‘It's obvious nobody's watching': Former GOP lawmaker says Republicans failing to hold Walters accountable amid massive staff payments
Last Wednesday, News 4 revealed OSDE paid its former spokesperson a final paycheck totaling more than $76,000.Then, on Monday, News 4 reported Walters' new chief of staff, Matt Mohler, a Florida political strategist who once worked for the same political consulting firm as Walters' highly paid advisor Matt Langston, received a $32,000 bonus in February.
New records reveal even more unexplained five-figure payouts to Ryan Walters' chief of staff
As News 4 reported, that was on top of Mohler's six-figure base salary at OSDE — and despite him still appearing to work full-time for a company in Florida, according to the company's website.On Tuesday, News 4 uncovered additional records revealing Mohler received another unexplained bonus payment in March for $12,500.On Wednesday, Oklahoma Watch reported OSDE hired another out-of-state political consultant, a man named Chad Gallagher, from Arkansas.
Oklahoma Watch reported OSDE hired Gallagher for a 'temporary' role, with a nearly $100,000 yearly salary.
'His background is pretty interesting,' Oklahoma Watch reporter Jennifer Palmer told News 4. 'He lobbied for ClassWallet, which, of course, you know, we've written about quite a bit here in Oklahoma,' Palmer said.As News 4 reported, ClassWallet was a vendor Walters, prior to becoming State Superintendent, hired to distribute federal COVID-relief funds to help families buy school supplies.
A state audit revealed that almost 20% of the total purchases families made through ClassWallet were on items not related to educational learning per the grant guidelines, including couches, Xbox consoles, and Christmas trees.
Further investigations revealed Walters gave ClassWallet his 'blanket approval' for all the purchases.
Despite that, the state later sued ClassWallet.When Oklahoma Watch reached out to OSDE spokesperson Grace Kim to explain Gallagher's hiring, she declined to comment.
New OSDE chief of staff paid nearly $50K in first month, still listed as active employee for Florida company
Kim also declined to comment to News 4 each time we reached out seeking explanations for the tens of thousands of dollars in payments OSDE made to Isett and Mohler.After News 4's reporting, Senate Democratic Leader Julia Kirt called on state lawmakers to take action.
'The superintendent has way too much latitude,' Kirt said in a TikTok post Tuesday. 'I keep asking my Republican colleagues to stand up to him and hold him accountable. They won't do it.'
Her comments caught the attention of former Republican State Representative Mark McBride.'There's so many things we should be pushing back as Republicans,' said McBride, who served as the chair of the Oklahoma House Education Committee until he termed out of office in November. 'But no. We've got Democrats you can interview, but the Republicans won't step up to the plate and say, hey, this is wrong. Stop it.'While in office, McBride repeatedly criticized Matt Langston's role at OSDE, as Walters' Chief Policy Advisor.
Langston runs a political consulting firm, 'Engage Right,' and worked as a strategist for Walters' campaign prior to being hired at OSDE.
Despite making a six-figure salary with OSDE, Langston lives and works out of Austin, Texas.
OSDE claims Langston is a 'part-timer' employee.
In February, Oklahoma Watch reported OSDE paid Langston a nearly $ 45,000 bonus, without explanation.
Records: State paid former OSDE spokesperson more than $75k in final paycheck
'He's a ghost employee pretty much, I've said that time and time again,' McBride said. 'At least when I was in office, we filed two subpoenas, multiple requests, had him come before us and talk to us.'But now—
'It's obvious nobody's watching,' McBride said. 'I don't know what they're trying to do.'This week, Governor Kevin Stitt also expressed concern about the reports.'Unfortunately, you know me, the Governor doesn't get to hire and fire the different state agency heads,' Stitt said at his weekly press availability Wednesday. 'We're not dumb. Oklahomans are not dumb. Oklahomans see these people in these different political positions, running for their next office.''The only people who push back against him are the governor and the attorney general,' McBride said. 'And there's not a comment—not one comment—from a Republican legislator pushing back on this misuse of state tax dollars. It's sad.'News 4 only heard from one currently-serving Republican lawmaker willing to speak on this issue: State Rep. Daniel Pae (R-Lawton).'It seems like there's always new developments happening at SDE,' Pae said. 'The more and more we have these issues arise, we have to follow the money.'Pae said he would like to see House Speaker Kyle Hilbert (R-Bristow) open a special investigation to look into the mysterious payments at OSDE.
'I know the Department of Mental Health has been the primary focus and there has been a select committee established by Speaker Hilbert,' Pae said. 'We could have a similar committee look into all these discrepancies at SDE. That would be my personal recommendation to have a formal process like that and have public hearings.'News 4 reached out to Speaker Hilbert's office to ask if he would support launching an investigation.His office said he has no comment.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration appeals to Supreme Court to allow $783 million research-funding cuts
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to allow it to cut hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of research funding in its push to roll back federal diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. The Justice Department argued a federal judge in Massachusetts was wrong to block the National Institutes of Health from making $783 million worth of cuts to align with President Donald Trump's priorities. U.S. District Judge William Young found that the abrupt cancellations ignored long-held government rules and standards. Young, an appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan, also said the cuts amounted to 'racial discrimination and discrimination against America's LGBTQ community.' The ruling came in lawsuits filed by 16 attorneys general, public-health advocacy groups and some affected scientists. His decision addressed only a fraction of the hundreds of NIH research projects that have been cut. The Trump administration's appeal also takes aim at nearly two dozen cases over funding. Solicitor General D. John Sauer pointed to a 5-4 decision on the Supreme Court's emergency docket from April that allowed cuts to teacher training programs to go forward. That decisions shows that district judges shouldn't be hearing those cases at all, but rather sending them to federal claims court, he argued. Lindsay Whitehurst, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘You just added a third building': Powell fact checks Trump's Fed renovation as awkward hard-hat visit turns tense
President Donald Trump's attempt to shame Federal Reserve Board of Governors chair Jerome Powell over the cost of a long-running renovation to the central bank's Washington headquarters went horribly wrong on Thursday when Powell had a ready response for the president's accusations during a tour of the construction site. After viewing parts of the costly renovation, Trump and Powell stopped briefly to speak to reporters who'd traveled to the Federal Reserve headquarters with the president. Trump said the cost of the years-long project was now 'about $3.1 billion' rather than the $2.7 billion previously stated by Powell. 'So we're taking a look, and it looks like it's about 3.1 billion went up a little bit or a lot. So the 2.7 is now 3.1 it just came out,' he said reading from a piece of paper, as Powell looked on and shook his head in the negative before interjecting. The chairman replied: 'I haven't heard that from anybody' and asked if the paper Trump was reading from came from the central bank. At that point, Trump handed him the paper and continued talking while Powell pulled out his reading glasses to look. He then told the president that the higher number he was claiming included a separate project that wasn't part of the renovation at issue. 'You just added in a third building,' he said. When Trump replied that the building in question was currently 'being built,' Powell spoke up once more to disabuse the president of his misunderstanding of what he was reading. He told Trump that he was mistakenly counting long-completed renovations to a building named for William Martin Jr., who served as Fed chair from 1951–1970, as part of the renovation of the Fed's main headquarters. 'No, it's been it was built five years ago. We finished Martin five years ago,' he said. Asked by reporters if he expects more overruns on the lengthy project, Powell said the Fed is 'ready' for any but doesn't expect more. 'We have a little bit of a reserve that we may use, but no,' he said before adding that he expects to project will wrap in 2027 — a year after his term as chairman is set to end. Trump and his allies have said the $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed headquarters and a neighboring building reflects an institution run amok — a belief they had hoped to verify in an afternoon tour of the construction site. The site visit by the president is an attempt to further ratchet up pressure on Powell, whom the Republican president has relentlessly attacked for not cutting borrowing costs. Trump's attacks have put the Fed, a historically independent institution, under a harsh spotlight. Undermining its independence could reduce the Fed's ability to calm financial markets and stabilize the U.S. economy. The president has made no secret of his distaste for Powell, whom he nominated to lead the Federal Reserve in 2017, primarily because of Powell's refusal to lower interest rates, particularly in light of Trump's decision to levy tariffs. Powell has said that the central bank needs time to see what effects tariffswill have on inflation and employment before making a determination on interest rates. This has prompted Trump to call Powell a 'stupid person.' The president can do little to remove Powell. Joe Biden re-nominated Powell for another five-year term in 2021 based on his steady leadership during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, and his term would expire in May. Federal statute says the president can only remove Powell 'for cause.' For a time, it appeared as if Trump and his allies had found such a cause in the costly renovation of the Fed's headquarters. But Trump, a former real estate developer, appeared to soften his criticisms of the project after viewing it himself. Appearing in his element while sporting a hard hat, Trump said he would like to see the project finish. 'In many ways it's too bad it started, but it did start, and it's been under construction for a long time. Gonna be it's going to be a real long time, because it looks like it's got a long way to go,' he said. A short time later, he told reporters that he'd had a 'very good tour' and declined to repeat his earlier criticisms of the project. He did, however, give a detailed description of the project's complexity with regard to a basement being dug beneath the Washington, D.C. water table. 'I was given a very nice tour by the head of construction. And, you know, look, if you look over here, they're trying to open up the basement. When you open up a basement, first of all, it's the worst space — always. A basement is the worst space in a building, and it's also the most expensive space to build, and especially here, because you have a water line, you know, you they're going down into the water. So they have to build a reverse, what's called a reverse bathtub. The water has to be kept out. It's very expensive construction,' he said. 'There's always Monday morning quarterbacks. I don't want to be that. I want to help them get it finished. It's been going around for years, and I want to help them get it finished.' He later wrote on Truth Social that it had been a 'great honor' to tour the building. 'It's got a long way to go, would have been much better if it were never started, but it is what it is and, hopefully, it will be finished ASAP,' he said. 'The cost overruns are substantial but, on the positive side, our Country is doing very well and can afford just about anything — Even the cost of this building!' He added that he'd be 'watching' the project and hoped to add his own expertise, citing his eponymous real estate company's renovation of the historic Old Post Office building into the hotel that became a MAGA hotspot during his first term before it was sold in 2021. 'The total Construction cost was a small fraction of the Fed Building's cost, and it is many times the size. With all of that being said, let's just get it finished and, even more importantly, LOWER INTEREST RATES!' he said. Despite the president's past criticism, it appears he has backed down from his implicit threat to fire Powell due to negative reaction from markets. Last week during an Oval Office press opportunity, Trump told reporters it was 'highly unlikely' that he would upend nearly a century of precedent by attempting to sack Powell less than a day after he reportedly polled a group of Republican lawmakers on whether he should sack the central bank boss during a Tuesday night meeting in the Oval Office after the 12 House Republicans blocked a cryptocurrency bill favored by the president. With additional reporting by agencies and Washington Bureau Chief Eric Garcia
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Say It, Scott': CNN Panel Turns Testy After Scott Jennings Resorts To Name-Calling
A segment from CNN's 'NewsNight with Abby Phillip' on Wednesday evening seemed to get tense after conservative commentator Scott Jennings threw an insult at fellow panelist Keith Boykin, a former White House aide to President Bill Clinton. During a discussion about Columbia University's announcement that it had reached a deal with the Trump administration on Wednesday to pay more than $220 million to restore federal research money, Boykin called out Jennings for interrupting Republican commentator Ana Navarro, who was commenting on the agreement. 'Do you have to interrupt every conversation? Do you have to be a part of every conversation?' Boykin asked. 'You're such a whiny [inaudible],' Jennings replied. 'A whiny what, Scott? Say it, Scott ... say it, Scott, ' Boykin responded. (Watch the moment here.) Boykin had also called out Jennings for interrupting him earlier in the conversation: 'You talk about people interrupting you, but you do it all the time.' People on X, formerly Twitter, slammed the polarizing CNN pundit for calling Boykin 'whiny' after the segment aired on TV. 'Why would Abby not allow Boykin to adequately address Jennings?,' one X user wrote, calling Jennings' behavior an example of a microaggression. 'Accusing someone else of being a whiny ass in the midst of your own whining is peak irony,' wrote another. Alexandra Cromer, a licensed therapist with Thriveworks, said that the moment on-air said a lot about the tense attitudes that exist in our current political climate — and Jennings' insult was a 'complete communication interrupter.' 'Clinically, if you want to communicate effectively, be clear, objective and direct as possible,' she said, adding, 'At that point, calling someone 'whiny' takes away meaning from their statements and does not promote further conversations or civil discourse.' By calling Boykin 'whiny,' Jennings may have been seeking to reduce his power, Cromer explained. 'In this situation, calling someone 'whiny' can communicate a dismissive and condescending tone,' Cromer said. 'By using an insult in any circumstance, you aim to reduce the other person's power and to obtain more perceived control over the situation.' Cromer explained that using the word 'whiny' specifically could have been an attempt by Jennings to imply that what Boykin was thinking and feeling is 'not good enough.' ″[It] promotes the concept of a power hierarchy and structure within the conversation when the panel is displayed as being as equitable as possible in panelist input opportunities,' she said. And Cromer said that Boykin's direct response to Jennings can be an example of 'a useful solution to a disagreement and/or miscommunication problem.' She cautioned, however, that when someone is addressing someone who insulted them, they should ensure that they are using 'clear, direct and objective communication.' 'The way that Boykin responded to Jenkins can also be seen as a personalized insult or weaponized conversation,' she said. Generally speaking, Cromer recommends that people take time to organize their thoughts when on the receiving end of an insult to 'be the most effective version of yourself.' And as it relates to Jennings calling Boykin 'whiny' during a panel discussion on network TV, Cromer emphasized that resorting to name-calling in any kind of professional environment can especially be viewed as being 'dismissive and disrespectful.' It can communicate a 'blatant lack of respect,' as well as perhaps a 'willful intolerance of views, opinions and emotional reactions that are different than your own and are outside of your own emotional experience.' Related... Scott Jennings Announces Why 'Liberal Tears Will Flow' In Next Move Scott Jennings Scorched For Calling Questions About Historic Racist Incidents A 'Gotcha' Columbia University Agrees To Pay More Than $220 Million In Deal With Trump
