Harish spreading canards, we know when to start motors: Uttam
Responding to the BRS leader's demand to start the motors of Kannepalli Pump House, Uttam Kumar Reddy stated that the BRS was 'constantly conspiring to cheat and worry farmers in the state,' and was 'spreading conspiratorial lies.' He claimed that 'Harish Rao has become accustomed to spreading lies more than Goebbels.' Uttam highlighted that last year, alongside the monsoon, Telangana farmers cultivated a record amount of paddy in the recent Yasangi season, an unprecedented achievement in India's history. 'Forgetting that fact, Harish Rao is speaking falsehood,' he said.
Uttam reminded that BRS had spread similar lies even before the Rabi season, making 'devious attempts to create panic among the farmers.' He detailed the state's agricultural success, noting that in the last monsoon, farmers cultivated paddy on 66.7 lakh acres and harvested 153.5 lakh metric tonnes of paddy. In Rabi, Telangana farmers cultivated paddy on 60 lakh acres, achieving a yield of 130 lakh metric tonnes. 'The record of achieving 283 lakh metric tonnes of paddy in a single year in the history of the country was achieved under the leadership of Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy during the Congress government,' Uttam Kumar Reddy asserted. The Irrigation Minister further stated that the Medigadda barrage had collapsed due to the 'incompetence, negligence, and mismanagement of the BRS.' He added that the Annaram and Sundilla barrages also remain in a dangerous condition. The National Dam Safety Authority (NDSA) found fault with the construction of Medigadda using secant piles technology. 'Like Medigadda, the Annaram and Sundilla barrages have become dangerous because they were built using the same secant piles foundation technology. They are in an unusable condition,' he explained. Uttam questioned, 'Have you forgotten that out of the 160 TMCs of water lifted from Medigadda to Annaram, Sundilla, and to Yellampally in the past, about 57 TMCs of water was again released into the sea by lifting the gates and pouring public money into the river?'
Uttam affirmed that the Congress government would take appropriate decisions on these projects as per the advice and suggestions of the NDSA, stating, 'We do not need to believe the words of Harish Rao.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
28 minutes ago
- News18
How Elon Musk Could Upend US Politics—And Why India Should Pay Attention
Last Updated: Elon Musk's new American Party could have ripple effects for India, given his deep business ties and disruptive influence. Find out how Billionaire Elon Musk has made his starkest threat to President Donald Trump after he stepped away from politics by launching his 'American Party'. The development comes after Musk condemned Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill" (new tax bill) on social media platform X a few days ago. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," he wrote. The President on Sunday assailed Musk, describing him as 'off the rails", over his new party announcement. 'I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks," Trump wrote on Truth Social on Sunday evening. 'He even wants to start a Third Political Party, despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States." The American Party confirms the rupture in Trump's relationship with Musk, who spent millions of dollars to support the Republican leaders in his campaign. Trump, in return, rewarded the businessman with a new position in the Department Of Government Efficiency, which oversaw drastic cuts to government staffing. Let us understand how Musk's new party threatens Trump's political capital and how the President could hurt the businessman. How Musk Could Threaten Trump Politically? With a net worth of $405 billion, Musk could single-handedly reshape US politics. In 2024, he poured $295 million into Republican campaigns—mostly backing Trump. While that's a record-breaking sum in politics, it's pocket change for Musk. For context, in 2023 and 2024, the total amount of money raised by all presidential candidates was only $2 billion, according to the Federal Election Commission. Congressional candidates raised $3.8 billion, while PACs raised a more respectable $15.7 billion. It won't be difficult for Musk to match those amounts because his wealth is tied up in stocks that can't easily be unloaded all at once. Based on last week's share prices, he could pay for the entire 2024 election cycle by liquidating just one fifth of his reported $130 billion stake in Tesla. He has also suggested donating the amount to Republican representative Thomas Massie, a persistent critic of Trump's. There's still another $100 million Musk previously promised Trump that he could decide to withhold, as per The Independent. He could even bankroll Democrats, who will likely take it (although Trump has threatened 'serious consequences" in that scenario). They are politicians, after all. While third parties rarely challenge America's two-party system, Musk's billions could disrupt the 2026 congressional elections — if he chooses to spend big, reports NPR. Interestingly, Musk believes that 80% of Americans share his views—a claim that seems far from reality. According to polling expert Nate Silver, Musk's net favourability stands at a weighted average of -18%, significantly lower than even Trump's, The Independent reported. Clash Of Personalities Musk has cultivated a loyal following that mirrors—and in some ways surpasses—the fervent base of Trump. Both men command near-religious devotion from supporters, blending celebrity, controversy, and populist rhetoric to dominate public discourse. But while Trump's appeal stems from his 'America First" nationalism and brash persona, Musk's influence is built on his image as a visionary technocrat, the real-life Tony Stark bending the future to his will. His tweets move markets, his memes go viral, and his every pronouncement sparks global debate. Where Trump mastered TV and rallies, Musk dominates X (formerly Twitter), using the platform to amplify conspiracy theories, troll critics, and position himself as a free-speech crusader. The parallels run deep. Both men thrive on polarisation, calling themselves as anti-establishment outsiders despite their immense wealth and power. Trump had his 'fake news" mantra; Musk decries 'woke mind viruses." Both attract fans who see them as truth-tellers fighting corrupt elites—even as Musk's companies benefit from government subsidies and Trump's presidency was defined by corporate favouritism. Their supporters dismiss scandals (Trump's indictments, Musk's erratic behaviour) as evidence of a rigged system targeting their hero. But Musk's cult may be more dangerous because it's apolitical at its core. Trump's base is ideological; Musk's is transactional, united by tech utopianism rather than policy. As the 2024 election showed, his endorsements—or withheld donations—can sway races. With his wealth, platform, and fanbase, Musk doesn't just rival Trump's influence—he's rewriting the rules of political power itself. The question isn't whether he'll reshape elections, but how far he's willing to go. How Musk Has Global Influence Musk's power extends far beyond any single nation or sector, giving him leverage few can match. For example, NASA depends entirely on SpaceX—currently the only reliable transporter of astronauts to the International Space Station. His satellite venture, Starlink, has become indispensable to militaries and governments worldwide, including US agencies. But his influence is far beyond. Thanks to Tesla's role in jumpstarting China's electric vehicle dominance, Musk enjoys both a massive fanbase in China and good relations with the Chinese Communist Party. Reports show Chinese supporters rally behind him—one Weibo user recently declared, 'Brother Musk, you've got over a billion people on our side backing you." Perhaps most intriguing, however, is the political ammunition Musk may possess. After spending months deeply embedded in Trump's White House, he likely holds insider knowledge that could damage Trump if revealed. Musk recently hinted at Trump's inclusion in the Epstein files, reviving long-standing (though unproven) associations between Trump and the disgraced financier. While nothing new, the remark demonstrates Musk's willingness to weaponise controversy. What Musk's Party Means For India? Musk's new American Party could have ripple effects for India, given his deep business ties and disruptive influence. As the CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and owner of X, Musk wields significant economic and technological leverage—factors that directly impact India's tech and space ambitions. If his party gains traction, it could reshape US-India relations, particularly in areas like trade, climate policy, and defence. India has actively courted Musk, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi asking Tesla to invest in local manufacturing and SpaceX exploring partnerships with ISRO for satellite broadband via Starlink. A Musk-aligned US political movement prioritising deregulation and private-sector innovation could accelerate these collaborations, benefiting India's renewable energy and space sectors. However, his unpredictable stance on issues like free speech and trade protectionism might introduce volatility. For instance, if Musk pushes for US tech dominance at the expense of global partnerships, Indian start-ups relying on American markets or investments could face hurdles. top videos View all Politically, Musk's anti-establishment rhetoric could resonate with India's youth and tech elites, but his libertarian leanings could be an issue with India's regulatory frameworks. His influence could also complicate India's balancing act between the US and China—especially if his party takes a hardline stance on Beijing, given Tesla's reliance on Chinese supply chains. While Musk's political venture might open doors for tech-driven cooperation, India must navigate his policies and prepare for both opportunities and disruptions in trade, diplomacy, and innovation. About the Author Shilpy Bisht Shilpy Bisht, Deputy News Editor at News18, writes and edits national, world and business stories. She started off as a print journalist, and then transitioned to online, in her 12 years of experience. Her More Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : elon musk India-US relations SpaceX Starlink Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 07, 2025, 14:35 IST News india How Elon Musk Could Upend US Politics—And Why India Should Pay Attention
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
VA avoids mass layoffs: How Veterans Affairs is protecting jobs and care amid staffing cuts
The Veterans Affairs Department will reduce staff by 30,000 through retirements. This avoids large layoffs initially planned. Veterans groups and Congress worried about the impact on veteran care. The VA assures safeguards are in place to protect services. Staff reductions happened through attrition and a hiring freeze. Secretary Collins says performance is improving despite fewer employees. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Veterans and workers fought against big job cuts Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads VA keeps services safe while staff leaves VA safeguards care amid cuts and protests FAQs The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) said on Monday it will not do a big layoff like many other federal agencies did under the Trump administration's U.S. DOGE Service. VA was originally planning to cut nearly 83,000 workers, as revealed in a leaked memo in March, but now it will only reduce staff by about 30,000 employees by the end of this fiscal year, as per the Secretary Douglas A. Collins had earlier said these cuts were 'tough but necessary' and warned staff to 'get used to it.' The White House said cutting VA staff would make the agency less 'bloated' and more efficient and transparent, as per the report by The Washington many veterans and advocacy groups strongly opposed the deep cuts, saying it would hurt the quality of VA services. VA employees' morale dropped, and many workers left their jobs because of fears about layoffs. The VA decided not to do a big Reduction in Force (RIF) after veterans groups, Congress, and staff warned that fewer workers would hurt veteran make up a large part of the federal workforce, so cutting VA jobs risked upsetting a key Republican voting group. President Trump is popular with veterans and had said he would not cut their VA benefits. VA avoided big layoffs because many workers left voluntarily through retirement, normal job attrition, and delayed resignations, as stated by the reports.A federal hiring freeze also helped reduce staff numbers without forced layoffs. VA had about 484,000 employees in January but had about 467,000 by June—a loss of 17,000 workers. Between July and September, VA expects 12,000 more employees to leave by normal attrition or retirement programs, as mentioned in the report by The Washington an email to VA staff, Secretary Collins said after four months of study and action, VA is 'headed in the right direction' for both staff levels and customer service. Collins said even with 30,000 staff leaving, VA performance is improving, like fewer veterans waiting for disability benefits and better claims processing, according to the said it has safeguards to protect veteran care and benefits during staff reductions, with many mission-critical jobs exempt from retirement offers and hiring freezes. The VA is one of the biggest federal employers and provides medical care to millions of veterans and families, as per the in the year, VA already lost 2,400 workers due to layoffs in February. Thousands of VA workers chose early retirement this spring to avoid future cuts. In June, thousands of veterans protested in Washington and many other states against more VA staff cuts, according to the report by The Washington reversal on big layoffs may also reflect the loss of power of Elon Musk and the DOGE team, who started cutting staff aggressively in January but later fell out with Trump and left. Some DOGE team members remain in government, working on Trump's policies like changing gun rules and federal regulations, as stated by the month, DOGE lost control over awarding billions in federal funds, showing its reduced influence. Collins thanked VA staff in his email, calling them 'an important part' of the effort to improve the agency, as mentioned in the report by The Washington the VA plans to reduce staff by about 30,000 through retirements and attrition, avoiding large VA says it has safeguards to protect veteran care and mission-critical jobs during staff reductions.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Dinhata farmer gets ‘illegal migrant' notice from Assam, TMC slams BJP
A notice to a farmer in Dinhata in Cooch Behar district from Assam's Foreigners Tribunal, declaring the 50-year-old an 'illegal migrant' has ignited a fierce political slugfest in West Bengal. Uttam Kumar, a resident of Sadyaler Kuthi in Dinhata subdivision, said he was stunned when he received the notice in January, accusing him of entering India 'illegally through Assam between 1966 and 1971.' 'I have never left Cooch Behar in my life. I was born and raised here. How can I be an illegal migrant? ' he told mediapersons, recalling that he only grasped the charge's seriousness after neighbours explained the tribunal's ruling. 'I was served the notice in January. I don't read things well, so I showed it to my neighbours. That is when I learnt Assam has charged me with being an illegal infiltrator,' he said. The notice alleges Kumar failed to submit required documents during police verification and now stands classified as a suspected illegal immigrant. Foreigners' Tribunals in Assam alone adjudicate such citizenship disputes. The Trinamool Congress (TMC) was quick to denounce the development as proof of the BJP's 'anti-Bengali' bias. Assam is ruled by the BJP. Calling the notice 'outrageous', TMC leader and North Bengal Development Minister Udayan Guha said: 'All residents of the Brahmaputra basin, who migrated before 1971, are Indian citizens as per the Assam Accord. Even if we assume someone entered before 1971, they are legitimate Indians. Uttam is a Rajbanshi, a son of this soil. The BJP is trying to repeat Assam's NRC chaos here.' On social media platform X, TMC Rajya Sabha MP Samirul Islam accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah of first deporting Bengali-speaking workers and now targeting lifelong residents. 'Despite documents showing his father's name on the 1966 electoral roll, Uttam is being hounded. But our leader Mamata Banerjee will fight this in court and on the streets,' he wrote. The BJP, however, rejected the accusations and instead blamed the Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government for the confusion over identity documentation. A party spokesperson described it as 'one or two stray cases' and insisted that the state administration must answer for blurred lines between real citizens and those using forged documents. 'We hold the Mamata Banerjee government accountable for the situation. The lines between real citizens and those using forged documents have become increasingly blurred,' he said. Thousands of infiltrators, the BJP leader alleged, have created fake papers to pose as Bengal residents. Sushil Chandra Barman, BJP MLA from Mathabhanga, also questioned the state administration's role. 'This is another baseless campaign of TMC. There is no truth in it. If this happens, the West Bengal government has to take responsibility for this,' he said. —WITH PTI Inputs
