
Nothing CMF Buds 2 review
A couple of weeks back we took a look at the CMF Buds 2 Plus, the premium model in Nothing's new budget lineup of audio products. Today, we are reviewing the Buds 2, which is the middle model in the Buds 2 series.
The Buds 2 come in at $59/₤39 or just INR 2,699. For the price, you get most of the features of the Plus model but with some cutbacks across the board. You get a slightly smaller driver, slightly lower rated ANC, a couple of hours less battery life, and no LDAC. In this review, we will be exploring if it's worth saving some money and getting this model or just forking over the difference for the Plus model. Design
The design of the CMF Buds 2 is nearly identical to that of the Buds 2 Plus. Both have identical dimensions for their cases but the finish on the Buds 2 case is a bit more plasticky compared to the soft touch plastic on the Buds 2 Plus case.
The Buds 2 also get a clear plastic rotating dial on the lid compared to the aluminum dial found on the Plus. However, the rotation is once again purely ornamental unless you choose to use it as a fidget spinner.
The earbuds are functionally identical in design and dimensions. This means they are still quite small and light with a comfortable fit but also that they come with the same cheap-feeling ear tips from the Plus model.
The lower price of the Buds 2 makes this a bit less egregious but the identically priced OnePlus Nord Buds 3 Pro have much nicer tips. Not only do these tips not feel nice but also don't provide a proper fit. The ear tips just slide in and out of your ears with little to no friction and you just don't get a satisfying seal with them. Software
The CMF Buds 2 work with the same Nothing X app as the Buds 2 Plus and other Nothing earbuds. Most of the features are identical between the two Buds 2 models so I'll just focus on the differences here.
There are only three changes here compared to everything described in the Buds 2 Plus review. The Buds 2 feature Dirac Opteo, which is the default EQ preset for these earbuds. According to Nothing's support page, Opteo "employs advanced measurement-based correction technology to eliminate any unintended resonances or sound colourations, maximising the acoustic performance of the Buds". A request for additional details on the inner workings of the feature was not met at the time of writing.
Nothing X app
The Buds 2 also lack support for the Personal Sound feature found on the Plus model, which plays a series of tones to let you customize the sound to your hearing. I already stated my concerns with this feature in the Plus review and its absence here isn't a big loss.
Audio settings
The final difference is the lack of LDAC, which means there is no option in the Nothing X app to switch between AAC and LDAC. Aside from that, the software experience is identical on both, for better and for worse. Performance
Audio quality
The Buds 2 feature an 11mm PMI (polymethacrylimide) driver compared to the 12mm LCP driver found on the Plus model. As mentioned previously, there is no LDAC and thus no Hi-Res Audio support here. Instead, you get Dirac-tuned audio, which can be customized using the EQ.
The default audio tuning isn't a million miles apart on the two models but there are some notable differences here with an unexpected conclusion.
The Buds 2 sound is a bit warmer and bassier than the Buds 2 Plus sound. There is more mid-bass heft here on top of the already potent low-end on the Plus. On the other end, the Buds 2 lack some of the high-end sparkle of the Buds 2 Plus model so the sound isn't as bright overall.
The major difference was in the mid-range. The Buds 2 have a surprisingly full-bodied mid-range, which makes vocals sound bolder and better balanced in the mix. In comparison, the mids on the Buds 2 Plus sound quieter with a worse timbre.
The overall sound of the Buds 2 is still a bit too bass-forward and that can get fatiguing on some tracks with a strong bass line. It's also not the most flexible sound if you like to listen to a lot of different genres. But most people will be using them to listen to popular genres like pop and for that, they work perfectly fine. In fact, I do prefer the overall tuning of the Buds 2 over the Buds 2 Plus for music.
Speaking of tuning, the Buds 2 offer multiple EQ options aside from the default Dirac Opteo mode. However, switching to other presets causes an audible break in sound and you hear it again when you go back to the Opteo preset. The only exception to this is the custom preset.
It's likely that the default Opteo and custom preset use different audio processing than the rest of the presets. Rather, it seems the other presets don't use much processing at all. Compared to the fuller and more spacious-sounding Opteo preset, the other EQ presets sound more congested with a smaller soundstage. This was not the case with the Plus model, where all presets got the same treatment.
This means that if you use other presets, even if you prefer their tuning, you don't quite get the same experience as the Opteo preset. More annoying is the half-second silence every time you switch back and forth between the Opteo/custom preset and the other presets, which is accompanied by a sharp momentary rise in volume before the sound settles back down.
The good thing is that the custom preset is based on the Opteo preset's processing, so you can customize the sound while still getting the full processing available for the Opteo preset. The bad thing is that Nothing's weird circular 3-band EQ is as terrible as it has always been.
Microphone
Like the Plus model, the Buds 2 have good microphone performance. Voices sound clear and while there is some modulation as the sound gets quieter now and then it's not very noticeable or distracting.
Noise cancellation
The Buds 2 have decent noise cancellation performance. You get good suppression in the low frequencies but some high-frequency sound seeps in, thanks to the cheap ear tips that create an imperfect seal. Still, for most use cases on things like public transport, the ANC performance is good enough.
Unfortunately, the transparency performance wasn't great. The sound is natural but quiet and at times you can't even tell if the mode is enabled or not. This means if you have anything playing then it's just going to drown out the ambient sound coming in through the speakers, defeating the purpose of the mode. Battery Life
The Buds 2 have a promised battery life of 13.5 hours during continuous playback with ANC disabled. In my testing, I got 13 hours and 17 minutes of usage, which is very impressive.
Nothing also claims 4 hours of playback after a 10-minute charge and I managed to get 4 hours and 25 minutes, which is also impressive. Conclusion
The Buds 2 are very close to the Buds 2 Plus that we reviewed earlier and I would urge you to read that review as it goes into a lot more detail.
I was expecting the conclusion to the Buds 2 to be to just get the Plus model considering how small the price difference is. However, it ended up being the other way around and I no longer see much point in picking up the Plus model over this.
Buds 2 inherit much of the strengths of the Plus model, including comfort, battery life, microphone performance, and respectable ANC for the price. Both also have clean-looking software and hardware design. However, the Buds 2 are just that little bit better tuned, which made them more enjoyable to listen to and proves yet again that having better codecs doesn't automatically make something sound better.
In the end, the CMF Buds 2 come out on top and are a strong contender for the best wireless earbuds in this price range.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


GSM Arena
3 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Ai+ will launch its smartphones on July 8
How easily people put privacy and Google in the same sentence? I wish I could meet one such person myself and ask him what he's smoking, must be something grade A. Anonymous, 9 hours ago From the name to the marketing about privacy, it's a scam. How dare you! The party would never lie to you! Blasphemy! ...or whatever the equivalence is in agnosticism. Soon: chatGpt launched it's first Virtual smartphone with chatGPT at the helm. After that, it contracted Gemini 3D printers to push out 100.000 units, that sold in a matter of seconds. Deep seek seeing the success of chat gpt took notes and launched himself 2 virtual smartphones, one with deep seek at the helm but with chatGPT like interface and the other with deep seek at the helm and 1000000 mAh virtual battery. Deep Seek is now struggling to push it's devices through the Gemini 3d printer. Gemini is reculent about Deep Seeks second device battery specifications, and said that the battery is a paper-specs only, while accusing deep seek of UI theft, puting manufacturing on hold. Deep seek needs now to seek other 3d printers with lesser strict rules or change it's ways. 3 months later: deep seek is now also on a 3d printer, happily puhing out it's paper specs devices. o be continued... From the name to the marketing about privacy, it's a scam. Ngl that price tag is pretty insane, in a good way [deleted post] It's got nothing to do with India. It's how sick the smartphone market, in general, has become. In India, nobody is focusing on building an Indian smartphone brand seriously, maybe Lava to some extent, and everyone is happy with what's available. I don't even want to argue which other countries contribute more to e-waste as that argument with someone like you is pointless. If you want to educate yourself about Indian innovation that is efficient, go read about our space programs. In my opinion, that's one area where we are doing a phenomenal job and they have also been quite underrated. Smartphones are not eco-friendly anywhere in the world. So I would request you to refrain from making such comments, unless it makes you feel good about yourself when you talk trash about something you have no knowledge of. These phones look great. They really spend a lot of money to disguise a generic oem phone into a good looking one. The Unisoc chipsets are worth the price. The only problem is the false marketing of this. AI? Focus on privacy? This is a glorified generic phone. [deleted post] Developed countries are the problem especially considering the plastic usageand production. In top 5 plastic producing companies there are two companies from US Dow inc and ExxonMobil. Moreover there are two waste landfills in the biggest landfills in the world list that are in US namely Apex Regional Landfill and Puento Hills California. That is after selling its a major plastic waste to Malaysia and other countries. Give me any fact refuting this. Anonymous, 20 hours ago That would be crazy good value What about this generic AI nonsense that offers absolutely nothing is good value? It's anything but that. Anonymous, 20 hours ago You know all those cautionary sci-fi tales about how mankin... more Not really, its just a primitive marketing. They are brainstorming how to sell a lot of crappy phones and decide to spin-off a small part of the company under one of the executives and assign it the name of the current marketing hit in the world. If not AI they would call it whatever is the currently popular branding. And they will use worst possible hardware at dirt cheap prices. Also at no risk for the fpunding brand. And if it succeds somehow, they will up the price fo square the circle. No worries, Unisoc will not overtake a single kitchen, let alone the world. Its just shameful that websites like gsmarwna will start spamming "exclusive infos" and "newest images" and force those upon us as if we are interested in this e-waste. And entire cycle will repeat itself again once AI goes out of fashion. DashF, 23 hours ago Why would you not expect low end specs in a phoen that cost... more HMD Crest at $70 would be much better value, and it's also cheaper than that, under different Indian retailers. I think the funniest thing about this brand is how they are incapable of Not Using AI footage in their ads. Do they not have like. Models of these phones? "Twitter, wikipedia.. Ai+?!" 🤣 .. who's gives names this things Yolobs, 23 hours ago And some peoples think indian cant create something new ! Is this even example to give as something new ? The whole article feels like they are targeting the company and telling it useless and not so valuable. Using words like "so-called" and so on. Let them enter into market first. People are becoming judge now-a-day without doing anything. aadam, 23 hours ago lol designed in india they said slaps infinix design the... more So, when chinese companies were making this type of design what were you doing, why didn't you spoke anything, never mind the cheap mindset of people rabbit OS 2.0 hahahaa That would be crazy good value Hamiyoo, 23 hours ago does AI really have to be in EVERYTHING You know all those cautionary sci-fi tales about how mankind becomes totally dependent on AI and it all goes horribly wrong? We're going down that same path.


GSM Arena
19 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Weekly poll: are you interested in the vivo X200 FE?
Tiny flagships with mighty cameras – are smartphone makers finally giving the people what they want? The vivo X200 FE is not as capable as the X200 Pro mini, but at least it will be widely available – which is more than can be said of the OnePlus 13T. The vivo X200 FE has a 6.31' display and while it's taller, wider and heavier than the Galaxy S25, it is smaller than the Pixel 9 Pro and about the same size as the iPhone 16 Pro (except the iPhone weighs 13g more). It's almost exactly the same size as the OnePlus 13s (the version of the 13T available only in India). The FE uses the Dimensity 9300+ instead of a 9400-series chip like the Pro mini. That's still plenty of performance. And it has a 6,500mAh battery that will make even larger phones jealous, especially with 90W charging. The camera system features a 50MP main (1/1.56', OIS), 50MP 3x/70mm periscope and an 8MP ultra-wide, complete with Zeiss optics and a 50MP selfie camera. That's better than the 10MP 3x/67mm tele module that Samsung offers (and will keep offering on the S26, according to rumors), though it comes up short when compared against the 48MP 5x cameras of the Pixel 9 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro. Samsung Galaxy S25 • Google Pixel 9 Pro • Apple iPhone 16 Pro • OnePlus 13S You have to keep in mind that the vivo X200 FE is a lot cheaper than the Galaxy, Pixel or iPhone and competitive with the OnePlus. Here's a price comparison for Europe and India, based on MSRP (discounted prices go up and down all the time). Model Memory Europe India vivo X200 FE 12/256GB ??? ??? Galaxy S25 12/256GB €810 ₹81,000 Pixel 9 Pro 16/256GB €1,200 ₹100,000 iPhone 16 Pro 256GB €1,330 ₹130,000 OnePlus 13s 12/256GB N/A ₹55,000 Are you interested in the vivo X200 FE?


GSM Arena
a day ago
- GSM Arena
Ai+ will launch its smartphones on July 8
We've been aware of the new Ai+ smartphone brand for some time now. It is part of NxtQuantum Shift Technologies, led by Realme India's former CEO, Madhav Sheth. All of its products, at least the ones being teased for now, are designed and built in India and will be exclusively sold through Flipkart. The fog of mystery is slowly lifting from the upcoming device lineup, and thanks to a few posts on the company's official Twitter, a Flipkart page and an insider leak, we now have the clearest picture yet. Apparently, the initial launch is scheduled to take place on July 8 in India, as previously expected. The Flipkart exclusive partnership hasn't changed, and neither has the suggested starting price of just INR 5000 ($59/€50). Allegedly, that price was supposed to be for the so-called AI+ Nova 2 5G, which was exclusively leaked to us a while back. Ai+ posts Why Nova 2? Well. We aren't quite sure, frankly, nor is the name set in stone as far as the earlier leak goes, but the new sources only mention an Ai+ Nova 5G moniker instead. Apparently, it will be based on the Unisoc T8200 (6nm) chipset, have a 50MP main camera, expandable storage and a 5,000 mAh battery. Then there is the Ai+ Pulse 4G. According to new sources, it will be a 4G device, featuring the Unisoc T7250 (12nm) chipset and the same 50MP main camera, expandable storage, and 5,000 mAh battery as its Nova 5G sibling. This makes us think that the 4G-only Pulse will probably be the cheapest of the bunch, starting at just INR 5000 and not the Nova 5G, but we'll have to wait and see. There have been two distinct back designs for AI+ phones shared so far, and we believe that the Pulse features a rectangular secondary camera, while the Nova has two round ones. ✅ Officially confirmed : Ai+ smartphones are launching on : 8th July in 🇮🇳Will be under 10K !Ai Nova 5G : likely : Unisoc T8200 (6nm)Ai Pulse 4G : likely : Unisoc T7250 (12nm)Both:• 50MP 📸 • Expandable storage These are designed & made in 🇮🇳 with focus on privacy! — Debayan Roy (Gadgetsdata) (@Gadgetsdata) June 28, 2025 As mentioned, AI+ phones will be designed and built in India. The brand also boasts that it will utilize a significant amount of reclaimed and recycled materials. The brand previously confirmed that AI+ smartphones will run NxtQuantum OS, which, it says, "has been uniquely designed by Indian engineers, offering a user-friendly interface optimized for the Indian market." Additionally, AI+ stated that the NxtQuantum OS, running on its smartphones, is "auditable, policy-aligned, and governed by Indian law." The brand also claimed that "all user data is stored within India on MeitY-approved servers hosted by Google Cloud." The brand is also expected to launch a smartwatch with built-in TWS earphones. An image of the smartwatch's retail box, which we exclusively shared earlier this month, revealed that it would be called "wearbuds Watch 3." We were told AI+ would unveil the smartwatch alongside its smartphones. Source 1 | Source 2 | Source 3