
US-China race for Pakistan: Trump's transactional diplomacy or Xi's financial doles?
With China announcing a $3.4 billion loan rollover for Pakistan and an increased engagement between Washington DC and Islamabad, experts believe that Pakistan could emerge as a surprising centre of attention-garnering renewed interest not just from China, its long-standing ally, but also from an increasingly transactional Trump-led United States. To unpack these evolving dynamics, we spoke to Michael Kugelman, Senior Fellow at the Asia Pacific Foundation, who offered deep insights into the strategic recalibration underway in the region.advertisement In a rapidly shifting South Asian geopolitical landscape, Kugelman highlighted how Pakistan's civilian and military leadership, particularly Field Marshal Asim Munir, has effectively tapped into key U.S. interests-from critical minerals to cryptocurrency and counterterrorism. These alignments, though narrow, have sparked a fresh wave of engagement with Washington, despite Pakistan's entrenched alliance with China. In fact, recent developments include crypto firms linked to Trump's family doing deals with Pakistan's new crypto council—pointing to a blend of policy and personal interests driving U.S. attention.On Iran and Afghanistan, Kugelman noted limited but real convergence, especially on counterterrorism. He also pointed out how the U.S. may be using Pakistan's proximity to Iran to quietly gather intelligence, even amid limited military strikes.
India, meanwhile, appears sidelined-possibly due to its cautious response to Trump's claimed role in brokering a ceasefire with Pakistan. Kugelman cautioned, however, against overstating a U.S.-Pakistan pivot, noting strong underlying India-U.S. ties and ongoing trade negotiations.He also touched on Pakistan's adept diplomacy in balancing its China and U.S. relations, and how shifts in Bangladesh and growing ties with Turkey further strengthen Islamabad's strategic posture.As for Trump himself, Kugelman described his fascination with power figures like Muneer, contrasting it with his longstanding rapport with Prime Minister Modi-hinting that personal chemistry may yet influence future U.S.-India ties. - EndsMust Watch

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
37 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Kisan Sabha demands amendments to Wildlife Act, threatens action if Union govt. fails to act
The All India Kisan Sabha (AIKS) has demanded immediate amendments to the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, to safeguard farmers from increasing wild animal attacks. 'If the Union government fails to declare animals like wild pigs and monkeys as pests and initiate effective control measures, farmers will be forced to take the law into their own hands,' the AIKS leaders told mediapersons on Monday after concluding the two-day national council meeting held at E.K. Nayanar Academy. AIKS general secretary Vijoo Krishnan criticised successive Congress and BJP-led Union governments for implementing wildlife policies that made it impossible for farmers to protect their crops and property. 'The Centre's policy failures are pushing farmers to the brink,' AIKS leaders said. The Sabha also lashed out at the Centre for signing free trade agreements with the U.K., EU, the U.S. and New Zealand without parliamentary debate, calling it a violation of federal principles. 'These FTAs are detrimental to Indian farmers and will be strongly opposed during a national strike on July 9,' the leaders said. AIKS further announced a solidarity campaign from July 26 to August 5 to support Cuba, which is under U.S. sanctions. Contributions collected during this campaign will be sent to aid the Cuban people. AIKS president Ashok Dhawale, finance secretary P. Krishna Prasad, vice-presidents E.P. Jayarajan and others were present. The Sabha currently has a membership of 1,53 crore across 27 State and Union Territories.


United News of India
41 minutes ago
- United News of India
Hope to bring India-US trade deal to a successful conclusion: EAM Jaishankar
New York/New Delhi, July 1 (UNI) India is hopeful of concluding a trade deal with the US very soon, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has said."We are in the middle, hopefully more than the middle, of a very intricate trade negotiation. Obviously, my hope would be that we bring it to a successful conclusion, I cannot guarantee, because there's another party to that discussion, but no question," Jaishankar said in an Exclusive Fireside Chat with Dev Pragad, Newsweek CEO. "I believe it's possible, and I think we'll have to watch this space for the next few days," he President Donald Trump has set a July 9 deadline for imposing reciprocal tariffs. Last week, President Trump announced that he has signed a trade deal with China and teased a new big deal with India. "We have one coming up maybe with India. A very big one where we're going to open up India," Trump said. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told a news briefing on Monday that "they are finalising these agreements'. The EAM's comments come as a trade delegation led by India's Chief Negotiator, Rajesh Agrawal, is in the US for negotiations. Earlier, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal has said that India and the US intend to give preferential market access to businesses, even as both countries will continue working bilaterally to resolve issues like tariffs on aluminium and steel. According to reports, an interim deal could be possible before the first tranche of the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA). US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick has said that a trade deal between India and the US could be finalised soon.'I think we are in a very, very good place, and you should expect a deal between the United States and India in the not-too-distant future because I think we found a place that really works for both countries,' Lutnick said last month. UNI RN


Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Elon may have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa if…': Donald Trump's warning to Tesla chief amid ‘Big Beautiful Bill' feud
In a dramatic escalation of political tensions, US President issued a pointed warning to tech billionaire , suggesting that the Tesla and SpaceX CEO might have to 'head back home to South Africa' without the financial support of federal subsidies. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The statement came in a Truth Social post on July 1 (June 30 in the United States), where Trump criticized Musk's business reliance on government funds and expressed his opposition to the federal electric vehicle mandate. The former allies now appear to be locked in a growing feud, sparked by deep divisions over the Republican Party's controversial new spending legislation, often referred to as the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Trump's remarks were part of a broader post in which he denounced electric vehicle requirements and claimed Musk's enterprises—from Tesla to SpaceX—were only possible because of extensive government backing. The president's comments follow a recent statement by Musk calling the bill 'political suicide' for the Republican Party and threatening to launch an entirely new political movement in response. Donald Trump criticises Elon Musk's business model and subsidy support In his Truth Social post, President Trump accused Musk of benefiting more from government subsidies than any individual in US history. He argued that without this taxpayer-funded support, Musk would be unable to continue manufacturing electric cars, launching rockets, or operating satellite services. Trump added, 'Our Country would save a FORTUNE' if it no longer supported Musk's companies through public funds. Trump's criticism is rooted in the electric vehicle mandate, a regulation requiring automakers to gradually phase out gas-powered vehicles in favor of electric models. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The mandate has been a major policy debate point, and Trump reiterated that it was 'always a major part of my campaign' to oppose it. He underscored his position by pointing out Musk's alleged dependency on federal contracts, loans, and clean energy tax incentives. Donald Trump warns Elon Musk The role of DOGE and federal oversight Alongside his criticism, Trump proposed that the Department of Government Efficiency—known as DOGE—should investigate the subsidies allocated to Musk's businesses. DOGE, a federal agency that Musk briefly led during Trump's first term, was created to identify and reduce wasteful spending in government operations. 'Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!' Trump wrote. The suggestion implies that the government might audit the financial assistance received by Tesla, SpaceX, and other Musk-led ventures. Musk responds: Threatens new political party and slams GOP Bill Elon Musk quickly responded through a series of posts on X (formerly Twitter). He criticized the Republican spending plan that Trump supports, describing it as 'insane,' 'debt-driving,' and filled with unnecessary allocations. Musk referred to it as the 'Porky Pig Bill' and warned that it would damage the party's credibility with fiscally conservative voters. Musk further stated that if the bill were passed in the Senate, he would immediately launch a new political movement—tentatively called the 'America Party.' According to his statement, the aim would be to provide voters with an alternative to what he termed the 'Democrat-Republican uniparty.' He also clarified that he supported eliminating subsidies altogether, even those that benefit his own companies. 'I am literally saying CUT IT ALL. Now,' Musk wrote, emphasizing his belief in market-driven innovation over government funding. The contentious 'Big Beautiful Bill' At the heart of the conflict is the so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' a sweeping legislative proposal that combines tax reforms, energy mandates, and long-term spending adjustments. The bill is designed to reduce the federal deficit while expanding clean energy initiatives, infrastructure, and national defense funding. Critics argue that the bill could add over $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, according to estimates from independent policy analysts cited by Reuters. Supporters claim it is a necessary long-term investment in American competitiveness and sustainability. The bill includes revisions to tax credits for electric vehicles and proposes phasing out subsidies for certain industries, which may directly impact companies like Tesla.