US Senator Ted Cruz faces backlash for not knowing basic facts about Iran
The full conversation, released on Wednesday on The Tucker Carlson Show, showcases rising tensions within Trump's right-wing base over the US role in the Middle East, particularly regarding Israel, Iran, and the possibility of wider war.
The rift within Republicans has seen Trump's "Make America Great Again" base, or "America Firsters", generally opposing the US being dragged into another war in the Middle East. The hawks within his base and his administration have been pushing the US into greater involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict.
In a striking exchange, Carlson and Cruz engaged in a heated argument over US involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict, with voices raised as they shouted over each other.
Carlson pressed Cruz on the population of Iran, asking,
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
'How many people live in Iran, by the way?'
Cruz replied, 'I don't know,' before being interrupted by Carlson: 'You don't know the population of the country you seek to topple?'
NEW: Republican Senator Ted Cruz is completely stumped after Tucker Carlson asks him what the population of Iran is.
Tucker: How many people live in Iran?
Cruz: I don't know the population.
Tucker: You don't know the population of the country you seek to topple?
Cruz: How… pic.twitter.com/7ES655jIud — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) June 18, 2025
A person on X wrote, 'Tucker Carlson was taken aback by the level of ignorance of Senator Ted Cruz. He is advocating to overturn the regime of a country he knows nothing about??'
Another social media user added, 'If you're calling for the bombing of or entry of war, you should at least be informed about the country you're targeting'.
Ted Cruz, in the interview with Tucker Carlson, couldn't answer a single basic question about Iran about the population and ethnic composition of the country and admitted that the US is helping Israel bomb Iran.
This is an absolutely insane state of the US politicians. Morbid. pic.twitter.com/LyBVbZ7iU9 — Olga Bazova (@OlgaBazova) June 18, 2025
The clips led to a broader discussion about the implications of Cruz's statements.
A person on X highlighted the cultural and religious ignorance displayed by Cruz, posting: 'The American establishment that wants regime change in Iran & claim that they care about Iranians actually knew nothing about Iranians, their population or religions or even ethnic groups, Ted Cruz in Tucker Carlson interview thinks that all Iranians are 'Persian Shias' 😂'.
Similarly, Donna Miles, a writer and columnist, wrote, 'Tucker Carlson's interview with Ted Cruz is truly eye-opening.
This is how the Iraq disaster happened, and the reason why we are here today, on the brink of a major global war.'
Tucker Carlson's interview with Ted Cruz is truly eye-opening.
This is how the Iraq disaster happened, and the reason why we are here today, on the brink of a major global war.
Iran war hawks are ignorant sycophants.
They know nothing about Iran, its resilient people and its… https://t.co/iGIBXEVoDY — Donna Miles دانا مجاب (@UnPressed) June 18, 2025
Cruz attempted to deflect, stating that he doesn't 'sit around memorising population tables', but this only fuelled further criticism of his readiness to advocate for military intervention.
The controversy extended beyond Iran, with another clip drawing attention to Cruz's views on alleged Israeli espionage on the US.
@tuckercarlsonnetwork
Why is it so hard to say that it's not okay for foreign governments to spy on our president? Watch the full episode tomorrow at 1PM ET ♬ original sound - Tucker Carlson Network
Carlson questioned Cruz about reports that Israel spies on American officials, to which Cruz responded, 'They probably spy on us and we spy on them. Friends and allies spy on each other.'
Reflecting a sentiment shared by many, a social media user wrote, 'Thanks Tucker for showing the world the real Ted Cruz… It's time that America no longer be controlled by Israel.'
Ted Cruz openly admits that Mossad, Netanyahu and Israel spy on our government and even our President.
Think about that.
Many Trump supporters are okay with Israel starting a war send US Soldiers to fight their battle.
Allies do not spy on each other. https://t.co/O2r8qtGj2F — Thomas Paine Band (@ThomasPaineBand) June 18, 2025
On TikTok, people pointed to Cruz's financial ties to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, with one asking, 'Why can't a US politician simply admit that it's not in America's best interest to be spied on by Israel? Hint: he has accepted 1.9 million from AIPAC,' with another suggesting he should be asked this question 'after stopping his AIPAC cheque'.
Social media reactions have been sharply divided, with some mocking Cruz for his lack of basic knowledge, while others accused him of prioritising foreign interests over those of the United States.
The interview's timing is significant, given the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. On 13 June, Israel launched unprovoked strikes targeting Iran's nuclear programme, military leadership, scientists and residential areas, prompting retaliatory missile attacks from Iran.
Publicly, the US has said it is playing a supportive role in the conflict, but Cruz, seemingly mistakenly, admitted that "we" were striking Israel when discussing the strikes with Carlson. After Carlson pushed back, he corrected himself, saying Israel was striking, but that the US was playing a supporting role.
President Trump's social media posts, claiming 'complete and total control of the skies over Iran' and demanding 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER', have further intensified debates about US involvement.
As tensions mount, the interview serves as a flashpoint for discussions about America's role in the region and the accountability of its leaders.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
40 minutes ago
- The National
Iran and European powers resume nuclear talks in Istanbul
Iran and European powers have begun talks in Istanbul over Tehran's nuclear programme, before a deadline to reimpose UN sanctions in September. Iran's nuclear negotiators and deputy foreign ministers, Kazem Gharibabadi and Majid Takht-Ravanchi, met in closed-door discussions with political directors from the foreign ministries of the UK, France and Germany at the Iranian consulate in Istanbul. These were the first in-person talks between Iran and the European countries, known as the E3, since the 12-day Israel-Iran war in June, and subsequent US air strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Last Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told foreign ministers from the E3 that they have no grounds to reactivate UN sanctions after they threatened to do so unless there is progress in nuclear talks. Speaking in Tehran on Thursday night, Mr Araghchi said his country's positions would be 'completely clear" in Friday's talks. "The Islamic Republic of Iran, while advancing its peaceful nuclear programme, has always been ready to adopt confidence-building measures", he added. 'Especially after the recent war, it is important for them [the E3] to understand that the Islamic Republic of Iran's position remains unshakable, and that our uranium enrichment will continue', the Tasnim news agency quoted Mr Araghchi as saying. The negotiations centre on the so-called snapback mechanism, which would allow remaining parties to the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers to reimpose UN sanctions on Tehran that are due to expire in the autumn. While the US left the 2015 nuclear deal in President Donald Trump 's first term, the E3, as well as China and Russia, are still parties to the agreement. In the deal's dispute resolution clauses, any of those parties can trigger a unilateral reimposition of UN sanctions, which include arms embargoes, asset freezes and restrictions on Iran's missile and nuclear programmes. Iranian officials have claimed repeatedly that European nations do not have the right to reimpose UN sanctions because they breached commitments under the 2015 deal and adopted what Tehran saw as pro-Israeli stances during the war in June. If the snapback process is not used and UN embargoes expire in October, Iran could in theory advance its nuclear programme without international restrictions, although remaining US sanctions would likely still complicate any such efforts. Clock ticking on sanctions Analysts and diplomats have said European powers could offer Iran an extension to the deadline. Without one, Germany, France and the UK must decide whether to activate the snapback process 30 days before the curbs expire completely on October 18. An extension would allow time for negotiations between Tehran and Washington in an attempt to reach a deal over Iran's nuclear programme, and impose limits on that activity in exchange for sanctions relief. Such a move would probably come in exchange for commitments from Iran to co-operate with international nuclear inspectors and re-engage in talks with the US. Iran said this week that it agreed to host a technical team from the UN nuclear watchdog to discuss future co-operation, while cautiously signalling openness to renewed talks with the US. The development comes after Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian this month ended co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency and said it could only be restored if the agency addressed Tehran's concerns over perceived bias. "A snapback extension remains a difficult means to an even more difficult end – securing new US-Iran negotiations and a new nuclear deal," Ellie Geranmayeh, a senior fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, wrote in an analysis on the snapback mechanism this week. "But Europeans need to be fully invested in this process." Iranian officials have voiced scepticism over an extension. 'We oppose it,' Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei told state media on Friday. The talks in Istanbul are an opportunity for European countries 'to make up for their previous unconstructive approaches that have tarnished Europe's credibility', he added. Iran and the US held five rounds of negotiations in Rome and Oman this year, before a sixth round was cancelled when Israel attacked Iran in June. The talks had also faltered over Iran's rights to uranium enrichment, which Tehran wants to continue, with possible limits. The US position hardened during the talks and Washington wants to deny Iran any nuclear enrichment capacity under a deal. Tehran insists its nuclear programme is for strictly peaceful purposes and denies seeking to develop a bomb. But uranium enrichment levels of up to 60 per cent, far exceeding the needs of civilian purposes, have raised suspicions in the West that Iran wants to build a weapon.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
India and Israel meet to deepen military ties in sign of solidarity amid Gaza atrocities
India and Israeli military officials have pledged to deepen and strengthen military ties even as images of Israel's engineered starvation of Palestinians continue to send shockwaves around the world. More than 59,000 Palestinians have been killed as a result of Israel's war on Gaza, which several countries, as well as many international rights groups and experts, now qualify as an act of genocide. More than 115 Palestinians, including 80 children, are estimated to have died from starvation in the past month, including 15 who died of malnutrition on Monday. Earlier this week, more than two dozen countries, including France and the UK, condemned "the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food', further calling for Israel's war on Gaza to end. But as global condemnation and calls for an arms embargo on Israel mounted this week, on Wednesday, India's defence secretary and the director general of Israel's Ministry of Defence met in New Delhi and "agreed to further strengthen bilateral defence cooperation with a long-term perspective". The meeting between Shri Rajesh Kumar Singh and the Israel's deputy chief of staff, Major General Amir Baram, signalled, once more, Delhi's intention to remain committed to supporting Israel diplomatically and economically even as Israel loses the support of some of its staunchest allies. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In the statement released by the Press Information Bureau (PIB) on Wednesday, Delhi said its defence secretary "reiterated India's zero tolerance approach to terrorism and condemned the October 7, 2023 terrorist attacks in Israel and called for the release of all hostages." It also narrated Israel's "support for India's fight against terrorism". The statement said the visit by the Israeli deputy chief of staff "marks a pivotal step in India-Israel defence relations and reinforces both sides' commitment to enhance their strategic partnership," the statement added. Flurry of meetings The meeting comes as part of a flurry of diplomatic and economic exchanges between the two states over the past several weeks. On Wednesday, Delhi's Mayor Raja Iqbal Singh held a meeting with Israeli Ambassador Reuven Azar in the capital, in which Singh reiterated the country's commitment to stand with Israel "during these difficult times'. Singh is reported to have added that both countries shared a 'strong relationship based on friendship, cooperation, and mutual respect'. According to reports, the duo discussed using Israeli expertise to improve healthcare, education, parks, and solid waste management in Delhi. 'With Israel being a technologically advanced country, this kind of exchange of ideas and experiences will further strengthen the functioning of the corporation,' Delhi's Commissioner Ashwani Kumar said. The mayor's comments were promptly slammed by Indian activists based in Delhi. A letter circulating amongst activists described Singh's comments as "a cruel, cold-blooded joke in the face of rivers of Palestinian blood." 'Mayor Singh's disgraceful declaration that he 'stands with Israel in difficult times' is nothing short of a moral betrayal and a distortion of truth' - letter from Indian activists " Mayor Singh's disgraceful declaration that he 'stands with Israel in difficult times' is nothing short of a moral betrayal and a distortion of truth," a letter signed by several activists in India read. "Whose 'difficult times' is he speaking of? It is not Israel but the people of Palestine who are enduring the most horrific times - relentless bombings, the destruction of hospitals, schools, homes, and the systematic blocking of essential food, water, and medical supplies. "It is Israel that has unleashed a barbaric campaign of mass murder - targeting children, women, the elderly, and unarmed civilians without the slightest regard for international law or basic humanity," the letter condemning the mayor's comments, added. The latest meetings come just two weeks after the Israeli government said it was finalising an Investment Protection Agreement (IPA) with India. IPAs are meant to address the risk of investing in each other's countries at a time of rising insecurity. Commenting on the IPA, Abdulla Moaswes, a Palestinian writer and academic based in the UK, told Middle East Eye the Indian government was using its ties with Israel to project "diplomatic victories to its voter base, amongst whom support for Israel is a popular sentiment". India is the world's largest importer of Israeli weapons and Delhi is also emerging as a major co-producer of Israeli weapons. Activists in India have been urging their government to impose an arms embargo after it discovered that Delhi had sent combat drones as well as an AI weapons system in aid of Israel's war effort. In December, Delhi said it would be guided by its "national interest" before reconsidering the transfer of weapons or arms sales to Israel.
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Jordan fuelling 'internal crisis' with Palestine solidarity crackdown, sources say
Jordanian authorities are inadvertently fuelling an "internal crisis" with their decision to crack down on Palestine solidarity activists, sources have told Middle East Eye. The sources said that the situation was reaching a boiling point due to Jordan's intelligence services launching a heavy-handed campaign of arrests targeting activists, political opponents and party leaders. The arrests come amid mounting instability in neighbouring Syria, worsening conditions for Palestinians in the occupied West Bank and Israel pursuing a campaign of genocide by starvation in Gaza. On Wednesday, Jordanian authorities arrested the prominent social media activist Ayman Aballi, days after he published a video denouncing what he called the country's "silence" over Israel's starvation policy in Gaza. Criticism of the intelligence services, commonly known as the Mukhabarat, was already escalating after a young man died in police custody a day after his arrest, the sources told MEE. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Local media reported that tensions began to escalate after Ahmed al-Ibrahim died in police custody after being subject to a "severe physical assault" during detention. According to his family, Ibrahim was taken to a nearby hospital on multiple occasions while at the Ramtha police station in Ar-Ramtha, 5km from the Syrian border. He reportedly succumbed to his injuries hours after being transferred to the hospital for the final time. His death triggered a night of anger in Ar-Ramtha, with videos seen by MEE showing angry protesters blocking roads, setting tyres on fire and demanding full accountability. Jordan targeting Gaza solidarity in largest arrest campaign in decades Read More » On the same day that Ibrahim died, security forces arrested Yanal Freihat, an MP from the Islamic Action Front (IAF) party, over a Facebook post in which he criticised the government's stance on the Muslim Brotherhood. Security forces also briefly detained Muslim Brotherhood spokesman Moaz al-Khawaldeh, before releasing him the following day. "The security forces are creating an internal crisis and causing an unprecedented wave of anger in the streets," a Jordanian political analyst told MEE on condition of anonymity, due to fear of reprisals. "This comes at a time when Jordan is facing serious external threats that require internal unity, not deep political and societal divisions. "Jordan now faces two major, unprecedented strategic threats. The first is the threat of the collapse of the Syrian state and the secession of Sweida with Israeli support, possibly sparking a widespread civil war that would impact the region and Jordan," the analyst said. "The second is the threat of the displacement of Palestinians from the West Bank to Jordan, leading to a change in the demographic composition of the Hashemite kingdom." Jordan needs internal stability One of the sources MEE spoke to emphasised that in both cases, Jordan needed internal stability to confront these threats. Neighbouring Syria has been beset with another round of deadly sectarian clashes, with Israel seeking to exploit the vacuum in the war-torn state. The violence was reportedly triggered by a petty crime on 11 July, when a Bedouin gang allegedly robbed and then kidnapped a Druze merchant. This prompted a series of tit-for-tat sectarian kidnappings and killings. When Syrian security forces entered the province to restore order, they were ambushed by Druze fighters. Jordan forcibly evicting Bedul Bedouins in Petra, says Human Rights Watch Read More » Reports that the Druze fighters executed government forces and killed women and children caused widespread outrage. As Syria's government deployed more troops, including tanks and heavy weapons, Israel began attacking them and military positions across the country. The source said that amid the wave of arrests, the security services were being attacked for cracking down on Jordanian civil society while "turning a blind eye to the real threat posed by Israeli activity in the region". In April, a Jordanian opposition website claimed that the government had launched a widespread arrest campaign against activists, in addition to its decision to target the Muslim Brotherhood. It claimed that this was reportedly in response to demands from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and aimed at obtaining financial aid from both countries. Earlier this month, tribesmen from the city of Tafilah gathered and organised a sit-in near the intelligence headquarters in Amman, to demand the release of 72-year-old Ahmed al-Zarqan, a former mayor of the southern Jordanian city. Zarqan is the deputy general supervisor of the Muslim Brotherhood, which was recently banned in the Hashemite kingdom. Security forces arrested him in late April. To date, Zarqan has not been charged, referred to court, or allowed to contact a lawyer. His family has not been allowed to visit him. Anger grows over 1994 'normalisation' As the situation in Gaza deteriorates, Jordanian authorities have faced unprecedented criticism over Amman's diplomatic relations with Israel. The two countries normalised relations in 1994 and are known to cooperate on numerous regional security issues. Massive protests have erupted over the 1994 accord and the genocidal war on Gaza, where at least 58,000 Palestinians have been killed, most of them civilians. Anger has also been steadily rising over Israel's occupation of the West Bank and the mounting civilian death toll. Jordan has a lengthy and complicated relationship with the West Bank, after occupying the area and East Jerusalem in 1948, before annexing them in 1950. Jordan offered citizenship to the Palestinians living there, including refugees, and ruled the West Bank until losing it to Israel during the 1967 war. Although the West Bank had been formally incorporated inside the kingdom, the 1950 annexation agreement decreed Jordanian rule a temporary arrangement, to be held in trust until a final resolution was found for the Palestinian issue. Following the 1967 war, Israel encouraged Jews to settle in the West Bank, providing land, military protection, electricity, water and roads. Some Israeli Jews justify settlement on religious grounds, but many Israelis consider control of the territory necessary to prevent Palestinians from attacking Israel.
