Proposed ban on ICE agreements pushed to next year as lawmakers consider other restrictions
The Judiciary Committee pushed off deciding on whether to ban local law enforcement agreements with federal immigration authorities until next year. But the majority of its members voted against a conflicting proposal that would make it illegal to restrict compliance with immigration enforcement.
These decisions were made on Wednesday as members ran back and forth between the committee room and their respective chambers amid a busy session day.
The committee decided to carry over into next year LD 1259, which would explicitly prohibit state and local law enforcement agencies from entering into contracts with federal immigration enforcement authorities.
On the other hand, a motion to pass LD 1656, which would prevent local agencies from adopting any policies that restrict them from assisting in the enforcement of federal immigration law, failed 4-8, with two members absent. This bill is sponsored by Rep. Michael Soboleski of Phillips and co-sponsored by nine other Republicans.
However, the committee has yet to decide on LD 1971, which would place restrictions on enforcement activities absent formal agreements with federal authorities.
The committee did discuss an amendment to clarify what would and would not be permitted under the bill as a means to address pushback from police groups. Auburn Police Chief Jason Moen, who is president of the Maine Chiefs of Police Association, raised concerns about the bill hindering federal task forces that are not primarily for immigration enforcement but sometimes touch on some immigration issues, such as drug enforcement partnerships.
Moen said the proposed changes assuage those concerns 'to some extent.' Another work session on LD 1971 is scheduled for Monday.
Immigration enforcement hearing highlights lack of protocol for local, federal collaboration
Rep. Ambureen Rana (D-Bangor), who sponsored LD 1259, requested that the bill be carried over to next year, telling her colleagues Wednesday that she believes it is necessary but would benefit from more time to allow for greater community engagement and to study its implications before lawmakers vote.
Participation in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's 287(g) program has grown across the country after President Donald Trump revived it to bolster ICE's capacity by deputizing local police officers to detain immigrants, an authority otherwise generally reserved to federal authorities. The program was discontinued in 2012 due to the discovery of discriminatory practices such as racial profiling.
Wells Police Department is the only Maine agency that has opted to join. However, Wells paused its agreement to see if the Legislature votes to ban such contracts.
'Some law enforcement officials expressed concerns about the bill's unintended impacts, which I take seriously,' Rana told Maine Morning Star after the vote.
Noting that six states have laws or policies that prohibit participation, Rana said, 'Additional time in our legislative process allows us to study the impacts in those states while individual communities continue to advocate for municipalities that stand for the safety of all residents.'
Wells residents have been voicing both support and opposition to their local police force contracting with ICE at Select Board meetings. Those calling for the police force to terminate the contract have collected more than 350 signatures.
Monmouth Winthrop Police Department, a combination of departments that serve central Maine communities, also initially submitted an application to join the program but withdrew it after community pushback, with their Police Chief Paul Ferland citing the division it caused in the community as the main reason.
'Carrying the bill over keeps it alive while we continue to build support across the state,' Rana said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Nearly two-thirds disapprove of Trump's handling of inflation: Survey
Nearly two-thirds of Americans disapprove of how President Trump has handled inflation — one of his key campaign promises, a new poll has found six months into Trump's second term. The CBS News/YouGov poll released Sunday also found that half of U.S. adults think that the Trump administration's policies have made them 'financially worse off' and 62 percent think the White House's policies have driven food and grocery costs up. Inflation rose by 2.7 percent in June, as businesses passed the costs of Trump's tariff hikes onto consumers. Trump has insisted, though, that inflation has settled as he has pressed Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell to lower interest rates. The White House has cited 'core inflation,' which excludes energy and food prices, as an indicator of positive movement on the issue. Core inflation hit 2.9 percent in June, below the expected 3 percent but up from 2.8 percent the month earlier. 'The USA is Rockin', there is VERY LOW INFLATION,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Friday. More than three-fourths of Republicans surveyed in the new poll said they approve of Trump's handling of inflation, while Democrats and independents overwhelmingly disapproved at 95 percent and 72 percent, respectively. The White House didn't immediately provide comment for this story, but it touted Trump's inflation record in a news release last week. 'Every month since President Trump took office, core inflation — the best measure of inflation — has beat or matched expectations,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement Tuesday. 'The data proves that President Trump is stabilizing inflation and the Panicans continue to be wrong about tariffs raising prices.' The president has pressed for lower interest rates, but economists warn that such a move could drive inflation higher. The CBS News/YouGov poll found people were split on the issue: 39 percent said that the White House's priority should be keeping interest rates where they are to try to control inflation; 34 percent said interest rates should be cut; and 27 percent said they were not sure. The CBS News/YouGov poll surveyed 2,343 adults nationwide Wednesday through Friday. The margin of error is 2.5 percentage points.
Politico
24 minutes ago
- Politico
Tax credit whiplash
Good morning and welcome to the weekly Monday edition of the New York & New Jersey Energy newsletter. We'll take a look at the week ahead and look back on what you may have missed last week. TAX CREDIT WHIPLASH — POLITICO's Marie J. French and Ry Rivard: The accelerated phaseout of federal tax credits for clean energy has increased uncertainty for state efforts to bolster renewables. States are delaying procurements of new renewables, including offshore wind and solar, as they evaluate the energy impacts of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Energy experts and policymakers expect consumer costs to be higher due to policy changes in the GOP megabill. 'Those costs will certainly increase, not just from short term supply shocks and the loss of federal tax credits but also from the uncertainty,' said Julia Hoos, an energy analyst with Aurora Energy Research. Why it matters: New York, New Jersey and other Northeast states have ambitious renewable energy goals. Democratic leaders were already signaling delays in meeting them after rising costs led to canceled contracts before President Donald Trump's election, but the looming end of federal support elevates the uncertainty and potential for missed milestones. 'These goals were based on, predicated on, offshore wind and solar really emerging as primary energy sources,' Gov. Kathy Hochul told reporters on July 11. 'But I have to deal with the reality that with a president that's hostile to those interests — and has told me directly that — how do we pretend that the goals will be met when all the incentives to invest in those industries has dissipated?' PJM TO HEAR FROM GOVERNORS — POLITICO's Ry Rivard: The embattled operator of the nation's largest electric grid agreed to hear from concerned governors' offices next week following a bipartisan letter from state leaders questioning whether it has its act together. In recent days, 10 governors, including three Republicans, have questioned the direction taken by PJM Interconnection LLC, which runs the grid and energy market for 13 states and Washington, D.C. PJM board Chair David Mills said Friday the grid operator would make time at the July 23 PJM Members Committee meeting to hear from the governors' representatives, who are expected to urge the grid operator to fill two seats on its nine-seat board with people handpicked by the states. On Wednesday, the governors of Delaware, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Virginia told PJM it is facing an 'unprecedented crisis of confidence.' On Thursday, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican, sent PJM a separate letter saying he supported his fellow governors' position. While blue states have long criticized PJM, the bipartisan criticism is perhaps the most serious political threat to PJM in its decades of existence. In a letter to governors, Mills — a former energy industry executive and consultant — defended his organization's record and said PJM is keeping the lights on 'through some of the most challenging circumstances that any grid operator, anywhere, has faced.' HAPPY MONDAY MORNING: Let us know if you have tips, story ideas or life advice. We're always here at mfrench@ and rrivard@ And if you like this letter, please tell a friend and/or loved one to sign up. Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories. Here's what we're watching this week: MONDAY — The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection is expected to publish substantially amended coastal building rules i n the New Jersey Register. TUESDAY — The Department of Public Service holds public statement hearings on the Propel NY transmission project on Long Island, 1 and 6 p.m., Knights of Columbus, 81 Sea Cliff Ave., Glen Cove. — The Department of Public Service holds public statement hearings on the Con Edison rate hike proposal, 6 p.m., JCC of Staten Island. — The Department of Environmental Conservation holds a hearing on the draft cryptocurrency environmental impact report, 2 p.m. WEDNESDAY — The New York State Energy Planning Board meets to vote on a draft energy plan, 1 p.m., Empire State Plaza, Meeting Room 6, Albany. — The Department of Public Service holds public statement hearings on the Propel NY transmission project on Long Island, 1 and 6 p.m., Nassau County Legislature. — The PJM Members Committee is expected to hear complaints from governors' representatives, 3 p.m. — The Department of Environmental Conservation holds a hearing on the draft cryptocurrency environmental impact report, 4 p.m. Around New York — 'This is a project of super-importance to the Trump administration, and I was honored to be asked to do it,' Andy Byford told City & State. — explores whether blocking gas-fired power plants was a mistake. — OPINION: NYSERDA President and CEO Doreen Harris touts programs to help New Yorkers save on energy bills, plus a nascent idea for a new nuclear plant upstate. Around New Jersey — NJ Transit's new budget 'calls for $980 million in fare revenue, but NJ Transit has failed to make its fare revenue goals for the past nine years,' Larry Higgs reports. What you may have missed NETFLIX EXEMPTION — POLITICO's Ry Rivard: Netflix is getting a major exemption from New Jersey's new coastal flood rules after months of lobbying over permitting issues at the sprawling former Army base it is working to redevelop. The carve-out will allow one of Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy's pet projects — a $1 billion film and television studio — to avoid complying with climate change regulations his administration has been working on since before the pandemic. Changes to the draft rules show the administration plans to exempt film studios, like Netflix, that have partnerships with the state's Economic Development Authority. Netflix is planning to build 12 soundstages at Fort Monmouth, a 292-acre former Army installation in Eatontown and Oceanport, New Jersey. State Sen. Declan O'Scanlon, a Republican who represents the area, said he's 'thrilled' Netflix got the carve-out but said every coastal development project should get the same level of 'deliberation and fair consideration.' The governor called changes to the flood rule a compromise. 'This is a classic situation where you're trying to get the right balance,' Murphy told reporters Tuesday in Newark. In lobbying disclosures from this year and last year, Netflix reported lobbying the DEP 'regarding environmental permitting issues related to the development of the former United States Army Base named Fort Monmouth.' The company also reported lobbying Eric Brophy, the governor's deputy chief of staff for economic development, about 'DEP flood report rules.' OFFSHORE WIND TRANSMISSION TERMINATED — POLITICO's Marie J. French: President Donald Trump's quest to stop 'windmills' in the ocean has led New York to abandon a major transmission project intended to support offshore wind. The decision to cancel the proposed investment is an acknowledgment that New York will not meet its 2035 offshore wind target given Trump's indefinite pause on permitting for the technology. Offshore wind is fundamental to the state's efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Public Service Commission Chair Rory Christian criticized federal attacks on the industry and said the commission's decision was necessary to protect ratepayers. The commission canceled the process to select a transmission plan during its regular monthly meeting Thursday. — On the 2035 target: 'Staff does not expect any additional generation to be developed in the New York Bight until federal policy changes, and even if the federal government resumes its support of the industry in a few years, projects will likely not be operational by 2035,' said Liz Grisaru, a senior adviser for policy at the department, during the meeting. After the meeting, DPS spokesperson Jim Denn said 'while the goals will be difficult to achieve by 2035, it is possible more offshore wind projects could come online by then depending on whether there are any shifts in federal policy.' — Reactions: The New York League of Conservation Voters' Julie Tighe said the group is 'deeply disappointed' by the decision. 'While the federal government continues to undermine progress on clean energy, New York should be doubling down on our commitment to become energy independent, not stalling it,' she said in a statement. 'These lines take many years to plan, permit, and build — by kicking the can now, we're risking falling behind in our clean energy transition and driving up costs in the future.' Natural Resources Defense Council's Chris Casey also found the decision 'deeply disappointing.' 'Rather than stepping back, the state should be continuing low-cost, high-value work — such as completing the grid operator's cost benefit analysis, selecting the most effective project, and advancing state-level approvals — to position New York to move quickly once federal barriers ease,' he said in a statement. The Alliance for Clean Energy New York and the New York Offshore Wind Alliance, which pushed for work to continue on the transmission project, issued a more milquetoast comment: 'Offshore wind projects can take more than a decade to develop, spanning far beyond state and federal election cycles. We encourage New York State to continue developing infrastructure in the near-term that will enable new generation to come online, addressing reliability and affordability for New Yorkers.' ENERGY ASSISTANCE EXPANDED — POLITICO's Marie J. French: More utility customers in New York will receive bill discounts under an expanded affordability program approved Thursday. The Public Service Commission voted to expand eligibility for the state's 'energy affordability program' to moderate-income residents. The move is expected to provide financial assistance to an additional 1.6 million households. 'With this expanded policy, we expand our reach to more households — households who had previously been excluded from this vital support because they didn't meet legacy criteria — even though they were still struggling to pay their bills,' said Public Service Commission Chair Rory Christian. 'More New Yorkers will be able to afford to keep the lights on.' Utility costs have been raising affordability concerns, with Gov. Kathy Hochul slamming proposed rate hikes and customer advocates pointing to the high number of people unable to pay their bills. The expanded program was required by the state budget passed in 2023 as lawmakers sought to address those concerns. — Also at the PSC: The commission took steps to hold utilities accountable for delays and problems with community solar credits and billing. New performance metrics could penalize utilities, although the commission only adopted two of six proposed measures. That was partly due to a recognition that complaints about consolidated billing have declined in recent years and that any costs to improve utility billing systems would be passed on to ratepayers. 'I think these provisions are going to encourage the right behavior from utilities and also, compensate customers if utility behavior is not aligned with our expectations,' Christian said. About 224,000 customers across the state are enrolled in community distributed generation programs, according to Department of Public Service staff. The commission also authorized the utilities to increase the fee utilities collect from community solar projects from 1 percent to 1.5 percent to cover their costs to comply with the order .… The commission also approved a Rochester transmission project to improve reliability … Central Hudson will have to start demand response programs and non-pipeline alternatives under a gas planning order. NEXT GOVERNOR COULD EASILY REMAKE BPU — POLITICO's Ry Rivard: New Jersey's next governor could quickly remake state energy policy after taking office by filling three seats on the powerful five-seat Board of Public Utilities. The board has been down a member for more than a year and a second vacancy opened Wednesday following the abrupt departure of Republican member Marian Abdou, who said she was leaving to tend to her family. A third spot could open next March, when Democratic commissioner Zenon Christodoulou's term expires. That means unless Gov. Phil Murphy, a term-limited Democrat, can get the Senate to quickly approve a pair of new members, his successor will be able to totally reshape the board during their first months in office. A Murphy spokesperson said the governor expects to fill the vacancies during the lame-duck legislative session after the election in collaboration with the Senate. UTILITY CALL CENTER LAW UNCERTAIN — POLITICO's Marie J. French: The fate of a union-backed measure to keep and expand utility customer service jobs in New York is uncertain after a federal court ruling. GREENWAY — Gov. Phil Murphy broke ground on a new rails-to-trails greenway to connect Newark and Jersey City. In the bed of an old Norfolk Southern line, the trail for bikes and pedestrians will eventually extend for nine miles through parts of Essex and Hudson counties. The first mile, which is in Newark and expected to be completed by the end of 2026, will cost about $65 million. It will be the first new state park in decades. Brendan Gill, an Essex County commissioner who championed the project, said it took 15,000 letters to Murphy and other officials to get going and had been under discussion for well over a decade. 'There was excuse after excuse after excuse as to why this project was never going to happen,' he said. Sen. Teresa Ruiz, who represents Newark, described the toxins and shabbiness of the area when it was an abandoned rail line and said, 'imagine the good of what this open space can do.' — Ry Rivard
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Farmers' tariff patience wears thin
Presented by With help from Samuel Benson and Marcia Brown QUICK FIX — How long will farmers' 'wait and see' attitude toward President Donald Trump's tariffs last? — The rollout of Republicans' reconciliation megabill will hit small, independent grocers hard. — A co-director of one recently-axed Regional Food Business Center talks about what the program's end will mean for rural communities. IT'S MONDAY, JULY 21. Welcome to Morning Agriculture. I'm your host Grace Yarrow, hoping you all celebrated National Ice Cream Day appropriately. Send tips to gyarrow@ or on Signal at gracemy.31 and follow us at @Morning_Ag for more. Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories. Driving the day HOW LONG WILL 'WAIT AND SEE' LAST? Farmers' patience with President Donald Trump could be waning as they scramble to understand and brace for a looming trade war ahead of harvest season for many major U.S. commodities. Trump has sent out dozens of letters to trading partners — and key ag importers like the European Union, Japan and South Korea — warning them of the tariff rate they will face in coming weeks. Time is running out for the administration to prove that those threats will pay off before hurting already-struggling farmers. Senate Ag Chair John Boozman (R-Ark.) said that farmers have had a 'wait and see' attitude towards the tariffs, trusting the Trump administration's work to get new trade deals done to open new markets. But, he added, farmers are 'anxious' in light of the president's slew of new tariff threats. Trump's farm state allies on Capitol Hill have stood by his ultimate goal of securing new markets for farmers, but it's not clear how long their patience will last. Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) told MA that farmers need to 'grab a hoe and hold on.' 'Our farmers are in trouble,' he told MA last week. 'They're in bad trouble. I don't know whether there's anything we can do to save them, unless these tariffs work, and I hope we can. We're going to do everything we possibly can.' Related reading: 'Trump's determination to barrel ahead with tariffs is forcing a growing number of Republican lawmakers to make an uncomfortable choice: defend the president's agenda or influential industries back home.' More on that from our Ari Hawkins and Daniel Desrochers here. Is time really running out? One ag advocate, granted anonymity to discuss concerns about the administration's tariff approach, said that Trump has about a month and a half to prove his trade plans are working before farmers start harvesting and selling their products. 'We're getting closer to harvest time,' the person said. 'We're getting to the point where those sales numbers are really going to matter, the prices are really going to matter. And we're coming into the fall with some limited trade deals.' Producers of top U.S. ag exports like corn and soybeans are gearing up to harvest and sell their products starting around August and September — and will be hit hard by any reciprocal tariffs or uncertainty caused by the state of Trump's trade negotiations. Another complication: The person added that agriculture lobbyists are struggling to ask the administration for carve-outs or support, as Trump himself is seemingly making calls on tariff plans without involving his Cabinet. 'Ultimately it's a good thing that other countries don't know what he's going to do. It's all subject to negotiations,' the person said. 'But the real challenge is that the only person whose word really matters here is Trump. … It doesn't matter what [Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins] says.' In the States LATEST IN MEGABILL FALLOUT: The deep cuts Republicans made to federal nutrition programs this summer are poised to devastate independent grocery stores that are central to many low-income communities, including those that voted for President Donald Trump. Food aid recipients often make up the majority of small grocers' customer base in remote areas and food deserts — places that have limited options for fresh, healthy food. But a central part of paying for the GOP policy megabill Trump signed on July 4 relied on slashing the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the nation's largest anti-hunger initiative. Even though some provisions in the new law won't go into effect for another three years, others, like expanded work requirements for SNAP participants, could kick some families out of the program and hit the bottom lines of small grocery stores within months. It's a chain reaction set off in Washington that's likely to reshape how people access food in more isolated communities even if they don't use federal assistance. 'I lean pretty heavily right most of the time, but one of the things that I do lean to the left on is we're a pretty wealthy country, we can help people out,' said St. Johns, Arizona, Mayor Spence Udall, whose town overwhelmingly supported Trump in 2024. Don't miss the full story from MA's own Rachel Shin here. AROUND THE AGENCIES GOODBYE RURAL FOOD CENTERS: USDA's move last week to abruptly cancel remaining funding for a dozen centers serving farms and other rural companies will have a 'devastating' effect on food and farm businesses, according to the co-director of one of the targeted centers. Katie Nixon said Heartland Regional Food Business Center will trim its work significantly over the next 60 days and then close its doors entirely in August 2026. You all had this meeting [last Wednesday] where you learned about this decision to end the program. What was that like and what reasoning were you given? The reasoning given on the call was that the way it was organized was not in line with congressional approval or something like that. And then the press release came out, and it was like the just most ridiculous argument, saying that this was temporary funding anyways, so we're going to cancel it, because it's unfair to farmers to put temporary funding on the ground and then take it away, which makes no sense. Is there anything else you want people to know about the work that the centers did and why it mattered? We are in a country right now where those small businesses are not succeeding and they're not thriving, especially in food and farming. Our farming businesses are dropping left and right, and the consolidation of agriculture has become to the point where I don't even recognize what a farm is anymore to some degree. What the Regional Food Business Centers do is ground the work in the community and allow the professionals who help those businesses and who care about those businesses help them thrive. Read the full Q&A from our Marcia Brown here. Transitions Venus Welch-White, who served as acting head of EPA's Office of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, has joined CropLife America as director of government relations. Emma Simon is now digital director for the House Ag Committee Democratic staff. She most recently was a content producer for Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and is a Jamaal Bowman and More Perfect Union alum. Row Crops — First in MA: The Center for the Environment and Welfare, an industry group that counsels companies and consumers on animal welfare and other policy issues, is placing an anti-Prop. 12 ad in print version of The Hill coinciding with the House Ag Committee's Wednesday hearing on how to reverse the California animal welfare law in the upcoming farm bill package. — Kellogg, the maker of Froot Loops and Apple Jacks, will cut synthetic dyes from its cereals by the end of 2027. — The Senate Agriculture Committee will vote today on advancing Brian Quintenz's nomination to become CFTC chair and other USDA nominations, our Declan Harty reports. — More cities and states are experimenting with the concept of publicly-supported grocery stores in low-income neighborhoods. But those stores are still struggling. (The Washington Post) THAT'S ALL FOR MA! Drop us a line and send us your agriculture job announcements or events: gyarrow@ marciabrown@ jwolman@ sbenson@ rdugyala@ and gmott@
