logo
BAU-Sabour gets NAAC Grade ‘A' certification

BAU-Sabour gets NAAC Grade ‘A' certification

Time of India07-06-2025

Bhagalpur: Bihar Agricultural University (BAU), Sabour, Bhagalpur, has been awarded with NAAC Grade 'A' certification with a remarkable score of 3.08 out of 4 CGPA points, making it a nationally acclaimed institution of the state.
BAU vice chancellor DR Singh said the NAAC Grade 'A' has put the university among the top-ranking universities of the country in the field of agriculture imparting education on projects focusing on sustainable agriculture, climate-resilient crops, precision farming, biotechnology and soil health etc.
"The NAAC peer team visited the university between May 28 to May 30 for assessment in which all major academic, administrative, infrastructural, research and education extension aspects were thoroughly evaluated," the VC said.
Referring to the grading, the VC further said it is a prestigious recognition awarded to higher educational institutions, indicating that it has achieved a high-level of standards in various aspects, including teaching, research, infrastructure, governance and student outcomes, within in a short span of 15 years.
"The grading also underlines the university's alignment with the vision of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 in the effective implementation across all parameters of higher education," Singh said, adding, "the university strategically restructured its course curriculum to make it multi-disciplinary, skill-oriented and innovation-driven academic course".
The NAAC also lauded the BAU's consistent progress in diversifying student enrolments by reaching out for under-represented communities from rural and marginalized backgrounds, student satisfaction survey (recorded with an impressive 92.5% satisfaction based on OTP-verified feedback on teaching quality, mentorship and academic support), added the VC.
Singh said the substantial steps for developing digital infrastructure, enabling smart classrooms, videoconferencing facilities, e-learning modules, digital libraries, and advanced laboratory systems through Learning Management System (LMS) are in use at the university. "These facilities allow seamless interaction between students and teachers, enhances blended learning and supports the digital assessment," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BAU to conduct survey of farm mechanisation
BAU to conduct survey of farm mechanisation

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

BAU to conduct survey of farm mechanisation

1 2 Ranchi: Birsa Agriculture University's (BAU) agriculture department would conduct a survey of farm mechanization in the state with the aim to assess extent machine usage in agriculture and scope for improvement, stated the university's annual report. The report stated that the survey of present status of mechanization and other related parameters would be conducted in randomly selected 70 villages in 70 blocks of seven districts namely Dumka, Giridih, Garwah, Ranchi, Palamu, Khunti and Godda. BAU stated that the exercise would be carried out in the backdrop of slow rate of farm mechanization in the state where a vast majority of farmers are using traditional sickles, country-made ploughs, mallet and khurpi in agriculture. For instance, while 26 percent of paddy tillage is through mechanization, machine usage in harvesting of the crop is very low. Dean and head of department BAU agriculture engineering college Dr D K Rusia said, "The programme will be carried out under the auspices of All India Co-ordinated Scheme on Farm Implements and Machinery (AICSFIM) Bhopal. The report would be submitted to AICSFIM. The state govt would also be informed about districts lagging behind and those where mechanization could be promoted faster."

CBSE board exams twice a year: How to make the most of the two chances you get
CBSE board exams twice a year: How to make the most of the two chances you get

Time of India

time14 hours ago

  • Time of India

CBSE board exams twice a year: How to make the most of the two chances you get

In a significant move aligned with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, the Central Board of Secondary Education ( CBSE ) has announced that students appearing for Class 10 board examinations will now have two opportunities in an academic year to take their final exams. Starting in 2025, this twice-a-year model aims to reduce exam-related stress and allow students a second chance to improve their scores without penalty. This change represents a major shift from the traditional 'one-shot' approach to a more flexible, student-centric system. But with this flexibility comes the need for smart planning, discipline, and strategy. Here's a comprehensive guide on how students can make the most of this opportunity and perform their best under the new system. Understanding the new format Under the revised model, CBSE will conduct two board exam sessions in a year, tentatively in March and July. Students can choose to appear in either one or both sessions. If a student appears in both, the better score out of the two will be considered final. This is not a supplementary or compartment system; both attempts are treated equally and are available to every student. This change brings CBSE in line with global practices, where students are often assessed more than once a year and given multiple chances to demonstrate their learning without being penalized for underperformance in one attempt. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy One, Get One Free, Up To 50% Discount, Expiring Soon Original Adidas Get Offer Undo Why this benefits students This new system is designed to ease the high-stakes pressure of board exams. Students no longer have to fear a single poor performance derailing their academic plans. They now have the freedom to try, reflect, and retry. This change allows students to: Improve scores in specific subjects Test their preparation early without fear Align their academic strategy with entrance exams like CUET, JEE, and NEET Develop a healthier relationship with learning and assessments For students who are unwell, anxious, or underprepared in the first session, this model provides a powerful safety net. Phase-wise preparation strategy To maximize this opportunity, students should break their academic year into two clear phases: Phase 1: Foundation and First Attempt (June to January) This phase should be focused on completing the syllabus thoroughly, understanding core concepts, and taking regular mock tests. Students should aim to take the first board exam attempt in March seriously, treating it as a primary shot at success. Phase 2: Revision and Second Attempt (February to June) If students are not satisfied with their first performance, they can use this second phase to revise key areas, work on weak subjects, and attempt the exam again in July with greater confidence and clarity. Deciding when and what to retake It's not necessary to reappear for all subjects in the second session. Students should be strategic and retake only those subjects where they feel they can significantly improve their score. For instance, if you're planning to pursue science or engineering, subjects like Physics and Mathematics become crucial and may be worth retaking if your initial scores are average. Students should analyze their first-session results carefully to determine which subjects will benefit most from a second attempt, and whether their overall percentage can be meaningfully boosted. Balancing board exams with entrance preparations For Class 12 students, this format adds flexibility but also demands smart scheduling. The first board exam attempt may overlap with preparations for national-level entrance tests like JEE, NEET, and CUET. Therefore, if students are satisfied with their first-session performance, they can shift focus entirely to entrance exams in the following months. Alternatively, if they plan to improve scores in the second session, time management will be key. Students may consider creating a blended study plan—one that combines CBSE revision with entrance exam strategies—especially for subjects that overlap like Physics, Chemistry, and Biology. Managing stress and expectations With the twice-a-year format, students are likely to feel less pressure to be 'perfect' on one specific day. However, it's essential to avoid over-relying on the second chance. The first attempt should still be approached with full commitment and preparation. Parents and teachers play an important role here. Instead of emphasizing score maximization alone, they should encourage consistency, concept clarity, and resilience. The focus must shift from just scoring to building long-term academic strength. The twice-a-year CBSE board exam model is not just a scheduling update—it's a paradigm shift in how student achievement is measured. With proper planning and awareness, students can use this flexibility to their advantage, without compromising on quality learning. The key lies in strategic preparation, timely decision-making, and maintaining mental balance. Instead of fearing exams, students can now embrace them as learning milestones, with not one but two chances to showcase their best selves. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.

DU's new tie-breaker for undergraduate admissions: Tripping on reform
DU's new tie-breaker for undergraduate admissions: Tripping on reform

Indian Express

time18 hours ago

  • Indian Express

DU's new tie-breaker for undergraduate admissions: Tripping on reform

When Delhi University (DU) adopted the Common University Entrance Test (CUET) for undergraduate admissions in 2022, it was seen as a long overdue step toward standardisation of a sprawling ecosystem. An improvement over the Central Universities Common Entrance Test introduced in 2010 for a handful of central universities, CUET promised to level the playing field by replacing the uneven Class XII cut-off system with a single, uniform test. It was an opportunity to move beyond the disparities of state boards, streamline admissions, and focus solely on merit. Though premised on fairness, some of the changes to the admission process this year — especially the addition of Class X scores as the penultimate tie-breaker, supplanting alphabetical order of candidates — tread a delicate line. In a country where access to higher education remains intensely competitive and deeply consequential, they risk reintroducing anxieties that CUET was designed to eliminate. With 71,624 seats across 79 undergraduate programmes in 69 colleges up for applications this academic year, the new tie-breaker has been designed to offer, as DU's dean of admissions has put it, a 'more rational and merit-based approach' to break CUET deadlocks. Class X performance is a reliable indicator of consistency, arguably less vulnerable to coaching-driven score inflation. It also reduces the arbitrariness of alphabetical tie-breakers, which, though neutral, fail to reward academic effort. However, it risks undermining CUET's foundational principle, rooted in the spirit of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which advocates for equity and inclusivity in higher education. In decoupling undergraduate admission from board variability, CUET sought to ensure that scores alone did not dictate a student's future. Reintroducing board scores from Class X opens up old vulnerabilities. State board curricula and grading systems continue to vary widely in difficulty and leniency. As a result, students from better-resourced boards or urban backgrounds may gain an unintended advantage. Moreover, NEP 2020 encourages holistic assessments over rigid reliance on any single score. Shifting the focus to grades — especially one from years prior — might be counterproductive for students who have matured academically in the years since or had faced personal setbacks at that stage. Instead of tying the admission process up with three separate academic records — CUET, Class XII, and Class X — a possible alternative could have been the option of more granular tie-breakers within CUET itself; its scores could have been extended to more decimal places or to domain-specific section scores. As India reimagines its higher education architecture, policymakers must be careful that efforts to fix procedural gaps do not reignite old apprehensions or come at the cost of inclusivity.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store