
Victory over Iran could expand peace accords: Netanyahu
"This victory gives us a chance to greatly expand our peace deals," Netanyahu said in a statement. "We are working on this with energy and excitement. Along with freeing hostages and defeating Hamas, this is a window of opportunity that we cannot let pass. We must act quickly—every day counts."
Earlier that day, the Israeli newspaper Israel Hayom reported that Netanyahu and U.S. President Donald Trump had spoken on the phone and agreed to end the war in Gaza quickly, possibly within two weeks.
The report also said that as part of the deal, the Abraham Accords—peace agreements between Israel and Arab countries—could be expanded to include Saudi Arabia and Syria. In return, Israel would support the idea of a future Palestinian state, but only if the Palestinian Authority makes certain reforms.
Netanyahu's office did not comment on the Israel Hayom story, and the White House did not respond to questions.
The ceasefire between Israel and Iran, brokered by the U.S. and announced by Trump, has given hope to Palestinians that over 20 months of war in Gaza could finally end. The conflict has destroyed much of Gaza and forced most people from their homes. Many are suffering from hunger.
The war began on October 7, 2023, when the militant group Hamas attacked Israel and took hostages. About 50 hostages are still in Gaza, but only 20 are believed to be alive.
Some right-wing Israeli ministers, like Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, have called for Israel to take over Gaza permanently and rebuild Jewish settlements there—settlements that were removed in 2005. Netanyahu has rejected these ideas.
This week, Smotrich said that Netanyahu does not have the right to support the creation of a Palestinian state. He said, "If countries want peace for peace, they are welcome. But if they want a Palestinian state, they can forget it. It will never happen."
Netanyahu said that Iran's weakness now gives Israel a better chance to make new peace deals.
"We have broken the axis," Netanyahu told reporters then. "This is a huge change, and Israel's status is rising, not just in the Middle East but also in the world. This is a tectonic shift."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Canada News.Net
2 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Paramount pays Trump $16 million over Kamala Harris' CBS interview
NEW YORK CITY, New York: Paramount has agreed to pay US$16 million to settle a lawsuit brought by U.S. President Donald Trump over CBS's broadcast of an edited interview with Kamala Harris, marking one of the largest media settlements involving a sitting president. The deal, announced late on July 1, follows months of legal wrangling and arrives as Paramount seeks regulatory approval for its $8.4 billion merger with Skydance Media. The settlement resolves Trump's claim that CBS deceptively edited its "60 Minutes" interview with Harris—then a presidential candidate—to favour Democrats in the 2024 election. Trump filed the original $10-billion lawsuit in October and raised the damages sought to $20 billion in an amended complaint filed in February. Paramount said the $16 million would go toward Trump's future presidential library. "The settlement does not include a statement of apology or regret," the company noted. Shares of Paramount dropped 1.2% on Wednesday following the news. The Federal Communications Commission, which must approve the Skydance merger, responded critically. FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez called the settlement a "desperate" move that casts "a long shadow over the integrity of the transaction" and sets a "dangerous precedent for the First Amendment." CBS had aired two versions of the Harris interview, which appeared to show her giving conflicting answers about the Israel-Hamas conflict. The network said the edits were routine for televised interviews and maintained the suit was "completely without merit," requesting its dismissal. On the campaign trail and as president, Trump has threatened to revoke CBS's broadcast licenses, though the FCC grants licenses to individual stations, not networks. The case entered mediation in April and comes amid growing scrutiny over media-industry concessions to Trump. Senator Ron Wyden called the settlement "a bribe for merger approval," while Senator Bernie Sanders warned it would embolden Trump's attacks on the press. Senator Elizabeth Warren announced plans to propose limits on donations to sitting presidents' libraries. Senator Ed Markey said the settlement "reeks of political interference." Trump's legal team welcomed the outcome. "With this record settlement, President Donald J. Trump delivers another win for the American people," a spokesperson said. Paramount also agreed that transcripts of future "60 Minutes" interviews with U.S. presidential candidates would be released after airing, with redactions as needed for legal or national security reasons. A spokesperson for Paramount Chair Shari Redstone was unavailable for comment. At the annual shareholder meeting, Co-CEO George Cheeks explained the decision: settling would avoid "unpredictable" legal costs and the risk of "significant financial as well as reputational damage." Trump argued CBS's editing violated Texas's Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, a novel legal route to target press coverage without needing to prove actual malice. The move adds to a growing list of media settlements with Trump. In December, ABC News agreed to pay $15 million to his presidential library and issued an apology for an inaccurate on-air comment. In January, Meta Platforms, parent of Facebook and Instagram, settled a suit over Trump's account suspensions by paying around $25 million. Trump has vowed to continue pursuing lawsuits against media outlets. In one ongoing case, he refiled a lawsuit against the Des Moines Register in Iowa state court after dropping a federal version. The suit alleges misleading polling data and seeks to bar the paper from publishing "deceptive" election-related polls. The Register has stood by its reporting and said the suit is without merit.


Winnipeg Free Press
7 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Congregation flees after arsonist sets fire to an Australian synagogue door
MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — An arsonist set fire to the door of a Melbourne synagogue and forced the congregation to flee on Friday, seven months after criminals destroyed a synagogue in the same Australian city with an accelerant-fueled blaze that left a worshipper injured. A man doused the double front doors of the downtown East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation and set it alight around 8 p.m., a police statement said on Saturday. Around 20 worshippers sharing a meal to mark the Shabbat Jewish day of rest evacuated through a rear door and no one was injured, police said. Fire fighters extinguished the blaze which was contained to the front entrance, police. Antisemitic attacks roil Australia since 2023 A wave of antisemitic attacks has roiled Australia since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas assault on Israel triggered the war in Gaza. Jewish and Muslim organizations and hate researchers have recorded drastic spikes in hate-fueled incidents on both groups. The Australian government last year appointed special envoys to combat antisemitism and Islamophobia in the community. Last December, two masked men struck the Adass Israel Synagogue in Melbourne's southeast. They caused extensive damage by spreading a liquid accelerant with brooms throughout the building before igniting it. A worshipper sustained minor burns. No charges have been laid for that attack, which Prime Minister Anthony Albanese blamed on antisemitism. The Victorian Joint Counter-Terrorism Team, which includes Victoria state police, federal police and Australia's main domestic spy agency, said the fire was likely a politically-motivated attack. Police say synagogue attack is a serious crime Acting Victoria Police Commander Zorka Dunstan described the latest synagogue fire as a serious crime. Police released a CCTV image of a suspect. 'I'd like to make it very clear that we do recognize that these crimes are disgusting and abhorrent. But at this stage, we are not declaring this a terrorist incident,' Dunstan told reporters. 'In the course of our investigation, we will examine the intent and the ideology of the persons involved, or person, to determine if this is in fact terrorism. At the moment, we are categorizing it as a serious criminal incident and responding accordingly,' she added. A terrorism declaration opens the investigation to more resourcing and can result in charges that carry longer prison sentences. The synagogue's president, Danny Segal, called for the wider Australian community to stand with his congregation. 'We're here to be in peace, you know, we're here for everybody to live together and we've got a fresh start in Australia, such a beautiful country, and what they're doing is just not fair and not right, and as Australians, we should stand up and everybody should stand up,' Segal told reporters. Protesters harass diners in Israeli-owned restaurant Also in downtown Melbourne on Friday night, around 20 masked protesters harassed diners in an Israeli-owned restaurant. A Miznon restaurant window was broken. A 28-year-old woman was arrested for hindering police. Anti-Defamation Commission chair Dvir Abramovich, a leading opponent of antisemitism in Australia, said diners were terrorized as the group chanted 'Death to the IDF,' referring to the Israel Defense Forces. 'Melbourne, for one night, stopped being a safe place for Jews,' Abramovich said. Melbourne Lord Mayor Nicholas Reece condemned both the synagogue and restaurant incidents. 'These criminal acts against a Melbourne synagogue and an Israeli business are absolutely shocking,' Reece said. 'All of us as a community need to stand up against it.' Victoria Premier Jacinta Allan said both incidents were designed to 'traumatize Jewish families.' 'Any attack on a place of worship is an act of hate, and any attack on a Jewish place of worship is an act of antisemitism,' she said in a statement.


Canada News.Net
11 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Israeli cabinet minister tells banks to ignore EU sanctions
Bezalel Smotrich has said financial institutions in the country should take measured risks in servicing settlers targeted by Brussels in 2024 Israeli banks should provide services to settlers whom the European Union has slapped with sanctions, despite any potential repercussions, the country's Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has insisted. He warned that those failing to comply could be made to pay out hefty compensations. Last July, the EU for the first time in its history imposed punitive measures on five Israeli settlers and three groups over "serious and systematic human rights abuses against Palestinians" in the occupied West Bank, which is considered part of Palestine under international law. Apart from an EU-wide entry ban and an asset freeze, the sanctions prohibit the "provision of funds or economic resources, directly or indirectly," to the affected Israeli nationals. In a post on X on Wednesday, the official, who is known for his far-right views, said that he had sent a letter to the banking supervisor, Dani Khachiashvili, in which he demanded an end to "the 'zero risk' policy on the part of banks, which leads to the abandonment of Israeli customers under the guise of compliance with foreign sanctions." Smotrich accused Israeli financial institutions of "small-mindedness" and unquestioning compliance with "unjust" EU sanctions. He argued that banks in fact "have a significant ability to act against" Brussels' punitive measures, by taking legal action and wielding their "global economic connections." The official threatened that if his call was not heeded, he would push for legislation that would force Israeli financial institutions to pay out sizable compensations to the affected individuals. The Israeli finance minister further wrote that he could also promote legislation that would require the Bank of Israel to "open and manage bank accounts for citizens on whom sanctions are imposed." Speaking to AFP last month, Swedish Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard said that Stockholm would "push for EU sanctions against individual Israeli ministers" since there was no "clear improvement for the civilians in Gaza." At around the same time, her Slovenian colleague, Tanja Fajon, announced that her country was "looking into the possibility of sanctions against Israel, alongside France and Ireland." Also in May, the UK and Canada, which are not part of the EU, along with France, issued a joint statement condemning the ongoing Israeli military campaign in Gaza. The document accused the Israeli government of denying "essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population" of the Palestinian enclave. London, Ottawa and Paris threatened to "take further concrete actions," including "targeted sanctions," should "egregious actions" on the part of Israel continue. The statement also demanded that Israel halt settlement activities in the occupied West Bank.