Buying a Mitsubishi? Prices Just Jumped
In its statement, Mitsubishi said the pricing adjustment was "a direct result of our regular and ongoing review of pricing to ensure we are aligned with segment expectations." However, they also emphasized that the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration were a significant factor, as increased import levies are making the cost of importing vehicles into the U.S. more expensive, leaving automakers with few options other than to raise sticker prices.
However, Mitsubishi reassured consumers and concerned dealers that the price increase would not affect vehicles already on showroom floors or on dealer lots. It clarified that the price bump will apply to new cars shipped to dealers following June 18.
Mitsubishi's price increase comes on the heels of a temporary pause in deliveries triggered by Trump's tariff policy. In April, a Mitsubishi spokesperson said that the automaker was holding its vehicles at the port before any levies could be applied, as it awaited more color and clarity on the tariff situation.
"We are holding vehicles at the port until we have additional visibility on tariffs and decisions made on next steps," the spokesperson told AutoNews on April 11. "We have sufficient stock on the ground at dealers for the moment to not impact customer choice."
Compared to its Japanese automotive compatriots like Honda, Toyota, Subaru, and Nissan, Mitsubishi is in a precarious position. While its contemporaries produce U.S.-market cars in several states in the Midwest and American South, Mitsubishi imports every single Outlander, Mirage, Outlander Sport crossover, and Eclipse Cross it sells in the United States from Japan, prime candidates for 25% tariffs when they land at the port.
Despite the tariff stress, Mitsubishi seems to be doing well in the United States. In Q1 2025, year-over-year sales increased by 11%. Last year, the company sold 110,000 vehicles, a 26% year-over-year increase and the best U.S. sales year for Mitsubishi since 2019. Mitsubishi credits this growth to its refreshed product lineup and the strong performance of the Outlander and Outlander Sport models in a competitive compact SUV market.
However, the auto industry is showing coping mechanisms as tariffs reshape the cost of business. Last month, Subaru of America raised prices on multiple models by up to $2,055, citing "current market conditions." Weeks earlier, Ford became one of the first major automakers to respond to the new tariffs directly, increasing prices on three Mexican-made models by as much as $2,000. Additionally, Volvo's new order guide for 2026 shows several price increases, with some as high as $3,200.
It seems that the tariff fiasco will not go away very soon. Last week, President Trump warned that he may raise the 25% auto tariffs, arguing that it could be an incentive for automakers to accelerate U.S. investments. "I might go up with that tariff in the not-too-distant future," Trump said on June 12. "The higher you go, the more likely it is they build a plant here."
The tariff troubles are showing results in economic activity. According to Nikkei Asia, new data shows that Japan's total exports by value to the U.S. fell by 11% year-over-year, and the number of cars exported from Japan to the U.S. fell by 3.9%.
To make matters worse, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Trump were unable to strike a tariff deal at a meeting on the sidelines of the G7 summit this week, as they couldn't agree on tariffs on Japanese automobiles, something the U.S. considers to be a main cause of its trade deficit with Japan.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
11 minutes ago
- Politico
Newsom fears backdoor ban on AI rules
AROUND THE NATION Republicans in Congress rejected a push by some of their colleagues to temporarily ban states from regulating artificial intelligence in President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act — citing their confidence in state lawmakers and the importance of keeping the tech giants in check. But now some in California are worried Trump revealed a backdoor ban this week with his release of an AI Action Plan that says he'll deny federal funding for AI to states with rules that might hinder the funding's 'effectiveness.' Trump's comments afterwards suggested he would interpret that mandate broadly. 'You can't have one state holding you up,' he said at a Washington event. 'We need one common sense federal standard that supersedes all states, supersedes everybody.' Trump's attitude caught the attention of California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, our colleagues in the Golden State reported. California has moved more quickly than other states to regulate AI. Newsom signed a bill last year that bars health insurers in the state from using AI to deny claims. 'Having failed to get his group of sycophants to approve an AI moratorium in his 'Big Beautiful Betrayal,' Trump now tries to force it on states,' Newsom spokesperson Tara Gallegos said in a statement. 'Trump might not care but the Governor will not let him endanger our most vulnerable citizens.' The backstory: The version of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act that the House passed in May would have barred states from regulating AI for 10 years. Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) proposed similar language when the Senate took up the measure, but Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) tanked it, arguing that states needed 'to protect their citizens from the abuses of AI.' She said she feared the moratorium would give tech firms licence to 'exploit kids, creators, and conservatives.' MORNING MONEY: CAPITAL RISK — POLITICO's flagship financial newsletter has a new Friday edition built for the economic era we're living in: one shaped by political volatility, disruption and a wave of policy decisions with sector-wide consequences. Each week, Morning Money: Capital Risk brings sharp reporting and analysis on how political risk is moving markets and how investors are adapting. Want to know how health care regulation, tariffs, or court rulings could ripple through the economy? Start here. WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. A new study by Harvard researchers says that a baby's sex might not be random but connected to the mother's age, genes and older siblings' sexes. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Carmen Paun at cpaun@ Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. WORLD VIEW The EU has joined the U.S. in scrutinizing citizens' exposure to fluoride, our colleagues across the pond report. This week, the European Food Safety Agency, an arm of the EU, updated safe fluoride intake levels, setting new limits but finding overall that the EU's drinking water doesn't pose health risks. In the U.S., Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants to stop adding the cavity-fighting mineral to drinking water, as many water systems here do on the recommendation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dentists say Kennedy is making a big mistake. Compare and contrast: Nearly three-quarters of Americans drink fluoridated water, but few EU countries fluoridate — in fact, only Ireland and parts of the U.K. and Spain do — and the concentration of fluoride found in drinking water in European countries is usually less than 0.3 milligrams per liter. The CDC recommends a level of 0.7 mg per liter to prevent tooth decay. Kennedy, who says Americans can get all the fluoride they need from toothpaste and mouthwash, cites research finding higher levels of fluoride linked to lower IQ scores as justification for rolling back the agency's guidance. The EU officials said those studies had prompted their review. They set 'tolerable upper intake levels' from all sources, including drinking water, of 1 mg per day for infants, 1.6 mg per day for children ages 1-3 years, 2 mg per day for children 4-8 years and 3.3 mg per day for anyone over 8 years old.
New York Times
11 minutes ago
- New York Times
Behind Trump's War With Powell: A Battering Ram With 3 Million Followers
At a meeting with House Republicans earlier this month, President Trump waved a draft of a letter firing the Federal Reserve chair, Jerome H. Powell. The letter, which rattled Washington and global markets, was not written by Mr. Trump or his core economic advisers. Instead, it was drafted by Bill Pulte, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, who has used his perch and his social media prowess to become the Trump administration's loudest critic of Mr. Powell. The campaign against Mr. Powell has given Mr. Pulte, an heir of one of America's largest home building families, a new prominence within the Trump administration that exceeds the usually quiet confines of the agency. A longtime social media maven, Mr. Pulte has deployed his bombastic tone and his credibility from the construction industry to argue that the Fed's policies are hurting the housing market and that a $2.5 billion renovation of its headquarters is an example of reckless spending by the central bank. 'I believe Jerome Powell is conducting economic warfare against America,' Mr. Pulte wrote on the platform X this month. For weeks, Mr. Pulte, who has three million followers, has either called for Mr. Powell to resign or be investigated over a renovation to the Federal Reserve building in Washington that he has said is 'riddled with fraud.' The approach has also been an opportunity for Mr. Pulte to ingratiate himself with the president, a developer. Within hours of Mr. Trump making a comment about his frustration with Mr. Powell's policy on interest rates, Mr. Pulte usually takes to 'X' with a post demanding Mr. Powell's resignation. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CBS News
11 minutes ago
- CBS News
Trump says he's considering rebate checks for Americans based on tariff revenue
President Trump on Friday said he's considering issuing rebate checks for Americans based on the billions in new tariff revenue collected by his administration. "We're thinking about a little rebate. But the big thing we want to do is pay down debt. But we're thinking about a rebate," Mr. Trump said in comments to reporters before he left for a four-day visit to Scotland. Federal debt, which currently stands at more than $36 billion, is projected to rise due to the new tax cuts and spending bill signed into law by Mr. Trump on July 4, according to forecasts from economists and public policy think tanks. The nation's deficit could rise by $3.4 trillion over the next 10 years because of the impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the Bipartisan Policy Center said, citing estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation. Mr. Trump added that the rebate could be "for people of a certain income level," although he didn't specify the threshold that he's considering. The federal government has collected about $100 billion in tariff revenue since the Trump administration instituted its higher import duties earlier this year, which could increase to $300 billion per year, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox Business' "Mornings with Maria" on Tuesday. Tariffs vary from country to country, but they're paid by U.S. importers, such as Walmart, or manufacturers that import materials and components from other countries, like Ford Motor. So far, some companies have been swallowing the higher costs rather than passing them on to consumers, although the latest inflation report signaled that higher tariff rates may be edging into consumer prices. Rebate checks have been floated by Mr. Trump previously, with the president saying in February he was considering using 20% of the savings from Elon Musk's cost-cutting task force, the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, to provide direct payments to taxpayers. During the pandemic, taxpayers received three rebate checks — two under the first Trump administration, and the third under the Biden administration — aimed at offsetting the economic impact of the crisis. Typically, such rebates are issued through the tax code, which would require Congress to pass new tax legislation authorizing the Treasury Department to issue checks. Lawmakers earlier this month passed a massive tax and spending bill that was signed into law by Mr. Trump on July 4, which authorizes some new tax breaks, but doesn't include a rebate based on tariffs. Some of the bill's new tax cuts are limited to low- and middle-income taxpayers. For instance, its new $6,000 deduction for senior citizens phases out for single taxpayers with incomes over $75,000 and married filers with earnings over $150,000.
