
Saudi Arabia, Jordan and UAE choose action over apathy
In times of profound geopolitical upheaval, and moral testing, the true character of nations and their leadership is revealed — not through slogans, but through action. As the Arab region continues to witness one of the gravest humanitarian catastrophes in its modern history — the brutal and prolonged assault on Gaza — the disparity between rhetoric and reality grows ever starker.
Since the beginning of the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip in October 2023, the world has watched in horror as entire neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, children buried under debris, and hospitals transformed into graveyards. The death toll has become a number, numbingly rising with each passing day. Yet amid this unbearable human suffering, the Arab and Islamic world's response has been mixed. Outrage has been loud, but tangible solidarity has been scarce. In this paradox, we see the stark division between those who choose to act and those who are content to comment.
What is deeply alarming is that those who act are often the very targets of baseless criticism. Take, for instance, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the UAE — three Arab states that have taken concrete, coordinated steps to deliver lifesaving humanitarian aid to Gaza. These efforts include air-dropped medical supplies, land convoys of food and flour, field hospitals, and even diplomatic pressure to facilitate humanitarian corridors. Rather than being acknowledged, these efforts are often derided or dismissed outright.
Just days ago, Jordanian trucks were seen crossing into Gaza, laden with flour, medicine, and essentials. This came after months of famine and humanitarian blockade. Similar aid from Saudi Arabia and the UAE has been dispatched repeatedly through Egyptian and Jordanian crossings. Yet what did this spark? An avalanche of online criticism, accusations of normalization, and claims of political theater. Some denied the images and videos altogether; others accused us of coordinating with the Israeli occupation, as if helping the wounded and starving somehow equates to betrayal.
This intellectual and moral duplicity not only undermines Jordan's efforts but also exposes a deeper rot — an obsession with ideological purity over practical compassion. Critics, often ensconced in digital echo chambers and hotel lobbies, prefer slogans over solutions. They vilify aid because it is not coupled with revolution, and they attack those who do something, however small, because it is not everything.
Every child saved today is a future voice for Palestine.
Hani Hazaimeh
Let us be clear: Jordan's support for Palestine is neither cosmetic nor contingent. It is rooted in history, blood, and political principle. From the 1948 Nakba to the ongoing siege of Gaza, Jordan has carried a disproportionate burden of the Palestinian tragedy — hosting millions of refugees, advocating at every international forum, and absorbing the political and economic consequences of standing by Palestine. What Jordan has done, and continues to do, is a reflection of state policy grounded in pan-Arab nationalism and a moral worldview.
And Jordan has not stood alone. Saudi Arabia has played a critical diplomatic and financial role, pressing international actors to ceasefire negotiations and providing major aid packages. The UAE, too, has dispatched multiple aid convoys and field hospitals, particularly to northern Gaza. These efforts represent a concerted Arab move to alleviate suffering — not because it is easy, but because it is right.
Do these efforts resolve the core issue of occupation? No. But are they futile? Absolutely not. In a time when Gaza is being starved into submission, every truck, every plane, and every pill becomes an act of resistance — a rejection of death, a declaration of life.
Unfortunately, the loudest critics rarely offer alternatives. Instead of mobilizing support, they mobilize hashtags. Instead of donating, they denounce. Their worldview is binary: either full liberation or full betrayal. This maximalist logic has paralyzed Arab action for decades and helped no one, least of all the Palestinians.
More dangerous still is the normalization of nihilism. To claim that no effort matters unless it achieves complete liberation is to ignore the complexity of political struggle. It is to surrender the realm of the possible in favor of performative purity. It is to forget that while the dream of a free Palestine is sacred, it must be pursued through all available means — diplomatic, humanitarian, and, yes, pragmatic.
We in Jordan do not claim sainthood. We acknowledge that Gaza's needs exceed our capacity. But it is unjust to scapegoat Jordan while wealthier, more capable actors do far less. Our commitment stems not from opportunism but from obligation. And it continues in the face of political backlash, security risks, and logistical nightmares.
We understand the frustration of Palestinians in Gaza — the parents burying children, the doctors working without anesthetics, the displaced living without hope. They have every right to be angry. But let their anger be directed toward those who bomb, besiege, and occupy — not those who rush to offer help.
To our critics, we say: What have you done? Did you sponsor a child? Did you send food or medicine? Did you speak to your governments or write to your lawmakers? Or did you merely tweet your indignation from a cafe, then move on?
The real betrayal is silence. The real complicity is inaction. In this region's darkest hour, lighting even a single candle — be it a truck, a medical tent, or a public statement — is infinitely more valuable than screaming into the void. Because in Gaza today, a loaf of bread can mean survival. A dose of insulin can mean life. A warm blanket can mean dignity.
Let us not romanticize suffering. Let us not fetishize resistance while ignoring the bleeding wound. Every child saved today is a future voice for Palestine. Every family helped is a shield against despair. And every Arab government that chooses action over apathy is keeping the cause alive — not in museum speeches but in lived reality.
Jordan will continue to act. Not because it is easy. Not because it is popular. But because it is right. Our moral compass does not waver with the winds of public opinion. And we remain convinced that Palestine is not a seasonal cause or a trending topic, but a permanent moral obligation.
In the end, we do not seek applause. We seek results. We seek to feed the hungry, heal the wounded, and preserve a flicker of hope in a sea of darkness. The path to liberation is long, and it passes through many roads — some political, some humanitarian, some military. But none of these roads are paved by cynicism alone.
So let the critics shout. Let the cynics scoff. We will continue lighting candles — because Gaza needs light, not lectures. And when history writes this chapter, it will remember neither the tweets nor the tirades, but the trucks that arrived, the hands that helped, and the hearts that stood firm.
• Hani Hazaimeh is a senior editor based in Amman. X: @hanihazaimeh

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
23 minutes ago
- Arab News
Is a desperate Netanyahu plotting an early election?
Most people look forward to their summer break, and this year no one more so than Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. His options for traveling abroad are somewhat limited, either because of the International Criminal Court arrest warrant that hangs over his head, or, more generally, his unsurprising lack of popularity in the face of the horrific images beamed around the world of starvation in Gaza. Still, the summer brings two blessings to the Israeli leader. First, the Knesset has broken up for its recess, giving him nearly three months of breathing space from managing his crooked coalition, which ranges from misfits to warmongers, to plot his next chapter of political survival, and with it the possibility of an early general election. Second, it is also a seasonal break for the courts, and hence for his corruption trial on charges of fraud, bribery, and breach of trust — with a looming prosecution cross-examination likely to leave him shifting uncomfortably in his seat. Israel, meanwhile, is desperate for a general election, one that polls suggest would bring about a new and very different government. By law, the latest date for holding that election is October of next year, but with the never-ending catalog of horrific damage the Netanyahu government and its bunch of extreme nationalists and populists are inflicting on it, the country just does not have the luxury of waiting for more than a year before these merchants of destruction are sent packing. While Israel is still at war in Gaza and on other unresolved fronts, Netanyahu has entangled himself in the web of lies and deceit he is offering to the entire nation, to his political partners, and to international friends and foes, which has made it crystal clear that the interest of the country comes second to that of his political survival. It is especially disturbing, while pressure is mounting from abroad to stop the war in Gaza, or at least alleviate the humanitarian disaster there, that he and his government are mainly responsible for this conflict. Even at the best of times, the composition of the current Israeli government was always bound to polarize the nation and aggravate relations with the wider world. Its intemperate agenda of undermining the very foundations of Israeli democracy has torn Israeli society apart while sending a message of weakness to its enemies — first and foremost Hamas — that was a significant contributory factor in the launch of the Oct. 7 attack. What has happened since then has exposed a weak prime minister who formed a coalition with the sole aim of serving his legal and political interests, which have become inseparably intertwined with horrendous consequences. Since no party in Israel's history has ever won an absolute majority in a general election, the leading party and the prime minister have always relied on good working relations with its coalition partners. However, this edition comes to the world born in sin, as the participants were the only ones prepared to form a coalition led by a defendant in a corruption trial, unashamedly knowing that this might be the only chance they ever get to wield excessive political power at the heart of government, with a prime minister who is susceptible to blackmail because of his desperation to stay in power and out of jail. Israel has angered some of its closest allies. Yossi Mekelberg However, between their extremism and incompetence, it was just a matter of time before interests and egos would clash and unsettle the coalition. One of the issues that is an open wound in Israeli society is the draft, more accurately the avoidance of the draft by ultra-Orthodox youth, ostensibly to allow them to study in rabbinical seminaries, or yeshivot. What began back at the early days of the nascent Jewish state as an exemption for no more than 400 religious scholars has turned into a law that now allows tens of thousands of young ultra-Orthodox to dodge the draft, whether or not they actually immerse themselves in holy scripture. Nothing angers the rest of Jewish society more than carrying the burden and the duty of serving for many years, first as conscripts and then for decades in the reserve force, while their fellow ultra-Orthodox are exempt, and in addition are living on generous state handouts from the taxes paid by the rest of the society, those who actually bother to get up in the morning and do meaningful work which benefits a modern economy. Since the High Court of Justice ordered the government to address by law this controversial inequality, which the government failed to do, it meant that not drafting ultra-Orthodox to the military became illegal. The brazen and frantic attempts in recent weeks to pass a bill in the middle of a war merely to prevent the ultra-Orthodox leaving the coalition failed. But Netanyahu was prepared to sacrifice a political ally in a key position: Yuli Edelstein, the chair of the Knesset's all-powerful foreign policy and security committee. Edelstein, who opposed the bill, was replaced by one of Netanyahu's psychopaths, simply to appease the ultra-Orthodox United Torah and Shas parties, despite both leaving the coalition. This at a time when the chiefs of the military are telling the prime minister that in light of the exhaustion of both the regular and reserve army, let alone the loss of soldiers, there is an urgent need for an extra 10,000 troops. But it does not stop there. Continuing this war, which is having a dwindling military return, is about satisfying the extreme right-wing partners in the coalition, who are still pursuing the illusion of total victory, the occupation of Gaza, and the building of new settlements there. The price is being paid by more than 2 million Palestinians who live in the enclave, many of whom are suffering dreadfully from the ills of the war, including starvation, and by the hostages languishing in Hamas tunnels. By inflicting an inhumane famine on Gaza, Israel has also angered some of its closest allies, who rightly demand that humanitarian aid be allowed to reach the Strip. It has also led countries such as France, the UK, and Canada, among others, to launch moves to recognize Palestinian statehood, something that Netanyahu has spent his entire political career attempting to thwart. In the twilight of his political life, entangled in legal turbulence, leading a failed government that is presiding over the worst period in the country's history, and losing his ability to manipulate his coalition partners, Netanyahu now appears to be plotting yet another election campaign. But this time he will have to defend a record that even this master spinner of Israeli politics will find hard to justify. • Yossi Mekelberg is a professor of international relations and an associate fellow of the MENA Program at Chatham House. X: @YMekelberg


Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Egypt's El-Sisi says Israel's war in Gaza a ‘systematic genocide'
CAIRO: Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi said Tuesday Israel was pursuing 'a war of starvation and genocide' in Gaza, and denied accusations Cairo prevented life-saving aid from entering the Palestinian territory. 'The war in Gaza is no longer merely a war to achieve political goals or release hostages,' El-Sisi told a press conference in Cairo along with his Vietnamese counterpart. Israel launched its offensive in response to Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack, vowing to crush the Palestinian militant group and to free hostages. To El-Sisi, 'this war has long since surpassed any logic or justification, and has become a war of starvation and genocide.' 'There is systematic genocide to eradicate the Palestinian cause,' he said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tuesday Israel must 'complete' the defeat of Hamas to free hostages held in Gaza, a day after Israeli media reported the army could occupy the entire territory. Israel has heavily restricted aid into Gaza which is slipping into a catastrophic famine 22 months into the war. It has killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run Gaza Strip. Following mounting international pressure on Israel, in late May aid has only began trickling into Gaza, which borders Israel and Egypt. In response to what El-Sisi said were 'bankrupt' accusations of Egypt's complicity in the siege, the president reiterated that the Rafah border crossing with Gaza was 'never closed.' The crossing at Rafah was a vital entry point of aid in the early months of the war, until Israeli troops took over its Palestinian side in May 2024, forcing it shut. 'The crossing was able to bring in aid as long as there were no Israeli troops stationed on the Palestinian side of the crossing,' El-Sisi said, adding that there are 5,000 trucks loaded with aid waiting to enter Gaza. He also defended what he said was Egypt's consistently 'positive' role seeking an end to the conflict. Since the war began, Cairo has undertaken a delicate balancing act, retaining its position as a mediator between Israel and Hamas — along with the United States and Qatar — while repeatedly criticizing Israel's assault. Cairo has also repeatedly refused US plans to displace Palestinians into Egypt, lobbying for a reconstruction plan for the territory that has fallen by the wayside as truce talks repeatedly folded. 'Egypt will always remain a gateway for aid, not a gateway for the displacement of the Palestinian people,' El-Sisi said on Tuesday. 'We are prepared to allow aid in at any time, but we are not prepared to receive or displace Palestinians from their land.' Last week, El-Sisi urged US President Donald Trump — who had touted the plan to displace Palestinians into Egypt — to intervene, saying he 'is the one capable of ending the war, bringing in aid and ending this suffering.'


Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Netanyahu reportedly backs full Gaza takeover
In this episode of W News, presented by Leigh-Ann Gerrans, our top story is the war in Gaza, where Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly supports a full military takeover of the territory. He is expected to meet senior security officials to finalize a new strategy in the 22-month war.