Mark Latham lashes media ‘galahs and fools' as accusations grow
The former Labor and one-time NSW One Nation leader has faced a week of controversy, including allegations he abused his former partner, Nathalie Matthews, and sent her sexual messages from the parliament chamber.
Mr Latham has strenuously denied Ms Matthews' allegations, which are untested and contained in an application for an apprehended violence order (AVO) filed in court this week, and has not been charged with any offence.
Speaking during his weekly slot with Brent Bultitude on Radio 2SM, Mr Latham said he 'couldn't say much' about the case, which is before the courts, but instead used his half-hour slot to lash out at negative reporting.
Mr Latham accused journalists from The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper of being the 'biggest pack of galahs and fools' who had a 'manic determination to engage in the politics of personal destruction against me'.
Mark Latham has dismissed claims he breached confidentiality. Picture: NewsWire / Monique Harmer
The former Sky News presenter's criticism of the SMH focused on an opinion piece published on Thursday that described Mr Latham as a 'cockroach' and alleged he shared a confidential psychologist's report.
The article alleged Mr Latham used parliamentary privilege to share the confidential medical information about Sydney MP Alex Greenwich that was presented to the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT).
Mr Greenwich began proceedings in the tribunal alleging homosexual vilification and workplace sexual harassment after the Federal Court found that Mr Latham had defamed Ms Greenwich in a series of tweets.
Mr Latham told Bultitude that he ascertained the 'nature' of the medical material by googling the name of the treating clinician after they were mentioned during NCAT proceedings and in affidavits to the Federal Court and NCAT.
He went on to call NSW upper house leader Penny Sharpe to withdraw a motion over the matter and claimed he had 'never received notification of any complaint' from the parliamentary ethics committee over his behaviour.
Mr Latham also bizarrely claimed to have received a phone call from SMH editor Bevan Shields on the day of the 2025 federal election but told Bultitude that he was unsure if it was Shields and could not call the number.
Alex Greenwich began proceedings in NCAT alleging homosexual vilification and workplace sexual harassment. Picture: NewsWire/Tamati Smith.
'When the fella saying he's Bevan Shields, the editor (of The Sydney Morning Herald) rings me up on federal election day, if indeed that was him … Bevan, come out and out yourself,' Mr Latham went on to tell Bultitude.
Bultitude defended his relationship with Mr Latham during the program on Friday afternoon and described criticism of Mr Latham by Premier Chris Minns as 'payback' for his opposition to the Rosehill Racecourse sale.
He said he had received 'abuse for still having him on'.
Latham was re-elected to the upper house in 2023.
He had previously served in the NSW parliament from 2019 with One Nation before being sacked from the party by Pauline Hanson in 2023. Before that, Mr Latham took the Labor party to defeat in the 2004 federal election.
Mr Latham is further alleged to have filmed sexual acts within his office in parliament, covertly photographed female colleagues, and not disclosed tens of thousands of dollars given to him by his ex, Ms Matthews.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
6 minutes ago
- ABC News
The 'stark' gender split in parliament
As parliamentarians descend on Canberra for the first sitting week of the 48th parliament, Anthony Albanese is warning Labor to avoid complacency. And while Opposition leader Sussan Ley makes history as the first woman in the role, the "stark" gender split between the Coalition and Labor ranks will be on display across both chambers. So, what can we expect from Australia's 48th parliament? Patricia Karvelas and Jacob Greber break it all down on Politics Now. Got a burning question? Got a burning political query? Send a short voice recording to PK and Fran for Question Time at thepartyroom@
News.com.au
32 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Walter Sofronoff fights against corruption findings during inquiry into Bruce Lehrmann's prosecution
Lawyers have rejected suggestions a corrupt motive could've driven a former judge to prematurely send out copies of a report into the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann to journalists, arguing 'at worst' it was an 'erroneous attempt' to ensure accuracy in public discourse. Former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff KC led the 2023 board of inquiry into Mr Lehrmann's prosecution over the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins. A subsequent investigation into Mr Sofronoff's conduct during that inquiry, in particular his decision to send a copy of the board's report to two journalists – ABC's Elizabeth Byrne and The Australian's Janet Albrechtsen – prior to its official release by the ACT government, was launched by the ACT Integrity Commission. The commission in March found Mr Sofronoff had engaged in 'serious corrupt conduct'; however, he is seeking to have the commission's Operation Juno report overturned by the Federal Court. Barrister Adam Pomerenke SC argued there was 'overwhelming evidence' Mr Sofronoff genuinely believed he was acting in the good of the public to ensure accurate media reporting by sending out the report to the journalists – an essential part of his role investigating a matter of public interest. Therefore, his conduct couldn't amount to having a corrupt, dishonest, or malicious motive, regardless of whether reasonable people disagreed with Mr Sofronoff's views. 'In my respectful submission those views of Mr Soffronoff are not rationally capable of amounting to a corrupt dishonest or malicious motive,' Mr Pomerenke told the court. 'A person can be wrong without being negligent, much less corrupt, dishonest or malicious.' He said even if Mr Sofronoff was 'wrong', he genuinely and honestly held his view. 'At worst, it could be characterised as an erroneous attempt to ensure accuracy and transparency in public discourse, and an attempt at accuracy and transparency in public discourse cannot rationally, in my respectful submission, be described as corrupt,' Mr Pomerenke said. 'Even if one vehemently disagrees with what Mr Soffronoff did, that statute does not authorise a misuse of language by describing it as corrupt.' This fell under Mr Sofronoff's sixth ground of appeal, which claims the commission's finding that his conduct was a 'breach of public trust' is affected by jurisdictional error. Further, Mr Pomerenke argued an error by the commission in finding Mr Sofronoff had engaged in contempt was a 'serious offence against the administration of justice' and cannot be 'disentangled' from the conclusion of serious corrupt conduct. He also claimed the Juno report couldn't be 'saved by reconstruction'. 'Our submission is given this entanglement, the conclusion of serious corrupt conduct is affected by jurisdictional error because its material …(there's a) realistic possibility that the conclusion could have been different if the respondent had not wrongly found that Mr Sofronoff could have committed a serious offence of contempt,' Mr Pomerenke said. 'And as I say if this is the right … serious corrupt conduct cannot stand.' Turning to the other grounds of appeal, he claimed if any of the first 11 grounds were established, they couldn't be 'disentangled' from the 12th ground relating to the finding of corrupt conduct itself, as each error was 'bound up in the rolled up conclusion of serious corrupt conduct'. 'Your Honour can't have regard to one error in isolation,' Mr Pomerenke said. 'Each additional error we establish beyond the concession in ground two fortifies that conclusion that … there was jurisdictional error, entitling Mr Sofronoff to relief.' He also argued there was a 'basic misuse of language' and a 'distortion' of the concept of corruption by the commission in interpreting 'integrity' as meaning soundness or efficacy as distinct from probity of government or public administration. 'In our respectful submission that's not correct: it seriously dilutes and distorts the very notion of corruption, which has probity at its heart,' Mr Pomeranke said. 'On the respondent's approach, it can include findings in its reports which stigmatise conduct as corrupt even though it is disconnected from probity in government or public administration.' Documents filed by the retired judge's legal team claim that Mr Sofronoff was given the ability to do 'whatever (he) considers necessary or convenient for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry' as head of the inquiry, and he considered it necessary or convenient to engage with journalists 'for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry'. The documents also claim Mr Sofronoff's actions were 'incapable of amounting to corrupt conduct' and the findings were 'seriously illogical, irrational and/or unreasonable'. The Federal Court has found that Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities. A criminal trial was aborted due to juror misconduct and a charge against him was dropped. Mr Lehrmann has always denied the allegation and is appealing the Federal Court's finding.
News.com.au
32 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Netherlands urges Australia to take China threat ‘seriously' amid war-games
Australia has been warned to take China's military build-up 'seriously', saying the threat of Beijing to the Indo-Pacific region is like the danger Russia poses to Europe. The Prime Minister spent much of last week touting Australia's trade, tourism and research offerings in Shanghai, Beijing and Chengdu. Securing peace through economic interdependence was a strategy the EU used with Russia following the collapse of the Soviet Union – a ploy that ultimately came back to bite the bloc when Russian tanks rolled into Ukraine. General Onno Eichelsheim is in Australia for Talisman Sabre – annual war games hosted by the Australian Defence Force, and said the country should 'get ready for something that you hope will never happen'. Speaking to the ABC, General Eichelsheim said Australia should not ignore the parallels between China and Russia. 'You should look at the facts that are around you … if Russia tells us that they want to have more, more influence, than take that seriously,' he said. 'And if you see in this case in this region, China building up, take it seriously and get ready for something that you hope will never happen. 'If you prepare for war, you can avoid war. And that's how we look at it.' During a press conference in China, NewsWire put to Mr Albanese that there were similarities between his approach to managing the relationship with Beijing and Europe's pre-Ukraine war approach to managing its relationship with Moscow. He denied there was. 'Our relationship is very different,' Mr Albanese said. 'And I don't think you can translate one thing across some other part of the world of which Australia is not a participant.' The Trump administration has called on the Albanese government to hike defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, warning of an 'imminent' threat to the Indo-Pacific. The concern is driven by China's constant war drills around Taiwan and rapid military build-up, including a massive expansion of its atomic arsenal. As of mid-2024, China's operational nuclear warheads exceeded 600, according to the US Department of Defense. That was nearly triple what the country was estimated to have in 2020. Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles has said build up was sparking 'security anxiety' in Australia. But Mr Albanese and his government have been firm to resist calls, both domestic and international, to boost the Australian Defence Force's budget. General Eichelsheim, whose country recently agreed to hike defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP in line with most of NATO, said a GDP percentage was not the only important measure, but that Australia would need to do more one way or another. 'It's not about the percentage, it's about the capabilities,' he said. 'But inevitably, I think Australia has to increase its capabilities as well, if you look at the region, and the build-up in this case of China. 'Also, if they need to help out Europe, which (Australia is) actually already doing – if you look at the war in Ukraine, and supporting us there.'
