Peterborough farmer 'devastated' as government scheme closes
The closure of the scheme has been described by the National Farmers' Union as "a shattering blow".The SFI was launched in 2022 and follows the post-Brexit payment scheme that replaced EU subsidies.Under the scheme, farmers in England are paid to manage land to protect soil, restore hedgerows and boost nature recovery. For farmers already on the scheme, nothing changes, and the government said those who had managed to submit an application before the window closed would be offered an agreement.However, if an application was started and not submitted, it will not be fulfilled.Mr Martin, whose family have farmed near Peterborough for four generations, said the news had been delivered without warning. He said: "At 6pm last night [Tuesday], we were told with no warning whatsoever the application window had just closed, so those farmers who were preparing their applications who were doing all the groundwork... have been left with nothing but loss and a pretty hollow feeling, and a massive gap in their budget as well."While some farmers were already on the scheme, he said those still reluctant to be a part of sustainable farming had been "caught short" and should be encouraged into this way of working. Coming after the government's changes to inheritance tax for farmers, he said it was "adding insult to injury".
Farming minister Daniel Zeichner, Labour MP for Cambridge, said with 37,000 live SFI agreements, the scheme was "now fully subscribed". Speaking in Parliament, he said: "This is an opportunity to improve how we do that under a fair and just farming transition, which supports farms to be profitable businesses in their own right... SFI can and must work better for all farms and for nature." Mr Zeichner said the revised scheme would "align" with the government's land use framework and contribute to the priorities of food, farming and nature. He said the underlying problem facing the farming industry was that farmers did not make enough money and the decision was about "investing in long-term stability".
Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
Big Tech's acquihire deals face regulatory scrutiny, outgoing EU antitrust official says
BRUSSELS, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Big Tech deals to acquire skills rather than major companies may soon come under the regulatory scrutiny they previously avoided, the outgoing head of the European Commission's antitrust unit said. Acquihires, in which Big Tech hires start-ups' founders and senior managers rather than acquire the companies, have been viewed by antitrust regulators as an attempt to evade merger rules. "It is important to preserve effective competition," Olivier Guersent, the director general at the competition unit, told Reuters in an interview earlier this week and ahead of his retirement on Thursday after a 33-year career tackling antitrust, cartels and financial services. He said the Commission was pushing national agencies with call-in powers to act. Such powers, enjoyed by Denmark, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Sweden, Slovenia, Lithuania and Latvia, allow them to refer below-EU threshold mergers to the EU enforcer. "So we need to be patient and have enough member states that have call-in provisions and use them. But we are working on it. Within the ECN, we are actively encouraging it to do so," Guersent said. The European Competition Network is a forum for cooperation between the Commission and national regulators. Guersent said acquihires can be considered a merger as staff are part of a company's assets. Instances include Microsoft's (MSFT.O), opens new tab $650 million deal to hire most of AI start-up Inflection's staff, including its co-founders and Google's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab poaching of employees from chatbot startup both last year. Last month Google hired staff members from AI code generation startup Windsurf. Amazon hired AI firm Adept's co-founders and some of its team in June last year, while Meta poached data-labelling startup Scale AI's CEO in June after taking a multi-billion dollar stake. Guersent, who spearheaded the EU's landmark Digital Markets Act that aims to curb Big Tech's power, said the results were encouraging. "It made a difference in fields in which decades of antitrust enforcement have not managed to make a difference," he said. "Did it change everything as much as we would have liked? Probably not. So that's why success is always relative," he said, contrasting Apple's changes to its closed ecosystem with Meta's pushback.
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
British steelmakers boosted by change to EU tariffs
The EU has agreed to more than double the UK's tariff-free quota for certain steel products in a move the Government described as a 'direct win' from Sir Keir Starmer's deal with the bloc earlier this year. At May's UK-EU summit, Sir Keir and European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen agreed to restore Britain's steel quotas to historic levels after they were slashed in March. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the announcement was 'yet another positive step forward for the UK steel sector' that would give producers 'certainty'. The agreement comes at a difficult time for the industry, which continues to face 25% tariffs on exports to the US. An agreement with President Donald Trump to effectively reduce those tariffs to zero is yet to come into effect, but Britain has been protected from the 50% tariff Mr Trump imposed on steel from the rest of the world last month. UK Steel director general Gareth Stace said Friday's change was 'excellent news' for the sector that had been 'plagued by problems' in exporting steel to the EU. He added: 'The quota will restore historic trade flows and is good news for both UK steelmakers and their EU customers.' The decision means the UK can export 27,000 tonnes of 'category 17' steel – which includes angles and sections of steel – to the EU each quarter without paying tariffs. The figure had been cut to 10,000 tonnes after the EU introduced a cap intended to prevent a single exporter dominating the market. In total, the UK exports around 2.4 million tonnes of steel to the EU, worth nearly £3 billion and accounting for 75% of British steel exports. Ministers expect the change to help protect jobs in the industry, which has been a priority for the Labour Government since coming to power. In April, the Government used an almost unprecedented weekend recall of Parliament to take control of British Steel to prevent the shutdown of its blast furnaces and maintain the UK's primary steel-making capacity. British Steel's interim chief operating officer Lisa Coulson said: 'The removal of EU tariffs on British-made steel is a significant boost to our business. 'The EU is an important market to us, particularly for the products our highly skilled colleagues manufacture in Scunthorpe, Teesside, and Skinningrove.' But Conservative shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith described the quota as 'tiny' and 'embarrassing from a Government which has nothing to show on removing the US tariffs on steel which the PM claimed to have delivered back in May'. He added: 'It's a paltry return for giving up 12 years of fishing rights and tying the energy costs of every business to a higher cost EU emissions regime over which the UK will have no say. 'When Labour nationalised British Steel we said they had no plan. This government by press release shows we were right.'
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
What John Swinney gets right about Scottish independence
He came, he saw, he putted. Donald Trump's visit to Scotland was the expected whirlwind – a golfing trip during which he fitted in some diplomacy (if that's the right word with this president) with the leaders of the EU, the UK and Scotland. Trump clearly enjoyed himself, to the extent that he suggested he could become first minister once he's done with the US and the rest of the world. That joke raised quite the entertaining vision, as did his description of Scotland as a land of 'no crime, no muggings. You don't have people being hit over the head when they are not looking with a baseball bat, they're not pushed into a subway.' Not at the five-star Turnberry resort, anyway. John Swinney had two chances to beard Trump, at a dinner and then at a head-to-head, and spoke to him about whisky tariffs and the ongoing crisis in Gaza. For all Trump's unpopularity, meeting the leader of the free world is the kind of moment that elevates any first minister. The far left carps, as the far left does, but Swinney was right to take his opportunity. He behaved like a grown up. That, so far, has been the mark of Swinney's time in office. These things are relative, but he has been a moderating force, dragging his party back to the centre ground after the leftist administrations of Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf. Much of his attention is on fixing the NHS – he has a plan, and we will see whether it bears fruit (it had better). There is also a focus on growing the economy. To many, these are obvious priorities for government activity, but it has not always been like that in Scotland. There is a limit to how long any SNP leader can get away with talking about anything other than independence, of course, and the First Minister is as committed to his party's raison d'etre as the most passionate activist. It is his life's work, and even his moderation is merely a means of achieving that goal. Whatever an SNP government does, it is always based on what it thinks will best advance the cause of breaking up the UK. True to form, Swinney has now unveiled the latest strategy for getting to indy. There have been so many of these in recent years that voters are understandably confused about what the offer is. A de facto referendum, 60 per cent backing for separation in the polls over a sustained period, a majority of Scottish seats for the SNP at Westminster – each has been proposed as a route since the turn of the decade. None has lasted. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Swinney has, in effect, returned to 2011. That was when Alex Salmond won a surprise overall majority at Holyrood, providing the legitimacy and momentum that led David Cameron to accede to the 2014 referendum. The SNP is going back to the future. The First Minister said that, once again, securing a majority in Edinburgh is the way to a second referendum. There are 129 seats at Holyrood, meaning the party would have to win 65 of them. The alleged transformation of Scotland that would come with independence 'only happens if we have that referendum and we only get that referendum if a majority of SNP MSPs are elected next May,' Swinney said. He insists independence will be at the heart of his party's election campaign, but it's hard to see his strategy as anything other than kicking the can down the road. That's certainly how the hardliners are viewing it, lining up to criticize the FM's approach as weak and defeatist. Alex Neil, a former SNP health secretary and a critic of the administration, said it was 'more about trying to save the SNP's bacon'. This is probably true, but that does not mean it lacks sense. Swinney has an election to win, which would take the Nats into their third consecutive decade of governance, and he will not do so with alarming promises of constitutional upheaval whatever the outcome. Sturgeon tried that, and it helped do for her. Voters – or most of them – are not looking at next May as a chance to refight the independence battles. They are worried about the cost of living, the state of the health service, jobs, transport and other policy areas that impact their day to day lives. They are nervous about the international climate, and are seeking security. They are fed up with politicians of all stripes. They are exhausted by the indy permawar, and would appreciate a break from all politics having to be squeezed through that funnel. Swinney's mature approach is to understand this, and to attempt to meet the electorate on its preferred terrain. A wise leader knows which fights to pick, and when. This is not the moment for William Wallace and saltire face-paint and screams of 'freedom'. It is not the time for 'one last push'. The SNP will not win 65 seats next May. It will be an unprecedentedly divided parliament, with Reform joining its ranks. There will be a minority administration, which will be formed by either the Nats or Labour. Swinney's independence plan is really an attempt to draw as much of the separatist support to the SNP, away from the Greens and Alba, so maximizing his party's performance. For the independence movement, if its members would only accept it, this is a time to regroup, rethink, and play a longer game. The First Minister, at least, seems to see this clearly. [See more: Maga zealots want to redraft the Civil Rights Act] Related
