logo
'Unanswered questions' linger over millionaire farmer's death

'Unanswered questions' linger over millionaire farmer's death

Extra.ie​16-07-2025
A coroner has recorded a narrative verdict in the case of a millionaire farmer who died just a day after getting 'secretly' married to his carer.
Raymond Mahon dismissed suggestions by barristers for Joseph Grogan's family that the gardaí should conduct a thorough, forensic investigation before he reached his decision. The court in Tullamore heard Mr Grogan, 75, was being treated for cancer but had been responding well to treatment.
He died at his home at around 3 pm on April 15, 2023, the day after attending a registry office to marry Lisa Flaherty, 50. Within hours, his body was embalmed, making it virtually impossible to determine a definite cause of death, Mr Mahon noted. Raymond Mahon. Pic: Colin Keegan/Collins
Mr Grogan was a well-known figure in the farming community and hosted the National Ploughing Championships between 2016 and 2018. His estate, which school SNA Ms Flaherty now stands to inherit, is valued at €5.5million.
Mr Mahon said Mr Grogan was diagnosed in early January 2023 with stage 4, aggressive, high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. He said he had suffered infections after two of his four rounds of chemotherapy, and that Mr Grogan was said by his oncologist to be vulnerable due to the chemo and his significant weight loss.
He said Mr Grogan's death was due to a 'probability of infection', his immune system having been compromised. Mr Mahon said there were 'valid concerns' about Mr Grogan's care, but said it must be borne in mind that Mr Grogan was very reluctant to see a doctor. Joseph Grogan. Pic: Rip.ie
He said it had been a very difficult and distressing case, and commiserated with both the Grogan and Flaherty families. Mr Mahon had ruled on day one of the three-day inquest that he would not make any decision about the validity of the marriage.
Earlier, Damien Tansey, barrister for three first cousins of Mr Grogan, Alo, Margaret and Seán, called for the case to be referred to the Director of Public Prosecutions for a forensic examination by the gardaí. He told the coroner that it was open to him to record a verdict of unlawful killing, which could arise from omission or commission.
In his closing submission, Mr Tansey said it was clear that Mr Grogan was very ill between April 5, when he finished his fourth round of chemotherapy, and April 15, when he died. He said that without medical intervention during that period, the consequences could be 'dreadful'. Lisa Flaherty. Pic: Fran Veale
'Was he properly treated during that ten-day period?' he asked. '…The only intervention during that ten-day period was to hurriedly and secretly arrange a marriage by which she [Ms Flaherty] stood to gain an estate valued at €5.5million.'
Mr Grogan's 'sudden and unexpected' death had caused disquiet in the local area and in the medical community, he said.
He suggested that those concerns had not been assuaged during the three-day inquest. Mr Grogan's oncologist had testified that Mr Grogan's cancer was responding well to treatment, and the pathologist had confirmed that cancer had not been the cause of death, and neither was organ failure. Niamh Higgins, sister of Lisa Flaherty. Pic: Fran Veale
Mr Tansey said the swift embalming procedure meant that the pathologist could not test for drugs in Mr Grogan's system. However, pathologist Charles d'Adhemar had warned that if the three medications Mr Grogan had been prescribed were not administered correctly, it could depress his respiratory and nervous systems.
The 'star witness' in the case, Lisa Flaherty, had repeatedly spread a narrative that Mr Grogan had an inoperable, stage 4 cancer and was at the end-of-life stage, awaiting palliative care, Mr Tansey said. 'None of that evidence is true or accurate,' he said.
He also noted that she had told the inquest she had been in a long-term relationship with her neighbour Mr Grogan, when she had other partners, and three children who were not Mr Grogan's. Her suggestion that their relationship began when she was 16, which 'puts Joseph Grogan into the realm of being a paedophile' had caused great anxiety to the Grogan family, he said. Tullamore District Court, Co Offaly. Pic: Cillian Sherlock
He continued: 'The troubling issue in this case is the secrecy of the marriage… her own sister did not know about it until the following day. Her best friend did not know until the following day. And she put a notice on the door of the house saying 'No visitors'. What was that about?'
He said that less than 24 hours after the 'secret marriage', there was the 'unlawful removal of the remains from the house'. Peter Jones, a solicitor representing Teresa Mooney, Mr Grogan's 90-year-old aunt, called for an open verdict and for the gardaí to investigate.
He said the inquest had left 'an awful lot of unanswered questions'. He also pointed to the 'undue haste' with which he said Mr Grogan's remains were taken to be embalmed, and to the contradictory evidence given by Ms Flaherty about Mr Grogan being at the end of his life, and awaiting palliative care.
The Grogan family had been excluded during the 'reign of secrecy' of Ms Flaherty, he said. They had to learn of Mr Grogan's death from a friend, which he said showed 'cruelty'.
'My client is concerned for justice for Joseph Grogan,' he said. 'Despite the best efforts of this inquest, we are no closer to knowing the way or circumstances of this death.'
He said there was a need to 'satisfy public disquiet', adding that most people on the street would be concerned to hear that a man had died the day after getting married, 'and was embalmed by teatime'.
Stephen Byrne, for Ms Flaherty, said Mr Tansey had all but accused his client 'of causing the death of the late Mr Grogan'. He said he had been concerned that the inquest would be used 'to attack the good name and reputation of Ms Flaherty', and that this had proved to be the case.
He said an inquest could only be adjourned for further investigations to be carried out on the basis of valid, legitimate suspicions, and said that threshold had not been reached.
Other friends and family of Mr Grogan could have gone over the head of his carer, Ms Flaherty, and called a doctor themselves if they were concerned – but they did not, he said. Instead, he said, the person who cared for him and 'stepped up to the plate' had been 'hauled over the coals'.
'It is easy for people who did not step up to the plate to instruct their lawyers to come in and criticise someone who did step up and take responsibility,' Mr Byrne said. Mr Grogan himself was reluctant to seek help or see a doctor, he said, and that was his own decision.
'He knew his own body, and he knew he was not going to beat this [cancer],' he said. Niamh Higgins, Ms Flaherty's sister and neighbour, told the court that she was a psychiatric nurse with an additional qualification in palliative care.
She said her mother had called her early on the day of Mr Grogan's death, telling her that his condition was deteriorating, and that she had gone up to the house. Mr Grogan was in bed and appeared to be comfortable and not experiencing any pain or distress, she said.
Ms Flaherty told her that she had called an ambulance at around 10.30am, as Mr Grogan's condition had rapidly deteriorated. She said she was told the paramedic had advised that palliative care in hospital would not be available until the Monday, and that Mr Grogan had said he wanted to stay at home.
She said she advised her sister that the MIDOC doctor-on-call service should be called, and that Ms Flaherty agreed, but asked her to make the call, which she did at around midday. By this time, she said, Mr Grogan's pulse was irregular and weak, his breathing was shallow, and he was less responsive.
At 3.48 pm, she said, she could no longer detect a pulse. Ms Higgins told the inquest that she learned of her sister's marriage after Mr Grogan's death.
Mary Coyne, a friend of Ms Flaherty and Mr Grogan, said he had told her of his marriage on the morning of his death. She said that he had said, in a low voice, 'I have news, we got married.'
Seán Grogan, a cousin of Joseph Grogan, from Naas, Co. Kildare, said that when he saw Joseph shortly before he died, his cousin had one eye closed, and one eye only half open. His head was leaning to one side, and he was limp, he said.
He said that Mr Grogan had been a confirmed bachelor who had previously been in a 23- or 24-year relationship with a local woman but had never expressed an intention to get married.
Pádraig Grogan, another cousin who ran a neighbouring farm and saw Joseph Grogan regularly, said he had been on holiday in the US when Mr Grogan died. He said his wife had sent text messages to Ms Flaherty to stay in touch, but there had been no response on August 14 or 15.
They learned of Mr Grogan's death on RIP.ie, he said. He had understood that his cousin had inoperable cancer and that there was no hope in his final months, he said. 'I would have loved to have known then that his results were so good from the oncologist, and to make sure that he knew it,' he told the inquest.
'Joe wanted to live.' Speaking following the verdict, Mr Tansey said that the focus of the Grogan family would now be on the validity of the marriage, which may involve a High Court challenge.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man accused of attacking ex in front of their children before ‘speeding off' in her car
Man accused of attacking ex in front of their children before ‘speeding off' in her car

Sunday World

time3 hours ago

  • Sunday World

Man accused of attacking ex in front of their children before ‘speeding off' in her car

The man was denied bail and the accused cannot be named at this time A 30-year-old man accused of attacking his former partner in front of their children at her south Dublin home before "speeding off" in her car has been denied bail. The unemployed father was charged with assault causing harm, burglary, motor theft and production of a metal bar as a weapon during the incident at the woman's home on the evening of July 18. Judge White noted at Dublin District Court today that there were no orders in place under the Domestic Violence Act but said he was exercising discretion to impose reporting restrictions. As a result, the accused cannot be named. He said a file will be prepared for the Director of Public Prosecutions and gardaí would recommend the accused face trial on indictment, in the Circuit Court. The investigating garda maintained that the unemployed man arrived by taxi at his ex-partner's home and entered the property. Dublin District Court in the Criminal Courts of Justice. Photo: PA News in 90 Seconds, Friday August 1 The woman was in her bedroom with her children while the accused allegedly grabbed her mobile phone and then punched her with a closed fist to the left side of her face. The woman then fell from the bed and was repeatedly hit while she tried to get up. The contested bail hearing was told that she managed to get out of the bedroom and went downstairs. However, it was claimed that the man, who is the father of her children, pulled her back by her jacket and brandished a metal bar from her vacuum cleaner. Judge White was told that she managed to get downstairs, open a window and "shouted for help". Meanwhile, the accused is said to have stolen €360 and her car key from her wallet. It was alleged he got into her car and drove away. The woman suffered "a busted lip and pain to her face, thighs and elbows", and there were photos of her injuries, the court heard. The car was recovered two days later. CCTV evidence, not played during the bail hearing, was said to have recorded shouting and roaring and the accused subsequently "speeding away". Gardaí had also taken statements from the woman, a taxi man and a neighbour to support the charges. The investigating officer also alleged the accused had evaded gardaí who had checked several addresses until he was found on Thursday. Concerns were raised that he had drink and drug issues and that he or his family would engage in witness interference. The defence submitted that the man denies the allegations, has the presumption of innocence and could face a lengthy period in custody on remand. His barrister also proposed a strict set of bail terms, including movement restrictions and no contact with the woman who did not attend the bail hearing. The accused claimed, via his counsel, that his former partner had told him she would withdraw the allegations and, instead of jailing him, she wanted him to get help for his problems. The defence raised issues about the use of hearsay evidence that would not be permitted in the trial. The judge denied the bail application but granted legal aid and a certificate for counsel. The man was remanded in custody to appear again next week.

US man jailed for five years over rape of woman in Dublin
US man jailed for five years over rape of woman in Dublin

RTÉ News​

timea day ago

  • RTÉ News​

US man jailed for five years over rape of woman in Dublin

A 32-year-old man who was extradited to Ireland from the United States has been sentenced to five years in prison after pleading guilty to raping a woman in Dublin seven years ago. Kevin Yungman was extradited from Florida in the US to Ireland in August 2024 after authorities in Ireland issued a warrant for his arrest. Yungman had initially met the then 19-year-old Brazilian woman in Paris in 2018, before arranging to meet in Ireland two months later where he allegedly raped her twice in a Dublin. The victim reported the assault to gardaí two days later and Yungman was arrested boarding a flight at Dublin Airport. He was later released from custody while a file was being prepared by the Director of Public Prosecutions, which directed he be charged with rape. In the sentencing hearing, Mr Justice Tony Hunt acknowledged it was very difficult and sad case which arose out of a consensual background which took a bad turn. "This case all comes back to consent of the other person involved," he told the court. Judge Hunt said he accepts fully how the victim's life has been affected and hopes the ability to express these matters will help her in her recovery. He added that Yungman's mother was an impressive witness too. But he said that Yungman must suffer the consequences of his actions and is confident he can contribute positively to society when he is released. Judge Hunt said it was a serious offence and that the asphyxiation was an aggravating factor in issuing the sentence. He also said that guilt was acknowledged at a late stage. Yungman was sentenced to six years in prison with the final year suspended. Judge Hunt told the court that Yungman said he will have difficulty in serving his sentence as he has no connections in Ireland. He said he will not have the regular support of friends or family. Judge Hunt said he would suspend an additional year if Yungman pays the sum of a bond of €100 and not return to Ireland for a period of ten years following his release and have no contact with the victim.

Man charged over Capel Street garda stabbing remanded in custody by Dublin court
Man charged over Capel Street garda stabbing remanded in custody by Dublin court

Irish Examiner

timea day ago

  • Irish Examiner

Man charged over Capel Street garda stabbing remanded in custody by Dublin court

A 23-year-old man charged over the stabbing of a Garda on a Dublin city-centre street on Tuesday evening has been remanded in custody. Abdullah Khan, with an address in North Dublin, was arrested at the scene following an incident at around 6pm on Capel Street on the city's north side. The injured Garda, a young probationary member of the force who was on high-visibility patrol with a colleague, received hospital treatment for non-life-threatening injuries. The accused was detained for questioning before he was charged on Wednesday night with assault causing harm to the officer and production of a Tactix knife capable of causing serious injury. He was brought before Judge Treasa Kelly at Dublin District Court on Thursday morning. He has yet to indicate a plea, made no bail application, and was remanded in custody to appear at Cloverhill District Court on August 6, pending directions from the Director of Public Prosecutions. The charges are under Section 3 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act and Section 11 of the Firearms and Offensive Weapons Act. Dressed in a black T-shirt and grey tracksuit bottoms, Mr Khan sat silently throughout the brief hearing. Detective Sergeant Liam McLaughlin, of Bridewell Garda Station, gave evidence, telling Judge Kelly that the accused "made no reply" to each charge. The court heard that Mr Khan was also handed copies of the charges. Detective Sergeant McLaughlin stated that he intended to object to Mr Khan's bail. However, defence solicitor Colleen Gildernew said, "There is no application for bail today." She also added that her client did not wish to appear via video link at his next hearing but wanted to be produced in court. Judge Kelly added that to her order and also acceded to a request from the solicitor to direct medical attention for the accused in prison. Ms Gildernew also requested reporting restrictions on the publication of her client's address, given the nature of the case and "concerns around safety," which was confirmed by Detective Sergeant McLaughlin. Judge Kelly ordered journalists not to report the man's address. Legal aid was granted after a statement of Mr Khan's means was furnished to the court. Judge Kelly also ordered the defence to give gardaí 24 hours' notice if the accused intends to make a bail application.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store