Family Sues Tesla Over Deadly Model S Crash
Tesla's suite of partially self-driving technologies is a double-edged sword. The tech is praised by many for taking the effort out of commuting, but on the other side, it has been harshly criticized for being implicated in a number of crashes. Some of these crashes have been fatal, and it has led to a new lawsuit being filed against Tesla for an accident that took place in September 2024, in which three people were killed when a 2024 Tesla Model S crashed. The incident took place on New Jersey's Garden State Parkway.
According to Reuters, the three people who were killed in the crash were David Dryerman (54), his wife Michele (54), and their daughter Brooke (17). Max Dryerman, the older brother of Brooke, is also a plaintiff but was not in the car at the time of the crash.
The Dryerman family were on the way back from a music festival on September 14 when the incident occurred. The electric sedan veered off the road before hitting a sign, a guardrail, and a concrete bridge support. According to the complaint, issues with the car's design resulted in it leaving its lane, and the automatic emergency braking system did not activate. All three family members were said to be buckled up at the time.
"Thousands of Tesla drivers have relied on Tesla's ADAS technology as though it were capable of safe, fully autonomous self-driving with minor software updates when in fact it is incapable of safely handling a variety of routine roadway scenarios without driver input," the complaint said via Pace Monitor(subscription required).
Furthermore, the crash was blamed on the car's "defective and unreasonably dangerous design."
Related: Hands-Free Showdown: BlueCruise, Super Cruise, Autopilot. Which One Owns the Highway?
Every new Tesla still functions most safely with an attentive driver behind the wheel, something the EV giant itself has emphasized. However, language used by Elon Musk and by the brand in marketing its tech have conflicted with this.
The complaint specifically mentioned a statement by Musk in 2016, when he said Autopilot was "probably better" than human drivers. Furthermore, the full suite of driver aids has been referred to as Full Self-Driving by Tesla for years, despite the cars not being capable of self-driving in every single scenario. Currently, you can still order what is called Full Self-Driving on a Model S, but Tesla has added the word "Supervised" to the suite's name. "Your car will be able to drive itself almost anywhere with minimal driver intervention," says a current statement on the brand's site.
Related: Tesla is responsible for more fatal accidents than any other carmaker - the reason why may surprise you
It's easy to see how this messaging can still be poorly interpreted by some drivers, and an analysis by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) indicated that there was a "critical safety gap between drivers' expectations of the L2 system's operating capabilities and the system's true capabilities."
This analysis specifically focused on Tesla models produced between the 2012 and 2023 model years. Following pressure from the NHTSA, Tesla agreed to recall over two million cars in late 2023 to include new safeguards for the Autopilot system. However, the car involved in this case is a 2024 model, so it's clear that there is still work to be done, assuming that the car's tech is the main cause of the unfortunate crash.
Both the plaintiffs' lawyers and Musk himself have not yet commented on the Dryerman case.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Deadline to claim part of $95M settlement over Siri snooping allegations nearing
(NEXSTAR) — If you ever thought Siri was snooping on you, you have only days to claim your portion of a settlement reached in a class action lawsuit against Apple. The settlement, totalling $95 million, arose from a lawsuit filed by a California resident who claimed Siri, Apple's virtual assistant, could be activated without consent and record conversations that were then provided to third parties. Plaintiffs said they saw ads for Olive Garden and Air Jordan shoes after talking about them with an Apple device nearby, according to Reuters. While Apple denied wrongdoing in the case, telling Nexstar that 'Siri has been engineered to protect user privacy from the beginning,' the company agreed to the $95 million settlement. The deadline to file a settlement claim is fast approaching, though. Here's what you need to know. You must have had a Siri-equipped Apple device between September 17, 2014, and December 31, 2024. During that time, your 'confidential communications' must have been 'obtained by Apple and/or were shared with third parties as a result of an unintended Siri activation.' You may have already received an email (which may have gone to your spam folder) or a postcard notifying you that you may qualify. Either correspondence will have an identification code and a confirmation code used to apply for a payout. If you meet the qualifications and have not received an email or postcard, you will be able to file a claim on the settlement's website. Claims can be submitted online, regardless of whether you received an email, a postcard, or neither. Codes provided via email or postcard can be entered into this online form. If you believe you qualify for the settlement and did not receive those codes, administrators say you can submit a new claim on the settlement website. There, you'll be asked to fill out a form with your contact information and details about your device (or devices) that may be impacted. For the latter, you'll need to include the email address linked to the device and proof of purchase, like a receipt or an invoice. Without proof of purchase, you'll need to provide the serial number and model for each device. While the settlement totals $95 million, you'll receive far less. You can submit claims for up to five Siri-enabled devices that you believe were unintentionally activated during a conversation you meant to be confidential or private. Qualifying Apple devices include: Settlement officials say you may receive up to $20 per qualifying Siri device, meaning at best, you could receive $100 (for five qualifying devices). The payout could increase or decrease based on the number of valid claims, however. Tens of millions of people may qualify for the settlement, Reuters previously reported. The deadline is currently July 2, 2025, according to the settlement website. That is also the final day to exclude yourself or object to the settlement. A final hearing is scheduled for August 1, 2025, which means the earliest approved payments could arrive is later this year. However, the timelines of other class action lawsuit settlements show it could take much longer. Two settlements reached in 2022 — one against Facebook, another against T-Mobile — didn't start dispersing payments until this year.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
A wild new EV battery can charge in just 18 seconds — plus, 4 more stories you need to know this week
This week, we're looking at Ford's wildest EV pony yet, more on the "Tesla effect," and a new wonder battery with a mind-blowing promise. Plus, we've got all the other stories you need to know about clean machines this week: The VarEVolt battery, a British invention, can reportedly fully charge in just 18 seconds. If that's true, it would completely change how we think about EV charge times. RML Group was just given regulatory permission to mass-produce the new battery for EVs. Right now, the company plans on producing just a few, but if it becomes available widely, it's the gas stations — not the charging stations — that will start seeming laughably slow. Ford's latest electric dream is an extreme race car called the Super Mustang Mach-E. Built to beat its sibling, last year's Ford F-150 Lightning SuperTruck, the Super Mustang that was designed for this year's Pikes Peak International Hill Climb has 1,421 horsepower and 6,900 pounds of downforce — double the weight of the race car itself. As if that wasn't enough, Ford has a second, even more hardcore version with 2,250 horsepower — more than even the record-setting Rimac Nevera hypercar. Porsche hasn't even officially announced production of an electric Cayenne — yet. To date, the German sports carmaker has given only sparse details about an electrified version of its largest SUV. Even still, a camouflaged version of one still managed to set a record for an SUV at the 2025 British Championship Hillclimb in Shelsley Walsh. The recent 16% drop in Tesla's U.S. sales is a huge part of why total EV sales have dropped for the first time in over a year. This is despite the $7,500 tax credit for some new models still being in play (although it will likely disappear for most models at the end of this year). Americans bought just under 98,000 EVs in April, 4.4% less than last year at the same time. As Fortune so aptly put it, "when Tesla sneezes, the entire U.S. electric vehicle market catches a cold." If you were going to purchase an EV, which of these factors would be most important to you? Cost Battery range Power and speed The way it looks Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. But the news isn't all bad, as Chevrolet's EV sales tripled, thanks largely to its Equinox crossover. In what the company called a "nationally representative" survey, BMW reported that a whopping 92% of Americans believe that continued innovation in electric vehicles is important and 30% of those believe that it's very important. Such open-minded optimism isn't just about EVs, either: The same study found that 58% of Americans are open to hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
The Verge
3 hours ago
- The Verge
‘We are the media now': why Tesla's robotaxis were dominated by Elon Musk superfans
Over the years, Tesla has built part of its reputation on hosting big, bold events to generate authentic hype for upcoming releases. The robotaxi launch in Austin, Texas, last week wasn't one of them. Coverage of the rollout was dominated by a close-knit cohort of Tesla influencers and Elon Musk superfans, many of whom are openly supportive of the CEO's vision. Journalists and tech bloggers who might have been more critical of the technology were not only excluded but also actively ridiculed and mocked by Tesla fans and some of their followers for attempting to ask basic questions about the service. In Austin and online, Tesla fans were taking a cue from Musk, who has spent years fomenting a culture of resentment toward critical media. One of the more prominent influencers, who goes by Zack on X, claimed he was approached multiple times by a Reuters journalist, whom he promptly ignored. That post, which has over 2,000 likes, received supportive responses from other users — one wrote that the publication and other legacy media outlets 'can go F themselves.' Another said they would unfollow any account that simply responded to members of the media. 'The best response would [be] to add a precondition and ask them to go on camera blanket apologising for all the lies and smears against Elon and Tesla first,' the account Tesla insights wrote. 'That will shut them up, and make them think!' That general sentiment reverberated across the parts of X and YouTube most actively covering the launch. Kim Java, a Tesla influencer with 258,000 YouTube subscribers, posted a comment saying she had been contacted by several major media outlets to speak about her experience but turned them down so she could 'control [her] own narrative.' The phrase 'we are the media now' appears repeatedly in posts and replies related to the robotaxi launch. This so-called alternative media is now receiving the very same closed-door access many of them criticize legacy publications for indulging in. The end result of that adversarial dynamic, experts tell The Verge, is a rollout that feels less like a transparent tech demo and more like a beta test — one amplified by livestreaming influencers who willingly promote Tesla's marketing material. Much of that coverage unfolds within small echo chambers on Musk-owned X and YouTube, where receptive audiences have largely already made up their minds about the robotaxi's significance. Boston University professor and Meme Wars author Joan Donovan says the rollout so far this week has been a textbook example of what she calls 'corporate propaganda.' 'The big push around robotaxis is explicitly about recuperating the reputation of Tesla,' Donovan says. 'It has a bit of an echo chamber effect.' 'The big push around robotaxis is explicitly about recuperating the reputation of Tesla,' Donovan says. 'It has a bit of an echo chamber effect.' Ed Niedermeyer, author of the Ludicrous: The Unvarnished Story of Tesla Motors, who filmed a robotaxi braking hard in the middle of the road when passing a police cruiser, echoes that sentiment and compares the influencers to a 'Greek chorus' collectively working to bolster the robotaxi's perception. Some of that narrative building appeared to be underway on the popular Reddit forum r/SelfDrivingCars. A user posting late last week claimed the forum has been 'flooded with Tesla apologist propaganda and disinformation,' following the robotaxi launch. Niedermeyer claims he's previously observed a Tesla employee moderating the r/Tesla forum. 'They know what their job is and Tesla knows how to use them,' Niedermeyer tells The Verge. Donovan and Niedermeyer are outspoken critics of Tesla. Both played active roles in the Tesla Takedown protests organized around the country earlier this year. Needless to say, they aren't in the 'superfan' club. Tesla did not respond to our request for comment. The Verge also reached out to several of the influencers cited above but hasn't heard back. This week's bizarre, influencer-led robotaxi event is the culmination of a yearslong evolution by Tesla to subtly cultivate its preferred media while simultaneously sidelining traditional journalistic outlets. Tesla has a long and bitter history of antagonism with the press. The company unofficially dissolved its PR team back in 2020 and has since made a point of dodging reporters' questions about its products and tech stack. Since acquiring Twitter in 2022, Elon Musk has further tilted the playing field by periodically banning accounts critical of him and his companies. At the same time, Tesla has built a loyal fan base, which Donovan compares to early Apple enthusiasts — eager to call out media critics as biased against Musk and the company. At first, much of that support was organic. The company attracted a devoted following of technologists, clean energy advocates, and entrepreneurs drawn to its willingness to take big swings at tough problems. But as Niedermeyer notes, some of that enthusiasm has tapered off in recent years, due in part to a series of underwhelming demos — like last year's lackluster 'We robot' event, which raised new doubts about the company's ability to deliver on its most ambitious promises around autonomy. Those who remain tend to be reliably loyal and often openly aligned with Tesla's success. Boosting Tesla's image online has its perks. Many in the community share personalized referral codes, which can be redeemed for rewards ranging from a few extra Supercharger miles to discounts on a new car purchase. (Some Tesla owners allege they've been abruptly removed from the program after posting content critical of the company.) 'They know what their job is and Tesla knows how to use them.' Loyal supporters in Tesla's online ranks may also gain access to exclusive events, as appears to have been the case with the robotaxi launch. Those who own stock in the company, Niedermeyer says, have an even more direct incentive to ensure Tesla is seen in a favorable light. 'The product is so dope they don't need a PR department,' YouTube creator and Tesla fan Galileo Russell said in an interview with CNN Business. 'I got involved with Tesla to make sure the company succeeded.' Operating in an echo chamber can only work for so long. Eventually, if Musk's vision of millions of autonomous Teslas zooming through city streets is to be realized, the company will have to open its doors to the broader public — including its detractors. That risks exposing more of the company's mistakes, which even influencers are already having trouble pushing aside. 'They know what their job is,' Niedermeyer says, 'and Tesla knows how to use them.'
