US and Allies Train Forces for Pacific War With China
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The United States, along with its allies and partners, is conducting a large-scale war game in Australia to train for maintaining stability in the Pacific amid growing threats from China.
The three-week-long Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025—the largest and most sophisticated warfighting exercise ever conducted in Australia—commenced on Sunday with more than 35,000 military personnel from 19 Indo-Pacific, North American and European nations.
Newsweek has contacted the Chinese Defense Ministry for comment via email.
Why It Matters
Exercise Talisman Sabre coincided with a U.S. Air Force exercise focused on the Pacific theater—the Department-Level Exercise series—which began last week and is taking place across the Indo-Pacific region with 12,000 personnel and more than 350 aircraft.
The multinational war game in Australia follows China's show of force in the South Pacific between February and March—when it deployed a three-ship flotilla for a circumnavigation of Australia, flexing its expanding naval strength as what it described as a "major power."
What To Know
The 11th iteration of Exercise Talisman Sabre took place across Australia and, for the first time, in Papua New Guinea. It included live-fire drills and field training exercises such as amphibious landings, ground force maneuvers, and air combat and maritime operations.
In addition to forces from Australia and the U.S., participating countries were Canada, Fiji, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, South Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Tonga and the United Kingdom. Malaysia and Vietnam attended the exercise as observers.
In Focus Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025
Four Australian Army High Mobility Artillery Rocket System launching rockets at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland, Australia, during Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 on July 13. Launch Slideshow
3 PHOTOS
The number of participating countries—the highest in the exercise's history—"underscores a shared understanding that lasting security in the Indo-Pacific depends on collective commitment, strength, and deterrence against modern challenges," the U.S. Army said.
Participating U.S. personnel come from the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard and Space Force. They, along with partnered forces, will be tested and will rehearse capabilities—demonstrating resolve for "enduring regional stability," the U.S. Army added
Photos released by the Australian military show several participating forces—including the Australian army, the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force and the U.S. Army—firing missiles and rockets at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland during a live-fire drill.
Exercises such as Talisman Sabre provide readiness to respond to nations' calls and serve as a deterrent mechanism, according to Lieutenant General Joel B. Vowell, the deputy commanding general of the U.S. Army Pacific, "because our ultimate goal, part two here, is no war."
What People Are Saying
Australian Vice Admiral Justin Jones, the chief of joint operations, said in a news release on Sunday: "Exercise Talisman Sabre remains a powerful demonstration of Australia's enduring commitment to strengthening relationships between trusted allies and partners, in support of a peaceful, stable and sovereign Indo-Pacific."
Lieutenant General Joel B. Vowell, the deputy commanding general of the U.S. Army Pacific, said in a news release on Sunday: "As part of the Combined Joint Force, we train diligently and realistically to integrate capabilities across land, sea, air, cyber, and space domains, operating alongside our allies and partners from 19 nations."
What Happens Next
According to Australian Defense Industry Minister Pat Conroy, the Chinese military sent surveillance ships to monitor naval exercises off the Australian coast during the last four Exercise Talisman Sabre iterations and is expected to surveil the current exercise as well.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Trump's Favored Pollster Advises Republicans to Adopt Obamacare Policy
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The GOP pollster used by President Donald Trump during some of his presidential campaigns found that swing-district Republicans can boost their standing ahead of the midterms by supporting a key measure of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare. Why It Matters Republicans are hoping to thwart losses in the 2026 midterm elections as President Donald Trump's approval rating has taken hits in recent public opinion surveys. Historically, the party in the White House suffers losses during their first midterm. During Trump's first midterm in 2018 for instance, Democrats picked up 41 seats in the House of Representatives. Healthcare is likely to be a major issue ahead of the midterms, especially following Medicaid cuts in Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill Act." A new survey from Trump pollsters Tony Fabrizio and Bob Ward found that Republicans in the most vulnerable districts may be able to build support among voters by adopting the premium tax credit, one part of the ACA, which has been generally opposed by Republicans since its inception in 2010. What to Know The poll asked voters in 28 swing districts, which were evenly divided in 2024, whether they would support a generic Democrat or Republican, and found Democrats up by three. Among highly motivated voters, Democrats were up seven. But it found that supporting the extension of the premium tax credit, set to expire at the end of 2025, is one way Republicans could win back support. The tax credit allows lower-income Americans to purchase healthcare in the ACA marketplaces and obtain healthcare coverage. "Republicans can position themselves ahead of Democrats in these districts by extending the premium tax credit and using the individual market as a landing spot for working age adults on Medicaid," the poll report, first reported by Politico, reads. Health care activists rally in Washington, D.C. on September 26, 2017. Health care activists rally in Washington, D.C. on September 26, found that Republican candidates who support that policy would lead Democrats by six points overall and by four points among the most motivated voters. Seventy-nine percent of respondents, including 68 percent of those who voted for Trump, supported tax credits "that make it more affordable for working families and individuals to purchase health insurance directly through or state exchanges," the poll found. The poll, notably, did not use the terms "Affordable Care Act" or "Obamacare" in its questioning. If the tax credit is not extended, Republicans could pay a price, the poll found, as the three-point deficit would expand to a 15-point deficit. Republicans can also "benefit" by using the tax credit as a "landing spot for working aged Medicaid enrollees.". The poll surveyed 1,000 registered voters from June 7 to July 10, 2025, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points. Congressional Republicans have opposed the ACA and sought to repeal it during Trump's first term, but those efforts were blocked by GOP Senators Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and John McCain. Fabrizio worked as Trump's 2024 pollster and has previously issued warnings to the GOP about voter concerns around the economy and healthcare. Newsweek reached out to Fabrizio Ward for comment via the firm's contact form. What People Are Saying The poll report noted: "Unlike recent changes to Medicaid which do not go into effect until after the midterm elections, voters on the individual insurance marketplace, who voted for Trump by 4-points, will begin getting notices of significant premium hikes this fall. The incentive is to act on extending the tax credit soon." A Peterson-KFF report from June said: "The enhanced premium tax credits are now set to expire at the end of 2025. Unless the premium tax credits are extended, consumers can expect increases in both the net premium payments and gross premiums." What Happens Next Whether or not the GOP-controlled Congress will vote to extend the tax credits remains unclear at this point. Republicans in these key districts are already facing criticisms from Democrats over healthcare ahead of the midterms.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Albanese Walks Fine Line Between Xi, Trump in China
US-China tensions and regional security concerns loom over Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing. Darren Lim of the Australian National University says Albanese is keeping focus on his economic agenda, as China remains Australia's biggest export market. Lim talks about how Canberra walks a fine line between its biggest trading partner and its most important long-term security ally on "Bloomberg: The Asia Trade." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Millions of Americans Could See Credit Scores Drop
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A federal judge in Texas has reversed a Biden-era Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) rule which barred medical debt from appearing on credit reports, a move that is set to negatively affect millions of credit scores across the country. In his opinion, Judge Sean Jordan of the US District Court of Texas Eastern District said that the bureau had overstepped its authority in enacting the rule under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which "authorizes creditors to consider such information when making credit decisions." Newsweek has reached out to the CFPB via email for comment. Why It Matters The credit scores of millions of Americans are weighed down by medical debt. According to the CFPB, the rule would have eliminated an estimated $49 billion in medical bills from the credit reports of some 15 million Americans. Fotostand / Schmitt/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images As a result of the decision, these unpaid bills will continue to weigh on Americans' creditworthiness. One expert told Newsweek that, "for many Americans, even a relatively small dip in their credit score can be significant," affecting their ability to buy homes, secure loans, or even rent apartments. What To Know The CFPB's rule was finalized in January, weeks before Trump's inauguration, and was set to go into effect in March. In addition to prohibiting reporting agencies from including medical debt information in credit reports, it would have barred creditors from considering medical debt when making loan decisions. At the time, the Bureau expected the rule to "lead to the approval of approximately 22,000 additional, affordable mortgages every year," and that Americans with medical debt on their credit reports could see scores increase by 20 points on average. However, the idea drew pushback from GOP lawmakers. In a letter to then-CFPB Director Rohit Chopra in August, several Republicans on the House Financial Services Committee warned this could "weaken the accuracy and completeness of consumer credit reports." Upon being finalized, it was swiftly challenged by the Consumer Data Industry Association and Cornerstone Credit Union League, who filed a lawsuit against the CFPB over the rule. The pair were later joined by the Trump administration and the CFPB itself, which, under new leadership, joined with the plaintiffs in opposition in April. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) director Rohit Chopra testifies before a Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on December 11, 2024 in Washington, DC. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) director Rohit Chopra testifies before a Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on December 11, 2024 in Washington, Americans owe over $220 billion in medical debt, per a 2024 estimate from health policy-focused research group KFF. However, a study by the CFPB found that medical debt is an unreliable indicator of overall creditworthiness, given this is often incurred due to unexpected health emergencies. "Medical debt may be less predictive of whether a consumer will pay a future loan, because medical debts can occur and are collected through unique circumstances and practices," the Bureau wrote in a separate 2024 study. "For example, consumers often have limited ability to control the timing and types of medical services that are required." "I understand the rationale behind including medical debt in credit reports," said Matt Schulz, chief consumer finance analyst at LendingTree. "Lenders want as complete a picture as possible of the financial situation of the people that they lend to." "However, medical debt is a different animal from other common types of debt," he told Newsweek. "For one, the dollars involved can be enormous. Also, medical bills often contain errors that can take a really long time to resolve because of how ridiculously complex and confusing the American healthcare and insurance businesses are. "That means many Americans may find their credit damaged unnecessarily, and that's a big deal." Bankrate Senior Industry Analyst Ted Rossman told Newsweek that, despite the ruling, voluntary changes adopted by major credit bureaus over the past few years – which worked to remove many forms of medical collection data from credit reports – mean that the impacts on credit scores may not be catastrophic. "In 2022 and 2023, the major credit bureaus voluntarily removed most medical debt from credit reports," he said. "They took off paid medical collections, medical debts that had been in collections for less than a year and medical collections under $500. This removed about 70% of medical debt from credit reports. "While this policy has been struck down by a judge, my understanding is that the voluntary changes will stick and most medical debt still won't appear on credit reports," he added. What People Are Saying Rohit Chopra, then-director of the CFPB, said in January: "People who get sick shouldn't have their financial future upended. The CFPB's final rule will close a special carveout that has allowed debt collectors to abuse the credit reporting system to coerce people into paying medical bills they may not even owe." LendingTree Chief Consumer Finance Analyst Matt Schulz told Newsweek: "There's no question that this will hurt some Americans' credit scores in the long run." "There's very little in life that is more expensive than having crummy credit. It can cost you literally tens of thousands of dollars or more over the course of your life in the form of higher interest rates and fees on mortgages, credit cards, auto loans and other things. It can push your insurance premiums higher and even keep you from getting that apartment you're looking for. For many Americans, even a relatively small dip in their credit score can be significant because it could drop them from very good to good credit, for example, or from good to fair. Those things matter a lot." Bankrate Senior Industry Analyst Ted Rossman told Newsweek: "If you have medical debt and you can't pay it off right away, try to work out a payment plan with the doctor or hospital. This is likely going to be a lot more affordable and better for your credit score than if you finance it with a credit card." "Many doctors and hospitals offer low- or no-interest payment plans and these have the added advantage of keeping the debt as medical debt (which is treated more favorably by the credit bureaus than credit card debt)," he added. What Happens Next? Judge Jordan's ruling is unlikely to be challenged or appealed by the CFPB, given the Bureau's decision to side with the plaintiffs and its current leadership, now overseen by Trump appointee Russell Vought.
