University Leaders Face Tough Questions in House Hearing on Antisemitism

Yomiuri Shimbun

16-07-2025

Three university leaders faced harsh questioning Tuesday during a House hearing about antisemitism on college campuses, as Republicans demanded answers about their handling of statements by students and faculty that the lawmakers found antisemitic.
In a three-hour hearing, Robert Groves, interim president of Georgetown University, Félix V. Matos Rodríguez, chancellor of the City University of New York, and Rich Lyons, chancellor of the University of California at Berkeley, asserted a commitment to combating anti-Jewish hatred while defending campus rights to free expression. Groves has been in his position since last year, Matos Rodríguez since 2019 and Lyons since last summer.
Tuesday's is the latest of a series of hearings over alleged failures to protect Jewish students that the House Committee on Education and the Workforce has held since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel. Tuesday's hearing had combative moments but was less explosive than some previous ones. Earlier hearings put intense personal scrutiny on leaders of other universities, some of whom eventually resigned after controversial exchanges with lawmakers.
The hearing was briefly interrupted a number of times by protesters yelling, 'There's blood on your hands' and 'Free Palestine!' After the fourth interruption, Rep. Randy Fine (R-Florida) yelled, 'Shut up and get out of here!' to the demonstrators, then turned to the university presidents and said he blamed them for the disruptions.
'I hold you all responsible for this,' he said. 'It is the attitude that you have allowed on your college campuses that make people think that this is okay.'
Facing questions about specific cases of alleged antisemitism on their campuses, the university leaders sometimes demurred or said they could not comment on individual disciplinary matters.
In one case, however, Groves said that Jonathan Brown, a professor still listed on his faculty page as the chair of Islamic civilization at Georgetown's School of Foreign Service, had been stripped of his chair title after posting on X last month that he hoped 'Iran does some symbolic strike on a base' amid news of U.S. strikes on Iran.
'He's on leave and we are reviewing the case,' Groves told lawmakers. Committee Chairman Tim Walberg (R-Michigan) said he found the news 'encouraging' but 'long overdue.' Brown did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Walberg questioned Matos Rodríguez about a Palestinian studies job posting at Hunter College that called for scholars who could 'take a critical lens' on issues including 'settler colonialism, genocide, human rights, apartheid' and other topics. The listing was removed in February following a demand from New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D).
'We made sure to tell Hunter College that it was entirely inappropriate to have that posting,' Matos Rodríguez said at the hearing.
Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-North Carolina) pressed Matos Rodríguez on whether he sees it as problematic that the president of CUNY's faculty and staff union personally supports BDS – the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement that targets Israel. In response, the president stressed that the union 'does not speak for' CUNY. Foxx responded: 'You obviously don't think it's problematic.'
Pressed by Fine and Rep. Lisa C. McClain (R-Michigan) on why history professor Ussama Makdisi, who had posted on social media, 'I could have been one of those who broke through the siege on October 7,' had not faced discipline at UC-Berkeley, Lyons said Makdisi is a 'fine scholar.' McClain retorted: 'I'm sure there's a lot of murderers in prison who are fine people, too, fine scholars, but they do some pretty nefarious and heinous acts.' Makdisi did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Rep. Glenn Thompson (R-Pennsylvania) pushed Groves to condemn a Georgetown employee who had compared Israel's actions in Gaza to Nazi concentration camps in a social media post. 'I reject those kinds of statements,' Groves said. 'I want everyone to know that to the extent that that hurt Jewish students, Jewish faculty, Jewish staff at Georgetown, I apologize for that,' he added.
Republicans repeatedly criticized the leaders' handling of faculty unions, which Walberg said have 'played a critical role in fomenting the rise of antisemitism.'
The committee's first hearing on antisemitism, in December 2023, put the presidents of the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard University under intense scrutiny over an exchange with Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-New York), who asked whether the presidents would punish students if they called for the genocide of Jews. Claudine Gay of Harvard and Liz Magill of the University of Pennsylvania said their response would depend on context. Both resigned in the aftermath.
The next hearing, four months later, also sparked controversy as the president of Columbia University, Minouche Shafik, drew criticism from some members of the university when she denounced specific professors and revealed disciplinary details, taking a more aggressive stance against pro-Palestinian leaders on her campus. She also later stepped down from the role.
The GOP's critics say the hearings do not represent genuine efforts to combat hatred directed at Jewish students, but rather an attempt to use antisemitism as a pretext to stem anti-Israel rhetoric on American campuses – and cut funding for those institutions.
'I am extremely disappointed in the majority for exploiting my community's legitimate fears and concerns as they advance discriminatory, regressive, unconstitutional, and harmful policy,' Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-Oregon) said. 'Jewish Americans and the American people deserve better.'
Democrats also criticized the hearings as political theater and condemned the congressional committee's focus on antisemitism as coming at the exclusion of other urgent concerns. 'This is yet another hearing to demonize Muslims and their religion, to demonize Palestinians, including those in Gaza,' Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pennsylvania) said.
The Trump administration has leaned on allegations of antisemitism to go after elite universities including Harvard, UC-Berkeley and Columbia in an unprecedented attack on the nation's higher education system. As administration officials have opened investigations into schools and sought to strip them of federal funding, they have expanded their probes beyond antisemitism.
The administration has opened two investigations into the University of California, one probing alleged antisemitism and the other investigating its hiring practices for evidence of diversity measures.
The schools in Tuesday's spotlight have looked to portray themselves as hard on antisemitism, in part by cracking down on encampments – a movement that swept college campuses in the spring of last year.
CUNY was the site of a prominent encampment in New York City and the attempted occupation of an administration building. The school eventually brought in New York police, leading to the arrest of dozens of protesters.
'We learned from that experience,' Matos Rodríguez said in his opening statement, saying the school significantly beefed up security. 'We now have a zero-tolerance policy against encampments.'
The encampment at UC-Berkeley ended after the school agreed to review its investments following three weeks of pitched tents and protests. The school strengthened its rules against encampments and banned face masks under some circumstances.
Georgetown largely avoided the high-profile encampments that roiled many campuses last year, as D.C.-area student protesters gathered for a united encampment at George Washington University, blocks from the White House.
In 2024, the university hosted families of Americans who were taken hostage by Hamas in the 2023 attack for a speaking event, which Groves stressed in his statement to the committee. In a letter to the House committee last week, some of the family members praised Georgetown and its students and faculty.
'During a fraught time in so many public spaces after October 7, 2023, Georgetown created space for something different: a conversation rooted in empathy, dignity, and truth,' the families wrote in the letter, a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Post.