UK lawmakers pass bill to stop imports of young kittens and puppies
London (PA Media/dpa) A bill that aims to stop animal smuggling and cruelty cleared the UK's House of Commons on Friday after cross-party support.Legislation put forward by Liberal Democrat MP Danny Chambers will reduce the number of animals for non-commercial entry into the UK, ban the import of puppies and kittens under six months old or heavily pregnant dogs and cats, and introduce a halt on the import of dogs and cats who have been "mutilated."The lawmaker's Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill was supported by the government, and will now proceed to the House of Lords on its passage to becoming law. Chambers said: "As a vet, I've seen the devastating consequences of puppy smuggling. It's unimaginably cruel to separate puppies and kittens from their mothers at a very young age, and then bring them across borders in substandard conditions where they're then sold for maximum profit by unscrupulous traders who prioritise profit over welfare."He added: "Careful consideration has been given to setting these limits, balancing the need to disrupt illegal trade with minimising impact on genuine pet owners. To underpin this, only an owner, not an authorised person, will be permitted to sign and declare that the movement of a dog or cat is non-commercial."Crucially, the bill places a duty on the government to use these regulation-making powers to first deliver three key measures - a ban on the import of puppies and kittens under six months old, a ban on the import of heavily pregnant dogs and cats that are more than 42 days pregnant, and a ban on the import of dogs and cats who've been mutilated."He criticised the influence of social media on the increased demand for dogs with docked ears, and a party colleague hit out at the platforms' role in publishing animal abuse. Labour MP Peter Lamb directly named Meta, which owns Facebook, as a company that publishes content featuring animal abuse. He said: "There are far too many groups online which are dedicated to animal abuse. Constituents of mine have been involved in attempts to try and shut these groups down over the years."They'll also often find that instead of finding support on the part of social media companies, to try and address these problems, instead it is they who are reported and face their own accounts being shut down by those perpetrators."Environment minister Emma Hardy said: "These measures represent a crucial step forward in our collective efforts to tackle the pet smuggling trade."Hardy added: "We want to see fewer low-welfare operations supply pets to the GB market and fundamentally less animals to suffer because of this."
She continued: "As set out in the government's manifesto, we are committed to ending puppy smuggling and delivering a better future for our animals and I am pleased to say that this bill does just that.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
4 days ago
- Al Etihad
UK lawmakers pass bill to stop imports of young kittens and puppies
4 July 2025 18:52 London (PA Media/dpa) A bill that aims to stop animal smuggling and cruelty cleared the UK's House of Commons on Friday after cross-party put forward by Liberal Democrat MP Danny Chambers will reduce the number of animals for non-commercial entry into the UK, ban the import of puppies and kittens under six months old or heavily pregnant dogs and cats, and introduce a halt on the import of dogs and cats who have been "mutilated."The lawmaker's Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill was supported by the government, and will now proceed to the House of Lords on its passage to becoming law. Chambers said: "As a vet, I've seen the devastating consequences of puppy smuggling. It's unimaginably cruel to separate puppies and kittens from their mothers at a very young age, and then bring them across borders in substandard conditions where they're then sold for maximum profit by unscrupulous traders who prioritise profit over welfare."He added: "Careful consideration has been given to setting these limits, balancing the need to disrupt illegal trade with minimising impact on genuine pet owners. To underpin this, only an owner, not an authorised person, will be permitted to sign and declare that the movement of a dog or cat is non-commercial."Crucially, the bill places a duty on the government to use these regulation-making powers to first deliver three key measures - a ban on the import of puppies and kittens under six months old, a ban on the import of heavily pregnant dogs and cats that are more than 42 days pregnant, and a ban on the import of dogs and cats who've been mutilated."He criticised the influence of social media on the increased demand for dogs with docked ears, and a party colleague hit out at the platforms' role in publishing animal abuse. Labour MP Peter Lamb directly named Meta, which owns Facebook, as a company that publishes content featuring animal abuse. He said: "There are far too many groups online which are dedicated to animal abuse. Constituents of mine have been involved in attempts to try and shut these groups down over the years."They'll also often find that instead of finding support on the part of social media companies, to try and address these problems, instead it is they who are reported and face their own accounts being shut down by those perpetrators."Environment minister Emma Hardy said: "These measures represent a crucial step forward in our collective efforts to tackle the pet smuggling trade."Hardy added: "We want to see fewer low-welfare operations supply pets to the GB market and fundamentally less animals to suffer because of this." She continued: "As set out in the government's manifesto, we are committed to ending puppy smuggling and delivering a better future for our animals and I am pleased to say that this bill does just that.
Middle East Eye
6 days ago
- Middle East Eye
UK MPs to vote on Palestine Action ban
British parliamentarians are set to vote on an order for the proscription of the protest group Palestine Action on Wednesday afternoon. If MPs vote in favour, the order will go before the House of Lords on Thursday, with the ban due to come into force as soon as Saturday. If passed, the move will designate Palestine Action a terrorist organisation, making membership and support for them a criminal offence, and punishable by up to 14 years in prison. It will mark the first time that a direct action group has faced proscription, placing it alongside groups like the Islamic State and al-Qaeda under British law. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's order, which was laid before parliament on 23 June, has proposed two other organisations, neo-Nazi groups the Maniacs Murder Cult (MMC) and the Russian Imperial Movement (RIM) for proscription along with Palestine Action. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In a statement, Cooper said that each of the groups had 'passed the threshold for proscription based on clear national security evidence and assessments'. All three proscription orders will be debated and voted on together under the statutory instrument, with MPs unable to vote to ban some organisations and not others. Palestine Action said the move to group the organisations together in the same vote is a deliberate attempt to ensure the order passes and forms part of Cooper's efforts to proscribe the group 'via the backdoor without proper Parliamentary consideration'. Clare Hinchliffe, the mother of one of 18 Palestine Action activists who were arrested on terrorism charges in August 2024 and have been held on remand since, told MEE that the ban could criminalise her support for her daughter. "It's scary, because we will continue to advocate for our loved ones and we don't know if that will be interpreted as support for Palestine Action," she said. "I cannot afford to go to prison. I am needed to support my daughter. I'm a single parent, the only one paying the mortgage. I have a younger daughter to care for. I can't go to prison, but I'm outraged that I should be put in that position for advocating for my daughter." 'A terrifying escalation' On Monday, the High Court granted Palestine Action an urgent hearing on Friday to consider a judicial review of the decision. If successful, the group's co-founder, Huda Ammori, would be given the opportunity to apply for "interim relief", which could stay the ban until after the review. Speaking to Middle East Eye on Tuesday, Ammori said that she thought it was likely the ban will be voted through. "Palestine Action was formed because we didn't rely on appealing to the politicians and the government to create changes for the people of Palestine," Ammori said. UK High Court grants Palestine Action urgent hearing to challenge ban Read More » "I understand how the system works and it's not a democracy by any means," she said, adding that she thought it would be likely MPs will be whipped to supporting the ban. "I don't think that's an excuse for us to be complacent in not holding them to account. Every single person who votes for us to be proscribed should be held to account for this huge attack on civil liberties." Meanwhile, pressure is mounting on Cooper to abandon the ban, with several UN special rapporteurs warning the decision could have a "chilling effect' on protest and advocacy in relation to Palestine. On Tuesday, hundreds of lawyers signed two letters to Cooper from the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) lawyers' group and the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers, warning that the group's ban could set a dangerous precedent. Also on Tuesday, Amnesty International's UK CEO wrote to parliamentarians, warning that the group's proscription would be a 'grave misuse of anti-terrorism powers'. 'The proscription of Palestine Action would be wholly unnecessary, disproportionate, and in violation of the right to freedom of association and expression amongst other human rights at risk should this harmful and dangerous motion proceed,' the NGO's UK chief, Sacha Deshmukh, said. Yasmine Ahmed, UK director of Human Rights Watch, described the proposed ban as 'a terrifying escalation in this government's crusade to curtail protest rights'. 'Politicians should not be wielding the power of the state to protect corporate interests and silence legitimate non-violent protest. We expect this of authoritarian regimes like Russia or China, not a country like the UK that professes to believe in democratic freedoms.'
Gulf Today
23-06-2025
- Gulf Today
UK parliament votes in favour of assisted dying law
Britain's parliament voted in favour of a bill to legalise assisted dying, paving the way for the country's biggest social change in a generation. The legislation passed by a vote of 314-291, clearing its biggest parliamentary hurdle. The 'Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life)' law would give mentally competent, terminally ill adults in England and Wales with six months or less left to live the right to choose to end their lives with medical help. The bill now proceeds to Britain's upper chamber, the House of Lords, where it will undergo months of scrutiny. While there could be further amendments, the unelected Lords will be reluctant to block legislation that has been passed by elected members of the House of Commons. The vote puts Britain on course to follow Australia, Canada and other countries, as well as some US states, in permitting assisted dying. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government was neutral on the legislation, meaning politicians voted according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Starmer voted in favour. Supporters of the bill say it will provide dignity and compassion to people suffering, but opponents worry that vulnerable people could be coerced into ending their lives. Hundreds of people gathered outside parliament to hear news of the vote. When the result was read out, those in favour of the legislation hugged, clapped and cheered. They shouted 'victory,' 'we won' and waved placards. Those opposed to it stood in silence. Emma Bray, who has motor neurone disease, said she hoped the result would help people in her condition. Bray, who is 42 and has two children, said she plans to starve herself to death next month to help relieve the pain after being told she only has six months to live. 'This result will mean that people will not have to go through the same suffering I have faced,' she told Reuters. Opinion polls show that a majority of Britons back assisted dying. Friday's vote followed hours of emotional debate and references to personal stories in the chamber and followed a vote in November that approved the legislation in principle. Opponents of the bill had argued that ill people may feel they should end their lives for fear of being a burden to their families and society. Some lawmakers withdrew their support after the initial vote last year, saying safeguards had been weakened. Reuters
