World War III fears grow as Trump sends nuclear submarines toward Russia — fires back at Putin crony's bold threat
In a dramatic turn of global events, President Donald Trump has ordered two U.S. nuclear submarines to be strategically deployed near Russian waters. This powerful move comes after Russia's Dmitry Medvedev, former president and current deputy chairman of the Security Council, made what Trump called 'foolish and inflammatory' threats, evoking Cold War-era nuclear rhetoric. The decision is not just a military maneuver—it is a strong geopolitical message amid rising global tensions and ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Donald Trump responds to Medvedev's nuclear threats with submarine deployment
Tensions between the U.S. and Russia are reaching a boiling point after President Donald Trump ordered two nuclear submarines to reposition closer to Russian waters. This dramatic military maneuver was a direct response to former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev's alarming nuclear rhetoric, where he warned of retaliatory measures over Trump's Ukraine ceasefire deadline. Trump framed the move as a "precaution," yet it marks one of the boldest nuclear postures by a U.S. president since the Cold War. His administration is sending a clear signal: America won't tolerate escalatory threats from Moscow.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Project Management
Artificial Intelligence
Degree
Data Science
Others
Product Management
MBA
Leadership
Finance
Healthcare
CXO
Public Policy
Operations Management
PGDM
MCA
Data Science
Management
Technology
Cybersecurity
Data Analytics
healthcare
others
Design Thinking
Digital Marketing
Skills you'll gain:
Project Planning & Governance
Agile Software Development Practices
Project Management Tools & Software Techniques
Scrum Framework
Duration:
12 Weeks
Indian School of Business
Certificate Programme in IT Project Management
Starts on
Jun 20, 2024
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Portfolio Management
Project Planning & Risk Analysis
Strategic Project/Portfolio Selection
Adaptive & Agile Project Management
Duration:
6 Months
IIT Delhi
Certificate Programme in Project Management
Starts on
May 30, 2024
Get Details
But Trump's move isn't just about deterring Russia militarily—it's part of a broader pressure campaign that includes punishing economic measures. Alongside the submarine deployment, Trump is ramping up tariffs and trade restrictions, directly tying them to global alliances and behavior, especially countries with growing ties to Russia. This includes India, a key member of the BRICS alliance, which has continued importing discounted Russian oil and weapons. With NATO on edge and global markets rattled, Trump's military and economic posture is designed to reassert American dominance on multiple fronts.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
20 Things Women Should NEVER Wear!
TheSeniorMag.com
Undo
Trump, reacting via his Truth Social account, stressed that the U.S. cannot afford to ignore such escalatory language. Calling Medvedev's rhetoric 'provocative,' Trump revealed that two nuclear-powered submarines have been moved to undisclosed locations near Russia 'as a precautionary measure.' His words echoed a deepening concern that the world is again walking a tightrope between diplomacy and destruction.
US nuclear submarines positioned as warning signal to Russia
The deployment of U.S. nuclear submarines near Russia serves a dual purpose—military deterrence and strategic signaling. While Trump emphasized that the move is defensive and meant to 'avoid unintended consequences,' analysts say this marks one of the most visible escalations between the U.S. and Russia in recent years.
Live Events
The submarines involved are part of the U.S. Navy's Ohio-class ballistic missile fleet, capable of carrying dozens of nuclear warheads. Their undetectable stealth and immense power make them one of the most formidable assets in America's strategic arsenal.
This development is especially critical as it comes at a time when U.S.–Russia relations are already strained over the prolonged war in Ukraine, cyber threats, and economic sanctions. Trump's decisive move may shift the global chessboard and intensify calls for diplomatic engagement before the situation spirals further.
Dmitry Medvedev revives Cold War-era nuclear warnings
At the center of this high-stakes exchange is Dmitry Medvedev, who has increasingly taken on a more hawkish and aggressive tone in recent months. In his latest statement, Medvedev dismissed Trump's suggested Ukraine ceasefire plans and instead referenced Russia's massive nuclear arsenal.
He also mentioned the
'Dead Hand' system
—a Cold War legacy technology rumored to automatically launch Russia's nuclear weapons if national leadership is wiped out. This chilling detail sent shockwaves through Western governments and likely played a major role in Trump's rapid military response.
Medvedev's public comments appear designed to demonstrate Russia's refusal to be bullied or coerced into surrendering geopolitical ground, especially in the ongoing conflict with Ukraine.
Is Trump targeting India and BRICS with tariffs over Russia ties?
Yes, and the message is loud and clear. President Trump has slapped
a 25% tariff
on Indian imports, followed by a penalty tied to India's continued trade with Russia. His administration is increasingly frustrated with BRICS nations—including India, Brazil, and China—who've maintained or deepened economic ties with Moscow despite the ongoing war in Ukraine. India's position is particularly sensitive: while it maintains strategic autonomy, its oil purchases from Russia and growing defense partnerships have drawn Trump's ire. U.S. officials even suggested India is being "made an example" to deter other nations from ignoring Washington's red lines.
Trump's trade strategy is deeply intertwined with his foreign policy objectives. He's not only seeking better deals for the U.S. but also using tariffs as leverage to isolate Russia and disrupt emerging multipolar alliances like BRICS. Some U.S. lawmakers have gone as far as proposing
500% secondary tariffs
on countries that continue to fund what they call "Putin's war machine." The timing is no coincidence—Trump's submarine deployment near Russia and economic pressure on India are part of the same high-stakes chess game. By linking military deterrence with aggressive trade tactics, Trump is reshaping the global order on his terms.
Trump's decision sends global markets and foreign leaders on alert
The announcement came as a shock to many international leaders, with NATO allies quickly convening emergency briefings to assess potential fallout. Several European nations have voiced concern about the dangerous path being carved by nuclear saber-rattling on both sides.
Financial markets also reacted with caution. Global stocks dipped, oil prices surged, and defense stocks rallied as investors priced in the risk of growing military conflict. Analysts warned that such volatile moves could create long-term instability unless world leaders return to diplomatic channels.
The United Nations issued a statement urging both the U.S. and Russia to exercise restraint and avoid inflammatory actions that could further escalate nuclear tensions.
The Ukraine war continues to fuel global geopolitical instability
The Ukraine–Russia war, now in its third year, remains a core source of global instability. President Trump has repeatedly insisted that Russia must agree to a ceasefire and begin peace talks, warning of strict deadlines and harsher consequences.
However, Moscow has resisted U.S. pressure, and the Kremlin continues to frame the conflict as a defensive effort against NATO expansion. Trump's latest move underscores just how intertwined the nuclear issue has become with the broader Ukraine war.
Experts fear that any misstep—verbal or strategic—could ignite a new, more dangerous chapter in this long-running conflict.
Analysts warn of heightened nuclear risk and diplomatic breakdown
Nuclear policy experts across the globe have raised alarms, cautioning that any military escalation involving nuclear assets, especially submarines, could be misinterpreted as a preparation for attack.
'This is a very delicate moment,' said Dr. Elena Petrov, a nuclear strategy analyst at the Atlantic Institute. 'By publicizing the submarine deployment, Trump is both deterring aggression and potentially increasing the likelihood of misunderstanding or miscalculation by the Russians.'
She added that in a world where communication can be instantaneous but filtered through political rhetoric, leaders must be especially cautious. 'What's said online or in speeches can spark real-world consequences—especially when nuclear weapons are involved.'
Trump defends the move as necessary caution, not aggression
In the face of mounting criticism, President Trump defended his decision. He emphasized that the U.S. had no plans to initiate conflict but could not sit idle while a senior Russian official made what he termed 'reckless threats.'
Trump insisted the move was not just about protecting American interests but also about showing strength in the face of intimidation. 'Words matter,' he wrote. 'When someone threatens nuclear retaliation, we must take it seriously.'
This response plays into Trump's broader strategy of projecting American strength on the world stage, particularly in matters involving national security, energy dominance, and great power competition.
Will nuclear brinkmanship replace diplomacy?
The current climate raises difficult questions about the future of international diplomacy. With both Washington and Moscow hardening their stances, and with war still raging in Eastern Europe, the room for peaceful resolution appears to be narrowing.
Analysts warn that mutual threats and weapons deployments only serve to erode what little trust remains between the superpowers. The absence of formal arms control talks, especially after the collapse of key nuclear treaties in recent years, makes these moments even more dangerous.
Whether this incident becomes a turning point for reengagement—or the beginning of a new era of nuclear brinkmanship—remains to be seen.
He world watches as nuclear tension rises between U.S. and Russia
Trump's bold decision to deploy nuclear submarines close to Russian territory has transformed a war of words into a potential flashpoint. His warning to Medvedev—combined with the reality of submarine positioning—sends a clear message that the U.S. is ready to defend its interests and allies, even at great risk.
At the same time, the move has rattled the international community, highlighting the urgent need for renewed diplomacy, strategic calm, and nuclear de-escalation.
For now, all eyes are on what happens next—because in a world with nuclear weapons, miscommunication can become catastrophe in a matter of minutes.
FAQs:
Q1: Why did Donald Trump deploy nuclear submarines near Russia?
To respond to Medvedev's nuclear threats and rising tensions over Ukraine.
Q2: What did Dmitry Medvedev say that triggered Trump's decision?
He warned of Russia's Cold War-era nuclear retaliation system, the 'Dead Hand.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US requires Zambia, Malawi citizens to pay up to $15,000 bond for some visitor visas
By Humeyra Pamuk US requires Zambia, Malawi citizens to pay up to $15,000 bond for some visitor visas WASHINGTON, - President Donald Trump's administration will require visa applicants from Zambia and Malawi to pay bonds up to $15,000 for some tourist and business visas under a pilot program launching in two weeks, the State Department said on Tuesday. "Starting August 20, 2025, any citizen or national traveling on a passport issued by one of these countries who is found otherwise eligible for a B1/B2 visa must post a bond in amounts of $5,000, $10,000, or $15,000, determined at time of visa interview," the State Department said in a notice on its website. A notice about the program, which gives U.S. consular officers worldwide the discretion to impose bonds on visitors from countries with high rates of visa overstays, appeared on the Federal Register on Monday but no country names had been mentioned. A State Department spokesperson on Monday said countries would be identified based on "high overstay rates, screening and vetting deficiencies, concerns regarding acquisition of citizenship by investment without a residency requirement, and foreign policy considerations." The spokesperson, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the list of countries may be updated from time to time. The bond amount will be returned to the applicant if the applicant leaves the U.S. within the allowed window of time in line with their visa and complies with all the terms of their visa status. President Donald Trump has made cracking down on illegal immigration a focus of his presidency, boosting resources to secure the border and arresting people who are in the U.S. illegally. He issued a travel ban in June that fully or partially blocks citizens of 19 nations from entering the U.S. on national security grounds. Numerous countries in Africa, including Burundi, Djibouti and Togo, also had high overstay rates, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data from fiscal year 2023. Visa holders who have posted a visa bond must arrive and depart the United States via three specific ports of entry, the State Department notice said on Tuesday. It listed those as Boston Logan Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York and Washington Dulles Airport. It warned that if such travelers arrive or depart from anywhere else, they could be denied entry or their departure may not be appropriately registered. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
Jobs data firestorm: Trump blasts ‘rigged' numbers after poor hiring revisions
President Trump fired the BLS commissioner after accusing the agency of rigging job numbers. The firing follows sharp downward revisions to job data for May and June, raising concerns about political interference and economic data reliability read more The monthly jobs report is already highly watched on Wall Street and in Washington, but it has taken on additional importance since President Donald Trump sacked the officer in charge of it on Friday. Trump said that June's job data were 'RIGGED' to make him and other Republicans 'look bad,' but he offered no evidence. Erika McEntarfer, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner nominated by former President Joe Biden, was fired following Friday's employment report, which revealed that hiring was poor in July and had practically came to a halt in May and June, just after Trump imposed massive tariffs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Economists and Wall Street investors have traditionally regarded job data as credible, with share prices and bond yields frequently responding dramatically when they are announced. However, Friday's revisions were extraordinarily large, the greatest outside of a recession in five decades. In addition, the surveys utilised to generate the report face issues due to diminishing response rates. Despite this, most economists do not doubt them. 'The bottom line for me is, I wouldn't take the low collection rate as any evidence that the numbers are less reliable,' Omair Sharif, founder and chief economist at Inflation Insights, a consulting firm, said. Heather Boushey, a top economic advisor in the Biden White House, noted that without Trump's firing of McEntarfer, there would be more focus on last week's data, which points to a slowing economy. 'We're having this conversation about made-up issues to distract us from what the data is showing,' Boushey said. 'Revisions of this magnitude in a negative direction may indicate bad things to come for the labour market.' Here are some things to know about the jobs report: Economists and Wall Street trust the data Most economists say that the Bureau of Labor Statistics is a nonpolitical agency staffed by people obsessed with getting the numbers right. The only political appointee is the commissioner, who doesn't see the data until it's finalized, two days before it is issued to the public. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Erica Groshen, the BLS commissioner from 2013 to 2017, said she suggested different language in the report to 'liven it up', but was shot down. She was told that if asked to describe a cup as half-empty or half-full, BLS says 'it is an eight ounce cup with four ounces of liquid.' The revised jobs data that has attracted Trump's ire is actually more in line with other figures than before the revision. For example, payroll processor ADP uses data from its millions of clients to calculate its own jobs report, and it showed a sharp hiring slowdown in May and June that is closer to the revised BLS data. Trump and his White House have a long track record of celebrating the jobs numbers — when they are good. Securing the data Rigging the numbers would be difficult. Hundreds of economists and statisticians are involved in compiling the monthly jobs report, and they follow 'transparent, well-established methodologies,'' Heidi Shierholz, the Labor Department's chief economist in the Obama administration, wrote in a commentary Friday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'It is very, very difficult to tamper or to interfere with these numbers,'' Elaine Chao, Labor secretary in the George W. Bush administration, told CNBC Monday. In the week before the numbers are released, she said, 'the process is very much locked down'' with about 40 people involved in the final preparations. 'If anything were to be awry, I think one of these 40 people in the final analysis would have spoken up,'' Chao said. The BLS commissioner only sees the numbers after they are final — usually the Tuesday before the report comes out on Friday. The White House Council of Economic Advisors gets a look and a briefing from the commissioner or BLS staff on Thursday, Groshen said. These are the figures Trump is attacking Trump has focused on the revisions to the May and June data, which on Friday were revised lower, with job gains in May reduced to 19,000 from 144,000, and for June to just 14,000 from 147,000. Every month's jobs data is revised in the following two months. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump also repeated a largely inaccurate attack from the campaign about an annual revision last August, which reduced total employment in the United States by 818,000, or about 0.5%. The government also revises employment figures every year. Trump charged the annual revision was released before the 2024 presidential election to 'boost' Vice President Kamala Harris's 'chances of Victory,' yet it was two months before the election and widely reported at the time that the revision lowered hiring during the Biden-Harris administration and pointed to a weaker economy. Here's why the government revises the data The monthly revisions occur because many companies that respond to the government's surveys send their data in late, or correct the figures they've already submitted. The proportion of companies sending in their data later has risen in the past decade. Every year, the BLS does an additional revision based on actual job counts that are derived from state unemployment insurance records. Those figures cover 95% of US businesses and aren't derived from a survey but are not available in real time. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Betsey Stevenson, a University of Michigan professor and former chief economist at the Labor Department, stressed that the government also needs to be able to release the data in a timely manner, so that companies have a sense on a monthly basis about how the economy is faring. The revisions help to ensure the timely release while improving accuracy over time, she said, adding that lawmakers need to make investments to modernize data collection. 'The trade offs between cost, speed, and accuracy are decisions made by Congress,' she said. 'The president seems frustrated by his own party's policy choices around national statistics.' Factors that cause revisions Figuring out how many new jobs have been added or lost each month is more complicated than it may sound. For example, if one person takes a second job, should you focus on the number of jobs, which has increased, or the number of employed people, which hasn't? (The government measures both: The unemployment rate is based on how many people either have or don't have jobs, while the number of jobs added or lost is counted separately). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Each month, the government surveys about 121,000 businesses and government agencies at over 630,000 locations — including multiple locations for the same business — covering about one-third of all workers. Still, the government also has to make estimates: What if a company goes out of business? It likely won't fill out any forms showing the jobs lost. And what about new businesses? They can take a while to get on the government's radar. The BLS seeks to capture these trends by estimating their impact on employment. Those estimates can be wrong, of course, until they are fixed by the annual revisions. The revisions are often larger around turning points in the economy. For example, when the economy is growing, there may be more startups than the government expects, so revisions will be higher. If the economy is slowing or slipping into a recession, the revisions may be larger on the downside. Revisions seem to be getting bigger STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The revisions to May and June's job totals, which reduced hiring by a total of 258,000, were the largest — outside recessions — since 1967, according to economists at Goldman Sachs. Kevin Hassett, Trump's top economic advisor, went on NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday and said, 'What we've seen over the last few years is massive revisions to the jobs numbers.' Hassett blamed a sharp drop in response rates to the government's surveys during and after the pandemic: 'When COVID happened, because response rates went down a lot, then revision rates skyrocketed.' Yet calculations by Ernie Tedeschi, an economic advisor to the Biden administration, show that while revisions spiked after the pandemic, they have since declined and are much smaller than in the 1960s and 1970s. Other concerns about the government's data Many economists and statisticians have sounded the alarm about things like declining response rates for years. A decade ago, about 60% of companies surveyed by BLS responded. Now, only about 40% do. The decline has been an international phenomenon, particularly since COVID. The United Kingdom has even suspended publication of an official unemployment rate because of falling responses. And earlier this year the BLS said that it was cutting back on its collection of inflation data because of the Trump administration's hiring freeze, raising concerns about the robustness of price data just as economists are trying to gauge the impact of tariffs on inflation. US government statistical agencies have seen an inflation-adjusted 16% drop in funding since 2009, according to a July report from the American Statistical Association. 'We are at an inflection point,' the report said. 'To meet current and future challenges requires thoughtful, well-planned investment … In contrast, what we have observed is uncoordinated and unplanned reductions with no visible plan for the future.
NDTV
2 minutes ago
- NDTV
Fake Residential Certificate Application In Trump's Name Surfaces In Bihar
Patna: In a bizarre twist to the growing trend of fake residence certificate cases in Bihar, an application has surfaced in Samastipur district seeking a certificate in the name of US President Donald Trump. The incident took place in the Mohiuddinnagar zone, where an unidentified person submitted an online application using Trump's photo and name, falsely listing the address as Village Hasanpur, Ward No. 13, Post Bakarpur, Police Station Mohiuddinnagar, District Samastipur. The application, submitted on July 29, 2025, was recorded under Application No. BRCCO/2025/17989735. Upon verification, officials found clear tampering in the form's photo, Aadhaar number, barcode, and address details, prompting the Circle Officer (CO) to reject the application outright. Officials believe the act was deliberately carried out to ridicule and defame the administrative system. Mohiuddinnagar CO confirmed that this is a serious violation under the IT Act, and a complaint has been filed with the local cyber police station. "Strict legal action will be taken against those responsible," said the CO, adding that cybercrime investigators are now tracking the IP address and login credentials used in the prank. This incident is the latest in a series of fake residence certificate scams surfacing across Bihar in recent weeks. Officials have flagged previous applications under names like 'Dog Babu', 'Nitish Kumari', and even in the name of Sonalika tractor, in Patna, East Champaran, Nalanda and other districts of Bihar, exposing glaring loopholes in the online application verification system. The repeated misuse of the online portal has raised serious concerns over digital document integrity and identity fraud. Administrative officers are now considering technical audits and stricter KYC verification mechanisms to prevent further embarrassment. As the state heads into election season, such incidents not only undermine the government's digital governance claims but also highlight the urgent need for cyber vigilance and stronger administrative filters. (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
