logo
Rajasthan BJP MLA Kanwarlal Meena, who faces disqualification, and his 26-year, 27-case run

Rajasthan BJP MLA Kanwarlal Meena, who faces disqualification, and his 26-year, 27-case run

Indian Express21-05-2025
With the Supreme Court-stipulated two-week relief coming to an end, convicted BJP MLA Kanwarlal Meena surrendered before a court in Manohar Thana in Rajasthan's Jhalawar district on Wednesday. However, there is still no word on the termination of his membership as a legislator due to his conviction, with Speaker Vasudev Devnani stating that he is taking legal opinion.
Meena, a two-time MLA from Anta and Manohar Thana, was sentenced to three years on charges of threatening then Aklera town Sub-Divisional Officer Ram Niwas Mehta with a revolver in 2005. As per the Representation of the People's Act, a legislator is disqualified in case sentenced for more than two years.
Meena was initially convicted in 2020, a decision that was upheld by the Rajasthan High Court earlier this month. The Supreme Court then rejected his plea challenging the conviction.
Sources said the BJP is still looking at ways to circumvent the termination of Meena's Assembly membership, including by seeking the Governor's pardon or a commutation of his three-year sentence to 23 months.
While the 2005 case now hangs over Meena's future, he has at least 27 cases lodged against him. An analysis by The Indian Express shows these range from rioting, assaulting public servants, promoting enmity on the basis of religion and defiling places of worship to house trespassing.
In almost all these 27 cases, Meena has been acquitted at various stages, though senior advocate and former Chief Justice of Orissa High Court S Muralidhar mentioned the cases in the Supreme Court.
Dismissing his petition challenging the High Court's order in the 2005 revolver case, the Supreme Court had remarked, 'Elected representatives need to discipline themselves… This is one of those rare cases where somebody has been convicted, otherwise you do everything and anything and get away with it, without any action against you.'
A lawyer for Meena said Wednesday that the 2005 case will be the first instance of him serving a sentence. 'All have been decided, nothing left, except one. Only one case is left; in the rest he has either been acquitted or a raazinama (compromise) has been reached.'
Meena's first case goes back to 1999, when as a youth about 25 years of age, he was accused of an attempt to murder and other crimes by one Girdhari Lal Meena in Aklera, Jhalawar. He was convicted in 2003.
In his second case the same year, he faced charges under seven sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty. But in this case, a compromise was agreed upon in 2011.
The subsequent cases included alleged trespassing and damage to a mosque; damaging a bus when asked for the fare; obstructing a national highway and injuring a public servant; setting fire to a complainant's tractor, motorcycle and farm equipment, and theft; setting fire to a complainant's house and looting his luggage; defiling religious books and destruction of articles in a mosque; shouting slogans against a community, and destruction of property; impersonating a public servant; assaulting Dr S D Sharma, the then assistant director with the state health department in 2011; thrashing social activists participating in a 'Jawabdehi Yatra' to demand an accountability law for government and elected officials in January 2016; apart from at least two cases for extortion.
In the 2016 case, women activists under the banner of Aruna Roy and Nikhil Dey's Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) had accused Meena of abuse and molestation. However, he was acquitted by a trial court and by an additional district judge too, though the case is still pending in the High Court.
The last known case filed against Meena was in August 2018, when Narpat Singh, head constable at Baran's Atru police station, lodged a case under 12 IPC sections, including for 'assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty'.
In his 2023 Assembly poll affidavit, Meena had listed the 2005 revolver case, the 2016 Jawabdehi Yatra case, and three cases from 2023 as pending. He had also stated he was convicted in two cases – his first ever case in 1999 and the 2005 revolver case.
In 18 of the 27 cases, Meena has been accused of rioting, with 14 of them including rioting while armed with a deadly weapon. Similarly, eight cases have been lodged against him for promoting enmity between different groups on the grounds of religion, and committing acts prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony; three cases were lodged for injuring or defiling places of worship with intent to insult the religion of any class. There are also five cases against him for destroying the Quran.
Eight cases have also been lodged against Meena for assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty, with four of them including voluntarily causing hurt and one for threat of injury to a public servant. In the Supreme Court, senior advocate S Muralidhar termed attacks on public servants as Meena's 'specialisation'.
Meena has also been accused of or convicted for house-trespass, forgery, criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, unlawful assembly. He has also faced charges under sections of the Arms Act, Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, and Rajasthan Excise Act.
On Monday, a delegation led by Congress state president Govind Singh Dotasra met Governor Haribhau Bagade seeking the termination of Meena's membership. Another delegation, led by Leader of the Opposition Tika Ram Jully, met Speaker Vasudev Devnani on Tuesday reminding him that he holds a 'constitutional post' and that 'the essence of the Constitution lies in impartiality and democratic values'.
Devnani too met Bagade on Tuesday, just a day after Chief Minister Bhajan Lal Sharma met the Governor on Monday. While these were officially cited as 'courtesy calls', the meetings have given rise to the speculation that the BJP may be hoping to seek a pardon for Meena from the Governor.
Meena's lawyers said a revision petition will soon be filed in the Supreme Court. Assuring the Congress delegation of a 'quick and just decision', the Speaker's office said it has asked the state Advocate General to share his opinion, which is expected to be received by the Assembly 'in a day or two'.
'To terminate the MLA's membership, all aspects of the court's judgement have to be studied so that no injustice is done to the MLA,' Devnani said.
Following Meena's surrender Wednesday, LoP Jully termed it a 'blot on democracy', saying it is unprecedented that the Speaker has not cancelled the membership even 20 days after the sentencing. However, BJP spokesperson Laxmikant Bhardwaj countered, saying: 'Politicians face a lot of cases but they are considered guilty only after the court finds them to be true. Until the court agrees, we can't hold someone as a criminal.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SC rejects plea seeking delimitation of Assembly seats in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana
SC rejects plea seeking delimitation of Assembly seats in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana

Scroll.in

time19 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

SC rejects plea seeking delimitation of Assembly seats in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a petition seeking directions to the Union government to conduct the delimitation process in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, reported Live Law. Delimitation is the process of redrawing the territorial boundaries of electoral constituencies. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh rejected the petitioner's argument that holding the exercise only in Jammu and Kashmir last year and not in the southern states was ' arbitrary or violative of the Constitution', according to Bar and Bench. The Union government had started the delimitation process of Assembly constituencies in Jammu and Kashmir in February 2020. In May 2022, the number of elected Assembly seats in the Union Territory was increased from 83 to 90 in the final delimitation order. Of the seven new seats, one was given to Kashmir, taking its total to 46, and six were given to Jammu, which now has 43 seats. K Purushottam Reddy, a professor, had approached the Supreme Court stating that excluding Andhra Pradesh and Telangana from the exercise 'created an unreasonable classification and was therefore unconstitutional', reported Live Law. Andhra Pradesh was bifurcated in 2014 to create Telangana. The Assembly of the undivided state had 294 seats. After the bifurcation, the Assembly in Andhra Pradesh was allocated 175 seats and Telangana 119. On Thursday, the Supreme Court stated that allowing the delimitation process in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana 'will open floodgates for all states to approach seeking parity'. The bench also said that the provisions dealing with delimitation in states were different from Union Territories.

SC allows Kerala govt to withdraw pleas against guv over assent to bills
SC allows Kerala govt to withdraw pleas against guv over assent to bills

Business Standard

time19 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

SC allows Kerala govt to withdraw pleas against guv over assent to bills

The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Kerala government to withdraw its pleas against Governor over the delay in approving bills passed by the state assembly. A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar passed the order after senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Kerala government, sought withdrawal of the plea and said the issue had turned infructuous in view of the recent judgment passed in the Tamil Nadu Governor case. Attorney General R Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta opposed the submission and urged the court to await the top court's decision on the reference of President under Article 143 of the Constitution over the grant of assent to bills. On April 22, the top court said it would examine whether the recent judgement on a plea of Tamil Nadu, fixing timelines for the grant of assent to bills, covered the issues raised by the Kerala government in its pleas. Acting on a plea of Tamil Nadu government, an apex court bench on April 8 set aside the reservation of the 10 bills for President's consideration in the second round holding it as illegal, erroneous in law. The bench, for the first time, also prescribed a time limit for President to decide on the bills reserved for her consideration by Governor. It set a three-month timeframe from the date on which such reference was received. Kerala sought similar directions in its petition. In 2023, the top court expressed displeasure over then Kerala Governor Arif Mohammed Khan "sitting" for two years on bills passed by the state legislature. Khan is currently Governor of Bihar. The top court, on July 26, last year, agreed to consider the plea of opposition-ruled Kerala alleging the denial of assent to bills passed by the legislative assembly. The Kerala government alleged that Khan referred certain bills to President Droupadi Murmu and those were yet to be cleared. Taking note of the pleas, the top court issued notices to the Union Ministry of Home Affairs and the secretaries of Kerala Governor. The state said its plea related to the acts of Governor in reserving seven bills, which he was required to deal with himself, to the President. Not one of the seven bills had anything to do with Centre-state relations, it argued. The bills were pending with the Governor for as long as two years and his action "subverted" the functioning of the state legislature, rendering its very existence "ineffective and otiose", the state added. "The bills include public interest bills that are for the public good, and even these have been rendered ineffective by the Governor not dealing with each one of them 'as soon as possible', as required by the proviso to Article 200," the plea said. The state government had said the home ministry informed it that President had withheld assent to four of the seven bills -- University Laws (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill, 2021; Kerala Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Bill, 2022; University Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2022; and University Laws (Amendment) (No. 3) Bill, 2022. The Constitution is silent on how much time the President can take in granting assent to a bill passed by a state legislature and referred to the Rashtrapati Bhavan for presidential consideration or for denying consent. Article 361 of the Constitution says the President, or Governor of a state, shall not be answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his office or for any act done or purporting to be done by him in the exercise and performance of those powers and duties.

Supreme Court rejects plea to increase Assembly seats in Andhra, Telangana
Supreme Court rejects plea to increase Assembly seats in Andhra, Telangana

Hans India

time19 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Supreme Court rejects plea to increase Assembly seats in Andhra, Telangana

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday declined to issue a direction to the Centre to increase the number of Assembly seats in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. A Bench of Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh was dealing with pleas seeking implementation of the provisions under the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014, which provided for delimitation of Assembly seats in the two successor states. In its judgment, the Justice Kant-led Bench refused to direct delimitation in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, observing that Article 170 of the Constitution allows delimitation only after the first census conducted post-2026. Delimitation under Article 170 has been frozen until the first census after 2026, as per the 84th and 87th Constitutional Amendments. The apex court rejected the contention that the Centre's decision to carry out delimitation in Jammu and Kashmir, raising the number of Assembly constituencies from 83 to 90 based on the 2011 census, while excluding Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, was arbitrary and discriminatory. Highlighting the constitutional distinctions, it opined that J&K, having been reconstituted as a union territory, is regulated by parliamentary legislation and provisions of the Constitution under Chapter III of Part VI will not apply. In a related development, the Telangana Assembly, in a resolution passed in March this year, urged the Centre to increase the number of seats from 119 to 153, pursuant to the A.P. Reorganisation Act, 2014 and as per the latest census. The state Assembly urged the Union government to introduce necessary Constitutional amendments for this purpose in order to strengthen representative democracy. Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy pointed out that the Centre, in reply to his question when he was a member of the previous Lok Sabha, had stated that the delimitation of Assembly constituencies would be done only after the 2026 census. Reddy slammed the Centre for its double standards on the issue. He said the Centre increased the number of Assembly constituencies from 83 to 90 as per the 2011 census in Jammu and Kashmir, and, in Sikkim, a resolution was passed in the Cabinet in 2018, and the process of delimitation of constituencies is currently underway.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store