US Senator Ted Cruz faces backlash for not knowing basic facts about Iran
The full conversation, released on Wednesday on The Tucker Carlson Show, showcases rising tensions within Trump's right-wing base over the US role in the Middle East, particularly regarding Israel, Iran, and the possibility of wider war.
The rift within Republicans has seen Trump's "Make America Great Again" base, or "America Firsters", generally opposing the US being dragged into another war in the Middle East. The hawks within his base and his administration have been pushing the US into greater involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict.
In a striking exchange, Carlson and Cruz engaged in a heated argument over US involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict, with voices raised as they shouted over each other.
Carlson pressed Cruz on the population of Iran, asking,
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
'How many people live in Iran, by the way?'
Cruz replied, 'I don't know,' before being interrupted by Carlson: 'You don't know the population of the country you seek to topple?'
NEW: Republican Senator Ted Cruz is completely stumped after Tucker Carlson asks him what the population of Iran is.
Tucker: How many people live in Iran?
Cruz: I don't know the population.
Tucker: You don't know the population of the country you seek to topple?
Cruz: How… pic.twitter.com/7ES655jIud — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) June 18, 2025
A person on X wrote, 'Tucker Carlson was taken aback by the level of ignorance of Senator Ted Cruz. He is advocating to overturn the regime of a country he knows nothing about??'
Another social media user added, 'If you're calling for the bombing of or entry of war, you should at least be informed about the country you're targeting'.
Ted Cruz, in the interview with Tucker Carlson, couldn't answer a single basic question about Iran about the population and ethnic composition of the country and admitted that the US is helping Israel bomb Iran.
This is an absolutely insane state of the US politicians. Morbid. pic.twitter.com/LyBVbZ7iU9 — Olga Bazova (@OlgaBazova) June 18, 2025
The clips led to a broader discussion about the implications of Cruz's statements.
A person on X highlighted the cultural and religious ignorance displayed by Cruz, posting: 'The American establishment that wants regime change in Iran & claim that they care about Iranians actually knew nothing about Iranians, their population or religions or even ethnic groups, Ted Cruz in Tucker Carlson interview thinks that all Iranians are 'Persian Shias' 😂'.
Similarly, Donna Miles, a writer and columnist, wrote, 'Tucker Carlson's interview with Ted Cruz is truly eye-opening.
This is how the Iraq disaster happened, and the reason why we are here today, on the brink of a major global war.'
Tucker Carlson's interview with Ted Cruz is truly eye-opening.
This is how the Iraq disaster happened, and the reason why we are here today, on the brink of a major global war.
Iran war hawks are ignorant sycophants.
They know nothing about Iran, its resilient people and its… https://t.co/iGIBXEVoDY — Donna Miles دانا مجاب (@UnPressed) June 18, 2025
Cruz attempted to deflect, stating that he doesn't 'sit around memorising population tables', but this only fuelled further criticism of his readiness to advocate for military intervention.
The controversy extended beyond Iran, with another clip drawing attention to Cruz's views on alleged Israeli espionage on the US.
@tuckercarlsonnetwork
Why is it so hard to say that it's not okay for foreign governments to spy on our president? Watch the full episode tomorrow at 1PM ET ♬ original sound - Tucker Carlson Network
Carlson questioned Cruz about reports that Israel spies on American officials, to which Cruz responded, 'They probably spy on us and we spy on them. Friends and allies spy on each other.'
Reflecting a sentiment shared by many, a social media user wrote, 'Thanks Tucker for showing the world the real Ted Cruz… It's time that America no longer be controlled by Israel.'
Ted Cruz openly admits that Mossad, Netanyahu and Israel spy on our government and even our President.
Think about that.
Many Trump supporters are okay with Israel starting a war send US Soldiers to fight their battle.
Allies do not spy on each other. https://t.co/O2r8qtGj2F — Thomas Paine Band (@ThomasPaineBand) June 18, 2025
On TikTok, people pointed to Cruz's financial ties to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, with one asking, 'Why can't a US politician simply admit that it's not in America's best interest to be spied on by Israel? Hint: he has accepted 1.9 million from AIPAC,' with another suggesting he should be asked this question 'after stopping his AIPAC cheque'.
Social media reactions have been sharply divided, with some mocking Cruz for his lack of basic knowledge, while others accused him of prioritising foreign interests over those of the United States.
The interview's timing is significant, given the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. On 13 June, Israel launched unprovoked strikes targeting Iran's nuclear programme, military leadership, scientists and residential areas, prompting retaliatory missile attacks from Iran.
Publicly, the US has said it is playing a supportive role in the conflict, but Cruz, seemingly mistakenly, admitted that "we" were striking Israel when discussing the strikes with Carlson. After Carlson pushed back, he corrected himself, saying Israel was striking, but that the US was playing a supporting role.
President Trump's social media posts, claiming 'complete and total control of the skies over Iran' and demanding 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER', have further intensified debates about US involvement.
As tensions mount, the interview serves as a flashpoint for discussions about America's role in the region and the accountability of its leaders.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Hamas agrees to a 60-day truce in partial response to latest Gaza proposals
Hamas has given mediators a partial and initial response to proposals for a Gaza ceasefire and hostage deal but was expected to shortly hand them a final reply, sources told The National on Wednesday. They said Hamas has unconditionally agreed to a 60-day truce during which sufficient humanitarian assistance will enter Gaza, chiefly through the Rafah crossing with Egypt in the south of the war-battered enclave. Hamas has also agreed in principle to most of the maps Israel presented for the redeployment of its troops in Gaza, but wants them to pull out from Deir Al Balah in central Gaza – the theatre of a major continuing military operation by Israel – as well as Khan Younis in the south, the sources said. 'Hamas is reviewing the maps with other resistance factions in Gaza,' said one of the sources. 'We expect Hamas's final and full response within hours, but that can change.' The sources spoke as President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff was expected to arrive in Europe on Thursday and Qatar on Friday, a sign that in the past has been interpreted to mean a deal was within reach. However, optimism that mediators from Qatar, Egypt and the US were on the cusp of getting Israel and Hamas to agree to a deal has previously proved premature because of the intransigence of both Israel and Hamas. Israel's President Isaac Herzog struck an upbeat note on Wednesday during a visit to Gaza, telling soldiers there were 'intensive negotiations' about returning the hostages held there. He said he hoped the soldiers will soon 'hear good news', according to a statement from the President's spokesperson. Hamas, however, is yet to provide a final list of the names of the hundreds of Palestinians it wants released from Israeli prisons as part of the deal, they said. The list is likely to include high-profile Palestinians serving long jail terms whom Hamas wants freed but Israel insists on keeping them incarcerated, they said. They include Marwan Barghouti, a senior leader of the mainstream Fatah faction who is widely tipped to be a possible successor to President Mahmoud Abbas. Hamas was also expected to provide mediators with its final timeline for the release of 10 Israeli hostages and the remains of 18 others who died in captivity, according to the sources. Hamas has previously proposed the release of the hostages in batches throughout the 60-day truce to ensure Israel's compliance with the terms of the agreement, but it appears that Israel has rejected that timeline and suggested an alternative, which Hamas is reviewing. Hamas is believed to be holding around 50 hostages, of whom 20 are thought by the Israeli military to be alive. Beside the truce and flow of relief aid into Gaza, where starvation is claiming more and more lives, the key provisions of the latest proposals include discussions on a long-term ceasefire and a full Israeli withdrawal. Hamas had wanted US guarantees that these talks would continue until an agreement is reached, but the sources said Hamas appears to have dropped that condition. Israel, moreover, insists the war in Gaza will not end until Hamas's military and governing capabilities have been fully dismantled and all the hostages released. It's also demanding that Hamas lays down its arms and its leaders leave the territory to live in exile with their families. Hamas has rejected Israel's demand that it surrenders its arms. Instead it suggested it was open to discussions on laying down its arms and storing them under international supervision when a long-term ceasefire is in place. It has agreed to the departure into exile of its leaders provided that they and their families are not targeted by Israel. The Gaza war was triggered when Hamas and its allies attacked southern Israeli communities, killing 1,200 and taking another 250 hostage. Israel's response has been a devastating military campaign that has killed nearly 60,000 Palestinians and injured more than twice that many, according to Gaza's health ministry. Nearly all the coastal enclave's 2.3 million residents have been displaced, more than once in many cases, and large swathes of built-up areas reduced to rubble.
Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Islamic State may be responsible for atrocities against Druze, not Syrian forces, Barrack says
US envoy Tom Barrack suggested that Syrian government forces were not responsible for atrocities committed against Druze in southern Syria, and that the armed fighters who carried out the attacks may have been Islamic State militants disguised in government uniforms. Barrack, who is President Donald Trump's envoy to Syria as well as ambassador to Turkey, made the comments in an interview with Reuters in Beirut on Tuesday. Syria's southern province of Sweida was the site of sectarian violence between the majority Druze community and Sunni Bedouins. The conflict was internationalised after Israel intervened, bombing Syrian government forces. Israel cast the bombings as an effort to protect Druze. Israel is home to around 150,000 Druze. Around 1,000 people were killed in the clashes in southern Syria. Barrack also cast doubt on video footage that circulated widely on social media alleged to be of Syrian government forces committing atrocities, saying it could have been easily altered. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "The Syrian troops haven't gone into the city. These atrocities that are happening are not happening by the Syrian regime troops. They're not even in the city because they agreed with Israel that they would not go in," he told Reuters. Israel's intervention in the fighting "upset" the Trump administration and Saudi Arabia, as Middle East Eye was the first to report. On Monday, the White House said Trump was "caught off guard" by Israel's bombing. Barrack is spearheading the lifting of US sanctions on Syria. He has been a vocal supporter of efforts by Gulf states to invest in the war-torn country. He has generally walked a tightrope between concerns for minorities in Syria and calls for the central government in Damascus to assert its authority. Barrack is trying to push the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) to integrate into the Syrian army as the US looks to continue reducing its military presence in northeast Syria. Barrack has been well received in Turkey. US support for the SDF has been a long-running sore point in the Nato allies ties. Barrack's messaging on Sharaa In a press conference in Beirut on Monday Barrack was asked about Israeli intervention, which he said 'came at a very bad time' and created 'another very confusing chapter' for Syria. Current and former Arab, Israeli and US officials told MEE that Israel's strikes and efforts to position itself as a defender of the Druze suggested it was bent on carving out a zone of influence in Syria that conflicts directly with the vision of a unitary post-war Syria put forward by Barrack. Barrack has repeatedly stressed that the US was not dictating Syria's form of government. He has cast his diplomacy as a test case for Trump's pledge in May to stop western 'nation builders' and 'interventionists' from working in the Middle East and instead empower locals allies such as the Gulf states and Turkey. Saudi Arabia told US that Syrian forces should deploy to Sweida despite Israeli objections, source says Read More » But Barrack said Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa should assess the fallout of the Sweida conflict, saying Sharaa should reflect: "I'm going to adapt quickly, because if I don't adapt quickly, I'm going to lose the energy of the universe that was behind me." Barrack added that Sharaa's 'theme … isn't working so well', and told Reuters he advised Sharaa to reduce the influence of Islamists in the military and cooperate on security with regional states. Sharaa was the leader of Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, a former US-designated terrorist organisation that toppled Bashar al-Assad last December. Before that he ran al-Qaeda's Syrian branch. Syria has been seen bouts of sectarian violence since Sharaa came to power. In March, Syrian security forces killed hundreds of Alawites - the sect to which Assad belonged - along the Mediterranean coast. In June, at least 25 people were killed in a bombing at Mar Elias Greek Orthodox Church. Sharaa was criticised for his handling of the fallout. He has promised to protect minorities. Barrack said that Sharaa had to address those concerns. "If they end up with a federalist government, that's their determination. And the answer to the question is: everybody may now need to adapt."
The National
6 hours ago
- The National
Iran agrees to UN nuclear watchdog visit and signals conditional openness to US talks
Iran has agreed to host a technical team from the UN's nuclear watchdog to discuss future co-operation, its Deputy Foreign Minister said on Wednesday, while cautiously signalling openness to renewed talks with the US. The development comes after Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian this month ended co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and said it could only be restored if the agency addressed Iranian concerns over its perceived bias. Kazem Gharibabadi, who is also Iran's lead nuclear negotiator, said the IAEA team would arrive in Tehran within two to three weeks to negotiate a 'new modality' for continued engagement. 'The delegation will come to Iran to discuss the modality, not to go to the [nuclear] sites,' Mr Gharibabadi told reporters in New York. 'Why are they insisting to send inspectors there if those facilities have been obliterated? There shouldn't be any request to go there, unless they are seeking to see how effective the attacks were.' Iran's nuclear facilities were severely damaged last month in US strikes. The Deputy Foreign Minister said Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation was still assessing the extent of the damage but offered no further details. The planned IAEA visit comes amid heightened mistrust between Tehran and the agency. Despite expressing 'dissatisfaction' with the IAEA's recent conduct, Mr Gharibabadi described the upcoming visit as a goodwill gesture. 'I hope that it would be welcomed and they would value such co-operation and good faith,' he said. He described scheduled talks on Friday in Istanbul with the E3 – Britain, France, and Germany – as 'very important', noting that the European countries had approached Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in a bid to 'manage the situation' and de-escalate tensions. The three European powers, along with China and Russia, remain signatories to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which offered Iran sanctions relief in exchange for curbs on its nuclear programme. The US withdrew from the deal in 2018 during President Donald Trump's first term. 'We have very constructive and good relations with China and Russia … we have always co-ordinated our positions when it comes to the nuclear issue, the negotiations, even the aggression and also now the snapback,' Mr Gharibabadi noted. The E3 have warned they may move to trigger the 'snapback' mechanism under the nuclear deal, which would reinstate all previous UN sanctions on Iran if negotiations with the US do not resume or fail to yield results by the end of August. The snapback option would remain valid until October 18, when the Security Council resolution underpinning the deal is set to expire. 'On Friday, we will discuss on this issue with the Europeans to see that how we should prevent a snapback and how we should prevent more complicating the situation,' Mr Gharibabadi said. 'Possibly, they may come to the table ... with new ideas, we are open to that. We will listen to them to see what are their ideas in this regard, to see that how we can agree to prevent complicating more the situation.' While not ruling out renewed negotiations with Washington, Mr Gharibabadi emphasised that any future talks must come with clear guarantees, including assurances that Iran would not be targeted militarily during the negotiation process and that any eventual agreement would be reciprocal. 'The calls for negotiations have never stopped, even one or two days after the Israeli aggression, and even after the armed attack of the United States on our peaceful nuclear facilities, we have received requests and calls for negotiations,' he said. He added that even following the announcement of a 'so-called' ceasefire, Tehran continues to receive overtures for renewed talks. 'We have not rejected them, but there are some issues around the negotiations,' he said. Mr Gharibabadi said a lack of consistency from Washington was a key obstacle in the five rounds of indirect talks already held with US officials. 'One of the problems we had was the continuous change in the American position. Unfortunately, we would come to a common understanding at the negotiating table, and then 24 hours later we would hear a completely different position, either through the media or directly from US officials,' he said. 'Iran is not against diplomacy and the resumption of negotiations,' he continued.
