Mobile road to close for Alabama Power work — detour planned
Mobile teen to give District Attorney's victim comfort room a makeover
According to a City of Mobile news release, the section just north of Beauregard Street will close for work, which will be performed by Alabama Power.
While the ramp to Interstate 165 will remain open, access to Conception Street Road will be restricted.
MAWSS issues wastewater advisory
A signed detour is expected to be placed around Beauregard Street, Lawrence Street, Morgan Street, Jackson Street, Marion Street and Conception Street Road, according to the release.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
an hour ago
- The Verge
BougeRV's portable solar fridge is quietly annoying
Keeping humans alive at home in post-agrarian societies requires refrigeration. Meat bags on the move must either load up a cooler with ice for a soggy weekend barbecue or do the evolved thing and use a 12V fridge instead. The $509.99 battery-powered BougeRV CRD2 40 refrigerator and freezer combo I've been testing for the last few weeks runs for almost 12 hours on its itty-bitty battery. It charges from a wall outlet or a 12V socket found in cars and portable power stations. It even accepts 100W of direct solar input to stay charged in sunny climates. And if this 40-liter (43-quart) model is too small, it's also available in larger 49-liter and 58-liter capacities. BougeRV gets the basics right, but with lots of little annoyances along the way. 6 Verge Score The CRD2 40 is what you choose when rugged portability is a must. It can easily find a home inside boat, RV, or the trunk or backseat of a car and features lots of tie-down points to keep the 28.7 x 18.14 x 17.24in (730 x 461 x 438mm) fridge from becoming a 41.9lb (19kg) projectile. And once you arrive, it can be moved about with help from its spring-loaded side handles, telescoping arm, and chunky wheels. Importantly, the two cooling compartments — one large (32.5 liters) and one small (7.2 liters) — are covered by a pair of doors that can be reversed for easy opening from either side. This adaptability is fantastic for vanlifers or anyone else with limited space for such a large appliance. And because it doesn't try to do too much — unlike EcoFlow and Bluetti's 3-in-1 ice-making fridges — BougeRV's combo unit maximizes available capacity for food and beverages. Even the smaller CRD2 40 fits a lot; enough for me and my wife to stay away from the grid comfortably for about a week when using the large compartment as a fridge and the small space as a freezer. I did all my testing at FDA-recommended temperatures of -18 degrees Celsius (0 degrees Fahrenheit) for the freezer and 4C (39F) for the fridge. Cooldown from room temperature of 22C (72F) to 4C took 17 minutes for the small compartment, or 37 minutes for the large. It took 79 minutes to bring the small space down to -18C and 101 minutes for the large side. That's pretty slow, but the CRD2 40 is also reasonably quiet. At its loudest, I measured 38dB during cooldown making it about as loud as a small home theater projector. That's far below the 45dB BougeRV quotes on the spec sheet (perhaps the larger CRD2 models are noisier?) and quieter than other combo fridges in this space. While there was the occasional audible whoosh of liquid, it otherwise didn't emit any odd gurgles or scratching sounds I've heard from other portable fridges. The compressor turns on and off every 10 minutes or so with a slight rattle and then runs for 10 minutes to maintain the temperature. The fully charged 173Wh battery lasted 11.5 hours when running in the most economical modes, so long as the compartments were cooled down to -18C/4C ahead of time. That runtime dropped to just six hours when the battery had to start at room temperature. That's not particularly efficient, and likely has to do with BougeRV skimping on insulation. For my insulation test, I brought the large compartment down to -18C and shut off the power. After one hour, it already read -4C, 0C after an hour and a half, and 10C at three hours in a room reading 22C. I never opened the lid. That's not very good compared to other portable fridges and suggests that this fridge will have to work hard in warmer climates to keep your food safe. Temperature readings on the BougeRV display and app were consistent with my reference thermometer in the smaller compartment. However, my thermometer read -14C, not the -18C reported by BougeRV, when placed at the bottom of the large compartment. This likely has to do with BougeRV's sensor placement and the poor air circulation that's typical of this class of fridges. So, BougeRV gets all the important things right, but I was disappointed by the company's inattention to detail and general lack of care. For starters, the simplistic Bluetooth app labels the two compartments 'L' and 'R' (left and right?) instead of 'L' and 'S' for large and small, like you see printed on the fridge. It also lacks precision when reporting the battery percentage, showing five of five bars, for example, when the LED display on the battery itself only shows two of four LEDs, or about 50 percent charged. And get this: the instruction booklet warns that 'due to different production batches, you may receive a battery with or without a Type-C connector.' WHAT?! My review unit arrived with a battery fitted with a little barrel, not the preferred USB-C jack. That means it can only be charged inside the fridge itself since I didn't receive a compatible charger in the box. Oh, and the logo on the battery is upside-down which makes insertion confusing. Come on. Annoyingly, solar charging requires a 5521 barrel connector, not the more common XT60 jack. I didn't have the correct 100W solar panel to test with the fridge, but BougeRV will happily sell you a bundle that includes a compatible panel for $663.99. More worrisome is the peculiar behavior I observed when the battery was almost fully discharged. In the last hour or so before the battery died, the temperature of the freezer dipped way below the -18C temperature I had set. It read -22C on the physical display, but my own thermometer dropped all the way down to -29C. At first, I thought it might be another case of a bad sensor like the one that plagued some older EcoFlow fridges. But plugging the fridge back in caused the temperature to quickly retreat to -18C, and I haven't seen any issues since. Weird. BougeRV didn't have an explanation ready in time for this review. The fridge is covered by a two-year warranty. Sleeping near the BougeRV fridge — as vanlifers and drunken fishermen are apt to do — is also a mixed bag. On one hand, it's reasonably quiet. However, it will beep a few times if it loses Bluetooth connection. This has already woken me up twice despite my phone being nearby the fridge. The display is also very bright in a dark room and there's no way to dim it or turn it off. Even with all my gripes, BougeRV's $509.99 CRD2 40 with battery bundle makes for a fine travel companion, especially in the highly portable 40-liter (43-quart) size I reviewed. However, I'd avoid the battery-less model priced at $349.99 because you can easily find a more compact and less expensive combo fridge that can be permanently plugged into a 12V power source at a fixed location. You buy the CRD2 40 because you're looking for adventure, and maybe just a taste of self-flagellation. Photography by Thomas Ricker / The Verge Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Thomas Ricker Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Accessory Reviews Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Reviews Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Work anywhere
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jury awards over $240 million in damages against Tesla in Autopilot crash lawsuit
A Florida jury on Friday ordered Tesla to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to the victims of a 2019 fatal crash involving its Autopilot driver assist technology. The verdict which comes after a four-year long case could encourage more legal action against Elon Musk's electric car company. A Miami jury decided that Elon Musk's car company Tesla was partly responsible for a deadly crash in Florida involving its Autopilot driver assist technology and must pay the victims more than $240 million in damages. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cellphone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. 'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. 'We finally learned what happened that night, that the car was actually defective,' said Benavides' sister, Neima Benavides. 'Justice was achieved.' Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. 'Today's verdict is wrong," Tesla said in a statement, 'and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology,' They said the plaintiffs concocted a story 'blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility.' In addition to a punitive award of $200 million, the jury said Tesla must also pay $43 million of a total $129 million in compensatory damages for the crash, bringing the total borne by the company to $243 million. 'It's a big number that will send shock waves to others in the industry,' said financial analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities. 'It's not a good day for Tesla.' Tesla said it will appeal. Even if that fails, the company says it will end up paying far less than what the jury decided because of a pre-trial agreement that limits punitive damages to three times Tesla's compensatory damages. Translation: $172 million, not $243 million. But the plaintiff says their deal was based on a multiple of all compensatory damages, not just Tesla's, and the figure the jury awarded is the one the company will have to pay. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019. But the issue of trust generally in the company came up several times in the case, including in closing arguments Thursday. The plaintiffs' lead lawyer, Brett Schreiber, said Tesla's decision to even use the term Autopilot showed it was willing to mislead people and take big risks with their lives because the system only helps drivers with lane changes, slowing a car and other tasks, falling far short of driving the car itself. Schreiber said other automakers use terms like 'driver assist' and 'copilot' to make sure drivers don't rely too much on the technology. 'Words matter,' Schreiber said. 'And if someone is playing fast and lose with words, they're playing fast and lose with information and facts.' Schreiber acknowledged that the driver, George McGee, was negligent when he blew through flashing lights, a stop sign and a T-intersection at 62 miles an hour before slamming into a Chevrolet Tahoe that the couple had parked to get a look at the stars. The Tahoe spun around so hard it was able to launch Benavides 75 feet through the air into nearby woods where her body was later found. It also left Angulo, who walked into the courtroom Friday with a limp and cushion to sit on, with broken bones and a traumatic brain injury. But Schreiber said Tesla was at fault nonetheless. He said Tesla allowed drivers to act recklessly by not disengaging the Autopilot as soon as they begin to show signs of distraction and by allowing them to use the system on smaller roads that it was not designed for, like the one McGee was driving on. 'I trusted the technology too much,' said McGee at one point in his testimony. 'I believed that if the car saw something in front of it, it would provide a warning and apply the brakes.' The lead defense lawyer in the Miami case, Joel Smith, countered that Tesla warns drivers that they must keep their eyes on the road and hands on the wheel yet McGee chose not to do that while he looked for a dropped cellphone, adding to the danger by speeding. Noting that McGee had gone through the same intersection 30 or 40 times previously and hadn't crashed during any of those trips, Smith said that isolated the cause to one thing alone: 'The cause is that he dropped his cellphone.' The auto industry has been watching the case closely because a finding of Tesla liability despite a driver's admission of reckless behavior would pose significant legal risks for every company as they develop cars that increasingly drive themselves. (FRANCE 24 with AP)
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Check out the baseball diamond the Reds, Braves will play on at Bristol Motor Speedway
The trouble with playing a regulation MLB game at Bristol Motor Speedway is that, well, the venue is what the name suggests: A motor speedway. It's a race track. It's not the biggest racing surface in NASCAR, but it's big enough to fit that regulation MLB playing surface, evidently. Construction of a field for the one-off game between the Cincinnati Reds and Atlanta Braves August 2, probably wasn't too big of a deal. It does look cool, though, and MLB has started to show video and images of the field the Reds and Braves will play on. According to Mike Wilson of the Knoxville News-Sentinel, nearly 20,000 tons of gravel was used to build the field at the iconic race track. From Wilson's June 24 story: "The process included using 17,500 tons of gravel to level and create the field. It will require 340 tons of clay, which is expected to arrive soon. A synthetic turf playing surface that matches what is used at Rogers Centre, the Toronto Blue Jays' ballpark, will be installed. Additional lighting will be installed on the roof of the facility." Thing is, MLB is pretty good at making regulation fields where they didn't previously exist. For instance, they even built one in Europe, at the London Stadium during years when MLB stages its London Series. London Stadium was the centerpiece venue for the 2012 London Olympics and is now home to the English Premier League's West Ham United. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Check out the field Reds, Braves will play on at Bristol Motor Speedway
