny. This year's Leaving Cert students would be the last to sit at a desk in the school that has been serving Kilkenny families from the same site since 1859.
ADVERTISEMENT
From August, the school will open its doors to students on an entirely new site, with space, facilities and an ambience of affirmation as to its educational potential that I could not have comprehended as I handed in my last Leaving Cert paper (Maths) in the old school on June 28, 1969.
Being aware that the Presentation Secondary School will also open its new school doors in August, I wondered if Kilkenny students had 'won the Lotto' in terms of future education.
Not so, as a document on the current status of large-scale projects being delivered under the School Building Programme dated this year, clearly indicates.
Kilkenny, while doing very well with its two new secondary schools has, in fact, a lesser number of large-scale school projects (which number over 300) than many other counties.
The shortage of housing is constantly and justifiably in the headlines, but, if only occasionally, the planning, enterprise and dedication to the long-term future of the school needs of families is surely deserving of headlines and infinitely more deserving than all the headlines garnered in the furore pertaining to school phone pouches.
Michael Gannon, Kilkenny
TDs answer to voters, they must respect our objection to joining military alliance
Many years ago now, my primary-school teacher told us that the Irish word for messenger was 'teachtaire', and that the role of a deputy, or Teachta Dála (TD) was to represent the views of the people who elected them to govern.
As such, the first duty of a TD is not to their party but to promote the best interests of the people in their constituency who elected them.
In that regard, successive opinion polls have shown that the majority of the Irish people do not want Ireland to be involved in a military alliance, but instead to uphold our constitutional obligation (Article 29.2) to be peacemakers.
While the Taoiseach has repeatedly said that we will not be joining Nato, it is abundantly clear that the EU and Nato are far too tightly linked.
The European Union is described by Nato as 'an essential partner' and EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen asserted that 'the EU-Nato partnership is a cornerstone of our security'. It is therefore incumbent on all TDs not to support the bill, currently before the Dáil, to remove the Triple Lock.
To replace the UN as one of the prerequisites for Irish soldiers to become involved in foreign military missions by the EU is to undermine the UN.
In contrast, Ireland must work to strengthen and reform the UN, and strive to uphold the sterling work of all those, including Frank Aiken, who have worked for active neutrality and to bring peace to our troubled world.
Elizabeth Cullen, Kildare
Thanks, Joe, for 27 years of extraordinary broadcasts, enjoy your retirement days
On Friday, RTÉ's Liveline was opened one last time by Joe Duffy.
What a show and what a consequential broadcaster Joe Duffy has been over the last 27 years.
He was always interested in people and he undoubtedly brought his concerns to the airways.
I believe there are many sides to Duffy. He was a campaigner and a social justice advocate, he was a man who loved art, literature, comedy and the pantomime.
Who will ever forget his Liveline 'Funny Fridays'? The range of skills Duffy exhibited was extraordinary and I would certainly put his wide and varied expertise under the rubric of being the quintessential Renaissance man. Let's not forget that he was an author of many books, too.
I want to wish this great man who did so much for people a happy retirement. Thanks, Joe, for everything.
The world is definitely a better place with your kind around.
John O'Brien, Clonmel, Co Tipperary
Weddings are one thing, but even an Irish funeral is better than the Bezos bash
Kathy Donaghy may prefer weddings in Ireland to those in Venice ('Ennis v Venice: Why Irish weddings will always beat Bezos-style blowout,' Irish Independent, June 28), but my brother takes a more radical line: he prefers funerals.
No dancing, no presents, and at an Irish funeral at least, you can drink just as much. Compared to the Bezos wedding's total obscene excess – a spectacle somewhere between Eurovision and a coronation –his logic is hard to fault.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
If long-term renting is such a good solution, why don't more politicians do it?
The Government has opted to reject suggestions from various quarters, including some of its own , that it should establish a fund to allow Irish savers to finance the development of affordable housing for sale. Instead, it's going to entice international investors to do so. It will just be housing for rent, not sale, and it won't be affordable for most. Oblivious to the contradictory position of luring landlords while simultaneously persisting with the fantasy of being parties that support home ownership, Government policy is engineering a decline in people owning their own homes, and a commensurate rise in numbers renting. Hundreds of thousands of households will become poorer, and a small cohort of landlords will become a lot wealthier . Is this private rental sector into which more and more households are going to be corralled even fit for purpose? One issue is the fact that there is no deposit protection scheme in Ireland, despite the issue of deposits consistently being the second most common reason for disputes between landlords and tenants. These are schemes run in other countries by private companies or state agencies into which tenants pay their deposits, instead of handing them over to their landlord. The scheme then returns the deposit at the end of the tenancy, if all is well in the interim. Complaints of landlords not returning deposits to tenants drop significantly under such schemes. READ MORE There were 474 applications to the Residential Tenancies Board to resolve disputes about deposit retention in the first three months of 2025 alone. There has been a provision in Irish legislation for the establishment of such a scheme for a decade, but the section of the Residential Tenancies (Amendment) Act 2015 has never been commenced. Last February, People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy introduced a Bill to force the Government to establish the scheme. Nothing has happened since. There is also no definition of rent in Irish legislation to say what is included or not included under it. This lack of clarity facilitates large landlords in levying – according to recent media reports – up to an extra €200 per month for the use and upkeep of common areas. Common areas are places that tenants do not occupy exclusively and have no control over. In the US, large landlord Greystar (which is also present here) is facing a a class-action lawsuit after the Federal Trade Commission accused the company of imposing hidden 'junk' fees , which it denies. The FTC's lawsuit states that the fees 'make it impossible to actually rent from Greystar for the advertised prices'. It accuses the commission of over-reach. Such additional charges allows for circumvention of rent caps. Regardless of recent Government bluster about increasing security for tenants during the reform of Rent Pressure Zones, the fact remains that tenants of a 'small landlord' can face eviction for essentially spurious reasons such as the probably unprovable 'personal hardship ' of the landlord, or because a member of the landlord's family might need the property. The Government's strategy is that in order for rents for already financially stressed tenants to fall, rents for financially stressed tenants must first be allowed to rise Most renters in Ireland live a very legally precarious existence, regardless of how good their landlord is. Ireland is an outlier in this regard, compared to many countries with an established rental sector. Rent inflation in Ireland is 39 per cent higher than the European average , and housing costs in general are more than double this average when utility bills are factored in. Those hardest hit by affordability issues also include better-off renters. According to the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), in 2023 'middle-to-higher-income renters in Ireland are more likely to face high housing costs than their European counterparts'. Fourteen per cent of the richest Irish renters pay more than 30 per cent of their income on rent, versus 3 per cent on average elsewhere. Sixteen per cent of the next-wealthiest renters pay more than 30 per cent of their income on rent compared to 9 per cent on average elsewhere. The Government's strategy is that in order for rents for already financially stressed tenants to fall, rents for financially stressed tenants must first be allowed to rise. High rents will then attract international investment, which will then build apartments for rent, which will then reduce rents across the board. Ignoring for a moment the significant pain that will be inflicted on all tenants while enacting this strategy of building housing that the majority of renters do not want , recent research from Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies found that the benefits of the construction of new apartments for rent does not find its way down to help those who need affordable rents. Given previous rent inflation, it is highly unlikely rents will fall here in any meaningful way, if at all. On the regulatory front, local authorities are charged with inspecting private rented sector accommodation to ensure it is safe and compliant with regulations. They each have a target to inspect 25 per cent of the private rented dwellings in their area. In 2023, just nine out of 31 local authorities hit that target (Meath achieved 45 per cent), and nine failed to meet it. Galway City Council managed to inspect less than 3 per cent of the private rented stock in its area. In 2023, 23 local authorities reported that more than 90 per cent of inspected dwellings were found to be non-compliant with the required standards. There are other concerns: tenancies being misrepresented as less secure licence agreements; landlords wilfully ignoring legal requirements including having to provide their names to tenants; and investigations that take years by an under-resourced RTB. The fact is that whether renting from the Government's white knights – international investors – or the traditional small landlord, there are serious issues with the private rented sector that need to be addressed before the State can legitimately expect people to willingly rent a home instead of owning one. The minuscule proportion of Government politicians who rent (in a country where one in five people in the population generally are in the private rental sector) tells its own story. If more politicians don't choose to rent long-term, why do they believe so many of us should? Dr Lorcan Sirr is senior lecturer in housing at the Technological University Dublin
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Foreign affairs committee begins discussions on contentious Occupied Territories Bill
An Oireachtas committee will start discussing the Occupied Territories Bill on Tuesday, when senior officials from the Department of Foreign Affairs are questioned by TDs and Senators on a summary of the Bill published by the Government last week. The Bill begins pre-legislative scrutiny and will continue on Wednesday when Senator Frances Black , who originally proposed the legislation back in 2018, appears before the foreign affairs committee . Supporters of the Bill want it to be rushed through the Houses of the Oireachtas and passed into law before the summer break, but most sources acknowledge that is not feasible. Last week, the Government published the heads of the Bill – a section-by-section summary – of the Israeli Settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Prohibition of Importation of Goods) Bill 2025, its version of the Occupied Territories Bill proposed by Senator Black. READ MORE It would ban the import of goods produced in the Israeli settlements, which are, according to International Court of Justice, illegally occupied Palestinian territories. 'Daddy' Trump meets Nato, while defence, trade and Gaza dominate EU summit Listen | 44:28 However, the Government's version does not include a ban on services, which it says is not possible under European law, though that is disputed by pro-Palestine campaigners. The foreign affairs officials are expected to be questioned on this point. It is expected that many committee members will seek to agree on a recommendation for the inclusion of services in the proposed legislation when the pre-legislative process is completed and a report compiled for the Government. The process will continue over the coming weeks as the committee hears from several groups and interested parties, though it is not clear if the Israeli government will be invited to make a submission to the committee. Israel withdrew its ambassador, Dana Erlich, from Dublin last year in protest at what it said was the anti-Israel stance of the Irish Government, something strongly disputed by Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Tánaiste Simon Harris. Allowing the Bill to begin its passage through the legislative process was specifically cited by the Israelis as part of the reason for closing their embassy here. 'We have been putting in place arrangements for extra sittings,' said Fianna Fáil TD John Lahart, who chairs the committee. 'We'll produce a report which will tee up the Dáil debate on the Bill.' There is some nervousness in Government about the possible consequences of passing the Bill, with the US government and business organisations underscoring their opposition to the measure. While the amount of trade between the State and the Occupied Territories is minuscule, the proposed legislation is seen – by supporters and opponents – as an important test case. Other European countries, frustrated with the lack of EU action against Israel on Gaza, have been asking the Irish Government about the legislation.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Concern over law which would see separated parents lose widow's pension rights
A bereaved TD has described her shock at planned changes to the widow's pension which, she said, would have left her and her daughter in financial hardship had they been in place when her former husband died. People Before Profit's Ruth Coppinger was teaching part-time when her daughter's father died last year. 'We were married for 14 years and had a maintenance agreement written into our separation agreement. I was reliant on that,' said Ms Coppinger. When her former husband died suddenly,Ms Coppinger worried about their financial security without his support. READ MORE Divorced or legally separated co-parents have been entitled to the widow's, or widower's, pension for almost 30 years – since the 1995 divorce referendum. The weekly rate is up to €249.50 for those aged under 66 and €289.30 for those aged 66 and older, with increases of €50 for each dependent child under 12 and €62 for each child aged 12 and older. 'It was such a relief, financially and mentally, to know I would get the widow's pension, that I would have that for my daughter,' Ms Coppinger said. Planned changes, however, would see parents in her situation excluded from entitlement to the pension. The Bereaved Partner's Pension Bill , expected to complete its passage through the Dáil on Wednesday, will remove entitlement to the pension from bereaved co-parents with the loss of hundreds of euro a week for them and their children, according to one legal charity. The Free Legal Advice Centres (Flac) is to brief Oireachtas members on its concerns about the Bill on Tuesday. The new law is to give effect to last year's Supreme Court judgment in the O'Meara case which ruled the exclusion of John O'Meara, a bereaved, unmarried father of three, from entitlement to the widower's contributory pension scheme was unconstitutional. It found the rules around access to the pension breached the guarantee of equality in the Constitution by refusing it to a bereaved unmarried parent with exactly the same obligations to their children as a bereaved married parent. While the new law extends entitlement to bereaved cohabiting parents, it stipulates they must be in a committed, intimate relationship and living together at the time of bereavement. It removes the entitlement of those who married the deceased parent of their children, but are divorced or separated from them when they die. The new law will not affect current recipients. The existing scenario, in which divorced or legally separated co-parents are entitled to the pension, has been an 'important protection' against poverty for children where the death of a parent meant the loss of maintenance, Flac has said. Karen Kiernan, chief executive of the support charity One Family, said a 'very small number' of divorced or separated people claim a survivor's pension. 'We see no basis for removing their entitlement,' she said. 'It is highly concerning that the potential financial impact ... on this group does not seem to have been considered by the Department in what is otherwise a very positive piece of legislation.' Damien Peelo, chief executive of lone-parent advocacy organisation Treoir, said the bill risked 'replacing one inequality with another' by excluding divorced or separated parents. 'Grieving children deserve equal treatment, regardless of their parents' relationship status,' he said. Ms Coppinger said the law would 'plunge households into poverty' and could see some children facing 'homelessness on top of grief' if their surviving parent could not pay their rent or mortgage. A Department of Social Protection spokesman said the O'Meara judgment had raised 'a range of complex matters. 'The Bill has been developed to ensure that the principle of equality in the treatment of potential beneficiaries is upheld both in relation to eligibility for the payment and the rules on the loss of entitlement when a relationship ends,' he said. 'The representation that this amounts to discrimination against single parents is incorrect.'
