
‘Word secular was not…': Swami Avimukteshwaranand amid row over RSS leader's Constitution remark
The Shankaracharya said the word was not originally a part of the Indian Constitution but was added later. According to him, the term does not align with the fundamental nature of the Constitution, which is why it often becomes a topic of discussion.
'The word secular was not there in the Constitution originally, it was added later. That is why it does not align with the nature of the Indian Constitution, and this issue is repeatedly raised," Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati told news agency ANI.
According to him, 'dharma' means to think about right and wrong and to adopt the right and to reject the wrong. "To become secular means that we have nothing to do with right or wrong. This cannot happen in anyone's life. So this word is also not right," the Shankaracharya said.
The statement comes in the wake of a much-discussed comment by Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh second-in-command Dattatreya Hosabale advocating that the words "secular" and "socialist" in the Preamble of the Constitution be reviewed.
He said the words were added during the Emergency and were not part of the original text drafted by BR Ambedkar.
Congress leaders have slammed the Bharatiya Janata Party and the RSS over Dattatreya's comment while Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar and Union minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan have spoken in support of his demand.
CPI MP P Sandosh Kumar wrote to RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, questioning if the organisation 'truly accepts the Indian Constitution'.
In a letter addressed to the RSS Sarsanghchalak Bhagwat, the CPI MP said it is time the RSS stop inflaming these debates for the sake of polarisation. He also said the terms were not 'arbitrary insertions' but 'foundational ideals'.
The Communist Party of India leader said in a diverse country like India, secularism ensures unity in diversity, while socialism promises justice and dignity to each of our citizens.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
30 minutes ago
- Mint
UP eyes global investment: Yogi Adityanath govt plans roadshows in US, UK and Europe to lure firms away from China
The Uttar Pradesh government is set to hold roadshows and business roundtables across the United States, the United Kingdom, and Europe to woo investors. The primary objective is to attract companies seeking to diversify their supply chains away from China, according to PTI. The initiative of holding roadshows and business round-tables is a part of the 'Invest-UP' initiative, which aims to position the state as a robust and reliable alternative for international investors, a press statement said on Friday. The state government, led by Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, is actively trying to promote its capabilities to offer a stable and attractive environment for businesses seeking to expand or relocate their manufacturing and operational bases beyond China, PTI reported. Meetings of investment talks are scheduled to be held in prominent global financial and business hubs, which includes New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, London, Paris, Frankfurt, Milan, Amsterdam, and Birmingham. These events are being organised in collaboration with Indian embassies and industry bodies, the statement said. In the US, the Uttar Pradesh delegation plans to hold crucial dialogues with prominent technology companies such as Google, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure and Oracle among others, it said. The outreach shows that the state intends to attract investments across a wide range of industries, including high-tech and digital services, the news agency reported. Chief Secretary Manoj Kumar Singh also emphasised that Uttar Pradesh's approach goes beyond inviting investments. 'It is not just inviting investment, but building sustainable, employment-driven value chains,' he said. He additionally highlighted the state's attractive policy framework, which includes 33-plus sector-specific policies, streamlined approval processes, and digital single-window system Nivesh Mitra, all designed to accelerate investor confidence and facilitate ease of doing business, the news agency reported.


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Modi ji, where are you?': Kharge slams PM's foreign policy, says 'India surrounded by enemies on all corners'
NEW DELHI: Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Friday criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP-led NDA government, alleging that India's foreign policy under PM Modi is flawed and has led to deteriorating ties with neighbouring countries. Speaking at the 'Samajika Nyaya Samara Bheri' event in Hyderabad, Kharge said, 'His foreign policy is not good, because of which we have enemies from all corners. On one side, there is China and on the other, Pakistan. Today, Nepal is also distancing itself from us. Everybody is moving away from us.' The Congress chief said that despite visiting 42 countries, PM Modi has not visited Manipur, where ethnic violence has led to loss of life. 'He has travelled to 42 countries in the world, but so far he has not visited Manipur, where people are dying,' Kharge said. He accused PM Modi of neglecting domestic issues in favour of international appearances. 'Modi ji, where are you? He is visiting eight countries, but he's not looking towards his country's people. He is not looking at the farmers of this country,' he added. Kharge also alleged that the government under PM Modi has harmed the Indian economy over the last 11 years and undermined the Constitution. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo 'He has ruined the country's economy and destroyed the Constitution,' he said. He further mocked the prime minister, saying, 'If someone gives Modi a cap or a medal he will wear it and go around,' urging that the focus should instead be on the welfare of farmers and the common people. Additionally, in a sharp attack on the RSS and BJP, Kharge referred to recent comments attributed to an RSS functionary suggesting the removal of the words 'secular' and 'socialist' from the Constitution. 'I challenge them – be it him, their BJP, PM Modi or Amit Shah – no one can remove those words,' Kharge said. During his address in Hindi, he said: 'I heard that an RSS leader from Shimoga said that the words 'secular' and 'socialist' should be removed from the Constitution. I challenge all of them – BJP, PM Modi, Amit Shah – no one can do it.' Reading from the BJP's own organisational constitution, Kharge pointed out that the party's own document states allegiance to the principles of socialism, secularism and democracy. 'If you hate secularism and socialism so much, why have you written it in your party's Constitution?' he asked. 'Your own party constitution says the BJP shall bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India and to the principles of socialism, secularism and democracy. Then why are you trying to remove these values now?' Kharge also cited past Indo-Pak conflicts while criticising the current government's posture. He said: 'You talk big about Pakistan. We helped them in the past. Then why did you back away? You say you ended the war between India and Pakistan. You say you calmed things down. Then why are you silent now, Prime Minister? Speak up. There is no need for Trump in India. We are strong, and we are ready to fight – just as Indira Gandhi once split Pakistan and created Bangladesh.' He urged PM Modi to stop misleading the people and to act decisively if the country's interests are at stake. 'If you had to act, you were in power, you could have. Don't mislead the country. Don't confuse the people,' he said.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
HC completes hearing, reserves verdict in school merger case
LUCKNOW The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court on Friday reserved its judgement in the merger of schools case after a detailed hearing for two days, in which the petitioner sought stay on the government order for merger of primary schools and the state government justified its decision. Fifty-one students from Sitapur – 50 from a primary school and one from the upper primary section – approached the high court challenging the June 16 order of the state government for the merger of primary schools across UP. They moved the court through their guardian. (File Photo) A single-judge bench of Justice Pankaj Bhatia reserved the order on Friday evening after the state government presented its viewpoint, justifying the merger of schools. Hearing in the case began on Thursday. Additional advocate general (AAG) Anuj Kudesia and chief standing counsel (CSC) Shailendra Kumar Singh presented the state government's view in court. The government counsel apprised the court about such primary schools that have zero students. They also informed the court about primary schools where the strength of students was less than 15. Defending the merger of primary schools, the government counsel pointed out that the merger of schools was in the larger interest of students. They pointed out that there will be more social activity and scope for development for a student who is relocated from a school having a few students to a school having 300 students. Senior advocate LP Mishra and advocate Gaurav Melhotra represented the petitioners in court. Mishra argued that the state government's June 16 order for the merger of primary schools violates Article 21A of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to free and compulsory education for children between the ages of 6 and 14 years and a school within one km for a village having a population of 300. 'It makes primary education a fundamental right and makes the state duty-bound to provide free and compulsory education to all eligible children, and this right cannot be waived,' he added. 'The government is duty-bound to create resources for schools within these parameters,' Mishra argued in court. Fifty-one students from Sitapur – 50 from a primary school and one from the upper primary section – approached the high court challenging the June 16 order of the state government for the merger of primary schools across UP. They moved the court through their guardian. They opposed the merger, stating that it will cause difficulties for children who will have to travel farther to reach their new schools, affecting their right to free and compulsory education.