Israeli strike on al-Ahli Baptist Hospital in Gaza City kills journalists
According to local sources, the attack on Thursday morning came with no prior warning of the bombing.
The Israeli assault has so far claimed the lives of correspondent Suleiman Hajjaj and photographer Ismail Badah, who both worked for Palestine Today TV, alongside photographer Samir al-Rifai, who worked for the Shams News Agency.
Journalist Imad Daloul, who works for Palestine Today TV, and photographer Ahmed Qaljah, who works for Al-Arabiya TV, were also critically injured in the Israeli attack and have been rushed to the intensive care unit.
Footage online shows bodies scattered across the courtyards of the Al-Ahli Hospital, otherwise known as the Baptist Hospital, as Palestinians attempt to aid one another.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Reporters told MEE that Israeli warplanes targeted the hospital's courtyards as journalists were covering the events on the ground.
Hamas released a statement condemning a "new war crime" by Israel.
"This is part of a systematic Zionist policy targeting Palestinian journalists to silence their voices, deter them from covering the occupation's crimes in Gaza, and obliterate its just narrative of the enemy's horrific crimes against our Palestinian people," the group said.
"This crime constitutes a complex war crime, as it assassinated journalists protected under the Geneva Conventions and all international conventions, and bombed a civilian hospital protected under international law.
"This reflects the insistence of the criminal government of Benjamin Netanyahu to expand the scope of its crimes of genocide against the Palestinian people and its blatant disregard for the international community and its legal and humanitarian system."
'Worst-ever conflict' for journalists
Thursday's killing of journalists is the latest in a wave of deadly Israeli attacks on Palestinian media workers.
The Israeli war on Gaza has been described by monitoring groups as the "worst-ever conflict" for journalists, due to the record number of media workers killed - at least 225 in 2o months.
Israel's war on Gaza 'worst ever conflict' for journalists: Report Read More »
According to a report published last month by the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, Israel's war on Gaza since October 2023 has "killed more journalists than the US Civil War, World Wars I and II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War (including the conflicts in Cambodia and Laos), the wars in Yugoslavia in the 1990s and 2000s, and the post-9/11 war in Afghanistan, combined".
"In 2023, a journalist or media worker was, on average, killed or murdered every four days. In 2024, it was once every three days," said the report.
"Most reporters harmed or killed, as is the case in Gaza, are local journalists."
The Israeli military has frequently justified its attacks on civilian sites in Gaza, including hospitals, by alleging that Hamas uses them for military operations.
The latest Israeli assault brings the number of journalists killed since 7 October 2023 to 225, Arab48 reported.
Overall, Israeli forces have killed more than 54,607 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip since the start of the war and wounded 125,341 others.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
21 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Writers group accuses New York Times of being 'accomplice to the genocide in Gaza'
A new dossier released by a coalition of media workers has accused The New York Times of systemic pro-Israel and anti-Palestinian bias, and alleged that nearly two dozen of its top journalists, editors and executives have extensive ties to pro-Israel lobbying groups. "The New York Times is an accomplice to the genocide in Gaza, serving as a mouthpiece for American imperialism and shaping elite consensus around foreign policy," a statement from the group Writers Against the War on Gaza (Wawog) reads. Like several mainstream news outlets, the NYT has come under intense scrutiny over its reporting of the war on Gaza, with several human rights activists and analysts accusing the publication of providing cover for Israeli war crimes. The dossier, released on Wednesday, argues that the NYT's coverage could be explained by the extensive material, financial and ideological connections between several current and former employees at the paper and the Israeli state or the army. The dossier also outlined other levels of ideological and material ties, including relationships with the pro-Israel lobbying groups and think tanks. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The dossier alleged that news editors at the NYT had ordered reporters to avoid so-called "inflammatory terms" - including "genocide", "ethnic cleansing", and "occupied territory", and even to avoid saying "Palestine". "Our dossier so far covers mostly material ties to occupation and apartheid, but we also include and discuss ideological ties, which we've updated the dossier to reflect," a spokesperson for Wawog told Middle East Eye. The group said its findings, extracted from the archives of Mondoweiss and The Electronic Intifada, as well as through interviews with Palestinian journalists, demonstrate "how the Times' vaunted code of conduct amounts to a racist double standard". 'New York War Crimes ' Wawog, a group made up of writers and creatives, emerged in the weeks following Israel's bombardment of Gaza after the Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel on 7 October 2023. The group has routinely held protests outside and at times in the lobby of the NYT's building in the borough of Manhattan. Western media enabling Gaza genocide and rewriting history, say experts Read More » The group has routinely referred to the paper as "The New York War Crimes" as a means to communicate the NYT's complicity in war crimes in Gaza. More than 58,000 Palestinians have been killed as a result of Israel's war on Gaza, which several countries, as well as many international rights groups and experts, now qualify as an act of genocide. In Wednesday's dossier, Wawog describes the deep entanglements between the NYT and Israel as fuelling the paper's biased coverage. Wawog said the omission of the journalists' connections to Israel - be it through personal or immediate family ties - in the reporter profiles on the NYC website contradicted the basic tenets of journalistic ethics. It said that the NYT "would offer bullhorns to people with clear allegiances to the Zionist project demonstrates its commitment to and support of Israel's fantasy of annihilation". Media analysts and human rights groups have repeatedly accused mainstream media of contributing to both the erasure and distortion of Israel's war crimes in Gaza. Several observers have argued that the reporting on Israel's war on Gaza, as well as the student movement for Palestine in the US, hasn't merely been inaccurate but has ventured close to journalistic malpractice. 'Palestinians and allies have been silenced and marginalised in the media for decades' - Joyce Ajlouny, American Friends Service Committee Western media in particular have come under fire for obfuscating in their headlines and for the explicit use of the passive voice in narrating the murder of Palestinians. Advocates' concerns over the use of language and terminology have also been backed up by data. An Intercept study published in January 2024 found that the NYT, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times' reporting of Israel's war on Gaza demonstrated consistent bias against Palestinians, offered disproportionate coverage of antisemitism in the US and downplayed anti-Muslim racism after the events of 7 October 2023. Likewise, in October 2024, several journalists from the BBC and CNN told Al Jazeera's Listening Post that their newsrooms routinely failed to hold Israeli officials to account. Speaking on condition of anonymity, the journalists accused senior editorial staff of attempting to minimise Israeli excesses in news coverage. Whereas the Wawog dossier details several members of staff who have either served in the Israeli army or have had children serve in the army, it also includes those who have consistently produced what Wawog describes as lies and justifications for war crimes. War on Gaza: How western media favours Israel on Instagram Read More » In January, the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), a Quaker organisation that advocates for peace, cancelled a planned advertisement in the paper after it refused to allow it to refer to Israel's actions in Gaza as genocide. "The refusal of The New York Times to run paid digital ads that call for an end to Israel's genocide in Gaza is an outrageous attempt to sidestep the truth," said Joyce Ajlouny, general secretary for the AFSC. "Palestinians and allies have been silenced and marginalised in the media for decades, as these institutions choose silence over accountability. It is only by challenging this reality that we can hope to forge a path toward a more just and equitable world," Ajlouny said. A spokesperson for the NYT rejected the arguments raised in the dossier, telling MEE that the report was "a vile campaign aimed at intimidating journalists and media executives because of fair-minded reporting and news coverage. "Rather than criticize the specifics of our journalism, this campaign is choosing to make personal attacks and innuendo based on a person's faith or ties to a group or country, all of which are public knowledge, and some of which are inaccurate. All to try to discredit our reporting. A group of writers should know better."
Dubai Eye
38 minutes ago
- Dubai Eye
UAE condemns Israeli plan to seize control of Ibrahimi Mosque
The UAE has strongly condemned Israel's plan to transfer control of the Ibrahimi Mosque in Hebron from Palestinian authorities to a Jewish religious council based in the Kiryat Arba settlement. In a statement, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs called the move a serious violation of the historical and legal status quo at the holy site. The UAE urged an immediate end to all unilateral and provocative actions that could escalate tensions in the occupied Palestinian territories and derail international peace efforts. The Ministry also called on the global community to take responsibility in protecting religious sites and preserving their historical significance. It reaffirmed the UAE's support for regional and international initiatives aimed at advancing the peace process and upholding the two-state solution. UAE Condemns Israeli Plan to Seize Control of Ibrahimi Mosque — MoFA وزارة الخارجية (@mofauae) July 18, 2025
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
ICJP writes to UK authorities over woman threatened with arrest for opposing genocide
The International Centre of Justice for Palestinians (ICJP) has written to a local police authority and the UK Home Secretary, demanding a formal investigation as to why a woman was threatened with arrest on terror charges for holding up anti-genocide signs, after rejecting that she supported proscribed organisations when asked. ICJP said armed police threatened peaceful protester Laura Murton, 42, for holding a Palestinian flag and having signs saying 'Free Gaza' and 'Israel is committing genocide'. She was threatened with arrest under terrorism laws, despite not saying anything or holding any signs that denoted support for any proscribed groups. When explicitly asked if she supported any proscribed organisations, she replied 'I do not.' ICJP said on Friday that it had brought a formal complaint to Kent Police, asking for clarity regarding the conduct of officers who attempted to make unfounded allegations against Murton for her protest. It also asked the Home Secretary for clarity on what guidance the Home Office has issued to police officers regarding protests that do not relate to Palestine Action, a group that was recently proscribed by the UK government. "This incident represents the sought chilling effect on speech and assembly of those who wish to speak out against Israel's violations of international law, that arises from misuse and misinterpretation of terror laws since the proscription of Palestine Action," ICJP said. It accused UK authorities of misusing the ban "to police the support for Palestine more generally, and any opposition to Israel's genocide in Gaza".
